Pathologic and gene expression features of metastatic melanomas to the brain.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of metastatic melanomas to the brain (MBM) is variable with prolonged survival in a subset. It is unclear whether MBM differ from extracranial metastases (EcM) and primary melanomas (PrM). METHODS: To study the biology of MBM, histopathologic analysis of tumor blocks from patients' craniotomy samples and whole-genome expression profiling (WGEP) with confirmatory immunohistochemistry were performed. RESULTS: High mononuclear infiltrate and low intratumoral hemorrhage were associated with prolonged overall survival (OS). Pathway analysis of WGEP data from 29 such craniotomy tumor blocks demonstrated that several immune-related BioCarta gene sets were associated with prolonged OS. WGEP analysis of MBM in comparison with same-patient EcM and PrM showed that MBM and EcM were similar, but both differ significantly from PrM. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that peritumoral CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ cells were associated with prolonged OS. CONCLUSIONS: MBMs are more similar to EcM compared with PrM. Immune infiltrate is a favorable prognostic factor for MBM.

The importance of 10q status in an outcomes-based comparison between 1p/19q fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite loss of heterozygosity analysis of oligodendrogliomas.

1p/19q codeletion is a favorable prognostic marker of oligodendrogliomas. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microsatellite-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) are common methods to test for 1p/19q codeletion, it is unclear which test is better at prognostic stratification. This study analyzed outcomes of 111 oligodendrogliomas with both 1p/19q FISH and LOH done at the time of diagnosis. Overall concordance between the 2 assays was 81.1%. In grade III oligodendrogliomas, LOH was better than FISH at survival stratification (p < 0.0001 for LOH vs p = 0.02 for FISH), although increasing the stringency of FISH interpretation criteria improved concordance and prognostic power. Oligodendrogliomas that were 1p/19q-codeleted by FISH but also had 10q LOH were negative for 1p/19q codeletion by PCR analysis in more than 70% of cases, with very poor survival in the grade III subset. Thus, although PCR-based LOH is a better stratifier of 1p/19q status, FISH still has clinical and prognostic utility, especially if 10q data can be incorporated.

Paradoxical relationship between the degree of EGFR amplification and outcome in glioblastomas.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults and often has amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. The value of EGFR as a prognostic marker in GBMs is unclear; some studies have shown an adverse correlation, whereas others have indicated a neutral or even favorable association with longer survival. Furthermore, EGFR-amplified GBMs are usually regarded as a single subgroup of tumors, although the range of EGFR copy number varies greatly. In this study, 532 GBMs were analyzed for EGFR amplification via fluorescence in situ hybridization at the time of initial diagnosis. Although there was no difference in survival by EGFR amplification (P = 0.33), stratification by the amount of EGFR amplification showed that, surprisingly, median survival was 39% longer in the high-amplifier group (EGFR:chromosome 7 ratio >20) compared to nonamplified GBMs (P = 0.03) and was 43% longer compared to GBMs with low to moderate EGFR amplification (EGFR:chromosome 7 ratio = 2 to 20; P = 0.0007). Stratifying by postsurgical treatment regimens, this difference was seen only when temozolomide (TMZ) was used; tumors without amplification and with high EGFR amplification both responded better to TMZ than those with low to moderate amplification (P = 0.01), whereas GBMs that had not been treated with adjuvant therapy nor with adjuvant therapy lacking TMZ showed no survival differences (P = 0.63 and 0.91, respectively). These results suggest that GBMs with EGFR amplification are a heterogenous group of tumors and that behavior might differ according to the degree of amplification, although not in a straightforward dose-response manner.