Prevalence, progression, and management of advanced chronic kidney disease in a cohort of people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Advanced kidney disease is an emerging problem in people living with HIV despite sustained viral suppression. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study to identify people living with HIV with advanced kidney disease according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria and to assess disease progression over a 48-week period following the offer of targeted multidisciplinary management. RESULTS: From our cohort of 3090 individuals, 55 (1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.25) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most were male (83.6%), and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 58 (53.25-66.75) years. Nadir CD4 T-cell count was 135.5 (IQR 43.5-262.75) cells/µl, current CD4 T-cell count was 574 (IQR 438.5-816) cells/µl, and 96% had maintained HIV viral suppression. The most frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (85.5%). Inadequate antiretroviral dose was detected in three individuals (5.5%), and drug-drug interactions were recorded in eight (14.5%), mainly involving the use of cobicistat (n = 5 [9%]). Four individuals (7%) required modification of their concomitant treatment. Seven (13%) had to start or resume follow-up with a nephrologist. Nine participants (16.4%) experienced an improvement in kidney disease stage, three individuals (5.5%) underwent renal transplantation, and one (2%) started haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a multidisciplinary approach, including a critical review of treatment and evaluation of specific requirements, could be useful for anticipating drug-drug interactions and toxicities and for reducing death and hospitalization in people living with HIV with advanced kidney disease.

Accentuated aging associated with HIV in a Mediterranean setting occurs mainly in persons aged>70 years: a comparative cohort study (Over50 cohort).

In an ongoing Mediterranean cohort, we compared age-related conditions between 208 HIV-infected persons and 104 matched controls. ≥3 comorbidities were found in 31.0% of HIV-infected patients and 8.7% of controls. Conditions significantly more frequent among the HIV-infected population were: lipid abnormalities, cancer, osteopenia/osteoporosis, liver disease, sexual dysfunction, hearing deficit, sleep disorders, falls, cognitive complaints, being single, living alone, and being elderly at risk. HIV-infected patients aged >70 years had a significantly higher number of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and comorbidities than controls. HIV-infected persons who had never smoked had a higher prevalence of CVRFs, ≥3 comorbidities, liver disease, cancer, and cognitive complaints compared to controls. Factors associated with frailty were being a man who has sex with men, ≥3 CVRFs, nadir CD470 years. The multidisciplinary assessment also revealed concerning findings in social, cognitive, and functional variables among HIV-infected individuals, with a higher prevalence of elderly at risk than among controls.

Potential prescribing issues among older HIV-infected subjects in a Mediterranean cohort: Does the current prevalence give cause for concern?

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of potential prescribing issues (PPI) in HIV-infected subjects aged ≥65 years according to the Beers and STOPP/START criteria and antiretroviral drug-drug interactions (Liverpool website). Secondary objectives were to assess the concordance between Beers and STOPP/START criteria in our population, and to identify the drugs most frequently involved in PPI. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort study based on a systematic review of the electronic drug prescriptions confirmed by an interview of 91 HIV-infected patients aged ≥65 years. Discrepancies between prescription criteria were assessed using crosstabs and compared using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: The mean age was 72.1 (5.6) years, 75.8% had ≥3 comorbidities and 59.3% polypharmacy. PPI were identified in 87.9%: 71.4% by STOPP/START and 45.1% by Beers. Comparing both criteria, 56.9% of PPI by STOPP/START were detected by Beers, while 92.5% of those detected by the Beers criteria were detected by STOPP/START (P < .001). Amber/red flag interactions between antiretrovirals and comedications were found in 45.1%: 3 severe (red) in 2 patients (2.2%). The most frequent drugs involved in PPI were benzodiazepines (>30%). Cobicistat was the drug most frequently involved in potential interactions (42.2%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PPI among older HIV-infected persons gives cause for concern, as it is almost 90%. Optimization strategies, including a critical review of the treatment plan, should be implemented in clinical routine by a multidisciplinary team, in particular in patients with multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. The STOPP/START criteria seem to detect more PPI, mainly for European populations.

