Multicenter quality control of hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor resistance genotyping.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) protease inhibitor resistance-associated substitutions are selected during triple-therapy breakthrough. This multicenter quality control study evaluated the expertise of 23 French laboratories in HCV protease inhibitor resistance genotyping. A panel of 12 well-defined blinded samples comprising two wild-type HCV strains, nine transcripts from synthetic NS3 mutant samples or from clinical strains, and one HCV RNA-negative sample was provided to the participating laboratories. The results showed that any laboratory with expertise in sequencing techniques should be able to provide reliable HCV protease inhibitor resistance genotyping. Only a 0.7% error rate was reported for the amino acid sites studied. The accuracy of substitution identification ranged from 75% to 100%, depending on the laboratory. Incorrect results were mainly related to the methodology used. The results could be improved by changing the primers and modifying the process in order to avoid cross-contamination. This study underlines the value of quality control programs for viral resistance genotyping, which is required prior to launching observational collaborative multicenter studies on HCV resistance to direct-acting antiviral agents.

Interpretation of real-time PCR results for hepatitis C virus RNA when viral load is below quantification limits.

Hepatitis C virus RNA quantification results obtained in 18 laboratories using real-time PCR methods with 10 negative samples and 22 sample dilutions (viral loads of 0.5 to 500 IU/ml) showed a score of correct results of up to 93.5%. However, 55.6% of the laboratories did not follow the recommendations for the interpretation of their results, leading to ambiguous conclusions.

National survey of hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymorphism in asymptomatic HBV blood donors from 1999 to 2007 in France.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) diversity is characterized by eight genotypes correlated to eight hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtypes, which differ in their geographical distribution. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To establish virologic characteristics and the evolution of HBV diversity, we carried out a study over a 9-year period in HBV-infected French blood donors. HBsAg subtyping based on specific antibody method concerned 2901 donors, from whom 940 have been analyzed by an S-gene sequencing to determine genotypes and S-gene mutations. RESULTS: HBsAg subtypes were distributed as follows: ayw2, 34.4%; adw2, 25.7%; ayw1, 10.2%; ayw4, 14.9%; adr, 7.8%; ayw3, 6.4%; and adw4, 0.7%. Ayw4 (Genotype E) proportion increased over time in correlation with an increased proportion of subjects originated from sub-Saharan Africa. The genotype observed with the highest proportion was D (43.0%), then A (26.2%), E (17.5%), B (6.5%), C (6.4%), and F (0.4%). Genotype B had the highest proportion of hepatitis B e antigen (39.2%) and the highest viral loads (VLs). Forty-three (5.5%) isolates presented one (n=35) or multiple (n=8) amino acid envelope substitutions. Donors infected with mutated isolates had lowest VLs. rtA181T/sW172 stop mutation associated with resistance to nucleos(t)ide analogs was detected in two donors suggesting a transmission of these isolates. CONCLUSION: This extensive study shows that HBV genotype evolution is closely linked to the geographical origin of subjects and that the occurrence of viral envelope mutants is not an exceptional event in healthy HBV chronic carriers. Blood donors rarely recruited in HBV studies provide further relevant information on the characteristics of HBV diversity.

Molecular characterization of genotype 2 and 4 hepatitis C virus isolates in French blood donors.

The subtype distribution of 142 genotype 2 and 97 genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates from the sera of 1,319 volunteer blood donors in France was determined by gene sequencing and by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region and E1 envelope. Findings underlined a wide range of subtypes in both genotypes, that is, 20 in HCV-2 and 11 in HCV-4. Eighteen of these 31 subtypes had not been defined previously. Some subtypes, that is, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2i, 2k, 4a, and 4d, showed numerous strains while subtypes in donors from West Africa or Central Africa showed an endemic profile with only a few strains. A Bayesian coalescence approach was used to estimate the demographic history of each HCV subtype. The estimated mean dates of the most recent common ancestors (MRCA) were 1,889 (confidence interval (CI), 1,842-1,930) for HCV-2a, 1,886 (CI, 1,843-1,921) for HCV-2b, 1,791 (CI, 1,699-1,848) for HCV-2c, 1,846 (CI, 1,803-1,878) for HCV-2i, 1,911 (CI, 1,879-1,937) for HCV-4a, and 1,957 (CI, 1,943-1,967) for HCV-4d. The period of spread for subtype 2b, 2c, and 2i was between 1900 and 1960 whereas rapid exponential spread for subtype 2a, 4a, and 4d occurred in the 1960s. The inferred histories of population growth indicated that transmission rates differed according to HCV subtype. These results may help to predict the future burden of HCV in France.

Improvement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination with the new version of the INNO-LiPA HCV assay.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5'UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5'UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5'UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary.

Multicenter trials need to use the same assay for hepatitis C virus viral load determination.

This study, involving 20 laboratories and using currently available assays for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification, demonstrated that differences in viral load values are due not to interlaboratory variations but rather to the nature of the assay itself. This underlines the importance of using the same assay in multicenter studies or when monitoring antiviral therapy.

