Sex-Related Differences in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary outcomes after surgical management of thoracic aortic disease have improved; however, the impact of sex-related differences is poorly understood. METHODS: A total of 1653 patients (498 [30.1%] female) underwent thoracic aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2002 and 2017 in 10 institutions of the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death, stroke, and a modified Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite for mortality or major morbidity (stroke, renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, prolonged ventilation). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: Women were older (mean±SD, 66±13 years versus 61±13 years; P<0.001), with more hypertension and renal failure, but had less coronary disease, less previous cardiac surgery, and higher ejection fraction than men. Rates of aortic dissection were similar between women and men. Rates of hemiarch, and total arch repair were similar between the sexes; however, women underwent less aortic root reconstruction including aortic root replacement, Ross, or valve-sparing root operations (29% versus 45%; P<0.001). Men experienced longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, but similar durations of circulatory arrest, methods of cerebral perfusion, and nadir temperatures. Women experienced a higher rate of mortality (11% versus 7.4%; P=0.02), stroke (8.8% versus 5.5%; P=0.01), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite end point for mortality or major morbidity (31% versus 27%; P=0.04). On multivariable analyses, female sex was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.81; P<0.001), stroke (odds ratio, 1.90; P<0.001), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite end point for mortality or major morbidity (odds ratio, 1.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women experience worse outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest. Further investigation is required to better delineate which measures may reduce sex-related outcome differences after complex aortic surgery.

Defining an Intraoperative Hypotension Threshold in Association with De Novo Renal Replacement Therapy after Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and deadly complication after cardiac surgery. In the absence of effective therapies, a focus on risk factor identification and modification has been the mainstay of management. The authors sought to determine the impact of intraoperative hypotension on de novo postoperative renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, hypothesizing that prolonged periods of hypotension during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy. METHODS: Included in this single-center retrospective cohort study were adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring CPB between November 2009 and April 2015. Excluded were patients who were dialysis dependent, underwent thoracic aorta or off-pump procedures, or died before receiving renal replacement therapy. Degrees of hypotension were defined by mean arterial pressure (MAP) as less than 55, 55 to 64, and 65 to 74 mmHg before, during, and after CPB. The primary outcome was de novo renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Of 6,523 patient records, 336 (5.2%) required new postoperative renal replacement therapy. Each 10-min epoch of MAP less than 55 mmHg post-CPB was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.23; P = 0.002), and each 10-min epoch of MAP between 55 and 64 mmHg post-CPB was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18; P = 0.0001) for renal replacement therapy. The authors did not observe an association between hypotension before and during CPB with renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: MAP less than 65 mmHg for 10 min or more post-CPB is associated with an increased risk of de novo postoperative renal replacement therapy. The association between intraoperative hypotension and AKI was weaker in comparison to factors such as renal insufficiency, heart failure, obesity, anemia, complex or emergent surgery, and new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, post-CPB hypotension is a potentially easier modifiable risk factor that warrants further investigation.

GATA6 Regulates Aortic Valve Remodeling, and Its Haploinsufficiency Leads to Right-Left Type Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), the most common congenital heart defect affecting 1% to 2% of the population, is a major risk factor for premature aortic valve disease and accounts for the majority of valve replacement. The genetic basis and mechanisms of BAV etiology and pathogenesis remain largely undefined. METHODS: Cardiac structure and function was assessed in mice lacking a Gata6 allele. Human GATA6 gene variants were analyzed in 452 BAV cases from the BAV consortium and 1849 controls from the Framingham GWAS (Genome Wide Association Study). GATA6 expression was determined in mice and human tissues using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Mechanistic studies were carried out in cultured cells. RESULTS: Gata6 heterozygous mice have highly penetrant right-left (RL)-type BAV, the most frequent type in humans. GATA6 transcript levels are lower in human BAV compared with normal tricuspid valves. Mechanistically, Gata6 haploinsufficiency disrupts valve remodeling and extracellular matrix composition through dysregulation of important signaling molecules, including matrix metalloproteinase 9. Cell-specific inactivation of Gata6 reveals an essential role for GATA6 in secondary heart field myocytes because loss of 1 Gata6 allele from Isl- 1-positive cells-but not from endothelial or neural crest cells-recapitulates the phenotype of Gata6 heterozygous mice. CONCLUSIONS: The data identify a new cellular and molecular mechanism underlying BAV. The availability of an animal model for the most frequent human BAV opens the way for the elucidation of BAV pathogenesis and the development of much needed therapies.

