Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 98
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Genet Med ; 26(12): 101272, 2024 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39301805

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Novel uses of genome sequencing (GS) present an opportunity for return of results to healthy individuals, prompting the need for scalable genetic counseling strategies. We evaluate the effectiveness of a genomic counseling model (GCM) and explore preferences for GS findings in the general population. METHODS: Participants (N = 466) completed GS and our GCM (digital genomics platform and group-based webinar) and indicated results preferences. Surveys were administered before (T0) and after (T1) GCM. Change in knowledge and decisional conflict (DC) were evaluated using paired-sample T and Wilcoxon tests. Factors influencing knowledge and results preferences were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Participants were 56% female, 58% white, and 53% ≥40 years of age. Mean knowledge scores increased (Limitations: 3.73 to 5.63; Benefits: 4.34 to 5.48, P < .0001), and DC decreased (-21.9, P < .0001) at T1 versus T0. Eighty-six percent of participants wished to learn all GS findings at T1 vs 78% at T0 (P < .0001). Older age, negative/mixed attitudes toward genetics and greater DC were associated with change in preferences after intervention. CONCLUSION: In a population-based cohort undergoing GS interested in learning GS findings, our GCM increased knowledge and reduced DC, illustrating the GCM's potential effectiveness for GS counseling in the general population.

2.
CMAJ ; 196(37): E1252-E1261, 2024 Nov 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39496352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although suspicions of cancer may be raised in patients who visit the emergency department, little is known about emergency department use before a cancer diagnosis. We sought to describe emergency department use among patients in Ontario within the 90 days before confirmed cancer diagnosis and to evaluate factors associated with this emergency department use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study of patients aged 18 years or older who had a confirmed cancer diagnosis in Ontario from 2014 to 2021 using linked administrative databases. The primary outcome was any emergency department visit within 90 days before the cancer diagnosis date. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with emergency department use, such as demographics (e.g., age, sex, rurality, Ontario Health region, indicators of marginalization), comorbidities, previous emergency department visits and hospital admissions, continuity of primary care, type of cancer, and year of cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: We included 651 071 patients with cancer. Of these, 229 683 (35.3%) had an emergency department visit within 90 days before diagnosis, 51.4% of whom were admitted to hospital from the emergency department. Factors associated with increased odds of emergency department use before cancer diagnosis included rurality (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.17), residence in northern Ontario (North East region OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.17 and North West region OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.32, v. Toronto region), and living in the most marginalized areas (material resources OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.35-1.40 and housing OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11, v. least marginalized quintile). We observed significant variation in emergency department use by cancer type, with high odds of emergency department use among patients with intracranial, pancreatic, liver or gallbladder, or thoracic cancer. INTERPRETATION: Emergency department use is common before cancer diagnosis, with about one-third of patients with cancer in Ontario using the emergency department before diagnosis. Understanding why patients visit the emergency department before cancer diagnosis is important, particularly for patients who live in rural or marginalized areas, or those who have specific cancer types.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Neoplasias , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Modelos Logísticos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Hum Genet ; 142(2): 181-192, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331656

RESUMO

Rapid advancements of genome sequencing (GS) technologies have enhanced our understanding of the relationship between genes and human disease. To incorporate genomic information into the practice of medicine, new processes for the analysis, reporting, and communication of GS data are needed. Blood samples were collected from adults with a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) diagnosis (target N = 1500). GS was performed. Data were filtered and analyzed using custom pipelines and gene panels. We developed unique patient-facing materials, including an online intake survey, group counseling presentation, and consultation letters in addition to a comprehensive GS report. The final report includes results generated from GS data: (1) monogenic disease risks; (2) carrier status; (3) pharmacogenomic variants; (4) polygenic risk scores for common conditions; (5) HLA genotype; (6) genetic ancestry; (7) blood group; and, (8) COVID-19 viral lineage. Participants complete pre-test genetic counseling and confirm preferences for secondary findings before receiving results. Counseling and referrals are initiated for clinically significant findings. We developed a genetic counseling, reporting, and return of results framework that integrates GS information across multiple areas of human health, presenting possibilities for the clinical application of comprehensive GS data in healthy individuals.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Aconselhamento Genético , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Genômica/métodos , Genótipo
4.
Ann Emerg Med ; 79(1): 35-47, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535301