A Specific Mobile Health Application for Older HIV-Infected Patients: Usability and Patient's Satisfaction.

Background: HIV infection is an increasingly complex chronic disease associated with numerous medical, psychological, and social problems. The life expectancy of affected patients has increased considerably. Medical apps could also play a role in prevention and management of comorbid conditions in the HIV-infected population. Objectives: To determine the usefulness of an app designed specifically for HIV-infected patients aged 60 years or older and to assess changes in patient satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and quality of health care. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted, including 100 patients (50 per group): (1) an experimental group comprising patients using the app + routine medical care (app group) and (2) with routine medical care (control group). The usability of the app and patient satisfaction were evaluated in the app group at week 48. Quality of life, adherence to treatment, and clinical parameters were compared between both groups at 48 weeks, as well as the number of face-to-face visits. Results: We found that 52.2% and 73.8% of patients in the app group used the app at weeks 24 and 48, respectively. Patients used the app for a mean of 23.7 (±2.84) days over the 48 weeks. The most visited screens were health counseling and medical records (24.8% and 22.2%, respectively). At week 48, 85.2% of patients thought that the app was useful and 91.4% would recommend the app to friends or relatives. The app was well valued by participants (4.79 [±0.21] of 5.00) and 64.6% thought that the app improved their health care.

High risk and probability of progression to osteoporosis at 10 years in HIV-infected individuals: the role of PIs.

Background: Osteoporotic fractures still remain very infrequent and physicians rarely evaluate bone health. We wanted to assess the magnitude of this problem in the near future by determining the risk and likelihood of progression to osteoporosis. Methods: We estimated the risk of progression to osteopenia/osteoporosis among HIV-infected patients with at least 2 DXA scans (3726 scans from 875 patients). Time-non-homogeneous bidirectional multistate models based on three states (normal bone mineral density, osteopenia and osteoporosis) were used to model the progression of bone mineral density as a function of age and to study the association between the risk of bone loss and antiretroviral use. Results: The HRs associated with age (>45 versus ≤45 years) were: (i) from normal bone mineral density to osteopenia, 0.71 (95% CI 0.45-1.11) for men and 1.06 (95% CI 0.55-2.05) for women; and (ii) from osteopenia to osteoporosis, 0.83 (95% CI 0.51-1.35) for men and 0.99 (95% CI 0.38-2.56) for women. The transition probabilities from osteopenia to osteoporosis over 10 years among men aged 30 and 50 years were 14.9% (95% CI 10.5%-20.4%) and 19% (95% CI 14.3%-24.3%), respectively; and for women, 6.9% (95% CI 3.1%-14.4%) and 30.1% (95% CI 19.8%-41.8%), respectively. An increased osteoporosis risk was observed for PIs and PIs + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; darunavir was associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis among men (HR 3.9; 95% CI 2-7.5) and women (HR 4.5; 95% CI 1.4-14.7); and atazanavir was associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis among women (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.3-14). Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of monitoring bone mineral density given the high probability of progression to osteopenia/osteoporosis, especially in women. In the future, changes in antiretrovirals other than tenofovir, such as PIs, should be recommended to reduce the risk of fracture.

Switching from a ritonavir-boosted PI to dolutegravir as an alternative strategy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals.

Background: Switching from PIs to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals has not been assessed. Objectives: The principal aim was to assess the evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) when switching from a ritonavir-boosted PI to dolutegravir in HIV-infected patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The secondary objective was to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of the switch therapy. Methods: This randomized, multicentre study assessed changes in BMD, bone turnover markers, and antiviral efficacy and safety in 73 virologically suppressed patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis taking a ritonavir-boosted PI plus abacavir/lamivudine who were randomized to switch from PI to dolutegravir (DOLU group, n = 37) or continue with a PI (PI group, n = 36). Clinical Trials: NCT02577042. Results: One and three patients from the DOLU and PI groups, respectively, withdrew prematurely (unrelated to treatment). At 48 weeks, 97.3% versus 91.7%, respectively, maintained viral suppression (snapshot analysis, ITT, M = F). No significant differences were seen between the groups in percentage change from baseline to week 48 in femoral ( P = 0.56) and lumbar spine ( P = 0.29) BMD, although lumbar spine BMD improved by 1.43% (-1.36; 2.92) in the DOLU group [0.12% (-2.83; 2.89) in the PI group]. Bone marker values did not vary significantly. At week 48, triglycerides were lower ( P < 0.001) and HDL cholesterol higher ( P = 0.027) in the DOLU group. Conclusions: Dolutegravir + Kivexa ® was safe and well-tolerated in virologically suppressed patients receiving a PI-based regimen. The lipid profile was better, albeit without significant changes in BMD, probably because of the short follow-up.

