Minimum five-year follow-up of posterior-only pedicle screw constructs for thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To review/report 5-year follow-up data on patients diagnosed with thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TK/TLK) treated with posterior-only spinal fusion. TK/TLK was initially treated with combined anterior/posterior spinal fusion, evolving into widespread treatment with posterior-only spinal fusion. METHODS: Forty-three patients who underwent a posterior-only spinal fusion for a primary diagnosis of TK/TLK from 1999 to 2009 with > 5-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative/postoperative/final follow-up measurements were recorded from full-length standing radiographs. Prospectively collected outcome scores were reviewed for the same time points, and charts were examined for complications. RESULTS: Patient age averaged 33 years (range 13-77), and follow-up averaged 5.6 years (range 5-12.2). Diagnoses included Scheuermann's disease (N = 15, 35%), idiopathic (N = 10, 23%), pseudarthrosis (N = 6, 14%), iatrogenic (N = 4, 9%), degenerative (N = 3, 7%), post-traumatic (N = 3, 7%), and congenital kyphosis (N = 2, 5%). Average correction of 44.3° (46%; 92.8° preoperatively vs 48.5° postoperatively) was achieved through posterior-only surgery. Loss of correction averaged only 1° in the instrumented segments at final follow-up. Eleven patients had a complication; proximal junctional kyphosis was the most common (N = 3, 7%). One patient lost intraoperative monitoring and one had temporary neurological deterioration postoperatively, but there was no permanent deficit. No pseudarthroses occurred. ODI scores improved 17.2 points on average (p = 0.01). SRS scores improved in all domains (average 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw constructs permit effective posterior-only correction of TK/TLK that is maintained at the 5-year follow-up time point. Patients report improvement, via outcome questionnaires, at the same follow-up time points. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The cranial sagittal vertical axis (CrSVA) is a better radiographic measure to predict clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery than the C7 SVA: a monocentric study.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to confirm the correlation between the Cranial Sagittal Vertical Axis (CrSVA) and patient-reported outcomes and to compare clinical correlation between CrSVA and C7 SVA in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. METHODS: 108 consecutive ASD patients were evaluated using the EOS® 2D/3D radio-imaging device. A vertical plumb line from the cranial center was utilized to measure the distance to the posterior corner of S1 (CrSVA-S), and to the centers of the hip (CrSVA-H), the knee (CrSVA-K), and ankle (CrSVA-A), as well as measuring the standard C7 SVA. We analyzed the correlation between each CrSVA parameter with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society form (SRS-22r). RESULTS: All 4 CrSVA measures demonstrated strong correlation with the ODI and SRS-22r total score and the pain, self-image, and function subscores. Of note, CrSVA-A (Global SVA) also strongly correlated with the SRS satisfaction subscore. Univariate linear regression showed similar results. The strongest predictor of outcomes was CrSVA, not C7 SVA; (CrSVA-H for ODI, SRS total score, and the pain, self-image, and function subscores; and Global SVA for satisfaction and mental health subscores). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical correlation effect of outcome scores to the CrSVA measures is validated. Global SVA has an especially strong correlation with ODI and all the SRS subscores. Our study confirms that CrSVA is a stronger predictor of preoperative clinical outcomes than the C7 SVA in adult deformity patients.

Neuromuscular scoliosis complication rates from 2004 to 2015: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality database.