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Temporary lower limb immobilization may be a risk for venous thromboembolism. The purpose of this study was to examine the 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. Secondary objectives were to examine individual factors associated with venous thromboembolism in this population and to compare the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with ankle fractures against a priori-selected control groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using province-wide health datasets from Ontario, Canada. We included patients aged 16 years and older discharged from an ED between 2013 and 2018 with closed ankle fractures requiring temporary immobilization. We estimated 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism after ankle fracture. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism, censoring at 90 days or death. Patients with ankle fractures were then propensity score matched to 2 control groups: patients discharged with injuries not requiring lower limb immobilization (ie, finger wounds and wrist fractures) to compare relative hazard of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: There were 86,081 eligible patients with ankle fractures. Incidence of venous thromboembolism within 90 days was 1.3%. Factors associated with venous thromboembolism were older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.39), venous thromboembolism or superficial venous thrombosis history (HR: 5.18; 95% CI: 4.33 to 6.20), recent hospital admission (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.68), recent nonankle fracture surgery (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.93), and subsequent surgery for ankle fracture (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.20). In the matched cohort, patients with ankle fractures had an increased hazard of venous thromboembolism compared to matched controls with finger wounds (HR: 6.31; 95% CI: 5.30 to 7.52) and wrist fractures (HR: 5.68; 95% CI: 4.71 to 6.85). CONCLUSION: The 90-day incidence of venous thromboembolism among patients discharged from the ED with ankle fractures requiring immobilization was 1.3%. These patients had a 5.7- to 6.3-fold increased hazard compared to matched controls. Certain patients immobilized for ankle fractures are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, and this should be recognized by emergency physicians.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/terapia , Redução Fechada/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Adulto , Braquetes/efeitos adversos , Moldes Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Redução Fechada/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Órtoses do Pé/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Pontuação de Propensão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Contenções/efeitos adversos
5.
Age Ageing ; 51(2)2022 02 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150585

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies estimate Emergency Department (ED) delirium recognition at <20%; few prospective studies have assessed delirium recognition and outcomes for patients with unrecognized delirium. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively measure delirium recognition by ED nurses and physicians, document their confidence in diagnosis and disposition, actual dispositions, and patient outcomes. METHODS: Prospective observational study of people ≥65 years. We assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method, then asked ED staff if the patient had delirium, confidence in their assessment, if the patient could be discharged, and contacted patients 1 week postdischarge. We report proportions and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). RESULTS: We enrolled 1,493 participants; mean age was 77.9 years; 49.2% were female, 79 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.2-6.5%) had delirium. ED nurses missed delirium in 43/78 cases (55.1%, 95% CI 43.4-66.4%). Nurses considered 12/43 (27.9%) patients with unrecognized delirium safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 7.0/10. Physicians missed delirium in 10/20 (50.0%, 95% CI 27.2-72.8) cases and considered 2/10 (20.0%) safe to discharge. Median confidence in their delirium diagnosis for patients with unrecognized delirium was 8.0/10. Fifteen patients with unrecognized delirium were sent home: 6.7% died at 1 week follow-up vs. none in those with recognized delirium and 1.1% in the rest of the cohort. CONCLUSION: Delirium recognition by nurses and physicians was sub-optimal at ~50% and may be associated with increased mortality. Research should explore root causes of unrecognized delirium, and novel strategies to systematically improve delirium recognition and patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente , Delírio , Idoso , Delírio/diagnóstico , Delírio/epidemiologia , Delírio/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Can Fam Physician ; 68(11): e326-e332, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36376040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the assessment of patients experiencing first-trimester bleeding or abdominal pain by family physicians working in family medicine clinics following first-trimester POCUS training and certification. DESIGN: Multisite, retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two hospital-affiliated academic family medicine clinics in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve family physicians who completed a first-trimester POCUS training and certification course. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of family physicians using POCUS during their evaluations of patients in the first trimester of pregnancy in the 6 months following the FPs' successful completion of the Family Medicine Obstetrical Ultrasound (FaMOUS) course. Secondary outcomes included indications for POCUS use, diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared with radiologist-interpreted ultrasound, pregnancy outcomes, and emergency department visits within 10 days of the index family medicine clinic visit. RESULTS: Of the 12 certified family physicians, 7 (58.3%) used POCUS during their assessments of first-trimester patients during the study period. The FPs used POCUS with 56 patients for the following indications: 11 (19.6%) had only vaginal bleeding, 5 (8.9%) had only abdominal pain, and 8 (14.3%) had both vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain; the indication for 32 patients (57.1%) was unclear. Forty-six patients (82.1%) underwent a subsequent radiologist-interpreted ultrasound within 10 days of the index POCUS test. Compared with radiologist-interpreted ultrasound, POCUS had a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% CI 79.2% to 97.6%) for documenting intrauterine pregnancy and a sensitivity of 81.4% (95% CI 66.6% to 91.6%) for documenting the presence of fetal cardiac activity. CONCLUSION: Following a first-trimester POCUS certification course, family physicians used POCUS for the assessment of first-trimester patients with varying frequency and for indications other than vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain. Further study is needed to assess the clinical impact of office-based POCUS, unforeseen barriers and facilitators to its use, and patient and provider preferences.


