Impact of discrepancies between the Abbott realtime and cobas TaqMan assays for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M non-B subtypes.

Viral loads in 249 clinical samples from individual patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 non-B subtypes were determined with both the Abbott RealTime and Cobas TaqMan assays. The differences exceeded 0.5 log for about 20% of samples and 1 log for 3%, with higher values always from the Abbott assay in the latter cases.

Viral efficacy maintained and safety parameters improved with a reduced dose of stavudine: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Stavudine (d4T) is a potent but potentially toxic nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is still widely used in developing countries. This study's aim was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of lower-dose d4T. METHODS: Multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, pilot, 48-week study in French patients weighing >60 kg with viral load <400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL who were receiving d4T 40 mg twice daily and then switched to 30 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion with plasma viral load <400 copies/mL at week 24. Secondary endpoints included the proportion with <50 copies/mL at weeks 24 and 48, changes in mitochondrial DNA, CD4 cell count and pharmacokinetics, and clinical and laboratory safety. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients enrolled. Baseline CD4 count was 584 cells/microL; viral loads were <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL in 100% and 89%, respectively. Prior antiretroviral drug exposure was 6.9 years, d4T exposure was 6.3 years. Fifty-six out of 57 (98%) patients had viral load <400 copies/mL and 51 (89%) had viral load <50 copies/mL at week 24. Median CD4 count increased by 63 cells/microL at week 48 (P=0.006). At 48 weeks, total cholesterol decreased by 0.24 mmol (P=0.02), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.15 mmol (P=0.0001) and alanine aminotransferase by 5.74 mg/dL (P=0.01). Paired baseline DNA and week 24 RNA mutations were unchanged. Mitochondrial DNA (copies/cell) content increased from 672+/-254 to 682+/-269. d4T area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) decreased by 31% (P=0.003) and C(max) by 44% (P=0.004). Clinical and laboratory parameters improved or were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-dose d4T is effective with improved safety parameters.

Re-occurrence of HIV-1 drug mutations after treatment re-initiation following interruption in patients with multiple treatment failure.

Antiretroviral treatment interruption in 20 extensively pre-treated HIV-1 patients with treatment failure led to genotype viral reversion of at least one class of drug-mutation resistance in half of the patients. The only predictive factor of reversion was found to be the duration of interruption. The outgrowth of residual wild-type virus seems not to be a true genetic reversion because drug mutations are detected rapidly at salvage therapy re-initiation.

Low-rate emergence of thymidine analogue mutations and multi-drug resistance mutations in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase gene in therapy-naive patients receiving stavudine plus lamivudine combination therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Mutations usually associated with zidovudine exposure have been observed in zidovudine-naive patients treated by stavudine in combination. These mutations were named thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs). This fact, combined with phenotypical and biochemical findings provided additional evidence for cross-resistance between zidovudine and stavudine. A recent genotypic study in naive patients receiving stavudine/didanosine combination showed emergence of TAMs and a multidrug-resistance mutation (MDR), Q151M, in 36 and 10% of cases, respectively. Stavudine plus lamivudine is one of the most used binucleoside associations in the antiretroviral combinations. The objective of this study was to assess the genotypic changes in the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) gene in antiretroviral-naive patients treated by stavudine plus lamivudine. METHODS: We analysed the RT gene of 44 HIV-1 patients, naive of antiretroviral therapy, who were treated for 24 or 48 weeks with stavudine/lamivudine. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, all patients acquired the lamivudine-associated mutation M184V. Only two subjects (4.5%) developed a TAM (T215Y; M41L), one subject developed a V75T/A mutation and one subject developed the particular MDR pattern F116Y, Q151M. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly demonstrated that naive subjects treated with stavudine/lamivudine for 24-48 weeks selected a low rate of TAMs and MDR Q151M. One hypothesis explaining these results could be the development of the M184V mutation.

Constant mitochondrial DNA levels in blood leukocytes of patients enrolled in a NRTI-free therapeutic trial (BIKS-2 study).

OBJECTIVES: Determine if a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-free regimen affected mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients enrolled in BIKS-2 trial. METHODS: Antiretroviral (ARV) naïve (N=13) and NRTI experienced (N=7) patients, received lopinavir/ritonavir, a boosted protease inhibitor, and efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor from Month (M) 0 to M12 (1-year BIKS trial) and from M12 to M36 (2-year BIKS-2 trial). MtDNA was quantified at M12, M24 and M36 via real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: From M12 to M36, the 20 patients have maintained undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, gained CD4 cells and had no side effects attributable to these drugs. Median mtDNA contents were constant: 478.6 at M12, 478.6 at M24 and 324.4 copies/cell at M36 (pM12-M36=0.5). Because M0 data is missing, these results were compared to those of two groups of age matched individuals: healthy donors and HIV-infected patients before and after exposure to NRTIs. Healthy donors have higher contents (871), followed by patients never treated (602), than by BIKS patients where 7 had toxic NRTIs (478.6) and at last by patients exposed for six months to the most toxic combination (ddI-d4T) (85 copies/cell). CONCLUSION: Lopinavir/ritonavir+efavirenz did not affect mtDNA contents in PBMCs.