Removal of Dolutegravir by Hemodialysis in HIV-Infected Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

Data on dolutegravir removal by hemodialysis are lacking. To study this, we measured dolutegravir plasma concentrations in samples of blood entering and leaving the dialyzer and of the resulting dialysate from 5 HIV-infected patients with end-stage renal disease. The median dolutegravir hemodialysis extraction ratio was 7%. The dolutegravir concentrations after the dialysis session remained far above the protein-binding-adjusted inhibitory concentration. Our results show minimal dolutegravir removal by hemodialysis, with no specific dolutegravir dosage adjustments required in this setting. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02487706.).

Switching from tenofovir to abacavir in HIV-1-infected patients with low bone mineral density: changes in bone turnover markers and circulating sclerostin levels.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir is involved in accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss. METHODS: We recently published a hip BMD improvement at week 48 [+2.1% (95% CI: -0.6, 4.7) (P = 0.043)] in HIV-infected patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis randomized to switch from tenofovir to abacavir (n = 26), although without reaching statistical significance compared with those who maintained tenofovir (n = 28). Here, we present changes at week 48 in bone markers [C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type 1 (CTX), osteocalcin and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP)] as well as in circulating levels of three proteins involved in bone regulation [osteoprotegerin, receptor activator for NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and sclerostin, a selective regulator of bone formation through the Wnt pathway] in 44 of these patients. χ(2) or Fisher and Student t-tests were performed according to the distribution of the variables. RESULTS: Bone markers decreased only in the abacavir group [mean (SD) CTX changed from 0.543 (0.495) to 0.301 (0.306) ng/mL; mean (SD) osteocalcin changed from 23.72 (22.20) to 13.95 (12.40) ng/mL; and mean (SD) P1NP changed from 54.68 (54.52) to 28.65 (27.48) ng/mL (P < 0.001 in all cases)], reaching statistical significance between the groups at week 48. Osteoprotegerin did not vary, but sclerostin significantly increased in the abacavir group [from 29.53 (27.91) to 35.56 (34.59) pmol/L, P = 0.002]. No significant differences in osteoprotegerin and sclerostin were detected between the groups at week 48. RANKL values were below the limit of detection in all samples. CONCLUSIONS: The switch from tenofovir to abacavir seems to induce a positive effect on bone tissue, since bone turnover markers decreased. In addition, circulating sclerostin levels increased, a change associated with improved bone properties.

Long-term changes in bone mineral density after switching to a protease inhibitor monotherapy in HIV-infected subject.

Although some clinical trials have studied the impact of treatments on bone mineral density (BMD), scarce data are available about the impact of protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapies on BMD. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in BMD in patients after one, two, or three years of a PI monotherapy. This study included 46 HIV-infected patients who switched from a conventional triple antiretroviral strategy to a monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) for one (one-year group, n=16), two (two-year group, n=20), and three (three-year group, n=10) years. BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The median percentage of change in total femur BMD was 0.20% after one, 0.79% after two, and -0.31% after three years. The change in lumbar spine was -0.08%, -0.14%, and 0.50% % after the same years. No significant differences were found when patients were classified regarding the type of PI and whether or not had previously received PI or tenofovir. However, patients who interrupted tenofovir or those who started with DRV/r had a higher BMD increment. Patients who had taken non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors previously decreased BMD when started PIs. Monotherapy treatment with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (both LPV/r and DRV/r) during one, two, or three years leads to the stabilization of BMD in HIV-infected patients with long-term virological suppression. Larger studies are necessary to compare the effect of starting or withdrawing PIs on BMD.

