Psychometric properties of MDHAQ/RAPID3 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: The Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool that includes the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), an index that can be calculated at the point of care. The objective of this study was to perform psychometric analyses of MDHAQ/RAPID3 to study its measurement properties in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The MDHAQ was completed by 161 SLE patients in routine care, along with LupusPRO (a disease-specific PRO). The SLE disease-specific activity index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and damage (SDI) were assessed. Data from 70 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had completed MDHAQ during their routine medical care were used as controls to compare the results of Physical Function (FN) domain exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability (ICR) for FN items was calculated using Cronbach's α. Validity of MDHAQ/RAPID3 was evaluated for content validity and construct validity. Responsiveness of the RAPID3 to changes in disease activity anchors was assessed. RESULTS: The ICR of the 10 physical function items on Cronbach's α was 0.88. Exploratory factor analysis revealed cross-loadings of three FN items. RAPID3 showed a strong correlation with LupusPRO health-related quality of life score (rho -0.68 (p < 0.001)), indicating convergent validity. RAPID3 scores did not correlate with disease activity indices or SDI. After adjustment for fibromyalgia status, a weak correlation with the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) (rho = 0.31, p = 0.008) was noted. RAPID3 could differentiate between SLE patients based on flare status. RAPID3 was not responsive to changes in PGA, SELENA-SLEDAI or SELENA-Flare Index. CONCLUSIONS: MDHAQ/RAPID3 has fair reliability and validity in SLE.

Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objectives LupusPRO has shown good measurement properties as a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For the purpose of clinical trials, the version 1.7 (v1.7) domain of Pain-Vitality was separated into distinct Pain, Vitality and Sleep domains in v1.8, and the psychometric properties examined. Methods A total of 131 consecutive SLE patients were self-administered surveys assessing fatigue (FACIT, SF-36), pain (Pain Inventory, SF-36), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index), emotional health (PHQ-9, SF-36) and quality of life (SF-36, LupusPRO) at routine care visits. Internal consistency reliability (ICR) for each domain was obtained using Cronbach's alpha. The convergent construct validity of LupusPRO domains with corresponding SF-36 domains or tools were tested using Spearman correlation. Varimax rotations were conducted to assess factor structures of the LupusPRO v1.8. Results Mean (SD) age was 40.04 (14.10) years. Scores from the LupusPRO-Sleep domain strongly correlated with insomnia scores, while LupusPRO-Vitality correlated strongly with fatigue (FACIT) and SF-36 vitality. The LupusPRO-Pain domain correlated strongly with pain (SF36 Bodily-Pain, Pain Inventory) scores. Similarly, the LupusPRO domains of Physical and Emotional Health had significant correlations with corresponding SF-36 domains. The ICR for HRQoL and non-HRQoL were 0.96 and 0.81. LupusPRO (domains HRQoL and QoL) scores correlated with disease activity. Principal component analysis included seven factor loadings presenting for the HRQOL subscales (combined Sleep, Vitality, and Pain), and three factors for the NHRQoL (Combined Coping and Social Support). Conclusions LupusPRO v1.8 (including its Sleep, Vitality, and Pain domains) has acceptable reliability and validity. Use of LupusPRO as an outcome measure in clinical trials would facilitate responsiveness assessment.

Practice patterns in longitudinal lupus care provision: patient and physician perspectives.

Background/purpose To plan a quality improvement project, we need to understand the practice patterns of physicians. We undertook an online survey of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and physicians providing care to SLE patients to determine the patterns of medical care provided to SLE patients. Materials and methods Two self-report surveys were developed. A 12-item survey for the patients and a 13-item survey for physicians enquired about longitudinal care for SLE. Surveys were administered online to physicians providing care to SLE patients, and to patients who self-identified as having SLE, through the Lupus Society of Illinois. Patient and physician data were analyzed for physician practice patterns for SLE care, using chi square tests and t tests. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant on two-tailed tests. Results A total of 283 patients completed the survey. Mean (SD) age and disease duration of patients were 45.9 (13.2) and 12.7 (9.7) years. Half of the participants were being seen at 3-4-month intervals. More than 70% of patients reported being tested for antinuclear antibody (ANA), and 20-30% anti-ENA antibody and Sjögren's (SSA/SSB) antibodies, respectively, at each follow-up visit. Eighty-six rheumatologists completed the surveys. Mean (SD) age was 55 (12) years and 56% were men. More than half (54%) provided care only in a private practice setting. More than 80% of physicians reported seeing their SLE patients at 3-4-month interval. Only 2% reported performing ANA tests at each visit, while 4-5% performed anti-ENA and anti-SSA/SSB antibody tests at each visit for their SLE patients. More than 75% of physicians in private practice also ordered sedimentation rate at each visit for their SLE patients. Conclusions Unnecessary laboratory investigations may be being ordered routinely for patients at every visit. These results indicate a need for physician education on indications and utility of some of the laboratory tests such as ANA.