Sensitivity of hepatitis B virus DNA transcription-mediated amplification testing in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive blood donations.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate the performance of nucleic acid testing (NAT) in the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 253 HBsAg- and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-positive samples (50 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 203 anti-HBe-positive) from blood donations collected in France were studied. The samples were investigated with a blood screening assay (Procleix Ultrio, Chiron/Gen-Probe) in minipool (MP; x8) and in individual-donation (ID) testing. All nonreactive samples were retested once, and nonreactive MP samples were assayed for viral load (VL). RESULTS: All 50 HBeAg-positive samples were reactive in MP-NAT and ID-NAT. Of the 203 anti-HBe-positive donations, 80.3 percent were MP- and ID-reactive, 17.2 percent were MP-nonreactive and ID-reactive, and 2.5 percent were nonreactive in ID-NAT. Overall the sensitivity of ID-NAT was 98 percent versus 84 percent for MP-NAT. After retesting, 16 of the 35 MP-nonreactive and/or ID-reactive donations became MP-reactive and 2 of the ID-nonreactive donations became NAT-reactive. The capacity of Procleix Ultrio to detect HBV DNA was not related to HBsAg subtype, but correlated with the VL: the mean VL in the group of MP-nonreactive samples was 1,420 copies per mL vs. 17,000 copies per mL in the group of 40 MP-reactive samples. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that HBV-NAT in ID format is far more effective in detecting viremia in chronic HBsAg carriers than in MP-NAT. The sensitivity of the NAT assay needs to be improved to be considered for replacing the current HBsAg assays, especially when anti-HBc testing is not performed.

Analysis of the 5' noncoding region versus the NS5b region in genotyping hepatitis C virus isolates from blood donors in France.

The 5' noncoding region (5' NCR) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become the standard for genotyping even though several reports show that its use can result in classification errors. The purpose of this study was to perform genotyping based on sequence analysis of the NS5b region in a set of 357 HCV strains isolated from blood donors in France in 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with those previously obtained using 5' NCR analysis, and HCV subtype distribution was reevaluated. Twenty-six of 120 strains (approximately 22%) initially identified as genotype 1b by 5' NCR region sequence analysis were reclassified as genotype 1a by NS5b region sequence analysis. Similarly, 14 of 23 strains (approximately 61%) initially identified as 2a/2c were reclassified as non-2a and non-2c subtypes, and 12 of 22 strains (approximately 45%) initially identified as 4c/4d subtypes were reclassified as non-4c and non-4d subtypes. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region also revealed 5 putative new subtype 2 variants and 2 putative new subtype 4 variants. Although these findings demonstrated full agreement between 5' NCR and NS5b sequence analysis with regard to type classification, genotyping based on phylogenetic analysis of the NS5b region is more accurate for subtype determination than genotyping based on analysis of the 5' NCR. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region is mandatory for epidemiologic studies.

Unique NS5b hepatitis C virus gene sequence consensus database is essential for standardization of genotype determinations in multicenter epidemiological studies.

A multicenter study of NS5b hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination involving 12 laboratories demonstrates that any laboratory with expertise in sequencing techniques would be able to provide a reliable HCV genotype for clinical and epidemiological purposes as long as they are provided a consensus reference sequence database.

Expertise of laboratories in viral load quantification, genotyping, and precore mutant determination for hepatitis B virus in a multicenter study.

A national evaluation study was performed in 14 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to provide (i) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral loads (VL), (ii) HBV genotypes, and(iii) identification of precore/core mutants. The panel consisted of 12 HBV DNA-positive samples with VLs from 2.8 to 9.1 log(10) copies/ml, different HBV genotypes (A to F), and 3 mutant and 9 wild-type samples at nucleotide 1896. The coefficients of variation of the mean VLs ranged from 2.4% to 10.4% with the Cobas HBV Monitor assay, from 1.8% to 5.5% with the Cobas TaqMan 48, from 1.5 to 26.2% with RealArt HBV PCR, and from 0 to 7% with branched DNA (bDNA). The Cobas Monitor assay underestimated the VLs of genotype F samples, with differences ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 log(10) copies/ml. The accuracies of genotype determinations ranged from 33% to 100%, and those of precore mutant determinations ranged from 25 to 100%. This study showed some drawbacks of two widely used assays: (i) Cobas Monitor has a narrow dynamic range and underestimates genotype F sample VLs and (ii) bDNA shows poor sensitivity and may fail to identify patients with low VLs. With higher performance in terms of analytical sensitivity combined with a larger dynamic range and an ability to quantify the main genotypes equally, real-time PCR methods appear more appropriate for accurate monitoring of HBV DNA quantification. Furthermore, the clinical implications of HBV genotyping and the determination of precore/core mutants need to be clearly stated to justify the standardization of these methods.

Is an assay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibody a valuable alternative to nucleic acid testing?