Improvement in bone mineral density after switching from tenofovir to abacavir in HIV-1-infected patients with low bone mineral density: two-centre randomized pilot study (OsteoTDF study).

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir has been associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). However, data on changes in BMD after discontinuing tenofovir are lacking. METHODS: We performed a two-centre randomized pilot study in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir with osteopenia/osteoporosis (OsteoTDF study, ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT 01153217). Fifty-four patients were randomly assigned to switch from tenofovir to abacavir (n = 26) or to continue with tenofovir (n = 28). Changes in lumbar and total hip BMD were evaluated at Week 48 from baseline. RESULTS: Five patients discontinued the study (three from the tenofovir group and two from the abacavir group). No significant differences were detected between the groups at Week 48 (P = 0.229 for total hip and P = 0.312 for lumbar spine). However, hip BMD improved by 2.1% (95% CI -0.6 to 4.7) (P = 0.043) in the abacavir group and 0.7% (95% CI -0.9 to 2.4) (P = 0.372) in the tenofovir group. Lumbar spine BMD varied by -0.7% (95% CI -3.8 to 3.3) (P ≤ 0.001) in the abacavir group and -1.2% (95% CI -3.8 to 0.4) (P < 0.001) in the tenofovir group. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from tenofovir to abacavir led to a slight improvement in femoral BMD although no differences were detected between groups. Larger studies are necessary before firm recommendations can be made on the discontinuation of tenofovir in patients with a low BMD.

Evaluation of protease inhibitors containing tubes for MS-based plasma peptide profiling studies.

BACKGROUND: Peptide profiling of biological fluids is a promising tool for biomarker discovery. Blood is an ideal entity for proteomic studies but it is subjected to a proteolytic activity that sets up just at the moment of phlebotomy. Intending to prevent this proteolytic activity, tubes containing protease inhibitors (PI) have been developed. In this study, we evaluated the effect on plasma peptide profile of using tubes containing PI and the evolution of this effect over time. METHODS: Blood samples from ten subjects were drawn into conventional tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and tubes containing PI. Samples were processed at time "zero" and after 1, 2, 4, and 8 hr. Plasma peptide profiles were analyzed by magnetic bead based technology coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry readout. RESULTS: When comparing plasma peptide profile of blood samples collected into tubes containing PI with samples collected into conventional EDTA tubes, differences in the area of 13 peaks were detected at time "zero"; after 8 hr these differences tended to disappear. Moreover, bradykinin and C3- and C4-derived peptides were produced promptly after blood extraction when samples were collected into conventional EDTA tubes, and the use of PI prevented their generation. CONCLUSION: Considering that time taken to process blood samples affects their peptide profile and a decrease in PI's effect occurs over time, it may be concluded that the use of tubes containing PI for blood collection may be advantageous in the context of research, but may have some limitations regarding clinical practice.

Switching the third drug of antiretroviral therapy to maraviroc in aviraemic subjects: a pilot, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching the third drug of antiretroviral treatment to maraviroc in aviraemic subjects infected with R5 HIV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a pilot, prospective, randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT00966329). Eighty HIV-1-infected aviraemic adults on stable antiretroviral treatment for ≥1 year and no antiretroviral drug resistance were screened for the presence of non-R5 HIV by triplicate proviral V3 population sequencing. From them, 30 subjects with R5 HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to switch the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to maraviroc (n = 15) or to continue the same antiretroviral treatment (controls, n = 15). The principal endpoint was the proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48. Ultrasensitive proviral HIV-1 tropism testing (454 sequencing) was performed retrospectively at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48. RESULTS: One subject in the maraviroc arm and one control had non-R5 HIV in proviral DNA by retrospective 454 sequencing. The subject receiving maraviroc was the only individual to develop virological failure. However, plasma HIV at failure was R5. Switching to maraviroc was well tolerated and associated with small, but statistically significant, declines in total, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Median (IQR) triglyceride [1 (0.67-1.22) versus 1.6 (1.4-3.1) mmol/L, P = 0.003] and total cholesterol [4.3 (4.1-4.72) versus 5.4 (4-5.7) mmol/L, P = 0.059] values were lower in the maraviroc arm than in controls at week 48. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, prospective, randomized clinical trial, switching the third drug to maraviroc was safe, efficacious and improved lipid parameters.