OBJECTIVE Postoperative complications are one of the most significant concerns in surgeries of the spine, especially in higher-risk cases such as neuromuscular scoliosis. Neuromuscular scoliosis is a classification of multiple diseases affecting the neuromotor system or musculature of patients leading to severe degrees of spinal deformation, disability, and comorbidity, all likely contributing to higher rates of postoperative complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate deformity correction of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis over a 12-year period (2004-2015) by looking at changes in postsurgical complications and management. METHODS The authors queried the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) database for neuromuscular scoliosis cases from 2004 to 2015. The SRS M&M database is an international database with thousands of self-reported cases by fellowship-trained surgeons. The database has previously been validated, but reorganization in 2008 created less-robust data sets from 2008 to 2011. Consequently, the majority of analysis in this report was performed using cohorts that bookend the 12-year period (2004-2007 and 2012-2015). Of the 312 individual fields recorded per patient, demographic analysis was completed for age, sex, diagnosis, and preoperative curvature. Analysis of complications included infection, bleeding, mortality, respiratory, neurological deficit, and management practices. RESULTS From 2004 to 2015, a total of 29,019 cases of neuromuscular scoliosis were reported with 1385 complications, equating to a 6.3% complication rate when excluding the less-robust data from 2008 to 2011. This study shows a 3.5-fold decrease in overall complication rates from 2004 to 2015. A closer look at complications shows a significant decrease in wound infections (superficial and deep), respiratory complications, and implant-associated complications. The overall complication rate decreased by approximately 10% from 2004-2007 to 2012-2015. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a substantial decrease in complication rates from 2004 to 2015 for patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing spine surgery. Decreases in specific complications, such as surgical site infection, allow us to gauge our progress while observing how trends in management affect outcomes. Further study is needed to validate this report, but these results are encouraging, helping to reinforce efforts toward continual improvement in patient care.

The Incidence of Adding-On or Distal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Anterior Spinal Fusion to L3 Was Significantly Higher Than by Posterior Spinal Fusion to L3.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3. METHODS: AIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000-2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. RESULTS: Twenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3-4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation > 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation > 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Posterior Spinal Segmental Instrumented Fusion : When Is Fusion to L3 Stable?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for distal adding on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: AIS patients undergoing PSF to L3 by two senior surgeons from 2000-2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results and defined as >3 cm of deviation from L3 to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or >10° angle at L3-4 on the posterior anterior- or lateral X-ray at ultimate follow-up. New stable vertebra (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. RESULTS: Ten of 76 patients (13.1%) were included in the poor radiographic outcome group. The other 66 patients were included in the good radiographic outcome group. Lower Risser grade, more SV-3 (CSVL doesn't touch the lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]) on standing and side bending films, lesser NV and TS score, rigid L3-4 disc, more rotation and deviation of L3 were identified risk factors for AO or DJK. Age, number of fused vertebrae, curve correction, preoperative coronal/sagittal L3-4 disc angle did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative Risser grade 0, 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (OR, 2.1 and 2.8, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.4), rigid disc at L3-4 (OR, 3.1), LIV rotation >15° (OR, 2.9), and LIV deviation >2 cm from CSVL (OR, 2.2) were independent predictive factors. Although there was significant improvement of the of Scoliosis Research Society-22 average scores only in the good radiographic outcome group, there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was 13.1%. To prevent AO or DJK following fusion to L3, we recommend that the CSVL touch L3 in both standing and side bending, TS score is -4 or less, the L3/4 disc is flexible, L3 is neutral (<15°) and ≤2 cm from the midline and the patient is ≥ Risser 2.

Vertebral column resection for the treatment of severe spinal deformity.