Assuntos
Médicos de Família , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico por imagem , Certificação
7.
Lancet ; 395(10221): 339-349, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007169

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute atrial fibrillation is the most common arrythmia treated in the emergency department. Our primary aim was to compare conversion to sinus rhythm between pharmacological cardioversion followed by electrical cardioversion (drug-shock), and electrical cardioversion alone (shock-only). Our secondary aim was to compare the effectiveness of two pad positions for electrical cardioversion. METHODS: We did a partial factorial trial of two protocols for patients with acute atrial fibrillation at 11 academic hospital emergency departments in Canada. We enrolled adult patients with acute atrial fibrillation. Protocol 1 was a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled comparison of attempted pharmacological cardioversion with intravenous procainamide (15 mg/kg over 30 min) followed by electrical cardioversion if necessary (up to three shocks, each of ≥200 J), and placebo infusion followed by electrical cardioversion. For patients having electrical cardioversion, we used Protocol 2, a randomised, open-label, nested comparison of anteroposterior versus anterolateral pad positions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by study site) for Protocol 1 by on-site research personnel using an online electronic data capture system. Randomisation for Protocol 2 occurred 30 min after drug infusion for patients who had not converted and was stratified by site and Protocol 1 allocation. Patients and all research and emergency department staff were masked to treatment allocation for Protocol 1. The primary outcome was conversion to normal sinus rhythm for at least 30 min at any time after randomisation and up to a point immediately after three shocks. Protocol 1 was analysed by intention to treat and Protocol 2 excluded patients who did not receive electrical cardioversion. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01891058. FINDINGS: Between July 18, 2013, and Oct 17, 2018, we enrolled 396 patients, and none were lost to follow-up. In the drug-shock group (n=204), conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 196 (96%) patients and in the shock-only group (n=192), conversion occurred in 176 (92%) patients (absolute difference 4%; 95% CI 0-9; p=0·07). The proportion of patients discharged home was 97% (n=198) versus 95% (n=183; p=0·60). 106 (52%) patients in the drug-shock group converted after drug infusion only. No patients had serious adverse events in follow-up. The different pad positions in Protocol 2 (n=244), had similar conversions to sinus rhythm (119 [94%] of 127 in anterolateral group vs 108 [92%] of 117 in anteroposterior group; p=0·68). INTERPRETATION: Both the drug-shock and shock-only strategies were highly effective, rapid, and safe in restoring sinus rhythm for patients in the emergency department with acute atrial fibrillation, avoiding the need for return to hospital. The drug infusion worked for about half of patients and avoided the resource intensive procedural sedation required for electrical cardioversion. We also found no significant difference between the anterolateral and anteroposterior pad positions for electrical cardioversion. Immediate rhythm control for patients in the emergency department with acute atrial fibrillation leads to excellent outcomes. FUNDING: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Cardioversão Elétrica , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos Clínicos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
CMAJ ; 193(40): E1561-E1567, 2021 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35040805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after head injury is a concern among older adult patients on anticoagulation. We evaluated the risk of ICH after an emergency department visit for head injury among patients 65 years and older taking warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with patients not taking anticoagulants. We also evaluated risk of 30-day mortality and neurosurgical intervention among patients with ICH. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used population-based data of patients 65 years and older seen in an Ontario emergency department with a head injury. We matched patients on the propensity score to create 3 pairwise-matched cohorts based on anticoagulation status (warfarin v. DOAC, warfarin v. no anticoagulant, DOAC v. no anticoagulant). For each cohort, we calculated the relative risk of ICH at the index emergency department visit and 30-day mortality. We also calculated the hazard of neurosurgical intervention among patients with ICH. RESULTS: We identified 77 834 patients with head injury, including 64 917 (83.4%) who were not on anticoagulation, 9214 (11.8%) who were on DOACs and 3703 (4.8%) who were on warfarin. Of these, 5.9% of patients had ICH at the index emergency department visit. Patients on warfarin had an increased risk of ICH compared with matched patients on DOACs (relative risk [RR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.69) and patients not on anticoagulation (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.61). We did not observe a difference in ICH between patients on DOACs compared with matched patients not on anticoagulation. In patients with ICH, 30-day mortality did not differ by anticoagulation status or type. Patients on warfarin had an increased hazard of neurosurgery compared with patients not on anticoagulation. INTERPRETATION: Patients on warfarin seen in the emergency department with a head injury had higher relative risks of ICH than matched patients on a DOAC and patients not on anticoagulation, respectively. The risk of ICH for patients on a DOAC was not significantly different compared with no anticoagulation. Further research should confirm that older adults using warfarin are the only group at higher risk of ICH after head injury.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Acidentes por Quedas , Idoso , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/mortalidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Ontário/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Varfarina/efeitos adversos
9.
Ann Emerg Med ; 77(6): 561-574, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33612283