Study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic activity of almitrine bismesylate in infants during the recovery phase following bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

The efficacy and pharmacokinetics of almitrine bismesylate were studied in 6 infants (age 2.5-9.5/months) during the recovery phase following bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The infants did not require assisted ventilation, but needed oxygen therapy with an FiO2 of 25-30% in stable condition. One to three hours after a single oral dose of almitrine (1.5 mg/kg), there was a marked increase in transcutaneous PO2 (TcPO2) (mean 2kPa) followed by a regular decrease to the baseline level. Nine to fourteen days after repeated administration of almitrine (1.5 mg/kg/12 h) in 4 children, the mean gain in TcPO2 was only 0.85 kPa. There was a very early flagging in efficacy of almitrine, since none of the children could be weaned from oxygen therapy. The absorption peak occurred 1-3 h after the administration of the compound. The maximum almitrine concentration was 173 +/- 44 ng/ml; plasma clearance was 21.9 +/- 6.6 ml/min and the volume of distribution was 18.7 +/- 2.1 liters/kg. The drug was eliminated biphasically. In the 4 studies with repeated drug administration, the pharmacokinetic results suggested that a steady state was still not achieved after 9-14 days of treatment. These results and the absence of any sustained effect of repeated doses of the drug raise the problem of a particular type of almitrine metabolization in the infant.

[Conditions of "thymidine analog mutations" (TAMs) in naive patients treated with different combinations of d4T]. / Conditions de sélection des "thymidines analogues mutations" (TAMs) chez des patients naïfs traités par différentes combinaisons incluant la d4t.

Recently, d4T/ddI combination has been associated with the selection of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) in 50% of patients with a detectable viral load after 6 to 12 months of this bi-therapy (ALBI, STADI and BMS A1460 tests). We evaluated the rate of selection of the TAMs in naive patients with a viral load of > 200 copies/mL after: 6 months to 1 year of d4T/3TC bi-therapy (group 1); 1 year or more of a treatment including d4T/3TC (group 2); and more than 6 months of tri-therapy including d4T/ddI (group 3). The reverse transcriptase gene has ben studied in 33 patients in group 1, 17 patients in group 2 and ten patients in group 3. For the latter patients, the tri-therapies were as follows: d4T/ddI/PI (n = 5), d4T/ddI/NNRTI (n = 4), d4T/ddI/NRTI (n = 1). For the group 1 patients, at baseline, two patients already had TAMs. At M6, all the patients acquired the 3TC-associated mutations, M184V. Only one patient selected a MDR mutation profile (F116Y, Q151M). At M12, 26 of 33 plasmas were analysed. Only one patient selected one TAM (T215Y). For the group 2 patients, only three patients selected TAMs after more than 30 months of treatment. For the group 3 patients, at baseline, only one patient already harbored TAMs. None of the other patients had selected TAMs. In patients who received d4T/ddI/3TC, only the M184V, the 3TC-associated mutation, was selected. In conclusion, stavudine in association with 3TC selected a low rate of TAMs; in patients receiving a treatment including d4T/3TC, time of exposure to stavudine seemed to be an important parameter for the selection of TAMs; and in contrast to results obtained on d4T/ddI, tri-therapies including d4T/ddI did not select any TAMs, whatever the combination (NRTI, NNRTI, PI).

