Race, ethnicity, and experienced racism are associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes among cancer survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Survivors of cancer are at risk for adverse mental and physical health outcomes. It is not well understood, however, how these outcomes are differentially experienced according to an individual's exposure to racism. This study sought to evaluate associations of race/ethnicity, and experiences of racism, with adverse health outcomes in survivors of cancer. METHODS: Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database, data from 48,200 survivors between 2014 and 2020 were evaluated. Survey items included negative physical and emotional symptoms as a result of race-based treatment. Outcomes of interest included days of poor mental and physical health, activity limitations, depression, and inadequate sleep. Associations using prevalence ratios were evaluated. RESULTS: All historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups were more likely to experience at least one adverse health outcome compared with non-Hispanic White survivors. Those who physically experienced racism were 2.1 (95% CI, 1.64-2.69) times as likely to report poor physical health, 3.51 (95% CI, 2.61-4.71) times as likely to report poor mental health, 2.14 (95% CI, 1.77-2.58) times as likely to report inadequate sleep, 2.33 (95% CI: 1.91-2.83) times as likely to report depression, and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04-1.93) times as likely to report activity limitations compared with those who have not experienced racism. Similar associations were observed for emotionally experienced racism. DISCUSSION: Racial inequities in health outcomes for survivors of cancer from marginalized racial/ethnic groups are well-established. Experienced racism contributes to adverse health outcomes and widens these disparities. Improving outcomes for survivors of cancer may require screening for experienced racism. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Survivors of cancer from marginalized racial/ethnic populations are more likely to have poor mental and physical health than their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Whether survivors from certain racial/ethnic populations of smaller size also have poorer health is less well understood. Generally, individuals who report experienced racism also report poor health, this association has not been studied in survivors of cancer. This study, from a national survey of survivors of cancer, describes disparities in health outcomes experienced by a variety of racial and ethnic populations. Our findings suggest racism is associated with poor mental and physical health in survivors of cancer.

Toward Improving Patient Equity in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Framework for Implementation.

Disparities in health care delivery and health outcomes for patients in the emergency department (ED) by race, ethnicity, and language for care (REaL) are common and well documented. Addressing inequities from structural racism, implicit bias, and language barriers can be challenging, and there is a lack of data on effective interventions. We describe the implementation of a multifaceted equity improvement strategy in a pediatric ED using Kotter's model for change as a framework to identify the key drivers. The main elements included a data dashboard with quality metrics stratified by patient self-reported REaL to visualize disparities, a staff workshop on implicit bias and microaggressions, and several clinical and operational tools that highlight equity. Our next steps include refining and repeating interventions and tracking important patient outcomes, including timely pain treatment, triage assessment, diagnostic evaluations, and interpreter use, with the overall goal of improving patient equity by REaL over time. This article presents a roadmap for a disparity reduction intervention, which can be part of a multifaceted approach to address health equity in EDs.

Protocol for the promoting resilience in stress management (PRISM) intervention: a multi-site randomized controlled trial for adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at high risk of poor psychosocial outcomes, and evidence-based interventions designed to meet their psychosocial and communication needs are lacking. The main objective of this project is to test the efficacy of a new adaptation of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management intervention for AYAs with Advanced Cancer (PRISM-AC). METHODS/DESIGN: The PRISM-AC trial is a 2-arm, parallel, non-blinded, multisite, randomized controlled trial. 144 participants with advanced cancer will be enrolled and randomized to either usual, non-directive, supportive care without PRISM-AC ("control" arm) or with PRISM-AC ("experimental" arm). PRISM is a manualized, skills-based training program comprised of four 30-60 min, one-on-one sessions targeting AYA-endorsed resilience resources (stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive-reframing, and meaning-making). It also includes a facilitated family meeting and a fully equipped smartphone app. The current adaptation includes an embedded advance care planning module. English- or Spanish-speaking individuals 12-24 years old with advanced cancer (defined as progressive, recurrent, or refractory disease, or any diagnosis associated with < 50% survival) receiving care at 4 academic medical centers are eligible. Patients' caregivers are also eligible to participate in this study if they are able to speak and read English or Spanish, and are cognitively and physically able to participate. Participants in all groups complete surveys querying patient-reported outcomes at the time of enrollment and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-enrollment. The primary outcome of interest is patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and secondary outcomes of interest include patient anxiety, depression, resilience, hope and symptom burden, parent/caregiver anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life, and family palliative care activation. We will conduct intention-to-treat analysis to compare the group means of primary and secondary outcomes between PRISM-AC arm and control arm with regression models. DISCUSSION: This study will provide methodologically rigorous data and evidence regarding a novel intervention to promote resilience and reduce distress among AYAs with advanced cancer. This research has the potential to offer a practical, skills-based curriculum designed to improve outcomes for this high-risk group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03668223, September 12, 2018.

