RNA editing blood biomarkers for predicting mood alterations in HCV patients.

Treatment-emergent depression is a common complication in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection undergoing antiviral combination therapy with IFN-α and ribavirin. It has recently been shown that changes in A-to-I RNA editing rates are associated with various pathologies such as inflammatory disorders, depression and suicide. Interestingly, IFN-α induces gene expression of the RNA editing enzyme ADAR1-1 (ADAR1a-p150) and alters overall RNA editing activity. In this study, we took advantage of the high prevalence of pharmacologically induced depression in patients treated with IFN-α and ribavirin to test the interest of RNA editing-related biomarkers in white blood cells of patients. In this 16-week longitudinal study, a small cohort of patients was clinically evaluated using standard assessment methods prior to and during antiviral therapy and blood samples were collected to analyse RNA editing modifications. A-I RNA editing activity on the phosphodiesterase 8A (PDE8A) gene, a previously identified RNA editing hotspot in the context of lupus erythematosus, was quantified by using an ultra-deep next-generation sequencing approach. We also monitored gene expression levels of the ADAR enzymes and the PDE8A gene during treatment by qPCR. As expected, psychiatric evaluation could track treatment-emergent depression, which occurred in 30% of HCV patients. We show that PDE8A RNA editing is increased in all patients following interferon treatment, but differently in 30% of patients. This effect was mimicked in a cellular model using SHSY-5Y neuroblastoma cells. By combining the data of A-I RNA editing and gene expression, we generated an algorithm that allowed discrimination between the group of patients who developed a treatment-emergent depression and those who did not. The current model of drug-induced depression identified A-I RNA editing biomarkers as useful tools for the identification of individuals at risk of developing depression in an objective, quantifiable biological blood test.

Efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in NS3/4A protease inhibitor-experienced individuals with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and HIV coinfection with and without cirrhosis (ANRS HC31 SOFTRIH study).

OBJECTIVES: Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have mainly included treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, open-label, double-arm, nonrandomized study in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 with and without cirrhosis, who had good viral suppression on their antiretroviral regimens. All patients were pretreated with a first-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitor (PI) plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Patients received a fixed-dose combination of LDV/SOF for 12 weeks, or for 24 weeks if cirrhosis was present. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 68 patients enrolled, 39.7% had cirrhosis. Sixty-five patients [95.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 87.6-99.1%; P < 0.0001] achieved an SVR, with similar rates of SVR in those with and without cirrhosis. Tolerance was satisfactory, with mainly grade 1 or 2 adverse events. Among patient-reported outcomes, only fatigue significantly decreased at the end of treatment compared with baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.04]. Mean tenofovir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) at week 4 was high, with mean ± SD AUC variation between baseline and week 4 higher in cirrhotic than in noncirrhotic patients (3261.57 ± 1920.47 ng/mL vs. 1576.15 ± 911.97 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.03). Mild proteinuria (54.4%), hypophosphataemia (50.0%), blood bicarbonate decrease (29.4%) and hypokalaemia (13.2%) were reported. The serum creatinine level was not modified. CONCLUSIONS: LDV/SOF provided a high SVR rate in PI-experienced subjects coinfected with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1, including patients with cirrhosis.

Open-label study of faldaprevir plus peginterferon and ribavirin in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients who failed placebo plus peginterferon and ribavirin.

Faldaprevir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, was evaluated in HCV genotype 1-infected patients who failed peginterferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) treatment during one of three prior faldaprevir trials. Patients who received placebo plus PegIFN/RBV and had virological failure during a prior trial were enrolled and treated in two cohorts: prior relapsers (n = 43) and prior nonresponders (null responders, partial responders and patients with breakthrough; n = 75). Both cohorts received faldaprevir 240 mg once daily plus PegIFN/RBV for 24 weeks. Prior relapsers with early treatment success (ETS; HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at week 4 and <25 IU/mL undetectable at week 8) stopped treatment at week 24. Others received PegIFN/RBV through week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL undetectable) 12 weeks post treatment (SVR12). More prior nonresponders than prior relapsers had baseline HCV RNA ≥ 800,000 IU/mL (80% vs 58%) and a non-CC IL28B genotype (91% vs 70%). Rates of SVR12 (95% CI) were 95.3% (89.1, 100.0) among prior relapsers and 54.7% (43.4, 65.9) among prior nonresponders; corresponding ETS rates were 97.7% and 65.3%. Adverse events led to faldaprevir discontinuations in 3% of patients. The most common Division of AIDS Grade ≥ 2 adverse events were anaemia (13%), nausea (10%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (9%). In conclusion, faldaprevir plus PegIFN/RBV achieved clinically meaningful SVR12 rates in patients who failed PegIFN/RBV in a prior trial, with response rates higher among prior relapsers than among prior nonresponders. The adverse event profile was consistent with the known safety profile of faldaprevir.

