Endoscopic approach to geniculate ganglion: a multicentric experience.

PURPOSE: A variety of lesions could arise from the GG area, or extend into this region from adjacent sites. The management of perigeniculate lesions includes observation, surgery, and radiation, according to the nature, the size of the lesion, and the accompanying symptoms. Preliminary experiences on the exclusive transcanal endoscopic approach to the GG area have shown safety and feasibility avoiding of any postauricular incision, or brain manipulation. The experience from two referral centers on patients treated for a GG lesion with a totally endoscopic approach is herein reported. METHODS: Data about patients who underwent exclusive endoscopic approach to the GG area at the Otolaryngology Departments of the University Hospitals of Modena and Bologna between May 2017 and February 2022 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: The total number of patients included in our study was 11. 10 patients (91%) had progressive unilateral facial paralysis and 1 patient (11%) presented with chronic otorrhea. The mean largest diameter of the treated lesions was of 8 mm. The resection was extended to the fundus of the IAC in 2 patients (expanded approach). The remaining 9 patients (82%) underwent partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP). No major complications occurred. Facial nerve outcomes were good in all patients and the mean ABG worsened from 12 dB pre-operatively to 22 dB post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: The exclusively endoscopic approach to GG lesions represents a viable alternative to traditional microscopic approaches and may be included in the armamentarium of ear surgeons.

Patterns and timing of recovery from facial nerve palsy after nerve-sparing parotid surgery: the role of neuromuscular retraining.

OBJECTIVES: Among the complications of parotid surgery, facial palsy is frequent and burdened by high functional and social impact for the patient. There are few data on the efficacy of facial neuromuscular retraining (FNR) in patients with facial palsy after parotid surgery, and no data exist on its impact in timing and extent of recovery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing FN sparing parotid surgery and suffering from postoperative facial palsy. Among 400 patients undergoing surgery between July 2016 and May 2023, those with the preservation of the FN and onset of facial palsy were selected. Nerve function was evaluated during 2 years follow up using the House-Brackman (H&Bs) and Sunnybrook scales (SBs). RESULTS: A total of 46 patients undergoing partial or total parotidectomy were included. At discharge 18 patients (39,1%) had IV to VI grade paralysis according to the H&Bs and the mean SBs value was 54. At 2 and 6 months after surgery, the average value of Sunnybrook increased to 76.5 and 95.4 respectively. After 12 months no patients with IV to VI grade paralysis were represent in our cohort. Two years after surgery, only five patients (10.9%) had persistent grade II paralysis according to HBs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the efficacy of FNR in the rehabilitation of facial paralysis after nerve-sparing parotidectomy. The greater functional improvement is achieved within the first 6 months of rehabilitation. A significant improvement is detected still after 18 months, supporting the importance of long rehabilitation for patients without complete recovery after the first year.