GENOPHAR: a randomized study of plasma drug measurements in association with genotypic resistance testing and expert advice to optimize therapy in patients failing antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in association with genotypic resistance testing and expert advice to optimize therapy in multiexperienced patients infected with HIV-1. METHODS: Patients with a viral load>1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and an unchanged antiretroviral therapy regimen over the last 3 months were randomized into two groups: a genotypic group (G) and a geno-pharmacological group (GP). Treatment was selected by an expert committee according to genotypic resistance testing (the G and GP groups) and TDM (the GP group) at week 4. Treatment could be modified at each visit according to toxicity, poor virological response and TDM. Results of TDM were withheld from the G group until week 12. The primary endpoint of the study was the percentage of patients with viral load<200 copies/mL at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were randomized in the study, with 67 in each group, and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. At baseline, median values were as follows: viral load (log(10) copies/mL): G=4.1, GP=4.0; CD4 cell count (cells/microL): G=292, GP=294; and number of prior drugs: G=7, GP=8. The median number of resistance mutations was five in the G group [nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)=three; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)=one; protease inhibitors (PI)=one] and seven in the GP group (NRTI=four; NNRTI=two; PI=one). At week 8, treatment was adjusted according to the TDM in 13 of the 67 patients in the GP group (19%). By ITT missing equal failure analysis at week 12, and after only one intervention according to plasma concentration results, a viral load<200 copies/mL was achieved in 30 of the 67 patients (45%) in the G group and in 29 of the 67 patients (43%) in the GP group (not significant). In the multivariate analysis, only prior exposure to at least two PIs at baseline gave a poor response to subsequent antiretroviral therapy. At week 24, a viral load<200 copies/mL was achieved in 35 of the 67 patients (52%) in the G group and in 40 of the 67 patients (60%) in the GP group. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant benefit of using TDM was not found in this short-term study where patients appeared to be adherent. However, combining genotypic resistance testing with the use of an expert committee to monitor subsequent therapy individually in patients with multiple resistance mutations was associated with high antiviral efficacy.

[Polymorphism of protease genes in patients infected with HIV-1 and response to therapy including a protease inhibitor]. / Etude du polymorphisme du gène de la protéase de patients infectés par le VIH-1 et réponse à un traitement comprenant un inhibiteur de la protéase.

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are recently introduced drugs that have improved the survival of HIV-infected patients when given in combination with two reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The HIV-1 protease gene is naturally highly polymorphic. Selection pressure due to IP use can result in major or minor resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). This study investigated whether presence before IP therapy of minor RAMs on the protease gene predicts the virological response. Of the 58 PI-naive patients included in the study, 12 had received two nucleoside reverse transcriptor inhibitors, 14 had received indinavir, 16 ritonavir, and 28 saquinavir-SGC. Viral load was measured on D0 (prior to PI initiation) and at M3 and M6 (Roche Monitor 1.5 with 200 and 20 copies/ml as the thresholds). The protease gene was fully sequenced on D0 using the ABI 377 automatic sequencer after RNA amplification by nested RT-PCR. None of the viral strains exhibited major mutations, but 57 of 58 (98%) had at least one minor mutation (median number of substitutions, 4), 60% had 1 to 4 substitutions, and 40% had 5 to 9 substitutions. Substitutions seen with a prevalence > 20% were located at codons 15, 35, 37, 41, 63, and 77. Numbers of substitutions at M3 and M6 were not correlated with viral load or the nature of the PI used, and neither were they significantly different between patients with more or fewer than 20 copies/ml. These data suggest that the protease genotype at PI initiation does not predict the efficacy of a regimen including a PI and is of no assistance in deciding whether or not to include a PI in a triple combination regimen.

Efficacy and tolerability of stavudine plus lamivudine in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: A combination of two nucleoside analogues is currently the core of any antiretroviral regimen for HIV-1 infection. Stavudine plus lamivudine has shown an additive effect in vitro, as well as an absence of overlapping toxicity and cross-resistance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antiviral efficacy of stavudine plus lamivudine in treatment-naive patients and in patients previously treated with other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label pilot study. SETTING: Three urban clinical centers in Paris. PATIENTS: 83 patients with CD4+ cell counts between 50 and 400 cells/mm3 (42 treatment-naive and 41 treatment-experienced patients). INTERVENTIONS: Stavudine, 40 mg twice daily (30 mg twice daily in patients with a body weight < or = 60 kg), and lamivudine, 150 mg twice daily. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points for efficacy included changes in plasma viral load and CD4+ cell count at 24 weeks compared with baseline. RESULTS: Therapy with stavudine plus lamivudine resulted in a median decrease of 1.66 log10 (10(1.66)) (range, -3.04 to -0.79 log10) in plasma HIV-1 RNA; the median increase in CD4+ cell count was 108 cells/mm3 (range, -58 to 406 cells/mm3) at week 24 in treatment-naive patients. In treatment-experienced patients, the median reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA was 0.55 log10 (range, -2.86 to 0.52 log10), and the median increase in CD4+ cell count was 46 cells/mm3 (range, -188 to 311 cells/mm3). The percentages of patients with less than 3000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and less than 400 copies/mL at 24 weeks were, respectively, 57% (95% CI, 41% to 72%) and 26% (CI, 12% to 40%) among treatment-naive patients and 22% (CI, 10% to 38%) and 5% (CI, 1% to 17%) among treatment-experienced patients. Of 82 patients, 14 (17%) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity and 2 discontinued therapy because of intolerance toward treatment. CONCLUSION: Stavudine plus lamivudine seems to have a potent antiviral effect in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. No major drug-limiting toxicity was found. This two-nucleoside combination should be considered in multidrug therapy for HIV.