UNLABELLED: The ability to treat severe pediatric and adult spinal deformities through an all-posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) has obviated the need for a circumferential approach in primary and revision surgery, but there is limited literature evaluating this new approach. Our purpose was therefore to provide further support of this technique. We reviewed 43 patients who underwent a posterior-only VCR using pedicle screws, anteriorly positioned cages, and intraoperative spinal cord monitoring between 2002 and 2006. Diagnoses included severe scoliosis, global kyphosis, angular kyphosis, or kyphoscoliosis. Forty (93%) procedures were performed at L1 or cephalad in the spinal cord (SC) territory. Seven patients (18%) lost intraoperative neurogenic monitoring evoked potentials (NMEPs) data during correction with data returning to baseline after prompt surgical intervention. All patients after surgery were at their baseline or showed improved SC function, whereas no one worsened. Two patients had nerve root palsies postoperatively, which resolved spontaneously at 6 months and 2 weeks. Spinal cord monitoring (specifically NMEP) is mandatory to prevent neurologic complications. Although technically challenging, a single-stage approach offers dramatic correction in both primary and revision surgery of severe spinal deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Selecting the "Touched Vertebra" as the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Patients with Lenke Type-1 and 2 Curves: Radiographic Results After a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is still controversial. Although multiple radiographic methods have been proposed, there is no universally accepted guideline for appropriate selection of the LIV. We developed a simple and reproducible method for selection of the LIV in patients with Lenke type-1 (main thoracic) and 2 (double thoracic) curves and investigated its effectiveness in producing optimal positioning of the LIV at 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: The radiographs for 299 patients with Lenke type-1 or 2 AIS curves that were included in a multicenter database were evaluated after a minimum duration of follow-up of 5 years. The "touched vertebra" (TV) was selected on preoperative radiographs by 2 independent examiners. The LIV on postoperative radiographs was compared with the preoperative TV. The final LIV position in relation to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) was assessed. The CSVL-LIV distance and coronal balance in patients who had fusion to the TV were compared with those in patients who had fusion cephalad and caudad to the TV. The sagittal plane was also reviewed. RESULTS: In 86.6% of patients, the LIV was selected at or immediately adjacent to the TV. Among patients with an "A" lumbar modifier, those who had fusion cephalad to the TV had a significantly greater CSVL-LIV distance than those who had fusion to the TV (p = 0.006) or caudad to the TV (p = 0.002). In the groups with "B" (p = 0.424) and "C" (p = 0.326) lumbar modifiers, there were no differences among the TV groups. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the TV rule as a third modifier in the Lenke AIS classification system. Selecting the TV as the LIV in patients with Lenke type-1 and 2 curves provides acceptable positioning of the LIV at long-term follow-up. The position of the LIV was not different when fusion was performed caudad to the TV but came at the expense of fewer motion segments. Patients with lumbar modifier "A" who had fusion cephalad to the TV had greater translation of the LIV, putting these patients at risk for poor long-term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Single-Level Versus Multilevel Vertebral Column Resection Surgery for Pediatric Patients With Severe Spinal Deformities.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of pediatric patients (younger than 21 years) with severe spinal deformities who underwent vertebral column resection (VCR) surgery. OBJECTIVE: To compare patients who underwent single- versus multilevel VCR surgery in terms of radiographic correction and perioperative complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few studies comparing single- to multilevel VCR surgery regarding the efficacy and safety of the procedures. METHODS: Eighty-two pediatric patients who underwent a VCR for severe spinal deformity between 2002 and 2012 by one surgeon were included. A single-level VCR was performed in 45 patients with an average of 4.7-year follow-up, and multilevel VCR in 37 patients with an average of 4.6-year follow-up. RESULTS: Coronal Cobb corrections were not different between groups (single level: 63%, multilevel: 58%, P = 0.146). Correction loss at final follow-up did not differ (3.1° vs. 0.3°, P = 0.132). Patients in the single-level group had shorter operation times (9.2 vs. 10.5 hours, P = 0.046), whereas estimated blood loss did not differ between the two groups (1061 vs. 1200 mL, P = 0.181). The rate of spinal cord monitoring events was 20% (8/40) and 30% (9/30), respectively. No patient in the single-level group had a postoperative neurologic deficit, whereas three patients in the multilevel group experienced a temporary deficit postoperatively (0/45 vs. 3/37, P = 0.088). