Identification of Aedes aegypti specificity motifs in the N-terminus of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Aa pesticidal protein.

One advantage of using the Cry proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis as pesticides is their relatively narrow spectrum of activity, thus reducing the risk of non-target effects. Understanding the molecular basis of specificity has the potential to help us design improved products against emerging pests, or against pests that have developed resistance to other Cry proteins. Many previous studies have associated specificity with the binding of the Cry protein, particularly through the apical regions of domain II, to particular receptors on the midgut epithelial cells of the host insect. We have previously found that the specificity of Cry2A proteins against some insects is associated with domain I, which is traditionally associated with pore-formation but not receptor binding. In this work we identify four amino acids in the N-terminal region that, when mutated, can confer activity towards Aedes aegypti to Cry2Ab, a protein known to lack this toxicity. Intriguingly these amino acids are located in the region (amino acids 1-49) that is believed to be removed during proteolytic activation of the Cry protein. We discuss how the motifs containing these amino acids might be involved in the toxic process.

Energetic efficiency of foraging mediates bee niche partitioning.

Revitalizing our understanding of species distributions and assembly in community ecology requires greater use of functional (physiological) approaches based on quantifiable factors such as energetics. Here, we explore niche partitioning between bumble and honey bees by comparing a measure of within-patch foraging efficiency, the ratio of flower visitation rate (proportional to energy gain) to body mass (energy cost). This explained a remarkable 74% of the variation in the proportions of bumble to honey bees across 22 plant species and was confirmed using detailed energy calculations. Bumble bees visited flowers at a greater rate (realizing greater energy benefits) than honey bees, but were heavier (incurring greater energy costs) and predominated only on plant species where their benefit : cost ratio was higher than for honey bees. Importantly, the competition between honey bees and bumble bees had no consistent winner, thus highlighting the importance of plant diversity to the coexistence of competing bees. By contrast, tongue : corolla-tube-length ratio explained only 7% of the variation (non-significant). Our results confirm the importance of energetics in understanding community ecology and bee foraging niche and highlight the energetic tightrope navigated by foraging bees, since approximately half the nectar energy gained was expended in its collection.