Caregiving, dyadic quality of life and dyadic relationships in lupus.

AIMS: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) mostly affects young women, adversely affecting their quality of life (QOL). Caregivers may experience caregiver burden (CGB), and it may lower the quality of their relationship. Herein we studied caregiving and CGB and their effects on QOL and relationships in SLE. METHODS: We recruited 10 dyads from the Lupus Clinic. Data collected included demographics, CGB (CGB Scale, screen for CGB), QOL (SF-36) and the quality of the dyadic relationship (Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS)). We calculated correlation coefficients for associations between (i) CGB and (ii) dyadic QOL or DAS. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) age of SLE patients was 35.2 (± 9) years and of caregivers was 37.3 (± 9.64) years. The mean (± SD, min-max) total CGB score was 9.1 (± 5.8, 0-19). The caregiver's QOL correlated strongly with some of the domains of the patient's QOL. The SLE-related CGB was associated with the caregiver's own QOL and their SLE partner's QOL. The dyadic DAS was linked to the patient's QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Because (i) CGB in SLE is associated with the caregiver's own QOL and with their SLE partner's QOL, and because (ii) the dyadic DAS score is linked primarily to the patient's QOL, then to optimize patient health outcomes and to decrease CGB, focus should be not only on the patient but should include the dyadic unit.Significant findings: To optimize patient outcomes of SLE patients, focus should be on the dyadic unit. CGB in SLE is associated with the caregiver's own QOL and with the SLE partner's QOL, making it crucial to study this relationship in more detail.

Lupus Impact Tracker is responsive to physician and patient assessed changes in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the responsiveness of Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) to changes in physician and patient disease activity assessments over time. METHODS: Available longitudinal data from routine patient care visits on LIT, physician assessed disease activity (physician global assessment (PGA), SELENA-SLEDAI score, SELENA Flare Index (SFI)), and patient-reported changes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) health status were analyzed. Significant, clinically important change (worsening or improvement) in physician disease activity assessment or patient-reported SLE health status were judged using the following criteria: change of 0.3 on PGA, 4 on SELENA-SLEDAI, change in SFI status over time, and change of 2 in either direction in patient-reported SLE health status. Mixed model regression analysis was used to compare changes in LIT using the above criteria. RESULTS: There were 1184 observations with significant changes in physician disease activity or patient-reported measure for 182 patients' data across 1364 visits. Patients' mean (SD) age and SELENA-SLEDAI were 43.5 (13.2) years and 6.4 (7.3) respectively. LIT mean scores decreased by more than 3 with improvement in PGA (standardized response mean -0.26, p < 0.05), while it increased by more than 5 with worsening in SELENA-SLEDAI (standardized response mean 0.42, p = 0.01). Mean change in LIT of greater than ±3 was noted with change in SFI status (p < 0.05). Mean LIT score decreased by greater than 4 and increased by greater than 2 with patient-reported improvement and worsening in SLE health status respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LIT is responsive to physician-assessed and patient-assessed changes in disease status. A mean LIT change of 2-4 may represent a significant clinical change in LIT. It is an effective tool that may be used by patients and physicians in tracking disease impact in SLE patients.

