Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 T helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s.

T helper cells type 1 (Th1s) that produce interferon-gamma predominantly mediate cellular immune responses and are involved in the development of chronic inflammatory conditions, whereas Th2s which produce large amounts of IL-4 and IL-5 upregulate IgE production and are prominent in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. The precise factors determining whether Th1- or Th2-mediated immune responses preferentially occur at a peripheral site of antigen exposure are largely unknown. Chemokines, a superfamily of polypeptide mediators, are a key component of the leukocyte recruitment process. Here we report that among four CXC (CXCR1-4) and five CC (CCR1-5) chemokine receptors analyzed, CXCR3 and CCR5 are preferentially expressed in human Th1s. In contrast, Th2s preferentially express CCR4 and, to a lesser extent, CCR3. In agreement with the differential chemokine receptor expression, Th1s and Th2s selectively migrate in response to the corresponding chemokines. The differential expression of chemokine receptors may dictate, to a large extent, the migration and tissue homing of Th1s and Th2s. It may also determine different susceptibility of Th1s and Th2s to human immunodeficiency virus strains using different fusion coreceptors.

Envelope-dependent restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spreading in CD4(+) T lymphocytes: R5 but not X4 viruses replicate in the absence of T-cell receptor restimulation.

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replicates in activated CD4(+) T lymphocytes. However, only CD4(+) Th2 and Th0, but not Th1, CD4(+) T-cell clones have been reported to efficiently support HIV-1 replication. This dichotomous pattern was further investigated in the present study in Th1, Th2, or Th0 cell lines derived from umbilical human cord blood and in T-cell clones obtained from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy adults. Both primary and laboratory-adapted HIV-1 strains with CCR5 as the exclusive entry coreceptor (R5 viruses) efficiently replicated in Th1, Th2, and Th0 cells. In sharp contrast, CXCR4-dependent (X4) viruses poorly replicated in both polarized and unpolarized CD4(+) T cells, including adults' PBMC infected several days after mitogenic stimulation. Unlike the X4 HIV-1(NL4-3), a chimera in which the env gene had been replaced with that of the R5 HIV-1(NL(AD8)), efficiently replicated in both Th1 and Th2 cells. This X4-dependent restriction of HIV replication was not explained by either the absence of functional CXCR4 on the cell surface or by the inefficient viral entry and reverse transcription. T-cell receptor stimulation by anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies fully rescued X4 HIV-1 replication in both Th1 and Th2 cells, whereas it did not alter the extent and kinetics of R5 HIV-1 spreading. Thus, R5 HIVs show a replicative advantage in comparison to X4 viruses in their ability to efficiently propagate among suboptimally activated T lymphocytes, regardless of their polarized or unpolarized functional profiles. This observation may help to explain the absolute predominance of R5 HIVs over X4 viruses observed after viral transmission and during early-stage disease.

Inhibition of R5X4 dualtropic HIV-1 primary isolates by single chemokine co-receptor ligands.

The susceptibility of HIV-1 to chemokine-mediated inhibition may be lost as a consequence of the expanded usage of chemokine co-receptors frequently occurring in clade B isolates obtained from individuals with advanced disease. Since chemokine-based immune intervention is under intense investigation, it is crucial to determine its potential effect on primary dualtropic HIV isolates characterized by simultaneous utilization of CCR5 and CXCR4 chemokine co-receptors (R5X4 viruses). In the present study, the CCR5 binding chemokine regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) strongly inhibited the replication of two of eight primary R5X4 viruses in mitogen-activated primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 efficiently suppressed the replication of other two HIV isolates, whereas the remaining four viruses were partially inhibited by treatment with either RANTES or AMD3100. The potency of chemokine-mediated inhibition was influenced by PBMC donor variability, but it was usually independent from the levels of expression of CCR5 or CXCR4. Dual co-receptor usage was maintained by the viruses after two serial passages on U87.CD4 astrocytic cell lines expressing exclusively either CCR5 or CXCR4. The gp120 env variable domains were sequenced before and after passages on U87.CD4 cells. Virus replication into U87.CD4-CXCR4 cells did not result in changes in the V3 region but perturbed the dominant env V4 sequence. Interestingly, double passage onto U87.CD4-CXCR4 cells determined the loss of susceptibility to RANTES inhibition. In conclusion, interference with CCR5 may efficiently inhibit the replication of at least some dualtropic HIV-1 strains, whereas forced CXCR4 usage may result in viral escape from CCR5-dependent inhibitory effects.