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in radiographic correction between the single- and multilevel VCR groups. The multilevel VCR patients had longer operative times, and although the differences were not statistically significant due to low sample size, the multilevel VCR group also had an increased rate of postoperative neurologic deficits. We would recommend single-level VCRs unless there is an absolute indication for multilevel resection as in necessary decompression for spinal cord impingement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Spinal Deformity with Five-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Short-term studies have shown improved outcomes and alignment after posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformity. Our goal was to report long-term changes in radiographic and health-related quality-of-life measures in a consecutive series of pediatric and adult patients undergoing posterior vertebral column resection with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing posterior vertebral column resection by a single surgeon prior to January 1, 2010, at a single institution. Standard preoperative and perioperative data were collected, including the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22/24 instrument. Radiographic and health-related quality-of-life measures changes were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients underwent posterior vertebral column resection prior to January 2010, and 54 patients (49.5%) were available for analysis: 31 (57.4%) were pediatric patients, and 23 (42.6%) were adult patients. The mean age (and standard deviation) was 12.5 ± 3 years for the pediatric cohort and 39.3 ± 20 years for the adult cohort. Improvements in the mean major Cobb angle at a minimum follow-up of 5 years were seen: 61.6% correction for the pediatric cohort and 53.9% correction for the adult cohort. The rates of proximal junctional kyphosis, defined as proximal junctional kyphosis of >10°, were 16.1% for the pediatric cohort and 34.8% for the adult cohort, but none underwent a revision surgical procedure for symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis. Of the 54 patients, 30 (55.6%) sustained complications, 5 (9.3%) experienced postoperative neurological deficits, and 7 (13.0%) required a revision by 5 years postoperatively. Significant improvements were observed in the SRS-Self Image with regard to the pediatric cohort at 0.9 (p = 0.017) and the adult cohort at 1.3 (p = 0.002) and in the SRS-Satisfaction with regard to the pediatric cohort at 1.8 (p = 0.008) and the adult cohort at 1.3 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior vertebral column resection offers substantial, sustained improvements in global radiographic alignment and patient outcome scores at 5 years. The major radiographic deformity was reduced by 61.6% in the pediatric cohort and by 53.9% in the adult cohort. Despite the high rate of complications, patients experienced significant improvement in the SRS-Self Image and SRS-Satisfaction domains. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Key Role of Preoperative Recumbent Films in the Treatment of Severe Sagittal Malalignment.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if severe sagittal malalignment (SM) patients without fixed deformities require a three-column osteotomy (3CO) to achieve favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: 3CO performed for severe SM has significantly increased in the last 15 years. Not all severe SM patients require a 3CO. METHODS: Severe SM patients (sagittal vertical axis [SVA] >10 cm) who underwent deformity correction between 2002 and 2011. Patients with <33% change in their lumbar lordosis (LL) on a preoperative supine radiograph were classified as stiff deformities, whereas those with ≥33% change were categorized as flexible deformities. The clinical/radiographic outcomes were assessed at minimum two years postoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria, 35 patients with flexible and 35 with stiff deformities. Eighteen flexible-deformity patients underwent a 3CO versus 22 stiff-deformity patients. The remaining patients in each group underwent spinal realignment without a 3CO. The flexible-deformity patients not undergoing a 3CO had overall improvement in all sagittal radiographic parameters. Preoperative LL (22°), LL-pelvic incidence (PI) mismatch (43), SVA (17 cm), and pelvic tilt (PT, 34°) improved to 46°, 18, 6 cm, and 26°, respectively, p < .05. Flexible-deformity patients who underwent a 3CO also had overall improvement in all radiographic parameters. Preoperative LL (8.5°), LL-PI mismatch (47), SVA (19 cm), and PT (37°) improved to 39°, 15, 7 cm, and 24°, respectively (p < .05). Stiff-deformity patients who underwent a 3CO had statistically significant improvement in all radiographic parameters. However, stiff-deformity patients who did not undergo a 3CO had suboptimal improvement in all radiographic parameters, except for SVA (14 cm-9 cm, p < .05). Flexible patients who did not undergo a 3CO had statistical improvement in the SRS domains of function and self-mage as well as in their ODI scores (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Severe SM that is flexible can be corrected without a 3CO without compromising clinical and radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Deformity Angular Ratio Describes the Severity of Spinal Deformity and Predicts the Risk of Neurologic Deficit in Posterior Vertebral Column Resection Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the deformity angular ratio (DAR, maximum Cobb measurement divided by number of vertebrae involved) in evaluating the severity of spinal deformity, and predicting the risk of neurologic deficit in posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the literature has demonstrated that PVCR in spinal deformity patients has achieved excellent outcomes, it is still high risk neurologically. This study, to our knowledge, is the largest series of PVCR patients from a single center, evaluating deformity severity, and potential neurologic deficit risk. METHODS: A total of 202 consecutive pediatric and adult patients undergoing PVCRs from November 2002 to September 2014 were reviewed. The DAR (coronal