Aortic Valve Cusp Coaptation Surface Area Using 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Correlates with Severity of Aortic Valve Insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test both in humans and using finite element (FE) aortic valve (AV) models whether the coaptation surface area (CoapSA) correlates with aortic insufficiency (AI) severity due to dilated aortic roots to determine the validity and utility of 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic-measured CoapSA. DESIGN: Two-pronged, clinical and computational approach. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 10 patients with known AI and 98 FE simulations of increasingly dilated human aortic roots. INTERVENTIONS: The CoapSA was calculated using intraoperative 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography data of patients with isolated AI and compared with established quantifiers of AI. In addition, the CoapSA and effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) were determined using FE simulations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the 10 AI patients, regurgitant fraction (RF) increased with EROA (R2 = 0.77, p = 0.0008); CoapSA decreased with RF (R2 = 0.72, p = 0.0020); CoapSA decreased with EROA (R2 = 0.71, p = 0.0021); and normalized CoapSA (CoapSA / [Ventriculo-Aortic Junction × Sinotubular Junction]) decreased with EROA (R2 = 0.60, p = 0.0088). In the 98 FE simulations, normalized CoapSA decreased with EROA (R2 = 0.50, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In both human and FE AV models, CoapSA was observed to be inversely correlated with AI severity, EROA, and RF, thereby supporting the validity and utility of 3D TEE-measured CoapSA. A clinical implication is the expectation that high values of CoapSA, measured intraoperatively after AV repairs, would correlate with better long-term outcomes of those repairs.

Aortic dissection following heart transplantation.

A 75-year-old male with a previous orthotopic heart transplantation performed 28 years ago was incidentally discovered to have an asymptomatic chronic type A aortic dissection. Catheter-induced dissection during coronary angiography was believed to be the culprit factor. Aortic root replacement and aortic valve reconstruction were successfully performed.

Impact of anesthetic handover on mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical handover is a critical moment in patient care. The authors tested the hypothesis that handover of anesthesia care is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: The study was conducted in a quaternary care cardiac surgery center and university research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures between April 1, 1999 and October 31, 2009 were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for differences between patients who received intraoperative handover of anesthesia care and those who did not, and in-hospital mortality and morbidity were compared using multivariate logistic modeling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 14,421 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study; handover occurred in 966 cases (6.7%). After propensity-score matching, 7,137 patients were included for analysis. In-hospital mortality was 5.4% in the handover group and 4.0% in the non-handover group (match-adjusted odds ratio, 1.425; 95% confidence interval, 1.013-2.006; p = 0.0422); the incidence of major morbidity was 18.5% in the handover group and 15.6% in the non-handover group (match-adjusted odds ratio, 1.274; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-1.564; p = 0.0212). CONCLUSIONS: Handover of anesthetic care during cardiac surgery is associated with a 43% greater risk of in-hospital mortality and 27% greater risk of major morbidity. Further studies are required to explore this relationship and to systematically evaluate and improve the process of handover.

Determinants of persistent or recurrent congestive heart failure after contemporary surgical aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although one of the goals of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is to alleviate congestive heart failure (CHF), the latter often occurs after AVR. Surprisingly, the incidence of CHF after AVR remains unclear, as outcomes are reported according to valve-related complications, each of which may result in CHF. The study aim was to: (i) validate a previously described model predicting persistent or recurrent CHF after AVR in a contemporary cohort; and (ii) apply the model to predict late outcomes following AVR with the Trifecta valve. METHODS: A previously described statistical model was validated in a cohort of 1,014 patients who received the St. Jude Trifecta prosthesis between 2007 and 2009. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the influence of risk factors associated with late CHF. Model prediction was verified with a Monte Carlo simulation employing 10,000 iterations. RESULTS: The model accurately predicted late CHF events in a contemporary cohort. Sensitivity analysis identified mean transprosthesis gradient (MTG), body surface area (BSA), and preoperative NYHA class as important CHF risk factors. Based on the model, a 5 mmHg decrease in MTG was associated with 2.5% and 10.4% reductions in late CHF at five and 15 years, respectively. A 10% decrease in mean BSA and preoperative NYHA class IV symptoms were associated with a 1% decrease and a 5% increase in CHF events at 15 years after AVR. CONCLUSION: The authors' previously described model predicting persistent or recurrent CHF after AVR was validated in a contemporary cohort. This model may be applied to predict outcomes in patients who receive modern prostheses, without long-term follow up.

Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes.

Aortic valve replacement has traditionally been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve insufficiency with or without aortic root pathology. Aortic valve repair is emerging as an attractive treatment alternative that avoids the long-term risks associated with prosthetic valve implantation including thromboembolism, endocarditis, prosthetic valve deterioration, and anticoagulation related hemorrhage. Important achievements in this discipline have occurred over the past decade including development and refinement of valve preserving aortic root replacement techniques, development of a classification system for aortic insufficiency, surgical approaches to cusp disease with varying cusp anatomy. As surgical techniques for aortic valve repair continue to evolve, clinical outcomes up to and beyond the first decade are promising with excellent survival and low risk of valve related events.

Hemiarch versus extended arch repair for acute type A dissection: Results from a multicenter national registry.

OBJECTIVE: We compared perioperative outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing hemiarch (HA) versus extended arch (EA) repair with or without descending aortic intervention. METHODS: Nine hundred twenty-nine patients underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair (2002-2021, 9 centers) including open distal repair (HA) with or without additional EA repair. EA with intervention on the descending aorta (EAD) included elephant trunk, antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic replacement, or uncovered dissection stent. EA with no descending intervention (EAND), included unstented suture-only methods. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, permanent neurologic deficit, computed tomography malperfusion resolution, and a composite. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed. RESULTS: Mean age was 66 ± 18 years, 30% (278 out of 929) were women, and HA was performed more frequently (75% [n = 695]) than EA (25% [n = 234]). EAD techniques included: dissection stent (39 out of 234 [17%]), thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (18 out of 234 [7.7%]), and elephant trunk (87 out of 234 [37%]). In-hospital mortality (EA: n = 49 [21%] and HA: n = 129 [19%]; P = .42), and neurological deficit (EA: n = 43 [18%] and HA: n = 121 [17%]; P = .74) were similar. EA was not independently associated with death (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.77-1.54; P = .63) or neurologic deficit (EA vs HA odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.47-1.55; P = .59). Composite adverse events differed significantly (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; P = .001). Malperfusion resolved more frequently after EAD (EAD: n = 32 [80%], EAND: n = 18 [56%], HA: n = 71 [50%]; P = .004), although multivariable analysis was not significant (EAD vs HA odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.83-5.66; P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Extended arch interventions pose similar perioperative mortality and neurologic risks as Hemiarch. Descending aortic reinforcement may promote malperfusion restoration. Extended techniques should be approached with caution in acute dissection due to increased risk of adverse events.

Impact of nondiameter aortic indices on surgical eligibility: Results from the Treatment in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Surgery Versus Surveillance (TITAN: SvS) randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Traditional criterion for intervention on an asymptomatic ascending aortic aneurysm has been a maximal aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or more. The 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association aortic guidelines adopted cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio, aortic size index, and aortic height index as alternate parameters for surgical intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of using these newer indices on patient eligibility for surgical intervention in a prospective, multicenter cohort with moderate-sized ascending aortic aneurysms between 5.0 and 5.4 cm. METHODS: Patients enrolled from 2018 to 2023 in the randomization or registry arms of the multicenter trial, Treatment In Thoracic Aortic aNeurysm: Surgery versus Surveillance, were included in the study. Clinical data were captured prospectively in an online database. Imaging data were derived from a core computed laboratory. RESULTS: Among the 329 included patients, 20% were female. Mean age was 65.0 ± 11.6 years, and mean maximal aortic diameter was 50.8 ± 3.9 mm. In the one-third of all patients (n = 109) who met any 1 of the 3 criteria (ie, aortic size index ≥3.08 cm/m2, aortic height index ≥3.21 cm/m, or cross-sectional aortic area/height ≥ 10 cm2/m), their mean maximal aortic diameter was 52.5 ± 0.52 mm. Alternate criteria were most commonly met in women compared with men: 20% versus 2% for aortic size index (P < .001), 39% versus 5% for aortic height index (P < .001), and 39% versus 21% for cross-sectional aortic area/height (P = .002), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients in Treatment In Thoracic Aortic aNeurysm: Surgery versus Surveillance would meet criteria for surgical intervention based on novel parameters versus the classic definition of diameter 5.5 cm or more. Surgical thresholds for aortic size index, aortic height index, or cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio are more likely to be met in female patients compared with male patients.