Serum free light chains, interferon-alpha, and interleukins in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interferon-alpha (IFN-α), and free light chains (FLCs: lambda, kappa) have all been noted to be of importance in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Herein, we quantified and explored the relationship between these inflammatory mediators and disease activity in SLE; and stratified by their current anti-dsDNA antibody status. METHODS: Seventy-seven SLE patients underwent assessment of disease activity using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). Serum FLC (lambda, kappa, and total), IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-α were quantified. Demographics of disease characteristics were determined by chart reviews. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney test, chi square, and linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of the patients was 44.9 ± 12.7 years; SLEDAI (mean ± SD) was 3.4 ± 4.0. Serum lambda FLC levels had a moderate correlation (r = 0.46 with physician global assessment, 0.44 with SLEDAI) and the strongest correlation with disease activity as compared with other inflammatory mediators including current dsDNA antibody status. After adjusting for prednisone use, the correlation of lambda FLC with PGA (r = 0.48) and SLEDAI (r = 0.52) was better than of current dsDNA antibody status with PGA (r = 0.33) and adjusted SLEDAI (r = 0.24), respectively. IL-10 and IFN-α activity did not correlate with disease activity. Serum FLC and IL-6 levels could differentiate between active and inactive SLE patients. Serum lambda FLC and IL-6 levels differed significantly among patients with and without current dsDNA antibodies. Serum lambda FLC levels accounted for 31% of variance in SLEDAI scores. CONCLUSION: Serum FLC and IL-6 are potentially useful biomarkers of disease activity in SLE. Further studies, with larger study sample and longitudinal design, are indicated.

The French-Canadian validation of a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure for lupus.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to perform the cross-cultural validation of the French version of the LupusPRO, a disease-targeted patient-reported outcome measure, among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in Canada. METHODS: The French version of the LupusPRO and the MOS SF-36 were administered; demographic, clinical and serological characteristics were obtained. Disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI and the Lupus Foundation of America definition of flare) and damage (SLICC/ACR SDI) were assessed. Physician disease activity and damage assessments were ascertained using visual analog scales. Internal consistency reliability (ICR), test-retest reliability (TRT), convergent and discriminant validity (against corresponding domains of the SF-36), criterion validity (against disease activity, damage or health status) and known group validity were tested. RESULTS: A total of 99 French-Canadian SLE patients participated (97% women, mean (SD) age 45.2 (14.5) years). The median (IQR) SELENA-SLEDAI and SDI were 3.5 (6.0) and 1.0 (2.0), respectively. The ICR of the LupusPRO domains ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 (except for lupus symptoms, procreation and coping), while TRT ranged from 0.72 to 0.95. Convergent and discriminant validity, criterion validity and known group validity against disease activity, damage and health status measures were observed. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit. CONCLUSION: The LupusPRO has fair psychometric properties among French-Canadian patients with SLE.

Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for lupus in Philippines.

OBJECTIVE: LupusPRO is a disease-targeted patient-reported outcome measure that was developed and validated among US patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We report the cross-cultural validation results of the LupusPRO English-language version among Filipino SLE patients. METHOD: The 43-item LupusPRO was pretested in 15 SLE individuals, then administered to 106 SLE patients, along with short-form SF36 and the EQ5D visual analogue scale. A mail/drop-back LupusPRO and change in health status item survey were returned within two to three days. Demographics, clinical and serological characteristics, disease activity and damage measured by PGA, SELENA-SLEDAI, LFA Flare, and SLICC-ACR SLE damage index (SDI) were collected. Internal consistency reliability (ICR), test-retest reliability (TRT), convergent validity (corresponding SF36 domains) and criterion validity (against general health and disease activity measures) were tested. Reported p values are two tailed. RESULTS: A total of 121 Filipino SLE subjects (95% women, median age 31.0 ± 16 years) with at least a high school level of English instruction participated. Median (IQR) PGA, SLEDAI and SDI were 0.0 (1.0), 2.0 (10) and 0 (1), respectively. ICR exceeded 0.7 for all domains except the lupus symptoms domain. TRT was greater than 0.85 for all LupusPRO domains. Convergent and criterion validity were observed against corresponding SF36 domains and disease activity measures. The tool was well received by patients. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit. CONCLUSION: English LupusPRO has fair psychometric properties among SLE patients in the Philippines, and is now available for inclusion in clinical trials and longitudinal studies to test responsiveness to change.

The effects of oral glucosamine on joint health: is a change in research approach needed?