BACKGROUND: A new enzyme immunoassay based on the simultaneous detection of nucleocapsid proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HCV (Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody Ultra, Bio-Rad) was evaluated as an alternative to nucleic acid testing (NAT) for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period in blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included 107 sequential samples from 10 HCV seroconversion commercial panels; 81 samples were in the preseroconversion phase, and 26 were collected after seroconversion. All samples were tested with HCV antigen-antibody assay and the two minipool (MP) NAT procedures that are routinely used in France (transcription-mediated amplification in pools of 8 and COBAS AmpliScreen HCV test [Roche Diagnostic] in pools of 24 donations). RESULTS: From the 44 samples collected during window period that were MP-NAT-positive, 31 (70.5%) were also positive with the Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay. The mean delay in detecting HCV infection between these two methods was 5.1 days (range, 0-24 days). The Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay led to a reduction in the window period of 26.8 days (range, 0-72 days). All samples collected after seroconversion were detected with the HCV antigen-antibody assay. The specificity analyzed in 2503 consecutive blood donations was estimated at 99.88 percent. CONCLUSION: This new developed assay presents an improvement for the detection of HCV infection, especially in the early phase of infection when antibodies are undetectable. Although less sensitive than NAT, this assay could be a suitable solution for blood screening in developing countries where NAT (or HCV core antigen-specific assay) is not affordable or its implementation is not feasible.

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies improves the early detection of HCV infection.

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.

Complete or partial seroreversion in immunocompetent individuals after self-limited HCV infection: consequences for transfusion.

BACKGROUND: The disappearance of anti-HCV antibodies over time, after a self-limited infection, also referenced seroreversion, has been observed. The frequency of this phenomenon remains controversial, especially in immunocompetent subjects. However, it has important implications in the context of transfusion inquiries, in particular in case of a blood donor suspected to have transmitted HCV through a past blood donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our findings are presented of a longitudinal study, including 16 patients from a cohort of 78 immunocompetent, multitransfused individuals who were positive for anti-HCV (EIA and confirmatory assay [RIBA]) and followed over a long period of time without having received any antiviral therapy. The aim was to establish whether a past and self-resolved HCV infection could evolve toward a negative serology. RESULTS: The 16 patients were classified in three groups: 1) 12 patients who remained anti-HCV positive with no evolution in their RIBA pattern after a mean follow-up of 7.6 years; 2) one patient who presented a complete seroreversion 6 years after enrollment; and 3) three patients with a partial seroreversion over a mean follow-up of 16 years. CONCLUSION: HCV infection is not always characterized by a persistent antibody response, even in immunocompetent individuals. This should be taken into consideration when transfusion inquiries are conducted.

HIV antibody screening remains indispensable for ensuring viral safety of blood components despite NAT implementation.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of the implementation of NAT for the screening of blood-borne viruses was to compensate for the failure of serologic assays during the window period. Because this new screening procedure theoretically covers the entire period of infectivity, the necessity for maintaining serologic assays in blood screening strategy could become questionable. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To investigate this issue, a panel of 35 samples has been studied by NAT. These samples had been collected from HIV-1 antibody-positive individuals presenting a persistently low viral RNA load (<400 copies/mL) in the absence of antiviral therapy. All samples were analyzed with the minipool (x8) NAT routinely used in blood bank setting (HIV-1 and HCV assay based on transcription-mediated amplification) and with single-donation testing. RESULTS: The minipool NAT failed to detect the presence of HIV RNA in 15 of the 35 samples (11 remained negative when retested). Single-donation testing gave negative results in 4 samples (3 remained negative when retested). Fourteen of the 18 samples with a viral load greater than 50 copies per mL were positive by minipool NAT versus 6 of the 17 samples with fewer than 50 copies per mL (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The results clearly demonstrate that anti-HIV screening should not be withdrawn from biologic qualification procedures of blood donations, even when single NAT is performed.

A new HCV core antigen assay based on disassociation of immune complexes: an alternative to molecular biology in the diagnosis of early HCV infection.

BACKGROUND: An EIA based on immune complex disassociation of nucleocapsid proteins of HCV has been developed to detect and quantify HCV core antigen. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To evaluate whether this new assay (trak-C, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics) could be an alternative to NAT during the window period, its sensitivity in this context was assessed, and its performance was compared with that of a first-generation HCV core antigen assay dedicated to the blood screening (HCV core antigen ELISA). Studied populations included nine HCV RNA-positive, HCV antibody-negative blood donors and 23 hemodialysis patients who underwent an HCV seroconversion. From these individuals, 81 samples (23 HCV RNA-negative and 58 HCV RNA-positive) sequentially collected during the phase before seroconversion were tested. RESULTS: The nine blood donor samples were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by the trak-C, and 6 of 8 tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by blood screening ELISA. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 23 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative with the two HCV core antigen assays. Among the 58 HCV RNA-positive samples, 46 of 57 (80.7%) tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the blood screening assay, and 57 of 58 (98.2%) were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the trak-C. The mean delays in detecting HCV infection between trak-C and the appearance of HCV antibodies, between HCV RNA testing and trak-C, and between trak-C and HCV core antigen ELISA were 58.2, 0.24, and 3.33 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Trak-C was more sensitive than the blood screening assay and had similar performance to HCV RNA assay in the window period. Trak-C could constitute an alternative to NAT for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period, especially when molecular biology procedures cannot be implemented.