Cerebral microembolization after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: comparison of warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only.

BACKGROUND: No human physiological data exists on whether aspirin only is as effective as warfarin plus aspirin in preventing cerebral microembolization in the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 56 patients who had no other indication for oral anticoagulation, who underwent bAVR and received, in an open-label fashion, either daily warfarin (for INR 2.0-3.0) plus 81 mg of aspirin (n=28) or 325 mg of aspirin only (n=28). Cerebral microembolization was quantified at 4 hours (baseline) and at 1 month postoperatively, by recording 1-hour bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) microembolic signals (MES). Platelet-function analysis (PFA) of closure times (CT) on collagen was also used as a marker of platelet-dependent activation. Follow-up to 1 year was complete. Preoperative demographics and baseline platelet function were equivalent in both groups. There was no mortality, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 1 year in either group. No significant differences were found in the proportion of patients with MES among those receiving warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only, at baseline (68% versus 82%, respectively; P=0.4) and at 1 month (46% versus 43%; P=1.0) after bAVR. The total MES and PFA were also equivalent between groups, at baseline and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Early after bAVR, the effects of these 2 antithrombotic regimens on cerebral microembolization and platelet function are equivalent. These data bring new mechanistic support to the premise that aspirin only may safely be used early after bAVR in patients who have no other indication for oral anticoagulation.

The association between tracheostomy and sternal wound infection in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether tracheostomy increases the risk of sternal wound infection (SWI) post cardiac surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy from September 1997 to October 2010 were included in this retrospective observational study. Primary exposure was tracheostomy performed during admission to the cardiac surgical intensive care unit. The primary outcome was SWI during hospital admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if tracheostomy was an independent predictor of SWI. Restriction and propensity score analyses were then used to assess if tracheostomy is a causal risk factor for SWI. RESULTS: Four hundred and eleven of 18,845 patients (2.2%) were treated with tracheostomy. Incidences of SWI in tracheostomy and non-tracheostomy groups were 19.5% (80/411) and 0.8% (154/18,434), respectively. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, tracheostomy was found to be an independent predictor of SWI (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 4.2). In an analysis restricted to respiratory failure patients, tracheostomy was associated with sternal wound infection (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.4 to 4.9). When the analysis was stratified by the risk of receiving tracheostomy as represented by propensity score (PS), 46 patients (12%) in the intermediate risk category (PS 0.2-0.4) had SWIs (adjusted OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.6 to 5.6), and 52 patients (14%) in the highest risk category (PS > 0.4) had SWIs (OR 1.52; 95% CI 0.85 to 2.87). DISCUSSION: Our single-centre observational study of cardiac surgery patients found tracheostomy to be an independent risk factor for SWI. Our analysis showed a robust association when restricted to patients with respiratory failure and after the population was stratified by the propensity to have a tracheostomy.