Early but limited effects of raltegravir intensification on CD4 T cell reconstitution in HIV-infected patients with an immunodiscordant response to antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune hyperactivation in immunodiscordant patients can induce residual HIV replication and limit CD4 T cell recovery. We assessed the impact of raltegravir intensification on CD4 T cell recovery and viral persistence. METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled, pilot trial. Patients with CD4 T cell counts <350 cells/mm(3) despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy were randomized (2 : 1) to intensify with raltegravir (intensified arm, n = 30) or to continue with the same regimen (control arm, n = 14) for 48 weeks. Then, the control individuals intensified their treatment for 24 weeks (delayed-intensification arm). We analysed changes in CD4 T cell counts, total and episomal HIV DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and predictive factors for response. RESULTS: Raltegravir intensification induced a rapid increase in CD4 T cell counts (week 12) (P = 0.007), although this was not sustained over time. Control patients maintained constant but slow increases in CD4 T cell counts (present in the pre-study period), reaching CD4 T cell counts similar to those of patients in the intensification arm at week 48. This effect was confirmed by the analysis of the delayed-intensification arm. Proviral DNA levels remained stable in both arms over time; episomal DNA forms and ultrasensitive plasma viral load were barely detected during the study. Increases in CD4 T cell counts were associated with low baseline CD95 expression in CD4 and CD8 T cells (P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir intensification modestly impacts viral dynamics and induces a rapid but limited gain in CD4 T cell counts in immunodiscordant patients. Residual viral replication does not seem to be the main cause of unsatisfactory CD4 T cell recovery in these patients.

Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Preperitoneal Fat as a Surrogate Marker of Cardiovascular Risk: Comparative Study Between People Living with HIV and Controls.

Optimal management of cardiovascular disease should start with the identification of subjects at subclinical stages. However, available tools are not always accurate or affordable. We assess the usefulness of ultrasound-guided measurement of abdominal fat layers as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk. We performed a cross-sectional, case-control, exploratory, pilot study in 10 people living with HIV (PLWH) and 10 HIV-uninfected subjects (control group) matched for age, sex, and body mass index. All participants were men 45-60 years of age, with no active disease or previous abdominal surgery; the PLWH group had been virologically suppressed for ≥2 years under stable antiretroviral therapy. The thickness of abdominal superficial and deep subcutaneous fat, preperitoneal fat, omental (periaortic) fat, and retroperitoneal (perirenal) fat was compared between both groups. Correlations between fat layers and traditional markers of cardiovascular risk were assessed. The thickness of most layers was always higher among PLWH. The differences were statistically significant for the preperitoneal fat layer (p = .04). The presence of atherosclerotic plaque was correlated with the preperitoneal fat layer in the PLWH group (odds ratio = 1.49, p = .02), and metabolic syndrome was correlated with superficial subcutaneous fat, although this was low (odds ratio = 0.54, p = .02). In the control group, several associations were found between carotid intima media thickness and abdominal fat layers. All abdominal fat layers were thicker in the PLWH group, especially preperitoneal fat, and several associations were found between specific fat layers and traditional cardiovascular risk markers. Our results suggest that the thickness of abdominal fat layers, assessed by ultrasound, could be a marker of cardiovascular risk. However, further studies with larger populations are required to confirm these findings.

