Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Vericiguat.

Vericiguat is an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator and enhances the cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway independently of nitric oxide as well as synergistically in normal- and low-nitric oxide conditions. This review describes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of vericiguat and summarizes the effect of vericiguat on cardiac electrophysiology and population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships. Vericiguat demonstrates virtually complete absorption and increased exposure with food. Vericiguat has high oral bioavailability when taken with food (93.0%) with dose-proportional pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Vericiguat has slightly less than dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with a slight decrease in bioavailability at higher doses in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Vericiguat is a low-clearance drug, with a half-life of approximately 20 h in healthy volunteers and 30 h in patients with HFrEF. Most drug metabolism is achieved by glucuronidation. Vericiguat has pharmacodynamic effects as expected from its pharmacological mechanism of action (i.e., relaxation of the smooth muscles in the vasculature leading to changes in hemodynamics). In the VICTORIA trial (NCT02861534), which enrolled patients with HFrEF, no meaningful exposure-response relationships for the incidence of symptomatic hypotension or syncope were evident. There were no significant imbalances in the incidence of undesirable hemodynamic-related effects (symptomatic hypotension and syncope) in subgroups with HFrEF defined by sex, age, race, and renal impairment. In addition, most patients achieved the 10-mg target dose per the blood pressure-guided titration regimen. No dose adjustments due to body weight, age, sex, race, or hepatic/renal impairment are necessary in adult patients with HFrEF. Observed and predicted changes in vericiguat exposure when co-administered with perpetrator drugs were small and not clinically meaningful. In addition, vericiguat has low potential as a perpetrator to affect exposure and/or pharmacodynamic effects of drugs commonly prescribed in patients with heart failure; therefore, no dose adjustment of these drugs is required in patients taking vericiguat. There is limited experience on the combined use of vericiguat with long-acting nitrates in patients with HFrEF. The ongoing VICTOR trial (NCT05093933), which is investigating vericiguat in patients with HFrEF, permits the co-administration of long-acting nitrates. Combined use of vericiguat and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors has not been studied in patients with HFrEF and is therefore not recommended because of the potential increased risk for symptomatic hypotension. Vericiguat was not associated with electrophysiological abnormalities in preclinical and clinical studies up to the approved dose of 10 mg at steady state. Vericiguat is approved for the treatment of recently decompensated patients with worsening HFrEF. Vericiguat's safety and efficacy profile in patients with HFrEF will be further characterized by the VICTOR trial (NCT05093933) in adults without recent decompensation and in a pediatric population with HF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (VALOR trial, NCT05714085).

Contemporary outpatient management of patients with worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Clinical outcome results from the CHART-HF study.

Background: Based on available data from randomized clinical trials, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and worsening HF events (WHFE) have substantial disease burden and poor outcomes. WHFE clinical outcome data in non-clinical trial patients, more representative of the US clinical practice, has not been demonstrated. Methods and results: CHART-HF collected data from two complementary, non-clinical trial cohort with HFrEF (LVEF <45 %): 1) 1,000 patients from an integrated delivery network and 2) 458 patients from a nationwide physician panel. CHART-HF included patients with WHFE between 2017 and 2019 followed by an index outpatient cardiology visit ≤6 months, and patients without WHFE in a given year between 2017 and 2019, with the last outpatient cardiology visit in the same year as the index visit. Compared to patients without WHFE (after covariate adjustment, all p < 0.05), patients with WHFE had a greater risk of HF-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.53-2.40) and next WHFE event (HR: 1.67-2.41) following index visits in both cohorts. Conclusion: HFrEF patients with recent WHFE consistently had worse clinical outcomes in these non-clinical trial cohorts. Despite advances in therapies, unmet need to improve clinical outcomes in HFrEF patients with WHFE remains.

Vericiguat and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Heart Failure by Baseline Diabetes Status: Insights From the VICTORIA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) significantly worsens heart failure (HF) prognosis. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the impact of T2DM on outcomes in patients enrolled in VICTORIA and assess the efficacy of vericiguat in patients with and without T2DM. METHODS: Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to receive vericiguat or placebo in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization (HFH). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate HRs and 95% CIs to assess if the effect of vericiguat differed by history of T2DM. RESULTS: Of 5,050 patients enrolled, 3,683 (72.9%) had glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measured at baseline. Of these, 2,270 (61.6%) had T2DM, 741 (20.1%) had pre-T2DM, 449 (12.2%) did not have T2DM, and 178 (4.8%) had undiagnosed T2DM. The risks of the primary outcome, HFH, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were high across all categories. The efficacy of vericiguat on the primary outcome did not differ in patients stratified by T2DM by history (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-1.04), T2DM measured by HbA1c (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.49-1.20), and pre-T2DM measured by HbA1c (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.68-1.13) and in those with normoglycemia (HR: 1.02: 95% CI: 0.75-1.39; P for interaction = 0.752). No significant differences were observed in subgroups with respect to the efficacy of vericiguat on HFH and all-cause or cardiovascular death. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of VICTORIA, vericiguat compared with placebo significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HFH in patients with worsening HF with reduced ejection fraction regardless of T2DM status. (A Study of Vericiguat in Participants With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [HFrEF] [Mk-1242-001] [VICTORIA]; NCT02861534).

Treatment patterns of patients with worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Patients with HFrEF and worsening HF events (WHFE) are at particularly high risk and urgently need disease-modifying therapy. CHART-HF assessed treatment patterns and reasons for medication decisions among HFrEF patients with and without WHFE. METHODS AND RESULTS: CHART-HF collected retrospective electronic medical records of outpatients with HF and EF < 45% between 2017-2019 from a nationwide panel of 238 cardiologists (458 patients) and the Geisinger Health System (GHS) medical record (1000 patients). The index visit in the WHFE cohort was the first outpatient cardiologist visit ≤6 months following the WHFE, and in the reference cohort was the last visit in a calendar year without WHFE. Demographic characteristics were similar between patients with and without WHFE in both the nationwide panel and GHS. In the nationwide panel, the proportion of patients with versus without WHFE receiving ≥50% of guideline-recommended dose on index visit was 35% versus 40% for beta blocker, 74% versus 83% for ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 48% versus 49% for MRA. The proportion of patients receiving ≥50% of guideline-recommended dose was lower in the GHS: 29% versus 34% for beta-blocker, 16% versus 31% for ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 18% versus 22% for MRA. For patients with and without WHFE, triple therapy on index date was 42% and 44% of patients from the nationwide panel, and 14% and 17% in the GHS. Comparing end of index clinic visit with 12-month follow-up in the GHS, the proportion of patients on no GDMT increased from 14% to 28% in the WHFE cohort and from 14 to 21% in the non-WHFE group. CONCLUSIONS: Major gaps in use of GDMT, particularly combination therapy, remain among US HFrEF patients. These gaps persist during longitudinal follow-up and are particularly large among patients with recent WHFE.