Impact of multiorgan and kidney-pancreas allocation policies on pediatric kidney-alone transplant candidates in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The United States organ allocation policies prioritize kidney-pancreas and other multiorgan candidates above pediatric kidney-alone candidates, but the effects of these policies are unclear. METHODS: We used OPTN data to describe trends in multiorgan and kidney-pancreas transplantation and identify 377 next-sequential pediatric kidney-alone candidates between 4/1/2015 and 10/31/2019 for individual-level analysis. RESULTS: Eleven percent of all kidneys were allocated as part of a multiorgan or kidney-pancreas transplant and 6% of pediatric kidney candidates were impacted. Pediatric next-sequential candidates accrued a median of 118 days (IQR 97-135 days) of additional wait time, and this was significantly longer for children who were Hispanic (p = .02), blood type B or O (p = .01), or had a cPRA ≥20% (p < .01). Eight pediatric next-sequential candidates (2%) were removed from the waitlist due to death or "too sick to transplant." 63% were transplanted with a kidney with a higher KDPI than the original multiorgan match (p < .01). Donor service areas with higher volumes of kidney-pancreas transplants had significantly longer additional wait times for pediatric next-sequential candidates (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Current allocation policy results in longer waiting times and higher KDPI kidneys for pediatric kidney candidates. As multiorgan transplant volume is increasing, further consideration of allocation policy is necessary to maximize equality and utility.

Rectal suction biopsy versus incisional rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease.

BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung disease is one of the most common congenital anomalies that affect colorectal function. Rectal biopsy demonstrating the absence of ganglion cells in the affected bowel is the gold standard for diagnosis. Suction and incisional rectal biopsies are appropriate methods for obtaining diagnostic tissue. The goal of this study is to determine if any differences in adequacy exist between suction and incisional rectal biopsies at our institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of suction and incisional rectal biopsies for inadequacy per procedure at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Each procedure for rectal biopsy was also evaluated by a number of biopsies per procedure. We used a two-sample test of proportions to compare the inadequacy of suction vs. incisional biopsies. RESULTS: 133 rectal suction biopsy procedures (227 biopsies) and 125 incisional biopsy procedures (140 biopsies) were analyzed. In patients 6 months of age and older, the percentage of inadequate procedures was substantially higher in the suction biopsy group (24.1% vs 0.9%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A substantially higher proportion of inadequacy was found in the suction rectal biopsy group compared to the incisional cohort among the older patient cohort, suggesting incisional biopsies should be strongly considered as the primary rectal biopsy method in patients older than 6 months.