DAR, sagittal DAR, and total DAR) was used to evaluate the complexity of the deformity. RESULTS: The incidence of spinal cord monitoring (SCM) events was 20.5%. Eight patients (4.0%) had new neurologic deficits. Patients with a high total DAR (≥25) were significantly younger (20.3 vs. 29.0 yr, P = 0.001), had more severe coronal and sagittal deformities, were more myelopathic (33.3% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.000), needed larger vertebral resections (1.8 vs. 1.3, P = 0.000), and had a significantly higher rate of SCM events than seen in the low total DAR (<25) patients (41.1% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.000). Patients with a high sagittal DAR (≥15) also had a significantly higher rate of SCM events (34.0% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.005) and a greater chance of neurologic deficits postoperatively (12.5% vs. 0, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing a PVCR, the DAR can be used to quantify the angularity of the spinal deformity, which is strongly correlated to the risk of neurologic deficits. Patients with a total DAR greater than or equal to 25 or sagittal DAR greater than or equal to 15 are at much higher risk for intraoperative SCM events and new neurologic deficits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Results of Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Posterior Segmental Instrumentation: Minimum 2-Year Postrevision Follow-Up.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographic and patient-reported outcomes at minimum 2 years after revision surgery for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), correlating these results with PJK etiology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are no studies detailing the results of revision surgery for PJK following posterior segmental instrumentation. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with revision surgery after PJK above posterior fusions (25 women/7 men, average age at surgery 60.6 yrs) were reviewed for radiographic and patient-reported outcomes (mean follow-up, 4.5 yrs; range, 2-10 yrs). Patients were subdivided into fracture (F) and nonfracture (NF) groups on the basis of PJK etiology. RESULTS: Radiographic severity of PJK improved significantly with revision surgery and was maintained at ultimate follow-up (P < 0.001). However, initial sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction was not maintained through ultimate follow-up (P = 0.04). There were significant postrevision improvements in mean Oswestry scores (P < 0.001) and SRS total scores (P < 0.001) in all patients. In patients with pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch < 11°, final PJK measurement was smaller than in patients with mismatch ≥11° (9.4° vs. 19.8°, P = 0.009). Six patients (19%) developed new postrevision PJK, with two (6%) requiring additional surgery. Patients who sustained PJK through a fracture had greater improvements in Oswestry (P = 0.004), total SRS (P = 0.04), pain (P < 0.001), and satisfaction (P = 0.05) scores, although the fracture patients had less maintained SVA correction (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Revision surgery for PJK following posterior instrumentation achieved acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with PI-LL mismatch <11° experienced more ultimate PJK correction than patients with mismatch ≥11°. Although the NF group experienced more sustained correction of sagittal balance, the F group reported greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Ultimate clinical outcomes after revision surgery for PJK were similar between patients with and without compression fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Results of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Database 2009-2012: A Report From the Morbidity and Mortality Committee.

INTRODUCTION: Members of the Scoliosis Research Society are required to annually submit complication data regarding deaths, visual acuity loss, neurological deficit and infection (2012-1st year for this measure) for all deformity operations performed. The purpose of this study is to report the 2012 results and the differences in these complications from the years 2009-2012. METHODS: The SRS M&M database is a self-reported complications registry of deformity operations performed by the members. The data from 2009-2012, inclusive, was tabulated and analyzed. Differences in frequency distribution between years were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Significance was set at α = 0.05. RESULTS: The total number of cases reported increased from 34,332 in 2009 to 47,755 in 2012. Overall mortality ranged from 0.07% in 2011 to 0.12% in 2009. The neuromuscular scoliosis group had the highest mortality rate (0.44%) in 2010. The combined groups' neurological deficit rate increased from 0.44% in 2009 to 0.79% in 2012. Neurological deficits were significantly lower in 2009 compared to 2012 for idiopathic scoliosis >18 years, other scoliosis, degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis and other groups. The groups with the highest neurological deficit rates were dysplastic spondylolisthesis and congenital kyphosis. There were no differences in vision loss rates between years. The overall 2012 infection rate was 1.14% with neuromuscular scoliosis having the highest group rate at 2.97%. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular scoliosis has the highest complication rates of mortality and infection. The neurological deficit rates of all groups combined have slightly increased from 2009 to 2012 with the highest rates consistently being in the dysplastic spondylolisthesis and congenital kyphosis groups. This could be due to a number of factors, including more rigorous reporting.

