Efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy is not impaired by previous bispecific antibody treatment in large B-cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: In this retrospective study, chimeric antigen receptor T cells remained effective in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines.

Obinutuzumab vs rituximab for transplant-eligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: Obinutuzumab (O) and rituximab (R) are 2 CD antibodies that have never been compared in a prospective randomized trial of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Herein, we report the long-term outcome of the LyMa-101 trial, in which newly diagnosed patients with MCL were treated with chemotherapy plus O before transplantation, followed by O maintenance (O group). We then compared these patients with those treated with the same treatment design with R instead of O (R group). A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the 2 populations (O vs R groups) in terms of measurable residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction (EOI), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In LyMa-101, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS after inclusion (n = 85) were 83.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5-89.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 77.6-92.5), respectively. At EOI, patients treated in the O group had more frequent bone marrow MRD negativity than those treated in the R group (83.1% vs 63.4%; χ2, P = .007). PSM resulted in 2 sets of 82 patients with comparable characteristics at inclusion. From treatment initiation, the O group had a longer estimated 5-year PFS (P = .029; 82.8% vs 66.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-3.76) and OS (P = .039; 86.4% vs 71.4%; HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01-4.16) compared with the R group. Causes of death were comparable in the 2 groups, the most common cause being lymphoma. O before transplantation and in maintenance provides better disease control and enhances PFS and OS compared with R in transplant-eligible patients with MCL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00921414 and NCT02896582.

Brexucabtagene autoleucel in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, intention-to-treat use in the DESCAR-T registry.

Not available.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Rituximab Maintenance in Young Patients With Mantle-Cell Lymphoma Included in the LYMA Trial: A LYSA Study.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The LYMA trial demonstrated the benefit of rituximab maintenance (RM) in first-line young patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. In this prolonged follow-up of 7.5 years (95% CI, 7.4 to 7.7) from inclusion, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the full population were not reached (NR) with a 7-year PFS of 55.5% (95% CI, 49.5 to 61) and OS of 69.5% (95% CI, 63.8 to 74.5). The EFS remained statistically superior in favor of RM (median NR v 5.8 years, P < .0001; HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.6] and 7-year estimate, 76.2% versus 46% for RM and observation, respectively). Similarly, RM prolonged PFS (estimated PFS at 7 years, 78.5% v 47.4% and HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.56] for RM and observation, respectively, P < .0001). The 7-year OS estimate was 83.2% versus 72.2%, respectively (P = .088, HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.37 to 1.08]). Cause of death was not significantly distinct between the two groups, with lymphoma being the leading cause with a very low rate of infection-related death. Overall, the PFS benefit of RM after autologous stem cell transplantation remains after 7-year follow-up, and RM was not associated with an increase in infection-related mortality, making this strategy a safe standard of care with long-term follow-up.

The addition of bortezomib to rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma-a randomized, open-label phase III trial of the European mantle cell lymphoma network.

The therapy of relapsed or refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients remains a major clinical challenge to date. We conducted a randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase-III trial hypothesizing superior efficacy of rituximab, high-dose cytarabine and dexamethasone with bortezomib (R-HAD + B) versus without (R-HAD) in r/r MCL ineligible for or relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), secondary endpoints included response rates, progression free survival, overall survival, and safety. In total, 128 of 175 planned patients were randomized to R-HAD + B (n = 64) or R-HAD (n = 64). Median TTF was 12 vs. 2.6 months (p = 0.045, MIPI-adjusted HR 0.69; 95%CI 0.47-1.02). Overall and complete response rates were 63 vs. 45% (p = 0.049) and 42 vs. 19% (p = 0.0062). A significant treatment effect was seen in the subgroup of patients >65 years (aHR 0.48, 0.29-0.79) and without previous ASCT (aHR 0.52, 0.28-0.96). Toxicity was mostly hematological and attributable to the chemotherapeutic backbone. Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia were more common in R-HAD + B without differences in severe infections between both arms. Bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy can be effective in r/r MCL and should be evaluated further as a therapeutic option, especially if therapy with BTK inhibitors is not an option. Trial registration: NCT01449344.

Outcome of large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR-T-cells.

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 CAR T-cell is currently debated. We analyzed large B-cell lymphoma patients in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi-cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line (L3+) and TAFA-LEN before (n=15, 'TL-pre-CAR-T' set) or directly after (n=52, 'TL-post-CAR-T' set) CAR T-cell. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR-T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T' set, the median follow-up duration (mFUD) was 7 months, and the median progression-free survival, overall survival and duration of response since the 1st treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7 and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell (mPFS2: 5.6 vs. 2 months, p=0.0138; mOS2: not reached vs. 3.8 months, p=0.0034). bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs. 24.9% and 11.6% vs. 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 [2-2.6] vs. 2.4 [1.5-4.2] months, p=0.91; mOS2: 3.3 [1.8-6.4] vs. 5.5 [4.4-6.3] months, p=0.06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set (mFUD since CAR T-cell: 2.8 months), the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration prior to CAR-T was 3.7 months and no patients were reported to become CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6-month PFS and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1% and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatments improved outcomes of patients who relapsed after CAR T-cell.

Oral azacitidine compared with standard therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular helper T-cell lymphoma (ORACLE): an open-label randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL) harbour frequent alterations in genes that regulate DNA methylation. Preliminary reports suggest that treatment with 5-azacitidine has clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. We aimed to compare the oral form of azacitidine with investigator's choice standard therapy (ICT; ie, gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin) in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with relapsed or refractory TFHL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or nodal T-cell lymphoma with phenotype, ie, positive with two or more markers among CD10, BCL6, CXCL13, PD1, or ICOS) based on the 2017 WHO classification of haematological neoplasms, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-3, were recruited in university hospitals from five European countries and from Japan. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with either azacitidine given at a dose of 300 mg once a day (200 mg in Japanese patients) for 14 days in a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin according to the investigator's choice. Random assignment was stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and by the presence of previous or concomitant myeloid malignancy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, presented in the intention-to-treat population. This Article is the final analysis of this trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Europe NCT03593018 and Japan NCT03703375). FINDINGS: 86 patients (median age 69 years [IQR 62-76], 50 patients were male, 36 were female) were enrolled between Nov 9, 2018, to Feb 22, 2021; 42 in the azacitidine group and 44 in the ICT group. With a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 20·2-32·9), the median progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 2·7 -8·1) in the azacitidine group versus 2·8 months (1·9-4·8) in the ICT group (hazard ratio of 0·63 (95% CI 0·38-1·07); 1-sided p=0·042). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 32 (76%) of 42 patients in the azacitidine group versus 42 (98%) of 43 patients in the ICT group. The most adverse grade 3 or worse adverse events were haematological (28 [67%] of 42 patients vs 40 [93%] of 43 patients), infection (8 [19%] and 14 [33%]), and gastrointestinal (5 [12%] vs 1 [2%] for azacitidine and ICT, respectively). There were two treatment-related deaths in the azacitidine group (one endocarditis and one candidiasis) and three in the ICT group (one heart failure, one COVID-19, and one cause unknown). INTERPRETATION: Although the pre-specified primary outcome of the trial was not met, the favourable safety profile suggests that azacitidine could add to the treatment options in these difficult to treat diseases especially in combination with other drugs. Trials with combination are in preparation in a platform trial. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Health-related quality of life profile of newly diagnosed patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A real-world study including 3922 patients from the French REALYSA cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Considering the notable advances made in the treatment of lymphoma, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of lymphoma patients has become a critical aspect to consider both in clinical research and routine practice. However, there is paucity of information about lymphoma specific HRQoL profile at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL at diagnosis was assessed for 3922 adult patients with newly diagnosed high-grade (HG) (n = 1994), low-grade (LG) (n = 1053) non-Hodgkin (NHL) and Hodgkin (HL) (n = 875) lymphomas included in REal world dAta in LYmphoma and Survival in Adults (REALYSA, NCT03869619), a prospective non-interventional multicentric cohort in France. Disease-specific HRQoL aspects were assessed with three validated EORTC questionnaires, namely, the QLQ-NHL-HG29, the QLQ-NHL-LG20 and the QLQ-HL27, for patients with NHL-HG, NHL-LG and HL, respectively. RESULTS: We confirmed the high-level of completion of these questionnaires in REALYSA cohort, ranging from 84 % for QLQ-HG29 to 88 % for QLQ-HL27. The proportion of patients with impaired global health status was as follows: T-cell NHL, 67 %; diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), 62 %; Burkitt, 61 %; HL, 53 %; marginal zone, 49 %; mantle cell, 48 %; follicular, 47 %. Multivariable regression analyses for DLBCL, follicular and HL showed that gender, performance status and B symptoms were independently associated with all HRQoL dimensions. However, a variable effect of age and stage were observed among these three subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis was made describing the HRQoL profile of newly diagnosed patients with different types of lymphomas. Our data may help to enhance the interpretation of HRQoL results in future studies using the recently validated EORTC lymphoma specific questionnaires.

CHRONOS-4: Phase 3 study of copanlisib plus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy in relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma.

Copanlisib, a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with predominant activity against the α and δ isoforms, previously demonstrated durable responses as monotherapy and improved progression-free survival (PFS) in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). CHRONOS-4 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of copanlisib in combination with standard immunochemotherapy in patients with relapsed iNHL. Patients (n=524) were randomized (1:1) to copanlisib (60 mg IV) plus immunochemotherapy (rituximab and bendamustine [R-B] or placebo plus R-B). Copanlisib/placebo were administered with R-B (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) for ≤6 cycles and as monotherapy from cycle 7 up to 12 months. The primary study endpoint was PFS. Median exposure was 8.5 months (0.2-12.9) for copanlisib plus R-B and 11.4 months (0.1-12.6) for placebo plus R-B. Median PFS was 32.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-38.6) for copanlisib plus R-B and 33.3 months (95% CI, 27.8-42.8) for placebo plus R-B (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.88-1.44]; P=0.83). No differences between treatment arms were observed in overall survival (data not yet mature), objective response rate, and duration of response for the overall population or individual histology types. Overall, copanlisib plus R-B was associated with higher rates of serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), grade 4 and 5 TEAEs, and treatment discontinuation. A number of serious TEAEs were infections. Overall, copanlisib plus R-B did not provide clinical benefit versus placebo plus R-B and was associated with worse tolerability in patients with relapsed iNHL. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02626455.