A novel combined resilience and advance care planning intervention for adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer: A feasibility and acceptability cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Few evidence-based psychosocial programs have been tested among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer (AC), and early advance care planning (ACP) in this population is rare. The authors aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of 1) delivering an established resilience-coaching program, and 2) integrating ACP into that program, among AYAs with AC. METHODS: Eligible AYAs were 12 to 24 years old, diagnosed with advanced cancer (recurrent/refractory disease or a diagnosis associated with <50% survival) and fluent in English. The Promoting Resilience in Stress Management-Advanced Cancer (PRISM-AC) program included PRISM's standard sessions targeting stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive-restructuring, and meaning-making, delivered 1:1, 1 to 2 weeks apart, plus a new session involving elements of the AYA-specific Voicing My Choices ACP guide. Participants completed surveys at baseline and 12 weeks, and exit interviews following study completion. Feasibility was defined as ≥70% completion of 1) standard 4-session PRISM and 2) the new ACP session among those completing standard PRISM. Acceptability was defined qualitatively. Trajectories of patient-reported anxiety, depression, and hope were examined descriptively. RESULTS: Of 50 eligible, approached AYAs, 26 (52%) enrolled and completed baseline surveys. The AYAs had a mean age of 16 years (SD = 2.7 years), and the majority were male (73%) and White/Caucasian (62%). Twenty-two AYAs (85%) completed standard PRISM, and of those, 18 (82%) completed the ACP session. Feedback was highly positive; 100% and 91% described the overall and ACP programs as valuable, respectively. Anxiety, depression, and hope were unchanged after the program. CONCLUSIONS: Resilience coaching followed by integrated ACP is feasible and acceptable for AYAs with AC. Participating did not cause distress or decrease hope. LAY SUMMARY: Advance care planning (ACP) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer can be difficult to introduce. We investigated whether it is feasible and acceptable to integrate ACP into an existing resilience-coaching program for AYAs. In this cohort study of 26 AYAs with advanced cancer, we found the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management-Advanced Cancer program to be feasible (≥70% intervention-completion) and highly acceptable (positive post-participation feedback, no evidence of participant-distress). We conclude that an intervention integrating resilience coaching and ACP is feasible and acceptable among AYAs with advanced cancer.

Prevalence and Long-Term Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant in Children with Intellectual Disability.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence and long-term outcomes of kidney, liver, and heart transplant for children with an intellectual disability. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children receiving a first kidney, liver, or heart-alone transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset from 2008 to 2017. Recipients with definite intellectual disability were compared with those possible/no intellectual disability. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for graft and patient survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between intellectual disability and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: Over the study period, children with definite intellectual disability accounted for 594 of 6747 (9%) first pediatric kidney-alone, 318 of 4566 (7%) first pediatric liver-alone, and 324 of 3722 (9%) first pediatric heart-alone transplant recipients. Intellectual disability was not significantly associated with patient or graft survival among liver and heart transplant recipients. Among kidney transplant recipients, definite intellectual disability was significantly associated with higher graft survival and lower patient survival, but the absolute differences were small. CONCLUSIONS: Children with intellectual disability account for 7%-9% of pediatric transplant recipients with comparable long-term outcomes to other pediatric recipients. These findings provide important empirical support for policies that include children with intellectual disability as transplant candidates.