OBJECTIVE: Oral glucosamine (GlcN) has been widely studied for its potential therapeutic benefits in alleviating the pain and disability of osteoarthritis (OA). Its popularity has grown despite ongoing controversy regarding its effectiveness vs placebo in clinical trials, and lack of information regarding possible mechanisms of action. Here, we review the state of knowledge concerning the biology of GlcN as it relates to OA, and discuss a framework for future research directions. METHODS: An editorial "narrative" review of peer-reviewed publications is organized into four topics (1) Chemistry and pharmacokinetics of GlcN salts (2) Biological effects of GlcN salts in vitro (3) Therapeutic effects of GlcN salts in animal models of OA and (4) GlcN salts in the treatment of clinical OA. RESULTS: Data reporting potent pleiotropic activities of GlcN in in vitro cell and explant cultures are discussed in the context of the established pharmacokinetic data in humans and animals. The available clinical trial data are discussed to place the patient in the context of controlled research on disease management. CONCLUSIONS: Future research to determine therapeutic mechanisms of GlcN salt preparations will require use of standardized and clinically relevant in vitro assay systems and in vivo animal models for testing, as well as development of new outcome measures for inflammation and pain pathways in human OA.

The biomechanical effects of focused muscle training on medial knee loads in OA of the knee: a pilot, proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: High dynamic loads of the medial knee are associated with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) severity and progression. The lower extremity acts as an integrated kinetic unit, thus treatments targeting adjacent segments may promote reductions in the loading of a symptomatic knee. This study examined the biomechanical effects of a lower extremity exercise regimen, emphasizing training of hip abductor musculature, on dynamic knee loads in individuals with knee OA. METHODS: Six subjects with medial compartment knee OA participated in a proof of concept study of a four-week exercise program specifically targeting the hip abductor musculature in combination with traditional quadriceps and hamstring training. Assessments included gait analyses to measure the external knee adduction moment, a surrogate marker of medial knee joint loading as well as WOMAC questionnaires and strength evaluations. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated a decrease in their external knee adduction moment, with an average decrease of 9% (p<0.05) following the exercise intervention. There was a 78% (p<0.05) decrease in WOMAC knee pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that targeting hip, rather than only knee musculature, may represent an effective biomechanically-based treatment option for medial knee OA.

Patient reported outcomes and analgesia use in osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Non-opioid analgesics (NOAs) are widely used to palliate osteoarthritis (OA) pain, however, their role in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in OA has not been well studied. Here, we assess the relationship of pain, physical function, and HRQoL to NOA use in symptomatic knee OA. METHODS: NOA dose, pain, physical function, and HRQoL were evaluated longitudinally over 1 year in medial knee OA. Doses provided by subjects' weekly medication diaries were normalized to equi-analgesic ibuprofen-equivalents (IEs). Descriptive analyses at baseline, 1.5, and 12 months, and non-parametric comparisons of NOA with pain, physical function, and HRQoL at 1.5 months and over 12 months were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-one subjects (19 males and 52 females; mean 57+/-10.5 years) used an overall median of 300 mg/week of IE. Twenty-five subjects reported no analgesic use during the study; of the 46 subjects that reported NOA use, the median intake was 1325 mg/week IE. Whereas age, Physical Functioning (PF) and HRQoL were predictive of NOA dose both at 1.5 months and during the entire study, pain level was not. The median NOA dose declined over 12 months (P=0.02), however, the change was not associated with changes in PF, HRQoL or pain. CONCLUSION: Greater age and worse physical function and HRQoL, but not pain severity, are predictive of NOA use in symptomatic knee OA. Longitudinally, NOA use does not change as a function of pain. These data suggest that pain is not the primary determinant of NOA use over time among OA patients.

Pain and its relationship with muscle strength and proprioception in knee OA: results of an 8-week home exercise pilot study.