A randomized pilot trial to evaluate the benefit of the concomitant use of atorvastatin and Raltegravir on immunological markers in protease-inhibitor-treated subjects living with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: Optimization of antiretroviral therapy and anti-inflammatory treatments, such as statins, are among the strategies aimed at reducing metabolic disorders, inflammation and immune activation in people living with HIV (PLWH). We evaluated the potential benefit of combining both strategies. DESIGN: Forty-two PLWH aged ≥40 years receiving a protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen were randomized (1:1) to switch from PI to Raltegravir (n = 20), or to remain on PI (n = 22). After 24 weeks, all patients received atorvastatin 20mg/day for 48 weeks. METHODS: We analyzed plasma inflammatory as well as T-cell maturation, activation, exhaustion and senescence markers at baseline, 24 and 72 weeks. RESULTS: Plasma inflammatory markers remained unchanged. Furthermore, no major changes on T-cell maturation subsets, immunoactivation, exhaustion or immunosenescence markers in both CD4 and CD8 T cell compartments were observed. Only a modest decrease in the frequency of CD38+ CD8 T cells and an increase in the frequency of CD28-CD57+ in both CD4 and CD8 T-cell compartments were noticed in the Raltegravir-switched group. CONCLUSIONS: The study combined antiretroviral switch to Raltegravir and Statin-based anti-inflammatory strategies to reduce inflammation and chronic immune activation in PLWH. Although this combination was safe and well tolerated, it had minimal impact on inflammatory and immunological markers. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02577042.

Improvement of mitochondrial toxicity in patients receiving a nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-sparing strategy: results from the Multicenter Study with Nevirapine and Kaletra (MULTINEKA).

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-related mitochondrial toxicity has been suggested as a key factor in the induction of antiretroviral-related lipoatrophy. This study aimed to evaluate in vivo the effects of NRTI withdrawal on mitochondrial parameters and body fat distribution. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial assessed the efficacy and tolerability of switching to lopinavir-ritonavir plus nevirapine (nevirapine group; n = 34), compared with lopinavir-ritonavir plus 2 NRTIs (control group; n = 33) in a group of human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virological suppression. A subset of 35 individuals (20 from the nevirapine group and 15 from the control group) were evaluated for changes in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to nuclear DNA ratio and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity after NRTI withdrawal. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were used to objectively quantify fat redistribution over time. RESULTS: The nevirapine group experienced a progressive increase in mtDNA content (a 40% increase at week 48; P = .039 for comparison between groups) and in the COX activity (26% and 32% at weeks 24 and 48, respectively; P = .01 and P = .09 for comparison between groups, respectively). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in DEXA scans at week 48, although a higher fat increase in extremities was observed in the nevirapine group. No virologic failures occurred in either treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a nucleoside-sparing regimen of nevirapine and lopinavir-ritonavir maintained full antiviral efficacy and led to an improvement in mitochondrial parameters, which suggests a reversion of nucleoside-associated mitochondrial toxicity. Although DEXA scans performed during the study only revealed slight changes in fat redistribution, a longer follow-up period may show a positive correlation between reduced mitochondrial toxicity and a clinical improvement of lipodystrophy.

High Prevalence of Sarcopenia in HIV-Infected Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is a geriatric syndrome that leads to a loss of functionality and mortality. METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of sarcopenia in HIV-infected patients attended in our HIV Unit who had at least two DXA scans from 2000 to 2016 (1,720 DXA scans from 860 individuals). Sarcopenia was determinate according to appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASM) calculated as the ratio between skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) by DXA and height2 (kg/m2). We stratified patients by gender and age (<40, 41-50, and >50 years) and according to the interval between DXAs (≤3, 3-7, 7-10, >10 years). The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age was 52 (47; 57) years, and 76% were male. The median (IQR) time with HIV infection was 8 (3; 15) years. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 25.7% (95% CI, 22.8-28.7), more prevalent in those aged >50 years (27.8%). Stratifying by gender, 43% of women aged >50 years presented sarcopenia compared with 8.8% of men. The frequency of sarcopenia increased from 37.6% to 49.4% when interval between DXA was 7-10 years (n=109), significantly higher in women than in men (p=0.016). In addition to the traditional risk factors, time with HIV infection was associated with sarcopenia [RR 1.780 (95% CI, 1.314-2.411), p=0.001]. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and progression of sarcopenia in HIV-infected patients were high, mainly among women. Further studies are necessary to assess the best approaches to prevent this condition and its consequences.