Impact of common risk factors of fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: The natural course of chronic hepatitis C varies widely. To improve the profiling of patients at risk of developing advanced liver disease, we assessed the relative contribution of factors for liver fibrosis progression in hepatitis C. DESIGN: We analysed 1461 patients with chronic hepatitis C with an estimated date of infection and at least one liver biopsy. Risk factors for accelerated fibrosis progression rate (FPR), defined as ≥ 0.13 Metavir fibrosis units per year, were identified by logistic regression. Examined factors included age at infection, sex, route of infection, HCV genotype, body mass index (BMI), significant alcohol drinking (≥ 20 g/day for ≥ 5 years), HIV coinfection and diabetes. In a subgroup of 575 patients, we assessed the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with fibrosis progression in genome-wide association studies. Results were expressed as attributable fraction (AF) of risk for accelerated FPR. RESULTS: Age at infection (AF 28.7%), sex (AF 8.2%), route of infection (AF 16.5%) and HCV genotype (AF 7.9%) contributed to accelerated FPR in the Swiss Hepatitis C Cohort Study, whereas significant alcohol drinking, anti-HIV, diabetes and BMI did not. In genotyped patients, variants at rs9380516 (TULP1), rs738409 (PNPLA3), rs4374383 (MERTK) (AF 19.2%) and rs910049 (major histocompatibility complex region) significantly added to the risk of accelerated FPR. Results were replicated in three additional independent cohorts, and a meta-analysis confirmed the role of age at infection, sex, route of infection, HCV genotype, rs738409, rs4374383 and rs910049 in accelerating FPR. CONCLUSIONS: Most factors accelerating liver fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C are unmodifiable.

Hepatitis C therapy in non-genotype 1 patients: the near future.

Worldwide, 50-70 million subjects are infected with an hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. In these patients, the combination of PEG-INF-α and ribavirin remains the currently approved standard-of-care treatment. The identification of different potential therapeutic targets in the HCV life cycle has led to the development of both direct antiviral agents (DAAs) and reagents targeting host functions essential for viral replication. DAAs comprise so far first-generation, second-wave and second-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PIs), nucleos(t)ide (NIs) and non-nucleoside inhibitors of the NS5B RNA polymerase and NS5A complex inhibitors. The main host-protein-directed antiviral agents are cyclophilin inhibitors and silibinin. Whereas the launch of first-generation PIs was a major landmark in the management of genotype 1 (GT-1)-infected patients, these drugs are inactive in most non-GT-1-infected patients. Several of these and other drugs have now reached phase II and even phase III clinical stage development. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the clinical results recently reported for the treatment for non-GT-1 HCV infection with a focus on the most promising new compounds and combinations.

[Analogs combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B: when and how?]. / Bithérapie par analogues dans le traitement de l'hépatite chronique B: de novo ou en cas d'échec.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomic variability is responsible for the complexity of the viral quasi-species and its evolution during the course of infection. The persistence of infected cells promotes the selection of drug-resistant strains. The development of nucleoside analogs without cross-resistance has provided a rationale for combination therapy. De novo combination, with low genetic barrier drugs, prevents the emergence of resistance in the short-term for drugs with a low genetic barrier and improves the control of infection. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether de novo combination is beneficial for analogs with a high genetic barrier as well. The add-on strategy is a standard in case of emergence of resistant mutants. This strategy needs to be implemented as early as possible before the virological breakthrough, especially if the viral suppression is sub-optimal. Clinical trials are mandatory in order to assess whether a) de novo combination is better than an early add-on strategy; and b) whether in case of sub-optimal viral suppression, an early add-on strategy is better in the long-term than a switch to a more potent drug with a high genetic barrier.

ActiTest accuracy for the assessment of histological activity grades in patients with chronic hepatitis C, an overview using Obuchowski measure.