Long-term radiographic outcomes of a central hook-rod construct for osteotomy closure: minimum 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term effectiveness of central hook-rod constructs for posterior spinal osteotomy closure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During osteotomy site closure various techniques are used, including patient positioning, rod cantilevering, extending fixation points, and compressing through pedicle fixation points. All add premature stress on fixation points and may lead to loosening/eventual fixation failure. To avoid this, we often use a central compression hook-rod construct for osteotomy closure. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with fixed sagittal imbalance were treated with multilevel posterior column osteotomies (N = 19), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (N = 31), or vertebral column resection (N = 6). All 56 patients had undergone osteotomy closure using central compression hook-rod constructs and were analyzed at a follow-up of 5 years or more. Compression hooks were inserted into the fusion mass or lamina above/below the osteotomy and centrally attached to a short rod connected to pedicle screw-based rods via a cross-link. Diagnoses included sagittal imbalance associated with scoliosis (N = 39), degenerative sagittal imbalance (N = 14), ankylosing spondylitis (N = 2), and Scheuermann's kyphosis (N = 1). There were 55 revision cases and 1 primary. Radiographic/clinical analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy/complications of this technique. RESULTS: Overall lumbar lordosis increased an average of 31.7° and local lordosis through the osteotomy site increased an average of 29.3°. Sagittal balance improved by an average of 92 mm. In all cases, osteotomy closures were performed without screw loosening or loss of correction intraoperatively. At a follow-up of 5 years or more, no failures of the hook-rod construct were seen, but there were 3 patients with partial implant failure; however, no symptomatic pseudarthroses at the osteotomy sites occurred. Seven patients developed pseudarthrosis below the central hook-rod construct. CONCLUSION: A central hook-rod construct is safe, controlled, and effective for applying compressive forces to close various spinal osteotomies without fixation failure or pseudarthrosis at the osteotomy site noted at a follow-up of 5 or more years. It adds fixation strength to the overall construct avoiding undue stress on pedicle screws. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Predicting Kyphosis Correction During Posterior-Only Vertebral Column Resection by the Amount of Spinal Column Shortening.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the amount of correction achieved (K°) and extent of vertebral column shortening (mm) with posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no scientific reference to the correlation between K° and column shortening (mm) with PVCR. METHODS: Based on simple geometry, we tested the hypothesis that we could predict the amount of actual kyphosis correction (K°) by calculation on 26 kyphotic PVCR patients. Using multiple linear measurements (mm), two angular approximations (°) were calculated: the geometric approximation (G°) using the geometric calculation (G-cal), and the rough approximation (R°) by more simplistic calculation (R-cal). Both G° and R° were compared against K° as measured on the pre- and postoperative radiographs. If calculated G° and R° is close to measured K°, we can use the calculations (G-cal and R-cal) in the clinical situation. RESULTS: The mean correction of K° was 38°. K°-G° and K°-R° were not significantly greater than 3° and 6°, respectively. As K° was very close to G° and R°, K° can replace G° and R°. Therefore, we can use G-cal and R-cal in the clinical setting and we can determine how much posterior shortening and what cage size is required to obtain a certain amount of K°. CONCLUSIONS: With two calculations (G-cal & R-cal), we can determine how much vertebral column shortening (mm) we need during PVCR to obtain the amount of kyphosis correction desired (K°). In order to obtain K°, using the formula deduced from G-cal and R-cal, we can determine the shortening between the upper and lower pedicle screws and cage size.