Feasibility and acceptability of a home-based resistance training intervention in adolescent and young adult hematopoietic cell transplant survivors.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors are at increased risk of metabolic syndrome and lean body mass (LBM) deficits. Resistance training (RT) is a potential intervention to improve LBM, metabolic fitness, and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease. PROCEDURE: Eligible participants ages 13-39 years, 80-120 days post-HCT, transfusion independent, and prednisone dose ≤1 mg/kg/day were approached. Baseline assessments of body composition (DXA), anthropometrics, and strength testing were completed and participants were taught a 12-week, home-based RT intervention with weekly remote coaching. Follow-up assessments were at day +200 (FU1) and +365 post-HCT (FU2). Feasibility targets were (a) 60% enrollment of approached patients, (b) 80% completion of weekly phone calls, and (c) 80% completion of the RT intervention and FU1 assessments. Acceptability was based on positive responses in qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 (65%) eligible AYAs enrolled. Three participants failed to complete baseline measurements (2 = scheduling barriers, 1 = passive refusal) and four participants who completed baseline assessments did not receive the intervention (1 = medical reasons, 2 = no longer interested). Of those who completed baseline assessments, 13 received the intervention, completed 88.5% of coaching calls, and 11 (65%) completed FU1. LBM (kg) increased or remained unchanged in nine of nine participants with complete body composition data at FU1 (mean 1.1 kg; 95%CI: 0.4, 1.9). All participants who completed FU1 reported they would recommend the intervention to an AYA HCT survivor. CONCLUSIONS: A home-based RT intervention in AYA HCT survivors early post HCT is both feasible and acceptable and may maintain or increase LBM.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and medically traumatic events (TEs) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: a report from the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, we examined (1) the distribution and type of traumatic events (TEs) experienced prior to baseline assessment and (2) how a resilience intervention, Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM), impacted changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for AYAs with and without TEs. METHODS: AYAs (12-25 years) within 1-10 weeks of diagnosis of new malignancy or ever diagnosed with advanced cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (UC) with or without PRISM. To assess TEs, we screened medical records for traditionally defined adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and medical traumatic events. Age-validated PROs assessed resilience, benefit-finding, hope, generic health-related quality of life (QoL), cancer-specific QoL, depression, and anxiety at enrollment and 6 months later. We calculated effect sizes (Cohen's d) for PRISM vs. UC effect on PRO score change at 6 months for 1+ TEs and 0 TE groups. RESULTS: Ninety-two AYAs enrolled and completed baseline surveys (44-UC, 48-PRISM; N = 74 at 6 months, 38-UC, 36-PRISM); 60% experienced 1+ TEs. PROs at baseline were similar across groups. PRISM's effect on score change was greater (Cohen's d ≥ 0.5) for the 1+ TE group on domains of benefit-finding and hope; and similar (d < 0.5) on domains of resilience, depression, anxiety, and both generic and cancer-specific QoL. CONCLUSIONS: In AYAs with cancer, TEs occurred at similar rates as the general population. PRISM may be particularly helpful for improving benefit-finding and hope for those who have experienced TEs.

Emergent Mental Health Visits to a Pediatric Hospital: Impact on Firearm Storage Practices.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe firearm storage practices in homes of patients evaluated for mental health (MH) complaints at a tertiary care children's hospital and to describe storage practice changes after treatment. METHODS: We surveyed families of children with MH complaints presenting to the emergency department or psychiatry unit who stored firearms in their homes between February 12, 2016, and January 14, 2017. Patients and families received standard care, including routine counseling on limiting access to methods of suicide. Participants completed surveys at baseline, 7, and 30 days after discharge. The primary outcome was triple safe firearm storage-storage of firearms unloaded, locked, and with ammunition stored and locked separately. RESULTS: Ninety-one household members of MH patients who stated they had firearms were enrolled at baseline. Seventy-seven (85%) completed at least 1 follow-up survey, and 63 (69%) completed both. At baseline, 21% (19/91) of participants reported engaging in triple safe firearm storage, 26% had an unlocked firearm, 23% had a loaded firearm, and 65% stored ammunition either unlocked or with their firearm. Triple safe storage rates increased to 31% at both 7 days and 30 days. Ten (17%) of 59 (P < 0.01) participants who did not report triple safe storage at baseline and completed a follow-up survey changed to reporting triple safe storage on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of firearm-storing family members of children with MH complaints do not follow triple safe storage practices. Storage practices modestly improved after an emergent MH visit, but over two thirds of participants reported unsecured or partially secured firearms 7 and 30 days later.