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine incidence and type of adverse events (adverse outcomes related to emergency care) among emergency department (ED) patients discharged with recent-onset atrial fibrillation, acute heart failure, and syncope. METHODS: This 5-year prospective cohort study included high-acuity adult patients discharged with the 3 sentinel diagnoses from 6 tertiary care Canadian EDs. We screened all ED visits for eligibility and performed telephone interviews 14 days postdischarge to identify flagged outcomes: death, hospital admission, return ED visit, health care provider visit, and new or worsening symptoms. We created case summaries describing index ED visit and flagged outcomes, and trained emergency physicians reviewed case summaries to identify adverse events. We reported adverse event incidence and rates with 95% confidence intervals and contributing factor themes. RESULTS: Among 4,741 subjects (mean age 70.2 years; 51.2% men), we observed 170 adverse events (3.6 per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 4.2). Patients discharged with acute heart failure were most likely to experience adverse events (5.3%), followed by those with atrial fibrillation (2.0%) and syncope (0.8%). We noted variation in absolute adverse event rates across sites from 0.7 to 6.0 per 100 patients. The most common adverse event types were management issues, diagnostic issues, and unsafe disposition decisions. Frequent contributing factor themes included failure to recognize underlying causes and inappropriate management of dual diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Among adverse events after ED discharge for patients with these 3 sentinel cardiovascular diagnoses, we identified quality improvement opportunities such as strengthening dual diagnosis detection and evidence-based clinical practice guideline adherence.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Síncope , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Canadá , Diagnóstico Duplo (Psiquiatria) , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/terapia
10.
Fam Pract ; 38(6): 731-734, 2021 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34173652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute pharyngitis is common in the ambulatory setting. The Modified Centor score uses five criteria to predict Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection and can be used to guide management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the emergency department (ED) management (throat cultures, antibiotics and corticosteroids) of acute, uncomplicated pharyngitis by Centor score. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of adult (>17 years) patients with an ED discharge diagnosis of acute pharyngitis from January 2016 to December 2018. RESULTS: Of 638 patients included, 286 (44.8%) had a Centor score of 0-1, 328 (51.4%) had a score of 2-3 and 24 (3.8%) had a score of ≥4. Of those with a Centor score of 0-1, 83 (29.0%) had a throat culture, 88 (30.8%) were prescribed antibiotics, 15 (5.2%) were positive for GAS and 74 (25.9%) received corticosteroids. Of those with a Centor score of 2-3, 156 (47.6%) had a throat culture, 220 (67.1%) were prescribed antibiotics, 44 (13.4%) were positive for GAS and 145 (44.2%) received corticosteroids. Of those with a Centor score ≥4, 14 (58.3%) had a throat culture, 18 (75.0%) were prescribed antibiotics, 7 (29.2%) were positive for GAS and 12 (50.0%) received corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: A higher Centor score was associated with a higher risk of GAS infection, increased antibiotic prescribing and use of corticosteroids. Many patients with low Centor scores were prescribed antibiotics and had throat cultures. Further work is required to understand clinical decision-making for the management of acute pharyngitis.