Measuring aortic valve coaptation surface area using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: As aortic valve (AV) repairs become more sophisticated, surgeons need increasingly detailed information about the structure and function of this valve. Unlike two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE), using three-dimensional (3D)-TEE makes it possible to image the entire AV. We hypothesized that measuring coaptation surface area (CoapSA) would be feasible and reproducible, and CoapSA would decrease in patients with aortic insufficiency. METHODS: We developed a new technique to calculate the AV-CoapSA using 3D-TEE. We measured the coaptation surfaces between the right coronary cusp/left coronary cusp, right coronary cusp/non-coronary cusp, and left coronary cusp/non-coronary cusp in ten normal AVs and ten AVs with moderate-severe aortic insufficiency (AI). Since computer models have previously shown that CoapSA is trapezoidal, we used the formula: trapezoid area = length × (medial coaptation height + lateral coaptation height)/2. The total CoapSA was calculated by adding all three areas. To adjust for valve size, we indexed the value to the diameter of the ventricular aortic junction (VAJ). Measurements were performed by two observers. RESULTS: The intra-observer correlation was 0.84 for one observer (P < 0.0001) and 0.93 for the other (P < 0.0001). The inter-observer correlation was 0.87 (P < 0.0001). In normal valves, the CoapSA [mean total (standard deviation)] was significantly greater than in the insufficient valves [1.61 (0.31) cm(2) vs 1.03 (0.22) cm(2), respectively; P < 0.001]. After indexing for the VAJ diameter, the total CoapSA remained significantly greater in normal valves than in insufficient valves. CONCLUSION: In this proof of concept study, we present a new and innovative technique to measure AV-CoapSA using 3D-TEE. It is reproducible and shows decreased CoapSA in patients with AI. Coaptation surface area may provide insight into mechanisms of AI and may have predictive value following AV repair.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice preferences in the surgical threshold for ascending aortic aneurysm among Canadian cardiac surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: The survey aimed to assess the practice patterns of Canadian cardiac surgeons on the size threshold at which patients with ascending aortic aneurysm would be offered surgery. METHODS: A 18-question electronic survey was electronically distributed to 148 practicing cardiac surgeons in Canada via email from January to August 2020. Questions presented clinical scenarios focusing on modifying a single variable, and respondents were asked to identify their surgical size threshold for each of the clinical scenarios. RESULTS: The individual response rate was 62.0% (91/148) and institutional response rate was 89.3% (25/29). For an incidental asymptomatic ascending aortic aneurysm in a 60-year-old otherwise-healthy male patient with a tricuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortic valve of 1.9 m2, 20.2% of the respondents would recommend surgery when the aneurysm was <5.5 cm. A significant number of surgeons modified their surgical threshold in response to changes to BSA, bicuspid aortic valve, growth rate, age, occupation, symptom, and family history (P < .01). Notably, if the patient had a bicuspid aortic valve, 41.0% of respondents lowered their threshold for surgery, with only 43.0% recommending surgery at ≥5.5 cm (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Practice variations exist in the current size threshold for surgery of ascending aortic aneurysms in Canada. These differences between surgeons are further accentuated in the context of bicuspid aortic valve, smaller body stature, younger age, low growth rate, family history, and for the performance of isometric exercise. These represent important areas where future prospective studies are required to inform best practice.

Combining Aortic Size With Arterial Hemodynamics Enhances Assessment of Future Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Expansion.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is a deadly disease whose current method for risk stratification (aneurysm size) is imperfect. We sought to evaluate whether combining aortic size with hemodynamic measures that reflect the aorta's function was superior to aortic size alone in the assessment of TAA expansion. METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven nonoperated participants with TAA were followed prospectively. Aortic stiffness and pulsatile hemodynamics were noninvasively assessed at baseline with a combination of arterial tonometry with echocardiography using validated methodology. Aneurysm growth was calculated from standard imaging modalities. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders evaluated the association of aneurysm size and arterial hemodynamics, alone and in combination, with TAA growth. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of participants were male. Mean ± SD age, baseline aneurysm size, follow-up, and aneurysm expansion were, respectively, 62.2 ± 11.4 years, 45.9 ± 4.0 mm, 4.5 ± 1.9 years, and 0.41 ± 0.46 mm/year. In the linear regression models, the standardised ß (ß∗) for the association of aneurysm size with aneurysm expansion was 0.178 (P = 0.044). This was improved by combining aortic size with most measures of aortic function, with ß∗ ranging from 0.192 (for aneurysm size combined with central diastolic blood pressure) to 0.484 (for aneurysm size combined with carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity) (P ≤ 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Combining aneurysm size with measures of arterial function improves assessment of aneurysm growth over TAA size alone, which is the standard for clinical decisions in TAA. Thus, combining aneurysm size with measures of aortic function provides a clinical advantage in the assessment of TAA disease activity.

Arterial Age and Early Vascular Aging, But Not Chronological Age, Are Associated With Faster Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth.

Background Aneurysm size is an imperfect risk assessment tool for those with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Assessing arterial age may help TAA risk stratification, as it better reflects aortic health. We sought to evaluate arterial age as a predictor of faster TAA growth, independently of chronological age. Methods and Results We examined 137 patients with TAA. Arterial age was estimated according to validated equations, using patients' blood pressure and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Aneurysm growth was determined prospectively from available imaging studies. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association of chronological age and arterial age with TAA growth, and multivariable logistic regression assessed associations of chronological and arterial age with the presence of accelerated aneurysm growth (defined as growth>median in the sample). Mean±SD chronological and arterial ages were 62.2±11.3 and 54.2±24.5 years, respectively. Mean baseline TAA size and follow-up time were 45.9±4.0 mm and 4.5±1.9 years, respectively. Median (interquartile range) TAA growth was 0.31 (0.14-0.52) mm/year. Older arterial age (ß±SE for 1 year: 0.004±0.001, P<0.0001) was independently associated with faster TAA growth, while chronological age was not (P=0.083). In logistic regression, each 5-year increase in arterial age was associated with a 23% increase in the odds of accelerated TAA growth (95% CI, 1.085-1.394; P=0.001). Conclusions Arterial age is independently associated with accelerated aneurysm expansion, while chronological age is not. Our results highlight that a noninvasive and inexpensive assessment of arterial age can potentially be useful for TAA risk stratification and disease monitoring as compared with the current clinical standard (chronological age).