Muscle strength and proprioception deficits have been recognized in knee OA. Pain is the symptomatic hallmark of knee OA. Indirect evidence suggests that muscle strength and proprioception deficits may be interrelated and that pain may have a confounding influence on the measurement of these factors in knee OA. However, these relationships have never been clearly evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to investigate relationships between pain, muscle strength, and proprioception in subjects with knee OA before and after an 8-week home exercise program. This study evaluated thirty-eight subjects with knee OA. Subjects were taught standard quadriceps strengthening exercises that were to be performed daily at home. Pain, muscle strength, and proprioceptive function were measured at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy. Significant improvements in pain (42%, p<0.001) and quadriceps muscle strength (30%, p<0.001) were noted. Significant indirect associations were observed between pain and both muscle strength (rho=-0.39, p=0.01) and proprioceptive acuity (rho=-0.35, p=0.03) at baseline. Changes in pain were directly associated with changes in muscle strength (rho=0.45, p=0.005) and proprioceptive acuity (rho=0.41, p=0.01) with exercise. The association of pain with both muscle strength and proprioception should prompt future studies to consider and adjust for the influence of pain on neuromuscular factors in knee OA.

Etanercept therapy in patients with a positive tuberculin skin test.

INTRODUCTION: Etanercept (Enbrel), a tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) antagonist, is commonly used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases. Tuberculosis (TB) infections have been associated with chronic TNF-alpha blocking therapy, and there is concern that such therapy may predispose patients to TB reactivation. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the frequency of latent TB reactivation among patients treated with etanercept. METHODS: All patients with either a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) for TB or a previous history of therapy for latent TB infection (LTBI) who were prescribed etanercept in the division of rheumatology at John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County prior to November 2005 were enrolled in this study. A retrospective chart review was performed looking for evidence of active TB infection during etanercept treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with a positive PPD were treated with etanercept, and followed for an aggregate of 818 patient-months of etanercept exposure, with a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range 5 to 48 months); all patients had at least one follow-up visit. Forty-four patients (92%) were fully or partially treated with LTBI therapy prior to initiation of etanercept. Chest roentgenograms were available for review in 43 patients, ten of which had evidence of old granulomatous disease. No cases of active TB were described during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective analysis, none of the 48 patients with positive PPDs who were treated with etanercept for average of 17 months developed active TB.

Bone mineral density in the proximal tibia varies as a function of static alignment and knee adduction angular momentum in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis.

Based on the premise that bone mass and bone geometry are related to load history and that subchondral bone may play a role in osteoarthritis (OA), we sought to determine if static and dynamic markers of knee joint loads explain variance in the medial-to-lateral ratio of proximal tibial bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with mild and moderate medial knee OA. We utilized two surrogate markers of dynamic load, the peak knee adduction moment and the knee adduction angular momentum, the latter being the time integral of the frontal plane knee joint moment. BMD for medial and lateral regions of the proximal tibial plateau and one distal region in the tibial shaft was measured in 84 symptomatic subjects with Kellgren and Lawrence radiographic OA grades of 2 or 3. Utilizing gait analysis, the peak knee adduction moment (the external adduction moment of greatest magnitude) and the time integral of the frontal plane knee joint moment (the angular momentum) over the entire stance phase as well as for each of the four subdivisions of stance were calculated. The BMD ratio was not significantly different in grade 2 (1.32 +/- 0.27) and grade 3 knees (1.47 +/- 0.40) (P = 0.215). BMD of the tibial shaft was not correlated with any loading parameter or static alignment. Of all the surrogate gait markers of dynamic load, the knee adduction angular momentum in terminal stance explained the most variance (20%) in the medial-to-lateral BMD ratio (adjusted r(2) = 0.196, P < 0.001). The knee adduction angular momentum for the entire stance phase explained 18% of the variance in the BMD ratio (adjusted r(2) = 0.178, P < 0.001), 10% more variance than explained by the overall peak knee adduction moment (adjusted r(2) = 0.081, P < 0.001). 18% of the variance in the BMD ratio was also explained by the knee alignment angle (adjusted r(2) = 0.183, P < 0.001), and the total explanatory power was increased to 22% when the knee adduction angular momentum in terminal stance was added (change in r(2) = 0.041, P < 0.05, total adjusted r(2) = 0.215, P < 0.001). The BMD ratio and its relationship to dynamic and static markers of loading were independent of height, weight, and the body mass index, demonstrating that both dynamic markers of knee loading as well as knee alignment explained variance in the tibial BMD ratio independent of body size.