Assuntos
Faringite , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes
11.
Circulation ; 139(9): 1146-1156, 2019 02 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Improved risk stratification of acute heart failure in the emergency department may inform physicians' decisions regarding patient admission or early discharge disposition. We aimed to validate the previously-derived Emergency Heart failure Mortality Risk Grade for 7-day (EHMRG7) and 30-day (EHMRG30-ST) mortality. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective validation study of patients with acute heart failure at 9 hospitals. We surveyed physicians for their estimates of 7-day mortality risk, obtained for each patient before knowledge of the model predictions, and compared these with EHMRG7 for discrimination and net reclassification improvement. We also prospectively examined discrimination of the EHMRG30-ST model, which incorporates all components of EHMRG7 as well as the presence of ST-depression on the 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: We recruited 1983 patients seeking emergency department care for acute heart failure. Mortality rates at 7 days in the 5 risk groups (very low, low, intermediate, high, and very high risk) were 0%, 0%, 0.6%, 1.9%, and 3.9%, respectively. At 30 days, the corresponding mortality rates were 0%, 1.9%, 3.9%, 5.9%, and 14.3%. Compared with physician-estimated risk of 7-day mortality (PER7; c-statistic, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.78) there was improved discrimination with EHMRG7 (c-statistic, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87; P=0.022 versus PER7) and with EHMRG7 combined with physicians' estimates (c-statistic, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88; P=0.003 versus PER7). Model discrimination increased nonsignificantly by 0.014 (95% CI, -0.009-0.037) when physicians' estimates combined with EHMRG7 were compared with EHMRG7 alone ( P=0.242). The c-statistic for EHMRG30-ST alone was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81) and 30-day model discrimination increased nonsignificantly by addition of physician-estimated risk to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.73-0.82; P=0.187). Net reclassification improvement with EHMRG7 was 0.763 (95% CI, 0.465-1.062) when assessed continuously and 0.820 (0.560-1.080) using risk categories compared with PER7. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical model allowing simultaneous prediction of mortality at both 7 and 30 days identified acute heart failure patients with a low risk of events. Compared with physicians' estimates, our multivariable model was better able to predict 7-day mortality and may guide clinical decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02634762.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
12.
Ann Emerg Med ; 75(4): 524-531, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31564379

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The electronic Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (eCTAS) is a real-time electronic triage decision-support tool designed to improve patient safety and quality of care by standardizing the application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). The objective of this study is to determine interrater agreement of triage scores pre- and post-implementation of eCTAS. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study conducted in 7 emergency departments (EDs), selected to represent a mix of triage documentation practices, hospital types, and patient volumes. A provincial CTAS auditor observed triage nurses in the ED pre- and post-implementation of eCTAS and assigned an independent CTAS score in real time. Research assistants independently recorded triage time. Interrater agreement was estimated with κ statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 1,491 individual triage assessments (752 pre-eCTAS, 739 post-implementation) were audited during 42 7-hour triage shifts (21 pre-eCTAS, 21 post-implementation). Exact modal agreement was achieved for 567 patients (75.4%) pre-eCTAS compared with 685 patients (92.7%) triaged with eCTAS. With the auditor's CTAS score as the reference, eCTAS significantly reduced the number of patients over-triaged (12.0% versus 5.1%; Δ 6.9; 95% CI 4.0 to 9.7) and under-triaged (12.6% versus 2.2%; Δ 10.4; 95% CI 7.9 to 13.2). Interrater agreement was higher with eCTAS (unweighted κ 0.89 versus 0.63; quadratic-weighted κ 0.93 versus 0.79). Median triage time was 312 seconds (n=3,808 patients) pre-eCTAS and 347 seconds (n=3,489 patients) with eCTAS (Δ 35 seconds; 95% CI 29 to 40 seconds). CONCLUSION: A standardized, electronic approach to performing triage assessments improves both interrater agreement and data accuracy without substantially increasing triage time.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Gravidade do Paciente , Triagem/métodos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar , Ontário , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Triagem/normas
13.
J Emerg Med ; 58(2): 269-274, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) guidelines recommend that in the absence of clinical indicators suggestive of serious underlying pathology, physicians should not order radiological imaging for patients presenting with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine how many patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with nontraumatic LBP had spinal imaging before and after the release of the CWC guideline. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective medical record review for patients aged 18-70 years presenting to an academic tertiary care ED with nontraumatic LBP from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015 (pre-guideline) and April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 (post-guideline). RESULTS: One-thousand and sixty (545 pre-guideline, 515 post-guideline) patients were included. Pre-guideline, 45 patients (8.3%) had spinal imaging compared to 39 (7.6%) post-guideline (Δ 0.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.6% to 4.0%). Of the 84 patients (7.9%) who had spinal imaging, 4 (8.9%) had pathologic findings pre-guideline compared to 11 patients (28.2%) post-guideline (Δ 19.3%; 95% CI 2.7% to 35.8%). CONCLUSIONS: CWC guidelines did not appear to alter the rate of imaging for patients presenting to the ED with nontraumatic LBP. Future clinical recommendations should consider active knowledge dissemination and education strategies to help facilitate guideline adoption.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico por imagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
J Asthma ; 56(9): 985-994, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30311821

