Evaluation of clinical outcomes of efficacy in food allergen immunotherapy trials, COFAITH EAACI task force.

Food allergy is a global public health problem that until recent years lacked any aetiological treatment supported by academy, industry and regulators. Food immunotherapy (AIT) is an evolving treatment option, supported by clinical practice and industry trial data. Recent AIT meta-analyses have highlighted the difficulty in pooling safety and efficacy data from AIT trials, due to secondary heterogeneity in the study. An EAACI task force (CO-FAITH) initiated by the Paediatric Section was created to focus on AIT efficacy outcomes for milk, egg and peanut allergy rather than in trial results. A systematic search and a narrative review of AIT controlled clinical trials and large case series was conducted. A total of 63 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, corresponding to 23, 21 and 22 studies of milk, egg and peanut AIT, respectively. The most common AIT efficacy outcome was desensitization, mostly defined as tolerating a maintenance phase dose, or reaching a particular dose upon successful exit oral food challenge (OFC). However, a large degree of heterogeneity was identified regarding the dose quantity defining this outcome. Sustained unresponsiveness and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. quality of life) were explored less frequently, and to date have been most rigorously described for peanut AIT versus other allergens. Change in allergen threshold assessed by OFC remains the most common efficacy measure, but OFC methods suffer from heterogeneity and methodological disparity. This review has identified multiple heterogeneous outcomes related to measuring the efficacy of AIT. Efforts to better standardize and harmonize which outcomes, and how to measure them must be carried out to help in the clinical development of safe and efficacious food allergy treatments.

Dual Role of microRNA-146a in Experimental Inflammation in Human Pulmonary Epithelial and Immune Cells and Expression in Inflammatory Lung Diseases.

microRNA (miR)-146a emerges as a promising post-transcriptional regulator in various inflammatory diseases with different roles for the two isoforms miR-146a-5p and miR-146a-3p. The present study aimed to examine the dual role of miR-146a-5p and miR-146a 3p in the modulation of inflammation in human pulmonary epithelial and immune cells in vitro as well as their expression in patients with inflammatory lung diseases. Experimental inflammation in human A549, HL60, and THP1 via the NF-kB pathway resulted in the major upregulation of miR-146a-5p and miR-146a-3p expression, which was partly cell-specific. Modulation by transfection with miRNA mimics and inhibitors demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect of miR-146a-5p and a pro-inflammatory effect of miR-146a-3p, respectively. A mutual interference between miR-146a-5p and miR-146a-3p was observed, with miR-146a-5p exerting a predominant influence. In vivo NGS analyses revealed an upregulation of miR-146a-3p in the blood of patients with cystic fibrosis and bronchiolitis obliterans, while miR-146a-5p levels were downregulated or unchanged compared to controls. The reverse pattern was observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In conclusion, miR-146a-5p and miR-146a-3p are two distinct but interconnected miRNA isoforms with opposing functions in inflammation regulation. Understanding their interaction provides important insights into the progression and persistence of inflammatory lung diseases and might provide potential therapeutic options.

MicroRNA Profiling of the Inflammatory Response after Early and Late Asthmatic Reaction.

A high proportion of house dust mite (HDM)-allergic asthmatics suffer from both an early asthmatic reaction (EAR) and a late asthmatic reaction (LAR) which follows it. In these patients, allergic inflammation is more relevant. MiRNAs have been shown to play an important role in the regulation of asthma's pathology. The aim of this study was to analyze the miRNA profile in patients with mild asthma and an HDM allergy after bronchial allergen provocation (BAP). Seventeen patients with EAR/no LAR and 17 patients with EAR plus LAR, determined by a significant fall in FEV1 after BAP, were differentially analyzed. As expected, patients with EAR plus LAR showed a more pronounced allergic inflammation and FEV1 delta drop after 24 h. NGS-miRNA analysis identified the down-regulation of miR-15a-5p, miR-15b-5p, and miR-374a-5p after BAP with the highest significance in patients with EAR plus LAR, which were negatively correlated with eNO and the maximum decrease in FEV1. These miRNAs have shared targets like CCND1, VEGFA, and GSK3B, which are known to be involved in airway remodeling, basement membrane thickening, and Extracellular Matrix deposition. NGS-profiling identified miRNAs involved in the inflammatory response after BAP with HDM extract, which might be useful to predict a LAR.

Severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness along with house dust mite allergy indicates persistence of asthma in young children.

BACKGROUND: Significant risk factors for persistence of asthma later in life are family history of allergies, early allergic sensitization and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). The evolution of BHR in young children without allergic sensitization and with house dust mite allergy (HDM) was investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, electronic charts of 4850 young children with asthma and wheezy bronchitis between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed in order to study all patients ≤6 years with BHR assessed by methacholine provocation tests (MCT) at least once (n = 1175). Patients with more than two follow-up measurements were divided in group 1 (no allergic sensitization; n = 110) and group 2 (HDM allergy; n = 88). Additionally, skin prick test, exhaled nitrite oxide (eNO), and asthma treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients of group 1 aged median 4.3 years and 48 patients of group 2 aged median 4.7 years showed initially severe BHR <0.1 mg. At follow-up, patients with HDM were more likely to show persistence of severe BHR than non-sensitized patients (severe BHR group 1: n = 5 (10.6%) vs. group 2: n = 21 (43.8%), p < .001). In addition, 89.4% of group 1 had mild to moderate or no BHR, compared to only 56.2% of group 2. There was a significant difference in eN0 (median group 1: 9 ppb vs. group 2: 26 ppb, p < .001), at last follow-up. Age, sex, and asthma therapy had no effect on BHR. CONCLUSION: In young children without sensitization BHR normalizes, whereas HDM allergy indicates a persistence of asthma beyond infancy.

Impulse oscillometry bronchodilator response in preschool children.

BACKGROUND: In preschoolers, performing an acceptable spirometry and measuring bronchodilator response (BDR) is challenging; in this context, impulse oscillometry (IOS) represents a valid alternative. However, more studies on the standardization of BDR for IOS in young children are required. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify optimal thresholds to define a positive BDR test with IOS in preschoolers with suspected asthma. METHODS: Children aged 3-6 years with suspected asthma and their lung function investigated with both IOS and spirometry pre- and post-BDR were retrospectively analyzed. The spirometric BDR was defined as positive when the change of FEV1 was ≥12% or ≥200 mL. The oscillometric BDR was defined as positive in case of change of at least -40% in R5, +50% in X5, and -80% in AX. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, 36 (age 5.2 ± 1 years; 64% boys) were selected for the subsequent analysis according to ATS/ERS quality criteria of measurements; specifically, 19 patients did not meet IOS and 36 did not meet spirometry criteria. The spirometric BDR was found positive in seven subjects (19.4%); conversely, a positive oscillometric BDR was identified in four patients (11.1%). No patient presented a positive BDR response with both methods. In IOS, the mean decrease in R5 and AX was 19.9% ± 10% and 44% ± 22.1%, and the mean increase in X5 was 23.3% ± 17.8%, respectively. A decrease in R5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.77, p = .03) and an increase in X5 of 25.7% (AUC 0.75, p = .04) showed the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to detect an increase of FEV1 ≥ 12% and/or ≥200 mL. CONCLUSION: The IOS represents a valid alternative to spirometry to measure BDR in preschool children and should be the gold standard in this age group. We are considering a decrease of 26% in R5 and an increase of 26% in X5 as diagnostic threshold for BDR.