Autologous cardiomyotissue implantation promotes myocardial regeneration, decreases infarct size, and improves left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: Cell therapy for myocardial infarction (MI) may be limited by poor cell survival and lack of transdifferentiation. We report a novel technique of implanting whole autologous myocardial tissue from preserved myocardial regions into infarcted regions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen rats were used to optimize cardiomyotissue size with peritoneal wall implantation (300 µm identified as optimal size). Thirty-nine pigs were used to investigate cardiomyotissue implantation in MI induced by left anterior descending balloon occlusion (10 animals died; male-to-female transplantation for tracking with in situ hybridization for Y chromosome, n=4 [2 donors and 2 MI animals]; acute MI implantation cohort at 1 hour, n=13; and healed MI implantation at 2 weeks, n=12). Assessment included echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, hemodynamics, triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, and histological and molecular analyses. Tracking studies demonstrated viable implants with donor cells interspersed in the adjacent myocardium with gap junctions and desmosomes. In the acute MI cohort, treated animals compared with controls had improved perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging (1.2±0.01 versus 0.86±0.05; P<0.01), decreased MI size (magnetic resonance imaging: left ventricle, 2.2±0.5% versus 5.4±1.5%, P=0.04; triphenyltetrazolium chloride: anterior wall, 10.3±4.6% versus 28.9±5.8%, P<0.03), and improved contractility (dP/dt, 1235±215 versus 817±817; P<0.05). In the healed MI cohort, treated animals had less decline in ejection fraction between 2 and 4 week assessment (-3±4% versus -13±-4%; P<0.05), less decline in ±dP/dt, and smaller MI (triphenyltetrazolium chloride, 21±11% versus 3±8%; P=0.006) than control animals. Infarcts in the treated animals contained more mdr-1(+) cells and fewer c-kit(+) cells with a trend for decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and increased expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2. CONCLUSION: Autologous cardiomyotissue implanted in an MI area remains viable, exhibits electromechanical coupling, decreases infarct size, and improves left ventricular function.

Reoperation of left heart valve bioprostheses according to age at implantation.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting the use of bioprostheses for heart valve replacement in young adults is accumulating. However, reoperation data, which may help guide clinical decision making in young patients, remains poorly defined in the literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the need for reoperation in 3975 patients who underwent first-time bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n=3152) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n=823). There were 895 patients below the age of 60 years at bioprosthesis implant (AVR, n=636; MVR, n=259). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary, stented aortic bioprostheses was 7.74 years (95% CI 7.28 to 9.97 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 12.93 years (95% CI 11.10 to 15.76 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. Multivariable risk factors associated with reoperation following bioprosthetic AVR include age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94 per year, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.96, P<0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99, P=0.04). The median interval to reoperation of contemporary mitral bioprostheses was 8.11 years (95% CI 5.79 to 16.50 years) in patients less than 40 years, and 10.14 years (95% CI 8.64 to 11.14 years) in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. As for AVR, age (HR 0.96 per year, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98, P<0.001) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.93, P=0.03) were associated with decreased reoperation risk following bioprosthetic MVR. CONCLUSIONS: These data constitute clinically relevant age-specific prognostic information regarding reoperation in young patients, who may wish to select a bioprosthesis at initial left heart valve replacement.

Repair of quadricuspid aortic valve associated with ascending aorta dilatation.

Quadricuspid aortic valve is a rare congenital anomaly that may require surgical intervention because of valvular dysfunction. Rarely, it may be associated with enlargement of the ascending aorta. Here, the case is presented of a quadricuspid aortic valve-associated enlargement of the ascending aorta and functional aortic annulus dilatation in a 36-year-old patient. The patient subsequently underwent a successful aortic valve repair and replacement of the ascending aorta.