RESUMO

Objective: Asthma is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. This study examined factors associated with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) use; and management and outcomes before and after ED presentation. Methods: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study; adults treated for acute asthma in Canadian EDs underwent a structured interview before discharge and were followed-up four weeks later. Patients received oral corticosteroids (OCS) at discharge and, at physician discretion, most received ICS or ICS/LABA inhaled agents. Analyses focused on ICS/LABA vs "other" treatment groups at ED presentation. Results: Of 807 enrolled patients, 33% reported receiving ICS/LABA at ED presentation; 62% were female, median age was 31 years. Factors independently associated with ICS/LABA treatment prior to ED presentation were: having an asthma action plan; using an asthma diary/peak flow meter; influenza immunization; not using the ED as usual site for prescriptions; ever using OCS and currently using ICS. Patients were treated similarly in the ED and at discharge; however, relapse was higher in the ICS/LABA group, even after adjustment. Conclusion: One-third of patients presenting to the ED with acute asthma were already receiving ICS/LABA agents; this treatment was independently associated with preventive measures. While ICS/LABA management improves control of chronic asthma, patients using these agents who develop acute asthma reflect higher severity and increased risk of future relapse.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda/terapia , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/efeitos adversos , Asma/diagnóstico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Combinação de Medicamentos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
15.
CMAJ ; 190(48): E1406-E1413, 2018 12 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30510045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Ottawa chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Risk Scale (OCRS), which consists of 10 criteria, was previously derived to identify patients in the emergency department with COPD who were at high risk for short-term serious outcomes. We sought to validate, prospectively and explicitly, the OCRS when applied by physicians in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted this prospective cohort study involving patients in the emergency departments at 6 tertiary care hospitals and enrolled adults with acute exacerbation of COPD from May 2011 to December 2013. Physicians evaluated patients for the OCRS criteria, which were recorded on a data form along with the total risk score. We followed patients for 30 days and the primary outcome, short-term serious outcomes, was defined as any of death, admission to monitored unit, intubation, noninvasive ventilation, myocardial infarction (MI) or relapse with hospital admission. RESULTS: We enrolled 1415 patients with a mean age of 70.6 (SD 10.6) years and 50.2% were female. Short-term serious outcomes occurred in 135 (9.5%) cases. Incidence of short-term serious outcomes ranged from 4.6% for a total score of 0 to 100% for a score of 10. Compared with current practice, an OCRS score threshold of greater than 1 would increase sensitivity for short-term serious outcomes from 51.9% to 79.3% and increase admissions from 45.0% to 56.6%. A threshold of greater than 2 would improve sensitivity to 71.9% with 47.9% of patients being admitted. INTERPRETATION: In this clinical validation of a risk-stratification tool for COPD in the emergency department, we found that OCRS showed better sensitivity for short-term serious outcomes compared with current practice. This risk scale can now be used to help emergency department disposition decisions for patients with COPD, which should lead to a decrease in unnecessary admissions and in unsafe discharges.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Intubação Intratraqueal/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ventilação não Invasiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco
16.
Ann Emerg Med ; 71(3): 326-336.e19, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28967517

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We explore the emergency department (ED) contribution to prescription opioid use for opioid-naive patients by comparing the guideline concordance of ED prescriptions with those attributed to other settings and the risk of patients' continuing long-term opioid use. METHODS: We used analysis of administrative claims data (OptumLabs Data Warehouse 2009 to 2015) of opioid-naive privately insured and Medicare Advantage (aged and disabled) beneficiaries to compare characteristics of opioid prescriptions attributed to the ED with those attributed to other settings. Concordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and rate of progression to long-term opioid use are reported. RESULTS: We identified 5.2 million opioid prescription fills that met inclusion criteria. Opioid prescriptions from the ED were more likely to adhere to CDC guidelines for dose, days' supply, and formulation than those attributed to non-ED settings. Disabled Medicare beneficiaries were the most likely to progress to long-term use, with 13.4% of their fills resulting in long-term use compared with 6.2% of aged Medicare and 1.8% of commercial beneficiaries' fills. Compared with patients in non-ED settings, commercial beneficiaries receiving opioid prescriptions in the ED were 46% less likely, aged Medicare patients 56% less likely, and disabled Medicare patients 58% less likely to progress to long-term opioid use. CONCLUSION: Compared with non-ED settings, opioid prescriptions provided to opioid-naive patients in the ED were more likely to align with CDC recommendations. They were shorter, written for lower daily doses, and less likely to be for long-acting formulations. Prescriptions from the ED are associated with a lower risk of progression to long-term use.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
Ann Emerg Med ; 69(5): 562-571.e2, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28110987

