Stepwise Transfer Learning for Expert-Level Pediatric Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation in a Limited Data Scenario.

"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Purpose To develop, externally test, and evaluate clinical acceptability of a deep learning (DL) pediatric brain tumor segmentation model using stepwise transfer learning. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the authors leveraged two T2-weighted MRI datasets (May 2001-December 2015) from a national brain tumor consortium (n = 184; median age, 7 years (range: 1-23 years); 94 male) and a pediatric cancer center (n = 100; median age, 8 years (range: 1-19 years); 47 male) to develop and evaluate DL neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma segmentation using a novel stepwise transfer learning approach to maximize performance in a limited data scenario. The best model was externally-tested on an independent test set and subjected to randomized, blinded evaluation by three clinicians, wherein they assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and artificial intelligence (AI)-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. Results The best AI model used in-domain, stepwise transfer learning (median DSC: 0.88 [IQR 0.72-0.91] versus 0.812 [0.56-0.89] for baseline model; P = .049). On external testing, AI model yielded excellent accuracy using reference standards from three clinical experts (Expert-1: 0.83 [0.75-0.90]; Expert-2: 0.81 [0.70-0.89]; Expert-3: 0.81 [0.68-0.88]; mean accuracy: 0.82)). On clinical benchmarking (n = 100 scans), experts rated AI-based segmentations higher on average compared with other experts (median Likert score: median 9 [IQR 7-9]) versus 7 [IQR 7-9]) and rated more AI segmentations as clinically acceptable (80.2% versus 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origin of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. Conclusion Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level, automated pediatric brain tumor auto-segmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. ©RSNA, 2024.

Noninvasive Molecular Subtyping of Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma with Self-Supervised Transfer Learning.

Purpose To develop and externally test a scan-to-prediction deep learning pipeline for noninvasive, MRI-based BRAF mutational status classification for pediatric low-grade glioma. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included two pediatric low-grade glioma datasets with linked genomic and diagnostic T2-weighted MRI data of patients: Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Hospital (development dataset, n = 214 [113 (52.8%) male; 104 (48.6%) BRAF wild type, 60 (28.0%) BRAF fusion, and 50 (23.4%) BRAF V600E]) and the Children's Brain Tumor Network (external testing, n = 112 [55 (49.1%) male; 35 (31.2%) BRAF wild type, 60 (53.6%) BRAF fusion, and 17 (15.2%) BRAF V600E]). A deep learning pipeline was developed to classify BRAF mutational status (BRAF wild type vs BRAF fusion vs BRAF V600E) via a two-stage process: (a) three-dimensional tumor segmentation and extraction of axial tumor images and (b) section-wise, deep learning-based classification of mutational status. Knowledge-transfer and self-supervised approaches were investigated to prevent model overfitting, with a primary end point of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To enhance model interpretability, a novel metric, center of mass distance, was developed to quantify the model attention around the tumor. Results A combination of transfer learning from a pretrained medical imaging-specific network and self-supervised label cross-training (TransferX) coupled with consensus logic yielded the highest classification performance with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.97), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.95) for BRAF wild type, BRAF fusion, and BRAF V600E, respectively, on internal testing. On external testing, the pipeline yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.86), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.89), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.88) for BRAF wild type, BRAF fusion, and BRAF V600E, respectively. Conclusion Transfer learning and self-supervised cross-training improved classification performance and generalizability for noninvasive pediatric low-grade glioma mutational status prediction in a limited data scenario. Keywords: Pediatrics, MRI, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Oncology, Feature Detection, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Noninvasive molecular subtyping of pediatric low-grade glioma with self-supervised transfer learning.

Purpose: To develop and externally validate a scan-to-prediction deep-learning pipeline for noninvasive, MRI-based BRAF mutational status classification for pLGG. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of two pLGG datasets with linked genomic and diagnostic T2-weighted MRI of patients: BCH (development dataset, n=214 [60 (28%) BRAF fusion, 50 (23%) BRAF V600E, 104 (49%) wild-type), and Child Brain Tumor Network (CBTN) (external validation, n=112 [60 (53%) BRAF-Fusion, 17 (15%) BRAF-V600E, 35 (32%) wild-type]). We developed a deep learning pipeline to classify BRAF mutational status (V600E vs. fusion vs. wildtype) via a two-stage process: 1) 3D tumor segmentation and extraction of axial tumor images, and 2) slice-wise, deep learning-based classification of mutational status. We investigated knowledge-transfer and self-supervised approaches to prevent model overfitting with a primary endpoint of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To enhance model interpretability, we developed a novel metric, COMDist, that quantifies the accuracy of model attention around the tumor. Results: A combination of transfer learning from a pretrained medical imaging-specific network and self-supervised label cross-training (TransferX) coupled with consensus logic yielded the highest macro-average AUC (0.82 [95% CI: 0.70-0.90]) and accuracy (77%) on internal validation, with an AUC improvement of +17.7% and a COMDist improvement of +6.4% versus training from scratch. On external validation, the TransferX model yielded AUC (0.73 [95% CI 0.68-0.88]) and accuracy (75%). Conclusion: Transfer learning and self-supervised cross-training improved classification performance and generalizability for noninvasive pLGG mutational status prediction in a limited data scenario.

Expert-level pediatric brain tumor segmentation in a limited data scenario with stepwise transfer learning.

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI)-automated tumor delineation for pediatric gliomas would enable real-time volumetric evaluation to support diagnosis, treatment response assessment, and clinical decision-making. Auto-segmentation algorithms for pediatric tumors are rare, due to limited data availability, and algorithms have yet to demonstrate clinical translation. Methods: We leveraged two datasets from a national brain tumor consortium (n=184) and a pediatric cancer center (n=100) to develop, externally validate, and clinically benchmark deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) segmentation using a novel in-domain, stepwise transfer learning approach. The best model [via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)] was externally validated and subject to randomized, blinded evaluation by three expert clinicians wherein clinicians assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and AI-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. Results: The best AI model utilized in-domain, stepwise transfer learning (median DSC: 0.877 [IQR 0.715-0.914]) versus baseline model (median DSC 0.812 [IQR 0.559-0.888]; p<0.05). On external testing (n=60), the AI model yielded accuracy comparable to inter-expert agreement (median DSC: 0.834 [IQR 0.726-0.901] vs. 0.861 [IQR 0.795-0.905], p=0.13). On clinical benchmarking (n=100 scans, 300 segmentations from 3 experts), the experts rated the AI model higher on average compared to other experts (median Likert rating: 9 [IQR 7-9]) vs. 7 [IQR 7-9], p<0.05 for each). Additionally, the AI segmentations had significantly higher (p<0.05) overall acceptability compared to experts on average (80.2% vs. 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origins of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. Conclusions: Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level, automated pediatric brain tumor auto-segmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. This approach may enable development and translation of AI imaging segmentation algorithms in limited data scenarios.