BACKGROUND: ActiTest (AT) is a biomarker of liver necro-inflammatory histological activity validated in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). AIM: The aim was to assess the accuracy of AT in comparison with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) the standard of care. METHODS: Methods used an integrated database of individual data and the new recommended Obuchowski measures. An updated "classical" meta-analysis of AT validation studies was also performed. The main end points were the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) for the diagnosis of each histological activity grade defined using METAVIR scoring system. To avoid repeated tests and the spectrum effect of activity grades prevalence, the comparison of AT and ALT accuracies used the Obuchowski method. RESULTS: For the individual analysis, a total of 1250 patients were included and for the meta-analysis six studies (2017 patients) were included. The overall accuracy of AT for the diagnosis of any activity grade (Obuchowski measure=0.850) was significantly higher than the accuracy of ALT (Obuchowski measure=0.837; P=0.009). The updated standard meta-analysis confirmed the accuracy of AT (p<0.0001) both in independent AUROC=0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) and in non independent studies AUROC=0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AT for grading the necro-inflammatory activity of patients with HCV was significantly higher than ALT serum activity alone, the standard biomarker.

Analogs and fibrosis regression in hepatitis B.

Nucleoside or nucleotide analogs (NUCs) are a major step forward in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Apart from their proven antiviral efficacy, these drugs have proved able to significantly improve liver fibrosis as short-term treatment. Using different definitions of fibrosis regression, after 1 year of treatment, improvement in liver fibrosis was observed among HBe antigen (HBeAg)-positive naive patients: 35-61% with lamivudine; 41% with adefovir; 68% with telbivudine; 39% with entecavir; and 74% with tenofovir. Among HBeAg-negative patients, after 1 year of treatment, improvement in liver fibrosis was seen in: 36-46% with lamivudine; 48% with adefovir; 56% with telbivudine; 36% with entecavir; and 71% with tenofovir. Long-term treatment is often required with NUCs; the response continue to improve over time, reaching up to 63% of patients with lamivudine and 71% of patients with adefovir, although the development of antiviral drug resistance can blunt any histological improvement. Also, there is now growing evidence that non-invasive methods of fibrosis diagnosis, such as surrogate markers, are likely to become as important as liver biopsy for taking the initial decision to biopsy and for treatment, and in the follow-up of treated chronic HBV patients.

[New perspective in chronic hepatitis B therapy]. / Traitement de l'hépatite chronique B : nouvelles perspectives.

New antiviral drugs, therapeutic vaccines and immunotherapies are interesting therapeutic option for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and clevudine are very effective in suppressing viral load with lack of resistance at short term. However antiviral drug rarely eliminate the virus. Immunotherapies by inducing HBV - specific T-cell responses may contribute to virus control. Adoptive T-cell therapy is an interesting approach to eliminate persistently infected cells. Therapeutic vaccines with either protein-based or DNA vaccines induce an HBV - specific T-cell responses leading to a more often transient decrease of viral load. Combination of antiviral drug and therapeutic vaccines may be an interesting therapeutic option. However additional larger scale and more systematic studies of the understanding of HBV specific T-cell response have to be performed in order to select which patient can benefit of such therapies.

Combining non-invasive methods for assessment of liver fibrosis.

Non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis, including biochemical scores using simple biochemical parameters and transient elastography (TE), have been developed over the past decade to either replace or reduce the need for liver biopsy (LB) in the assessment of liver fibrosis. Although their diagnostic accuracy in liver fibrosis is promising, around 20% of patients are likely to be misclassified if these tests or LB are used alone. However, using a combination of several biochemical scores (Fibropaca algorithm, Leroy algorithm) or one biochemical score with TE (Bordeaux algorithm) will increase diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis and reduce the need for LB. Stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive scores (SAFE biopsy) also improve the diagnostic performance in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) compared with the use of a single non-invasive score. Other sequential stepwise algorithms have been developed in CHC with similar performance results. Comparisons of different combinations of non-invasive methods indicate that the SAFE biopsy, Fibropaca algorithm and Bordeaux algorithm are excellent and comparable in the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in HCV patients, and will markedly reduce the need for LB. They may also be useful in clinical practice and particularly for large-scale screening of HCV patients.

A French prospective observational study of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in drug abusers.

The objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study was to evaluate healthcare for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected drug abusers in France and to determine predictors of successful therapeutic intervention. A total of 170 drug users were recruited from 40 French centers. Three centers recruited 66 participants (38.8%), and one to eight patients each were enrolled from 37 other centers (n=104). A sustained viral response (SVR) was seen in 65 (38.2%) patients. SVR rates were significantly higher in compliant than in non-compliant patients (43.5% versus 23.9%; P=0.019), in patients from high- rather than low-recruiting centers (54.5% versus 27.9%; P<0.001) and in patients receiving Buprenorphine rather than methadone (48.1% versus 21.8%; P=0.001). In patients, who completed both the treatment and follow-up (n=94), SVR rate was 57.4%. Buprenorphine substitution therapy and genotypes 2 or 3 HCV infection were associated with significantly higher rates of SVR (P<0.01, for both comparisons). In conclusion, successful care of hepatitis requires an active treatment policy of every center toward drug addicts. Additional studies are needed to explore the difference in SVR with methadone versus Buprenorphine therapy.

Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.

BACKGROUND: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is widely used as an estimate of the diagnostic value for fibrosis markers. Biopsy length and fragmentation are known as risk factors of false positive or false negative of biopsy but their quantitative impact on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve variability has not been assessed. AIM: To assess these relationships to better compare the fibrosis markers. METHODS: The area under the ROC curves of FibroTest for the diagnosis of fibrosis was estimated in patients with chronic hepatitis C using an integrated database including 1312 patients with FibroTest and biopsy. To take into account the biopsy length, we used two adjustment factors: one in which an observed area under the ROC curve could be adjusted according to the relative area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a biopsy of a given length vs. the entire liver and one taking into account the prevalence of each fibrosis stage defining advanced and non-advanced fibrosis. RESULTS: The mean biopsy length was smaller for cirrhosis (F4, 16 mm) vs. F3, (18 mm, P=0.01) and F0 (19 mm, P=0.01). The mean number of fragments was higher for cirrhosis (F4=4.1 fragments) vs. all the other stages (F0=1.9, F1=1.9, F2=1.9, F3=2.3; P<0.001 vs. F4). The FibroTest area under the ROC curves for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, adjusted for stages' prevalence, ranged from 0.80 to 0.98 depending on biopsy length and fragmentation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The comparison of the area under the ROC curves of fibrosis markers should take into account the biopsy length and fragmentation.

[Auto-immune hepatitis and antiphospholipids]. / Etude de l'association hépatite auto-immune et antiphospholipides.

INTRODUCTION: Only few series have reported the association of autoimmune hepatitis with antiphospholipid antibodies. The aim of our study is to investigate the frequency of these antibodies in a series of autoimmune hepatitis and to search for a correlation with clinical, biological or histological characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Antiphospholipid were investigated in 24 patients with well defined autoimmune hepatitis. Characteristics were compared between antiphopholipids positive and negative patients. Characteristics of our patients were also compared toward cases collected in a literature review. RESULTS: The frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies is of 70.8% in our series. Four patients had a well defined antiphospholid syndrome. Seven patients had a systemic lupus erythematosus in the antiphospholipid group whereas none in the antiphospholipid negative group. The frequency of the different antiphopholipid antibodies was: IgG ACL (52.9%), IgM APE (52.9%), ACC (43.7%), IgG Abeta2GP1 (41.2%). We found no correlation between hypergammaglobulinemia and the presence or the isotype of antiphospholipid antibodies. Clinical presentation and outcome as biological and histological parameters were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our study report a high frequency of antiphospholipids antibodies in autoimmune hepatitis patients. However we found no clinical, biological or histological correlation with the presence of antiphospholipids. Further longitudinal studies on larger cohorts should clarify the association between antiphospholipid antibodies and autoimmune hepatitis and potential therapeutic issues.

The negative impact of HBV/HCV coinfection on cirrhosis and its consequences.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) confection has been rarely studied in nonasian series. AIM: To compare the characteristics of HBV/HCV coinfected patients to those of HBV- or HCV-monoinfected patients in the ANRS CO22 HEPATHER cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 20 936 included patients, 95 had HBV/HCV coinfection (hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA positive) and were matched with 375 HBV- and 380 HCV-monoinfected patients on age, gender and time since HBV or HCV diagnosis. RESULTS: F3-F4 fibrosis was more frequent in coinfected patients (58%) than in HBV- (32%, P < .0001), but similar in HCV-monoinfected patients (52%, P = .3142). Decompensated cirrhosis was more frequent in coinfected patients (11%) than in HBV- (2%, P = .0002) or HCV- (4%, P = .0275) monoinfected patients. Past excessive alcohol use was more frequent in coinfected patients (26%) than in HBV (12%, P = .0011), but similar in HCV monoinfected patients (32%, P = .2868). Coinfected patients had a higher proportion with arterial hypertension (42%) than HBV- (26%) or HCV-monoinfected patients (25%) (P < .003). Multivariable analysis confirmed the association between F3-F4 fibrosis and HCV infection in HBV-infected patients (OR = 3.84, 95% CI 1.99-7.43) and the association between decompensated cirrhosis and coinfection in HBV infected (OR = 5.58, 95% CI 1.42-22.0) or HCV infected patients (OR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.22-7.44). CONCLUSIONS: HCV coinfection harmfully affects liver fibrosis in HBV patients, while decompensated cirrhosis is increased in coinfected patients compared with HBV- or HCV-monoinfected patients. HCV treatment is as safe and effective in coinfected as monoinfected patients and should be considered following the same rules as HCV monoinfected patients.