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter are the most common arrhythmias managed in the emergency department (ED). We evaluate the management and 30-day outcomes for recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter patients in Canadian EDs, where cardioversion is commonly practiced. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 6 academic hospital EDs and enrolled patients who had atrial fibrillation and flutter onset within 48 hours. Patients were followed for 30 days by health records review and telephone. Adverse events included death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, subsequent admission, or ED electrocardioversion. RESULTS: We enrolled 1,091 patients with mean age 63.9 years, atrial fibrillation 84.7%, atrial flutter 15.3%, hospital admission 9.0%, and converted to sinus rhythm 80.1%. Although 10.5% of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter patients had adverse events within 30 days, there were no related deaths and 1 stroke (0.1%). Adjusted odds ratios for factors associated with adverse event were hours from onset (1.03/hour; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.05), history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (2.09; 95% CI 1.01 to 4.36), and pulmonary congestion on chest radiograph (7.37; 95% CI 2.40 to 22.64). Patients who left the ED in sinus rhythm were much less likely to experience an adverse event (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although most recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter patients were treated aggressively in the ED, there were few 30-day serious outcomes. Physicians underprescribed oral anticoagulants. Potential risk factors for adverse events include longer duration from arrhythmia onset, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, pulmonary congestion on chest radiograph, and not being in sinus rhythm at discharge. An ED strategy of sinus rhythm restoration and discharge in most patients is effective and safe.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Flutter Atrial/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Flutter Atrial/complicações , Canadá , Cardioversão Elétrica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16(1): 615, 2016 Oct 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of influenza in older adults may be complicated by atypical presentations or when patients present with complications of an underlying illness. We aimed to identify clinical characteristics and epidemiological factors associated with influenza among community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years presenting to emergency departments. METHODS: We identified patients with influenza-compatible chief complaints presenting to emergency departments of six acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada during the 2011/12 and 2012/13 influenza seasons. Clinical characteristics, medical history and demographics were collected by patient interview, chart review and by contacting vaccine providers. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction. We modeled predictors of influenza using multivariable logistic regression models that compared individuals with and without influenza. RESULTS: Of 1318 participants, 151 (11 %) had influenza (98 A/H3N2, 12 A/H1N1, 4 A [not sub-typed], 37 B). In the multivariable model, clinical symptoms associated with influenza were cough (OR 6.4, 95 % CI 3.2, 13.0), feverishness and/or triage temperature ≥37.2 °C (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 2.0, 4.7), 2-5 days from symptom onset to the emergency department visit (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.5, 3.2), and wheezing (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.3, 3.3). The effect of cough on influenza increased with older age. Epidemiological factors associated with increased odds for influenza included weeks when ≥10 % influenza tests from provincial laboratories were positive (OR 5.1, 95 % CI 1.2, 21.7) and exposure to a person with influenza-like illness (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.3, 2.8). Among participants with influenza, only 47 (31 %) met the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for influenza-like illness (temperature ≥37.8 °C and cough and/or sore throat). CONCLUSIONS: As in younger adults, cough and feverishness are the two symptoms most predictive of influenza in the elderly. Current influenza-like illness definitions did not adequately capture influenza in older adults.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tosse/etiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/patogenicidade , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/patogenicidade , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Faringite/etiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
19.
Can Fam Physician ; 62(7): 572-578, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27829074

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine 20- and 40-week fetal outcomes following documentation of fetal cardiac activity (FCA) and intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) in women at less than 20 weeks' gestation presenting to the emergency department (ED) with vaginal bleeding. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary care ED. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women at less than 20 weeks' gestation presenting to the ED with vaginal bleeding. INTERVENTION: All study participants underwent ED point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to document IUP and FCA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of spontaneous abortion or pregnancy loss by 40 weeks' gestational age following ED POCUS documentation of FCA or IUP in women at less than 20 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: A total of 85 of 111 eligible patients were enrolled; FCA and IUP were detected in 43 (50.6%) and 54 (63.5%) participants, respectively. Participants with documented FCA on ED POCUS were less likely to experience pregnancy loss than participants without documented FCA were (5.0% vs 92.7%; Δ = 87.7%; 95% CI 71.0% to 93.7%), and participants with documented IUP were less likely to experience pregnancy loss than participants without documented IUP were (22.0% vs 93.5%; Δ = 71.5%; 95% CI 52.1% to 81.9%). Compared with radiologist-interpreted ultrasound, ED POCUS had sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI 75.9% to 96.2%) and specificity of 100.0% (95% CI 89.6% to 100.0%) for documenting FCA, and sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 99.4%) and specificity of 93.1% (95% CI 77.2% to 99.0%) for documenting IUP. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of women presenting to the ED with bleeding in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, detection of IUP and especially FCA using POCUS performed by providers certified by the Canadian Emergency Ultrasound Society was associated with ongoing viable pregnancy at 20 and 40 weeks' gestational age. These data might be useful for ED physicians counseling women with symptomatic early pregnancies about the chance of miscarriage after an episode of vaginal bleeding.