Prevalence, evolution, and related risk factors of kidney disease among Spanish HIV-infected individuals.

Prevalence of kidney disease (KD) is increasing among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected population. Different factors have been related, varying on different published series.The objectives were to study prevalence of KD in those patients, its evolution, and associated risk factors.An observational cohort study of 1596 HIV-positive patients with cross-sectional data collection in 2008 and 2010 was conducted. We obtained clinical and laboratory markers, and registered previous or current treatment with tenofovir (TDF) and indinavir (IDV). The sample was divided according to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. Group 1: eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m; group 2: eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m.Among the patients, 76.4% were men, mean age (SD) 45 ±â€Š9 years, time since diagnose of HIV 14 ±â€Š7 years, and 47.2% of the patients received previous treatment with TDF and 39.1% with IDV. In 2008, eGFR ≤60: 4.9% (91.4% of them in chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 3, eGFR 59-30 mL/min); this group was older, presented higher fibrinogen levels, and more patients were treated previously with TDF and IDV. In 2010, eGFR ≤60: 3.9% (87.1% stage 3 CKD). The 2.4% of cohort showed renal improvement and 1.3% decline of renal function over time. The absence of hypertension and treatment with TDF were associated with improvement in eGFR. Increased age, elevated fibrinogen, decreased albumin, diabetes mellitus, hyperTG, and worse virological control were risk factors for renal impairment.The HIV-positive patients in our area have a CKD prevalence of 4% to 5% (90% stage 3 CKD) associated with ageing, inflammation, worse immune control of HIV, TDF treatment, and metabolic syndrome.

Viral failure in HIV-infected patients with long-lasting viral suppression who discontinued enfuvirtide.

The aim of this pilot study was to assess whether enfuvirtide can be discontinued in patients on long-term viral suppression. Eight patients with multidrug-resistant virus were randomly assigned to stop and 10 subjects to continue enfuvirtide. At week 48, viral rebound occurred in five (62.5%) and in no patients, respectively, (P = 0.007). The CD4 cell decrease in failure patients was 5% (P = ns). These results suggest that enfuvirtide should be maintained until new active drugs became available.

Ezetimibe, a promising lipid-lowering agent for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients with poor response to statins.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic interactions of ezetimibe in HIV-infected patients with poorly controlled antiretroviral-associated dyslipidaemia while taking pravastatin alone. DESIGN: A prospective, open-label, one-arm study of 24 weeks duration. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Nineteen patients (18 on stable HAART), with low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol values of > or = 130 mg/dl despite the use of pravastatin. METHODS: Ezetimibe, 10 mg/day, was added to pravastatin 20 mg/day, while patients maintained the same antiretroviral regimen. Determinations of total, LDL-, and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, apoproteins, and inflammatory factors (homocystein and C-reactive protein) were performed at baseline, and at weeks 6, 12, and 24. Liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were also assessed. Protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) Cmin was determined just before and 12 weeks after ezetimibe introduction. RESULTS: At week 24, 61.5% of patients achieved the endpoint of the study (LDL-cholesterol < 130 mg/dl). Significant declines in mean total and LDL-cholesterol levels were observed between baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 24, irrespective of antiretroviral type (PI or NNRTI). Mean HDL-cholesterol and apoprotein A increased significantly. No patients discontinued therapy due to intolerance or presented toxicity of grade 2 or more. No differences were observed in lopinavir or nevirapine Cmin measured just before and 12 weeks after ezetimibe introduction. CONCLUSION: The addition of ezetimibe to ongoing pravastatin seems to be an effective and safe option for HIV-infected patients not achieving the NCEP ATPIII LDL-cholesterol goals while receiving a statin alone. Its high tolerability and the lack of interactions with the cytochrome CYP3A4 indicate that ezetimibe will not increase the risk of toxicity or pharmacokinetic interactions with antiretrovirals.