Effectiveness of interferon plus ribavirin combination in the treatment of naive patients with hepatitis C virus type 5. A French multicentre retrospective study.

AIM: To assess the rate of sustained virological response in naïve hepatitis C virus-type 5 patients treated by standard interferon or pegylated-interferon [corrected] (peg-interferon) and ribavirin combination for 48 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 hepatitis C virus patients were included from 12 centres in France; 28 patients received interferon plus ribavirin and 59 were treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were: mean age 58 +/- 11 years, sex ratio 1, 66% had metavir fibrosis score >or=F2, 21% were cirrhotics and 53% had pretherapeutic viral load >or=800,000 IU/mL. Sustained virological response was achieved in 64% and 58% of hepatitis C virus-5 patients treated with interferon and peg-interferon, respectively (NS). In adherent patients, sustained virological response was obtained in 75% of patients. Sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-5 patients (60%) was significantly higher than sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-1 patients (37%) (P = 0.0499) and not significantly different from sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus-2-3 patients (63%) (P = 0.8098). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is effective in 60% of hepatitis C virus-5-infected patients. Sustained virological response seems better in hepatitis C virus-5 patients than in hepatitis C virus-1 patients, and is similar to that of hepatitis C virus-2-3 patients. More studies are needed to determine optimal duration of treatment in hepatitis C virus-5 patients.

[Serum markers of non-invasive fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection]. / Les marqueurs sanguins non invasifs de fibrose hépatique au cours de l'infection chronique par le virus de l'hépatite C.

MATTER: Liver biopsy is recommended for the management of patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and is currently the gold standard in assessing liver histology. It's an invasive test prone to complications with a morbidity rate of 0.3 to 0.6% and a mortality rate up to 0.05%. Since the last decade, researchers developed non invasifs biomarkers of liver fibrosis as an alternative to liver biopsy. These scores are based on different algorithms with various combinations of biomarkers issued from extra-cellular matrix, serum and cells. CURRENT EVENTS: The diagnostic performance of these scores, estimated by the AUROC for significant fibrosis (>F2), in patients with chronic hepatitis C reach 0.78 to 0.90 for the most accurate. In HIV-HCV co-infected patients and patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis the diagnostic performance of these scores reach 0.74 to 0.88 and 0.73 to 0.97 respectively. PERSPECTIVES: Liver fibrosis biomarkers constitutes an alternative to liver biopsy due to their non invasive approach, their easy reproducibility and accuracy. However, these scores must be used only after a validation in multicentric independent studies. The future is based on the comparison and validation of these scores after laboratory methods standardization.

HBV and HIV screening, and hepatitis B immunization programme in the prison of Marseille, France.

This study estimated the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serological markers among inmates and evaluated inmates' compliance with an HBV immunization programme. During the mandatory consultation at the sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic of the Marseille Prison (HIV counselling, and syphilis/HIV screening), physicians offered serological testing (anti-HBs, anti-HBc, HbsAg, anti-HIV) and Engerix B vaccination to each entrant. The number participating in the survey is 391/411 (89%); 75% were aged 18 to 35 years and 79% were men; 42% reported having had multiple sexual partners during the last 12 months. Report of an intravenous drug user (IDU) sexual partner was more frequent among women than men (22% vs 8%). Injecting drug use over lifetime was reported by 23%; 27% declared having shared their injection equipment during the last 12 months. 124/267 (32%) had an HBV marker: anti-HBs + only (immunized): 2.3%; anti-HBs + and anti-HBc +: 21.7%; anti-HBc + only: 6.4%; HBsAg +: 1.3%. The HIV seroprevalence was 6% (21% among IDUs). This survey underlines the high HBV and HIV seroprevalence among prisoners and the high proportion of inmates at risk for these infections. There is an urgent need for immunization and education programmes in this population. It demonstrates an HBV immunization programme is feasible and accepted by inmates and staff members.