OBJECTIF: Déterminer les incidences sur le fœtus à 20 et à 40 semaines après la documentation d'une activité cardiaque fœtale (ACF) et d'une grossesse intrautérine (GIU) chez des femmes à moins de 20 semaines de gestation qui se sont présentées à l'urgence avec des saignements vaginaux. CONCEPTION: Étude observationnelle et prospective de cohortes. CONTEXTE: L'urgence d'un centre de soins tertiaires. PARTICIPANTES: Des femmes enceintes à moins de 20 semaines de gestation qui se sont présentées à l'urgence avec des saignements vaginaux. INTERVENTION: Toutes les participantes à l'étude ont subi une échographie au point d'intervention (EGPDI) à l'urgence pour documenter la GIU et l'ACF. PRINCIPAUX PARAMÈTRES À L'ÉTUDE: La prévalence d'avortements spontanés ou d'interruptions de grossesse à 40 semaines d'âge gestationnel après la documentation par EGPDI de l'ACF ou de la GIU chez des femmes à moins de 20 semaines de gestation. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 85 des 111 femmes admissibles ont participé à l'étude; une ACF et la GIU ont été détectées respectivement chez 43 (50,6 %) et 54 (63,5 %) participantes. Les participantes chez qui une ACF a été détectée par EGPDI à l'urgence ont été moins susceptibles de vivre une interruption de grossesse que celles sans ACF documentée (5,0 % c. 92,7 %; Δ = 87,7 %; IC à 95 % de 71,0 à 93,7 %), et les participantes dont la GIU a été documentée ont été moins susceptibles de vivre une interruption de grossesse par rapport à celles dont la GIU n'a pas été documentée (22,0 % c. 93,5 %; Δ = 71,5 %; IC à 95 % de 52,1 à 81,9 %). En comparaison des échographies interprétées par un radiologiste, l'EGPDI à l'urgence avait une sensibilité de 88,9 % (IC à 95 % de 75,9 à 96,2 %) et une spécificité de 100,0 % (IC à 95 % de 89,6 à100,0 %) pour documenter l'ACF et une sensibilité de 96,0 % (IC à 95 % de 86.3 à 99.4 %) et une spécificité de 93,1 % (IC à 95 % de 77,2 à 99,0 %) pour documenter la GIU. CONCLUSION: Dans cette cohorte de femmes qui se sont présentées à l'urgence avec des saignements vaginaux durant les 20 premières semaines de grossesse, la détection de la GIU et surtout de l'ACF à l'aide d'une EGPDI, effectuée par des professionnels certifiés par la Société canadienne d'échographie au département d'urgence, a été associée à une grossesse viable sans interruption à 20 et à 40 semaines d'âge gestationnel. Cette information pourrait être utile aux médecins à l'urgence pour conseiller les femmes en début de grossesse symptomatique au sujet des risques d'avortement spontané après un épisode de saignements vaginaux.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Ultrassonografia , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico por imagem , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Adulto , Canadá , Gonadotropina Coriônica/sangue , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
20.
CMAJ ; 186(6): E193-204, 2014 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24549125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assist physicians with difficult decisions about hospital admission for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presenting in the emergency department, we sought to identify clinical characteristics associated with serious adverse events. METHODS: We conducted this prospective cohort study in 6 large Canadian academic emergency departments. Patients were assessed for standardized clinical variables and then followed for serious adverse events, defined as death, intubation, admission to a monitored unit or new visit to the emergency department requiring admission. RESULTS: We enrolled 945 patients, of whom 354 (37.5%) were admitted to hospital. Of 74 (7.8%) patients with a subsequent serious adverse event, 36 (49%) had not been admitted after the initial emergency visit. Multivariable modelling identified 5 variables that were independently associated with adverse events: prior intubation, initial heart rate ≥ 110/minute, being too ill to do a walk test, hemoglobin < 100 g/L and urea ≥ 12 mmol/L. A preliminary risk scale incorporating these and 5 other clinical variables produced risk categories ranging from 2.2% for a score of 0 to 91.4% for a score of 10. Using a risk score of 2 or higher as a threshold for admission would capture all patients with a predicted risk of adverse events of 7.2% or higher, while only slightly increasing admission rates, from 37.5% to 43.2%. INTERPRETATION: In Canada, many patients with COPD suffer a serious adverse event or death after being discharged home from the emergency department. We identified high-risk characteristics and developed a preliminary risk scale that, once validated, could be used to stratify the likelihood of poor outcomes and to enable rational and safe admission decisions.


Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Canadá , Causas de Morte , Estudos de Coortes , Tomada de Decisões , Tratamento de Emergência/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA