Comparison of the modified Mallampati classification score versus the best visible Mallampati score in the prediction of difficult tracheal intubation: a single-centre prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: The modified Mallampati classification is part of the preoperative airway risk assessment. Inconsistency in the way it is examined may contribute to heterogeneity in its diagnostic performance. The best visible Mallampati score could reduce interobserver heterogeneity but its diagnostic characteristics remain unknown. METHODS: During preoperative anesthesia consultation of adult patients with a senior anesthesiologist, we compared the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score using cervical extension, tongue in, and phonation. The primary outcome was the diagnostic characteristic of the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score as predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation (more than two direct laryngoscopies or need for an alternate device). We performed a multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation in the tested cohort. RESULTS: Difficult orotracheal intubation occurred in 77/3,243 (2.4%) patients. A best visible Mallampati score was obtained in 1,596 (49.2%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the modified Mallampati classification score for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation were 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.66) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.71), respectively. By comparison, the best visible Mallampati score was less sensitive (difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.30; P < 0.001) but more specific (difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.22 to -0.25; P < 0.001). In patients with difficult orotracheal intubation, 53% were incorrectly reclassified as low risk by the best visible Mallampati score. CONCLUSION: Compared with the modified Mallampati classification score, the best visible Mallampati score decreased sensitivity for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation and falsely classified half of the patients with difficult orotracheal intubation. Taking the risks associated with difficult airways into account, our findings indicate that a careful examination of the modified Mallampati classification is required during the global preoperative airway examination. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 February 2016.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La classification de Mallampati modifiée fait partie de l'évaluation préopératoire des risques pour les voies aériennes. La disparité dans la façon dont elle est examinée peut contribuer à l'hétérogénéité de ses performances diagnostiques. Le meilleur score de Mallampati visible pourrait réduire l'hétérogénéité inter-observateurs, mais ses caractéristiques diagnostiques restent inconnues. MéTHODE: Lors de la consultation d'anesthésie préopératoire de patient·es adultes avec un·e anesthésiologiste senior, nous avons comparé le score de classification sur l'échelle de Mallampati modifiée vs le meilleur score de Mallampati visible en utilisant l'extension cervicale, la langue rentrée, et la phonation. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la caractéristique diagnostique du score modifié de classification de Mallampati vs le meilleur score de Mallampati visible comme prédicteurs d'une intubation orotrachéale difficile (plus de deux laryngoscopies directes ou nécessité d'un autre dispositif). Nous avons réalisé une analyse multivariée pour identifier les prédicteurs indépendants d'intubation orotrachéale difficile dans la cohorte testée. RéSULTATS: Une intubation orotrachéale difficile est survenue chez 77 patient·es sur 3243 (2,4 %). Le meilleur score de Mallampati visible a été obtenu chez 1596 patient·es (49,2 %). La sensibilité et la spécificité du score de classification de Mallampati modifié pour prédire l'intubation orotrachéale difficile étaient de 0,56 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,44 à 0,66) et 0,69 (IC 95 %, 0,68 à 0,71), respectivement. À titre de comparaison, le score de Mallampati le plus visible était moins sensible (différence, −0,30; IC 95 %, −0,19 à −0,30; P < 0,001) mais plus spécifique (différence, 0,24; IC 95 %, 0,22 à −0,25; P < 0,001). Chez les patient·es présentant une intubation orotrachéale difficile, 53 % ont été reclassé·es à tort comme à faible risque par le score de Mallampati le plus visible. CONCLUSION: Par rapport au score modifié de classification de Mallampati, le score de Mallampati le mieux visible a diminué la sensibilité pour prédire l'intubation orotrachéale difficile et a faussement classé la moitié des patient·es présentant une intubation orotrachéale difficile. En tenant compte des risques associés aux voies aériennes difficiles, nos résultats indiquent qu'un examen minutieux de la classification de Mallampati modifiée est nécessaire lors de l'examen préopératoire global des voies aériennes. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 février 2016.

Towards an evolution in ambulatory surgery for orbital floor repair? Our experience over a period of 11 years.

INTRODUCTION: Orbital floor fracture repair is a complex surgery with intra-orbital hematoma being the most feared complication as it can lead to visual loss if not treated in good time. This is why currently patients are monitored for almost 48 hours as inpatients. The purpose of this study was to find out if orbital floor repair surgery could be safely undertaken as a day case by reviewing the experience of the last 11 years at the Caen University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted at the Caen University Hospital. All patients undergoing orbital floor reconstruction in a trauma setting from January 2008 to December 2019 were included. RESULTS: Of the 130 included patients, none presented a post-operative complication such as intra-orbital hematoma. 3 patients had their surgery performed as a day case. DISCUSSION: In the literature, more and more surgeons are proposing orbital floor fracture repair to be undertaken as day case. Indeed, the theoretical risk of intra-orbital hematoma is greater within the first 6 hours after surgery and can persist up to 10 days postoperatively. Provided patients meet the classic criteria for outpatient surgery, and are provided with a precise post-operative care protocol. Under these conditions, orbital floor fractures may be repair in ambulatory surgery.

Retrospective study of long-term hard and soft tissue stability after advancement genioplasty with the use of rigid osteosynthesis.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate long-term stability of rigid osteosynthesis in the context of advancement genioplasty. Bone stability was defined as a long-term bone loss of less than 2 mm. Measurements were performed on lateral cephalograms, in the sagittal and vertical planes, at three times: preoperative (T0, less than one month before surgery), early postoperative (T1, at least one month post-operatively) and late postoperative (T2, at least one year after surgery). 25 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 3.47 years (range 1-9.42 years). The mean sagittal bone advancement at T1 was 4.06 mm ± 1.34, with a bone loss of 0.65 mm at T2 (p = 0.001). The mean vertical bone movement was 1.25 mm ± 0.47 at T1, with a relapse at T2 of 0.34 mm (p = 0.27). The soft-to-hard tissue ratio was 78% in the sagittal plane. Rigid osteosynthesis offers long-term stability, with very little change in clinical outcome, in advanced genioplasty.

Correction of lip and nasal deformities in bilateral cleft operated with Le Mesurier procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral cleft lip surgery recently evolved with the generalization of cheilorhinoplasty replacing cheiloplasty alone. The aim of this study was to analyze lip and nasal deformities of bilateral cleft lip operated on with the Le Mesurier procedure, and then to evaluate possible secondary surgical solutions used in our Cleft Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 39 patients born between 1991 and 2009 with a bilateral cleft all type included (isolated lip, lip and alveolar, associated or not with a cleft palate), all treated at the Caen University Hospital with a Le Mesurier procedure for the primary cleft lip closure. We studied population characteristics, the number of secondary surgical procedures for lip and nasal deformities. We analysed therapeutic approaches of the different secondary surgical procedures used and their morphological results. RESULTS: 85% of patients needed at least one secondary surgical procedure, 28% two procedures, 15% three procedures and 8% four or more procedures. Median age at secondary surgery was 6,8. 79% had a "scar repositioning", 33% managed the vermilion, 18% a restoration of the volume of the lip, 12% a philtral tissue sacrifice, 9% a procedure on Cupid's bow, 24% a surgery for nasal tip projection, 45% a columella lengthening and 58% a reposition of the alar base. DISCUSSION: Le Mesurier procedure for bilateral clefts leads to deformities that require secondary surgical procedures. We propose an algorithm to manage loop scar in this procedure.

Perioperative non-invasive haemodynamic optimisation using photoplethysmography: A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of a haemodynamic algorithm using SV maximisation by non-invasive photoplethysmography (interventional group) on the incidence of postoperative complications compared with a control group using intermittent mean arterial pressure. METHODS: The non-blinded parallel-group trial randomised low-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery into either interventional group or control group. The primary outcome was the incidence of patients with at least one complication during the 30 days following surgery. The secondary outcomes were the total number of complications, the length of hospital stay and postoperative mortality. A meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing perioperative haemodynamic optimisation (interventional group) using photoplethysmography with control group was performed to assess the external validity. RESULTS: Among 160 randomised patients, 159 were analysed (80 and 79 in interventional and control groups, respectively). Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 40 (50%) and 34 (43%) patients in the interventional and control groups, respectively (P=0.471). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the total number of complications (P=0.078), the hospital length of stay (P=0.960), or postoperative mortality (P=1.000). In the meta-analysis including 1089 patients in 7 randomised controlled studies, 203 (38%) and 221 (40%) patients suffered from at least one complication following surgery [risk ratio 0.89 (95% CI 0.68-1.17), P=0.407] in interventional and control groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of the present study and meta-analysis, a haemodynamic perioperative algorithm using SV maximisation by non-invasive photoplethysmography cannot reduce postoperative morbidity.

Interchangeability of cardiac output measurements between non-invasive photoplethysmography and bolus thermodilution: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Continuous non-invasive cardiac output devices using digital photoplethysmography (PPG) are widely available for bedside use, but their interchangeability with reference methods has not yet been evaluated in a systematic review and patient data meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing non-invasive cardiac output monitoring using PPG with the invasive bolus thermodilution method was performed. With ethical approval, all published studies from the PUBMED, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2018 were included. From these analysed studies, individual patient data were interpreted using the interchangeability methods for both absolute values and changes in cardiac output measurements. RESULTS: Ten studies comparing PPG and bolus thermodilution in the operating room and intensive care settings were included. The interchangeability rate (95% CI) was 37% (24-48) (n=1350 pairs of measurements). The interchangeability rate was poorer with the CNAP device (CNSystems, Graz, Austria) [18% (17-20)] than with the Clearsight (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) device [33% (31-34), P<0.0001], for patients receiving norepinephrine [19% (17-20) vs. 33% (32-34), P<0.0001], and for patients with low mean arterial pressure (<65mmHg) [26% (23-29) vs. 30% (29-31), P<0.0001]. Among the 1009 comparisons of the changes in cardiac output between both methods, 561 (56%) were interpretable with a trend interchangeability rate at 24% (12-36). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output measurements using PPG were not interchangeable with bolus thermodilution in regard to both absolute values and changes in cardiac output measurements, and should be used with caution in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID CRD42018089513.

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization using the photoplethysmography in colorectal surgery (the PANEX3 trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Photoplethysmography with a digital sensor (ClearSight, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) connected to a dedicated monitor (EV 1000, Edwards Lifesciences) was recently proposed for use in performing hemodynamic optimization during surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of photoplethysmography on the incidence of postoperative complications compared with the conventional hemodynamic algorithm, which uses mean arterial pressure. METHODS/DESIGN: The hemodynamic optimization using photoplethysmography (PANEX3) trial is a monocentric, randomized, single-blind, controlled, two parallel arm, superiority trial, randomizing 160 patients with an intermediate risk of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The hemodynamic optimization is conducted using a specified hemodynamic algorithm either with photoplethysmography (the photoplethysmography group) or with conventional mean arterial pressure (the control group). The anesthesiologist performed a 1:1 randomization the day before surgery using a scratch card, which is available 24/7. The randomization sequence is generated using permutated blocks. Both the patients and surgeons are blinded to the allocation group. The primary outcome is the incidence of at least one postoperative complication during the 30 days following surgery. Two independent experts, who were blinded to the group allocations, validate the complication for each patient using an a priori classification. The secondary outcomes are to study the total number of postoperative complications, the real length of hospital stays, and the postoperative mortality between each group. DISCUSSION: The PANEX3 trial is the first randomized controlled study conducted to investigate whether perioperative hemodynamic optimization using photoplethysmography during colorectal surgery could decrease the incidence of patients having at least one postoperative complication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02343601.