[Hepavir, the first observational study of one cohort of patients treated with alpha-2a interferon, monotherapy. Evaluation of asthenia and its social consequences]. / Hépavir, première étude observationnelle d'une cohorte de malades traités par interféron alpha-2a en monothérapie. Evaluation de l'asthénie et de ses répercussions sociales.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study in patients with chronic hepatitis C and treated with interferon alpha-2a was to assess 1) monitoring in everyday practice, 2) the acceptability of treatment and 3) the intensity of fatigue. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty four patients were enrolled by physicians in both teaching and general hospitals, or private practice. Before treatment, clinical, epidemiological, and virological data were collected as well as a self-evaluation of fatigue using a visual analogic scale. Clinical follow-up was assessed every 3 months during treatment and 6 months after the end of treatment and included an evaluation of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness. RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen men and 135 women, mean age 45 +/- 13, were included. The epidemiological, histological and virological features of this group were similar to those patients usually treated for chronic hepatitis C. Before treatment, the mean measurement of fatigue was 41 on a scale from 0 (perfect form) to 100 (exhausted). Fatigue was unrelated to age, source of infection, biological activity, or histological score. It worsened in patients who stopped interferon after 3 or 6 months, but was stable in patients who continued treatment for 12 months. Fatigue decreased after the end of treatment and was unrelated to treatment response. The need to stop work was strongly related to the intensity of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness represented nearly two months out of three in 25% of active patients during the first quarter and in 15% of patients thereafter. 61% of patients self-injected interferon (mainly previous drug users) whereas 30% of patients used nurse care throughout treatment. CONCLUSION: This study not only provides a realistic evaluation of fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C, before, during and after treatment, but also highlights its social and economic consequences. It shows the need for further cost-effectiveness studies on new therapeutic strategies using combined treatments.

[Do general practitioners want to manage chronic hepatitis C and take part in hepatitis C health networks? A national survey]. / Les médecins généralistes souhaitent-ils prendre en charge l'hépatite chronique virale C et participer aux réseaux ville-hôpital?

OBJECTIVES: To assess information that general practitioners had on hepatitis C and on the hepatitis C network in hospitals and private practice. METHODOLOGY: A national telephone survey of 604 general practitioners was conducted between March 18 and 23, 1998. RESULTS: Screening and management of hepatitis C was important for 89% and 97% of general practitioners. Screening was performed in relation to the relative risk (IV drug users 89%, blood transfusion before 1991 88%). General practitioners wanted more information on treatment (54%), patient counselling (42%) and the potential risks of the disease (42%). Of 604 general practitioners, 6% were involved in a hepatitis C network, while 21% were involved in another network (drug users 9%, AIDS 8%). Of the 94% general practitioners who were not part of the network, 33% were willing to join a hepatitis C network. Only 56% were aware of a hepatitis C network (press article 30%, mailing 17% or local meeting 12%). The difficulties for the involvement of general practitioners were: lack of time, topics not adapted to daily practice and geographic constraints (74%), too few patients in their practice (52%), no need (38%), the idea itself of a network and lack of information (28%). CONCLUSION: General practitioners screen patients at risk of hepatitis C. They want to be better informed about treatment, patient counselling, and the potential risks of hepatitis C. They are less involved in hepatitis C networks than in other networks (drug, AIDS). However, one third of general practitioners would like to be involved in a hepatitis C network. These results could be useful for implementing post-graduate courses and general practitioner training.

[Nucleoside analogues resistance in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection]. / Résistance aux analogues de nucléosides dans le traitement de l'hépatite chronique B.

SUBJECT: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is usually treated by interferon alpha. However, a sustained response after stopping treatment is only obtained in 30% of patients. ACTUALITY: New therapeutic nucleoside analogs have been developed, i.e. lamivudine, famciclovir, adefovir, entecavir, clevudine. However, as in HIV infection, clearance of the original hepatitis B virus with emergence of distinct resistant mutants have been observed during or after treatment with most nucleoside analogs. In this review, the underlying mechanisms of resistance and the characterisation of HBV mutants are described to optimize the best therapeutic regimen. PERSPECTIVES: Treatment of chronic HBV infection, as most of other chronic viral infection, should be based on combination therapy with a special search for the appearance of HBV mutant resistant.