A Managed Care System with Telemedicine Support for Neurological Emergencies.

OBJECTIVES: Telemedicine is frequently used to provide remote neurological expertise for acute stroke workup and was associated with better functional outcomes when combined with a stroke unit system-of-care. We investigated whether such system-of-care yields additional benefits when implemented on top of neurological competence already available onsite. METHODS: Quality improvement measures were implemented within a "hub-and-spoke" teleneurology network in 11 hospitals already provided with onsite or telestroke expertise. Measures included dedicated units for neurological emergencies, standardization of procedures, multiprofessional training, and quality-of-care monitoring. Intervention effects were investigated in a controlled study enrolling patients insured at 3 participating statutory health insurances diagnosed with acute stroke or other neurological emergencies. Outcomes during the intervention period between November 2017 and February 2020 were compared with those pre-intervention between October 2014 and March 2017. To control for temporal trends, we compared outcomes of patients with respective diagnoses in 11 hospitals of the same region. Primary outcome was the composite of up-to-90-day death, new disability with the need of ambulatory or nursing home care, expressed by adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). RESULTS: We included 1,418 patients post-implementation (55% female, mean age 76.7 ± 12.8 year) and 2,306 patients pre-implementation (56%, 75.8 ± 13.0 year, respectively). The primary outcome occurred in 479/1,418 (33.8%) patients post-implementation and in 829/2,306 (35.9%) pre-implementation. The aHR for the primary outcome was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.99, p = 0.04) with no improvement seen in non-participating hospitals between post- versus pre-implementation periods (aHR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.15). INTERPRETATION: Implementation of a multicomponent system-of-care was associated with a lower risk of poor outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:511-521.

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein for Prehospital Diagnosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Both, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hemorrhage stroke (intracerebral hemorrhage, ICH) require early attention but different treatment strategies. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels were found to be elevated in ICH patients after they arrived in the hospital. Because treatment options differed, we sought to determine whether GFAP can be used to accurately differentiate between of AIS and ICH in the prehospital setting. METHODS: We assessed acute stroke patients in the Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO). STEMO is a stroke ambulance staffed by a specialized team including a neurologist and equipped with a computed tomography scanner plus a point-of-care laboratory. The STEMO ambulance is integrated in the emergency medical system of Berlin, Germany. Following prehospital stroke diagnosis, blood was drawn and subsequently analysed using research assays from Roche diagnostics. The clinical accuracy of plasma GFAP was tested using a cut-off value of 0.29 ng/ml. RESULTS: Blood samples of 74 patients were analysed. Twenty-five patients had ICH (mean age 69 ± 11 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 15) and 49 IS (mean age 75 ± 10 years, median NIHSS 6). Nine ICH (0 IS patients) had GFAP-levels above 0.29 ng/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of GFAP for differentiating between ICH and AIS were 36.0 and 100%. The sensitivity for ICH volume >15 ml was 61.5%. ICH patients without GFAP elevation had significantly smaller hemorrhage volumes (median 4.5 vs. 37.6 ml, p = 0.004) and were less likely to deteriorate (19 vs. 56%, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: GFAP levels >0.29 ng/ml were seen only in ICH, thus confirming the diagnosis of ICH during prehospital care. However, sensitivity is low particularly in smaller hemorrhages.

Influence of Distance to Scene on Time to Thrombolysis in a Specialized Stroke Ambulance.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specialized computed tomography-equipped stroke ambulances shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital arrival. Because of longer travel-time-to-scene, time benefits of this concept are expected to diminish with longer distances from base station to scene. METHODS: We used data from the Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Cares in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) trial comparing time intervals between patients for whom a specialized stroke ambulance (stroke emergency mobile) was deployed and patients with conventional emergency medical service. Expected times from base station to scene had been calculated beforehand using computer algorithms informed by emergency medical service routine data. Four different deployment zones with-75% probability-expected arrival within 4, 8, 12, and 16 minutes and total population coverage of ≈1.3 million inhabitants were categorized for stroke emergency mobile deployment. We analyzed times from alarm-to-arrival at scene, to start of intravenous thrombolysis and from onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis. RESULTS: Corresponding to the size of the respective catchment zone, the number of patients cared increased with distance (zone 1: n=30, zone 2: n=127, zone 3: n=156, and zone 4: n=217). Although time to stroke emergency mobile arrival increased with distance (mean: 8.0, 12.5, 15.4, and 18.4 minutes in zones 1-4), time from alarm-to-intravenous thrombolysis (mean: 41.8 versus 76.5; 50.2 versus 79.1; 54.5 versus 76.6; and 59.3 versus 78.0 minutes, respectively; all P<0.01) remained shorter in the stroke emergency mobile group across all zones. CONCLUSIONS: In a metropolitan area such as Berlin, time benefits justify a specialized stroke ambulance service up to a mean travel time of 18 minutes from base station. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01382862.