A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between objective measurements and subjective symptoms of patients with spinal stenosis and the degree of narrowing of the spinal canal is not clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and intermittent neurogenic claudication with functional testing, quantitative imaging, and patient self-assessment. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication were prospectively enrolled in the study. All underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography myelography, and all were treated with decompressive surgery and were followed for a minimum of two years. The evaluation included treadmill and bicycle exercise tests as well as patient self-assessment with use of the Oswestry Disability Index and a visual analog pain scale preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively fifty-eight (94%) of the patients had a positive result (provocation of symptoms) on the treadmill test and twenty-seven (44%) had a positive result on the bicycle test, whereas postoperatively six and twelve, respectively, had positive results. The mean preoperative scores on the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog pain scale were 58.4 and 7.1, respectively. Postoperatively, these scores decreased to 21.1 and 2.3, respectively, and both decreases were significant (p < 0.05). Forty-seven (76%) of the patients were seen to have central stenosis on the preoperative imaging studies; forty-one of them had a cross-sectional area of the dural tube of <100 mm (2) at at least one level and twelve had a cross-sectional area of <100 mm (2) at at least two levels. CONCLUSIONS: A positive treadmill test was consistent with a diagnosis of spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication in >90% of the patients preoperatively. Following surgical decompression of the lumbar spinal stenosis, more functional improvement was demonstrated by the treadmill test than by the bicycle test. The scores on the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog pain scale also improved postoperatively. The severity of central canal narrowing at a single level does not appear to limit the postoperative improvement in either functional ability or patient self-assessment. Patients with multilevel central stenosis were, on the average, older and walked a shorter distance preoperatively and postoperatively, although the improvement in their postoperative self-assessment scores was similar to that of patients with single-level stenosis.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance.

BACKGROUND: Fixed sagittal imbalance (a syndrome in which the patient is only able to stand with the weight-bearing line in front of the sacrum) has many etiologies. The most commonly reported technique for correction is the Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Few reports on pedicle subtraction procedures (resection of the posterior elements, pedicles, and vertebral body through a posterior approach) are available in the peer-reviewed literature. We are aware of no report involving a substantial number of patients with coexistent scoliosis who underwent pedicle/vertebral body subtraction for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients in whom sagittal imbalance was treated with lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy at one institution were analyzed. Radiographic analysis included assessment of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, lordosis through the pedicle subtraction osteotomy site, and the C7 sagittal plumb line. Outcomes analysis was performed with use of a before-and-after pain scale, items from the Oswestry questionnaire, and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire after a minimum duration of follow-up of two years. Complications and radiographic findings were also analyzed for the entire group. RESULTS: Overall, the average increase in lordosis was 34.1 degrees and the average improvement in the sagittal plumb line was 13.5 cm. One patient had development of a lumbar pseudarthrosis through the area of pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and six patients had development of a thoracic pseudarthrosis. Two patients had development of increased kyphosis at L5/S1, caudad to the fusion, resulting in some loss of sagittal correction. There were significant improvements in the overall Oswestry score (p < 0.0001) and the pain-scale score (p = 0.0002). Most patients reported improvement in terms of pain and self-image as well as overall satisfaction with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a useful procedure for patients with fixed sagittal imbalance. A worse clinical result is associated with increasing patient comorbidities, pseudarthrosis in the thoracic spine, and subsequent breakdown caudad to the fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Fixed sagittal imbalance (a syndrome in which the patient is only able to stand with the weight-bearing line in front of the sacrum) has many etiologies. The most commonly reported technique for correction is the Smith-Petersen osteotomy. Few reports on pedicle subtraction procedures (resection of the posterior elements, pedicles, and vertebral body through a posterior approach) are available in the peer-reviewed literature. We are aware of no report involving a substantial number of patients with coexistent scoliosis who underwent pedicle/vertebral body subtraction for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients in whom sagittal imbalance was treated with lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy at one institution were analyzed. Radiographic analysis included assessment of thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, lordosis through the pedicle subtraction osteotomy site, and the C7 sagittal plumb line. Outcomes analysis was performed with use of a before-and-after pain scale, items from the Oswestry questionnaire, and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire after a minimum duration of follow-up of two years. Complications and radiographic findings were also analyzed for the entire group. RESULTS: Overall, the average increase in lordosis was 34.1 degrees and the average improvement in the sagittal plumb line was 13.5 cm. One patient had development of a lumbar pseudarthrosis through the area of pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and six patients had development of a thoracic pseudarthrosis. Two patients had development of increased kyphosis at L5/S1, caudad to the fusion, resulting in some loss of sagittal correction. There were significant improvements in the overall Oswestry score (p < 0.0001) and the pain-scale score (p = 0.0002). Most patients reported improvement in terms of pain and self-image as well as overall satisfaction with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a useful procedure for patients with fixed sagittal imbalance. A worse clinical result is associated with increasing patient comorbidities, pseudarthrosis in the thoracic spine, and subsequent breakdown caudad to the fusion.

Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched-cohort comparative study. OBJECTIVE: Compare radiographical outcomes after the use of a standard 2-rod construct (2-RC) versus a multiple-rod construct (multi-RC) across 3-column osteotomy sites in a matched cohort with severe kyphosis and/or scoliosis with minimum 2-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Three-column osteotomies are used for treating severe spinal deformities, typically with a standard 2-RC across the highly unstable osteotomy site. METHODS: Between 1996 and 2010, patients undergoing a 3-column osteotomy by a single surgeon were matched for age/diagnosis/vertebra(e) resected/levels fused and curve magnitude. Sixty-six control patients with a 2-RC were identified and appropriately matched to 66 consecutive patients with a multi-RC across the 3-column osteotomy site. Each group included 50 patients with lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy and 16 patients with vertebral column resection. Radiographs were measured using standard adult deformity criteria. RESULTS: Averages were compared for 2-RC versus multi-RC demonstrating no statistical differences in mean age at surgery, vertebrae resected, levels fused, bone morphogenetic protein used (patients), or average preoperative Cobb magnitude. There were significant differences in the occurrence of rod breakage and revision surgery for pseudarthroses at the 3-column osteotomy site (rod breakage: 2-RC: 11 vs. multi-RC: 2, P=0.002; and revision: 2-RC: 6 vs. multi-RC: 0, P=0.011). There was no complete implant failure in the multi-RC group but 2 patients had partial implant failure without symptomatic pseudarthrosis. Eight patients in each group (12%) developed a pseudarthrosis above or below the osteotomy site. CONCLUSION: The use of a multi-RC is a safe, simple, and effective method to provide increased stability across 3-column osteotomy sites to significantly prevent implant failure and symptomatic pseudarthrosis versus a standard 2-RC. We strongly recommend using a multi-RC to stabilize 3-column osteotomies of the thoracic and lumbar spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) cases. OBJECTIVE: To report our results, radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years following revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To our knowledge, there is no report on the results of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with pseudarthrosis after PSO (16 females/2 males; average age at surgery, 49.8 yr) treated with revision surgery at one institution were analyzed (average follow-up, 6.5 yr; range, 5-12 yr). Radiographic and clinical outcomes analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and lumbar lordosis (LL) improved significantly after revision surgery (SVA, P = 0.000; LL, P = 0.024) and were maintained until ultimate post-revision follow-up (SVA, P = 0.170; LL, P = 0.729). Proximal junctional angle (P = 0.828), thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.828), and PSO angle (P = 0.717) achieved by the primary surgery were also maintained until ultimate post-revision. We increased the number of rods and/or changed them to 6.35-mm diameter in all patients. There were significant improvements post-revision in Oswestry Disability Index (45 vs. 37.9, P = 0.041) and Scoliosis Research Society pain subscale (2.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.047) but not in Scoliosis Research Society total score or other subscales. Pelvic incidence greater than 60° demonstrated a trend toward poorer Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores (P > 0.05), but there were no significant differences between SVA greater or less than 11 cm. CONCLUSION: Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after PSO can provide acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years post-revision. Successful surgical outcomes may be achieved by using an increased number or size of implants and ample bone graft for complete fusion after revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.