Endovascular therapy in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion and patent circle of Willis.

BACKGROUND: Occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) may extend into the middle or anterior cerebral artery (ICA-T) or be confined to the intracranial (ICA-I) or extracranial segment (ICA-E). While there is excellent evidence for endovascular therapy (EVT) in ICA-T occlusions, studies on EVT in non-tandem ICA-I or ICA-E occlusions are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To characterize EVT-treated patients with ICA-I- and ICA-E occlusion by comparing them with ICA-T occlusions. METHODS: The German Stroke Registry (GSR), a national, multicenter, prospective registry was searched for EVT-treated patients with isolated ICA occlusion between June 2015 and December 2021. We stratified patients by ICA occlusion site: (a) ICA-T, (b) ICA-I, (c) ICA-E. Baseline factors, procedural variables, technical (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI)), and functional outcomes (modified Rankin scale score at 3 months) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 13 082 GSR patients, 2588 (19.8%) presented with an isolated ICA occlusion, thereof 1946 (75.2%) ICA-T, 366 (14.1%) ICA-I, and 276 (10.7%) ICA-E patients. The groups differed in age (77 vs 76 vs 74 years, Ptrend=0.02), sex (53.4 vs 48.9 vs 43.1% female, Ptrend<0.01), and stroke severity (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission 17 vs 14 vs 13 points, Ptrend<0.001). In comparison with ICA-T occlusions, both ICA-I and ICA-E occlusions had lower rates of successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3: 85.4% vs 80.4% vs 76.3%; aOR (95% CI for ICA-I vs ICA-T 0.71 (0.53 to 0.95); aOR (95% CI) for ICA-E vs ICA-T 0.57 (0.42 to 0.78)). In adjusted analyses, ICA-E occlusion was associated with worse outcome when compared with ICA-T occlusion (mRS ordinal shift, cOR (95% CI) 0.70 (0.52 to 0.93)). CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics and outcomes differ substantially between ICA-T, ICA-I, and ICA-E occlusions. These results warrant further studies on EVT in ICA-I and ICA-E patients.

Time-to-care metrics in patients with interhospital transfer for mechanical thrombectomy in north-east Germany: Primary telestroke centers in rural areas vs. primary stroke centers in a metropolitan area.

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is highly effective in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. In north-east Germany, many rural hospitals do not have continuous neurological expertise onsite and secondary transport to MT capable comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) is necessary. In metropolitan areas, small hospitals often have neurology departments, but cannot perform MT. Thus, interhospital transport to CSCs is also required. Here, we compare time-to-care metrics and outcomes in patients receiving MT after interhospital transfer from primary stroke centers (PCSs) to CSCs in rural vs. metropolitan areas. Methods: Patients from ten rural telestroke centers (RTCs) and nine CSCs participated in this study under the quality assurance registry for thrombectomies of the Acute Neurological care in North-east Germany with TeleMedicine (ANNOTeM) telestroke network. For the metropolitan area, we included patients admitted to 13 hospitals without thrombectomy capabilities (metropolitan primary stroke centers, MPSCs) and transferred to two CSCs. We compared groups regarding baseline variables, time-to-care metrics, clinical, and technical outcomes. Results: Between October 2018 and June 2022, 50 patients were transferred from RTCs within the ANNOTeM network and 42 from MPSCs within the Berlin metropolitan area. RTC patients were older (77 vs. 72 yrs, p = 0.05) and had more severe strokes (NIHSS 17 vs. 10 pts., p < 0.01). In patients with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; 34.0 and 40.5%, respectively), time from arrival at the primary stroke center to start of IVT was longer in RTCs (65 vs. 37 min, p < 0.01). However, RTC patients significantly quicker underwent groin puncture at CSCs (door-to-groin time: 42 vs. 60 min, p < 0.01). Despite longer transport distances from RTCs to CSCs (55 vs. 22 km, p < 0.001), there was no significant difference of times between arrival at the PSC and groin puncture (210 vs. 208 min, p = 0.96). In adjusted analyses, there was no significant difference in clinical and technical outcomes. Conclusion: Despite considerable differences in the setting of stroke treatment in rural and metropolitan areas, overall time-to-care metrics were similar. Targets of process improvement should be door-to-needle times in RTCs, transfer organization, and door-to-groin times in CSCs wherever such process times are above best-practice models.

Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study.

BACKGROUND: Specialised CT-equipped mobile stroke treatment units shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital admission; however, direct effects of pre-hospital thrombolysis on clinical outcomes have not been shown. We aimed to compare 3-month functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic who had received emergency mobile care or and conventional care. METHODS: In this observational registry study, patients with ischaemic stroke received intravenous thrombolysis (alteplase) either within a stroke emergency mobile (STEMO) vehicle (pre-hospital care covering 1·3 million inhabitants of Berlin) or within conventional care (normal ambulances and in-hospital care at the Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin in Berlin). Patient data on treatment, outcome, and demographics were documented in STEMO (pre-hospital) or conventional care (in-hospital) registries. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had lived at home without assistance before stroke and had a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or lower. Our multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and stroke severity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358772. FINDINGS: Between Feb 5, 2011, and March 5, 2015, 427 patients were treated within the STEMO vehicle and their data were entered into a pre-hospital registry. 505 patients received conventional care and their data were entered into an in-hospital thrombolysis registry. Of these, 305 patients in the STEMO group and 353 in the conventional care group met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 161 (53%) patients in the STEMO group versus 166 (47%) in the conventional care group had an mRS score of 1 or lower (p=0·14). Compared with conventional care, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for STEMO care for the primary outcome (OR 1·40, 95% CI 1·00-1·97; p=0·052) were not significant. Intracranial haemorrhage (p=0·27) and 7-day mortality (p=0·23) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: We found no significant difference between the proportion of patients with a mRS score of 1 or lower receiving STEMO care compared with conventional care. However, our results suggest that pre-hospital start of intravenous thrombolysis might lead to improved functional outcome in patients. This evidence requires substantiation in future large-scale trials. FUNDING: Zukunftsfonds Berlin, the Technology Foundation Berlin with EU co-financing by the European Regional Development Fund via Investitionsbank Berlin, and the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research via the Center for Stroke Research Berlin.

Cost-effectiveness estimate of prehospital thrombolysis: results of the PHANTOM-S study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of shorter delays to treatment and increased thrombolysis rate as shown in the PHANTOM-S (Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Care in Stroke) Study. METHODS: In addition to intermediate outcomes (time to thrombolysis) and treatment rates, we registered all resource consequences of the intervention. The analyzed treatment effects of the intervention were restricted to distribution of IV thrombolysis (IVT) administrations according to time intervals. Intermediate outcomes were extrapolated to final outcomes according to numbers needed to treat derived from pooled IVT trials and translated to gains in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The net annual cost of the Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) prehospital stroke concept was €963,954. The higher frequency of IVT administrations per year (310 vs 225) and higher proportions of patients treated in the early time interval (within 90 minutes: 48.1% vs 37.4%; 91-180 minutes: 37.4% vs 50%; 181-270 minutes: 14.5% vs 12.8%) resulted in an annual expected health gain of avoidance of 18 cases of disability equaling 29.7 QALYs. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €32,456 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on willingness-to-pay thresholds in societal perspectives, the STEMO prehospital stroke concept has the potential of providing a reasonable innovation even in health-economic dimensions.