Examining key sociodemographic characteristics of adolescents and young adults with cancer: A post hoc analysis of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management" intervention is a skills-based, early palliative care intervention with demonstrated efficacy in adolescents and young adults with cancer. AIM: Utilizing data from a randomized clinical trial of Promoting Resilience in Stress Management versus Usual Care, we examined whether response to Promoting Resilience in Stress Management differed across key sociodemographic characteristics. DESIGN: Adolescents and young adults with cancer completed patient-reported outcome measures of resilience, hope, benefit-finding, quality of life, and distress at enrollment and 6 months. Participants were stratified by sex, age, race, and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage based on home address (Area Deprivation Index scores with 8-10 = most disadvantaged). Differences in the magnitude of effect sizes between stratification subgroups were noted using a conservative cutoff of d > 0.5. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 12 to 25 years old, English-speaking, and receiving cancer care at Seattle Children's Hospital. RESULTS: In total, 92 adolescents and young adults (48 Promoting Resilience in Stress Management, 44 Usual Care) completed baseline measures. They were 43% female, 73% 12 to 17 years old, 64% White, and 24% most disadvantaged. Effect sizes stratified by sex, age, and race were in an expected positive direction and of similar magnitude for the majority of outcomes with some exceptions in magnitude of treatment effect. Those who lived in less disadvantaged neighborhoods benefited more from Promoting Resilience in Stress Management, and those living in most disadvantaged neighborhoods benefited less. CONCLUSION: The "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management" intervention demonstrated a positive effect for the majority of outcomes regardless of sex, age, and race. It may not be as helpful for adolescents and young adults living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Future studies must confirm its generalizability and integrate opportunities for improvement by targeting individual needs.

Exploratory analysis of treatment response trajectories in the PRISM trial: Models of psychosocial care.

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at high risk of negative psychosocial outcomes. Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM), a novel, brief, skill-based intervention, has demonstrated efficacy in improving psychosocial well-being for AYAs. We utilized data from a recent randomized trial of PRISM versus usual care (UC) to categorize and explore group differences in change trajectories of patient reported outcomes (PROs) over time. METHODS: One hundred English-speaking AYAs (aged 12-25 years old) with cancer were randomized to PRISM versus UC. At enrollment and 6 months later, AYAs completed validated PROs measuring resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale [CDRISC-10]), hope (Hope Scale), benefit finding (Benefit and Burden Scale for Children), cancer-specific quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life [PedsQL] Cancer Module), and distress (Kessler-6). Patient response trajectories were categorized as "improved," "consistently well," "consistently at risk," or "deteriorated" using minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) or established measure cutoffs for all PROs. Positive response trajectories consisted of the first two categories ("improved" and "consistently well"), and negative response trajectories consisted of the latter two categories ("consistently at risk" and "deteriorated"). RESULTS: Across all PROs, more patients in the PRISM arm "improved" in psychosocial well-being over time, and fewer PRISM recipients "deteriorated" over time. Across all PROs, a greater proportion of PRISM participants (vs UC) experienced positive response trajectories. Across all PROs, a greater proportion of UC participants experienced negative response trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: PRISM shows evidence of both a prevention effect and an intervention effect. Thus, PRISM may serve as a viable prevention and early intervention model for psychosocial care.

Hope and benefit finding: Results from the PRISM randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk for poor psychosocial outcomes, perhaps because they have not acquired skills to navigate the adversities of illness. In a recent phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT), the "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management" (PRISM) intervention was associated with improved patient-reported resilience, quality of life, and distress. In this planned analysis of secondary aims, we hypothesized PRISM would also improve targeted coping skills of hopeful thinking, benefit finding, and goal setting. METHODS: We conducted this parallel RCT at Seattle Children's Hospital from January 2015 to October 2016. English-speaking AYAs (12-25 years old) with cancer were randomized one-to-one to PRISM or usual care (UC). PRISM teaches stress-management, goal-setting, cognitive-reframing, and meaning-making skills in four sessions delivered in-person every other week. Participants completed surveys at enrollment and 6 months later. Mixed effects linear regression models evaluated associations between PRISM and benefit finding (Benefit-Finding Scale for Children), hopeful thinking (Hope Scale), and an exploratory outcome of goal setting (queried with open-ended items about participant's goals, measured qualitatively by three blinded reviewers). RESULTS: Of N = 92 AYAs (48 PRISM, 44 UC), 73% were 12-17 years old, 43% female, and 62% diagnosed with leukemia or lymphoma. PRISM was associated with improved benefit finding and hope with moderate-to-large effect sizes-benefit finding: +3.1 points, 95% CI 0.0, 6.2, d = 0.4, and P = 0.05; and hope: +3.6 points, 95% CI 0.7, 6.4, d = 0.6, and P = 0.01. We did not detect changes in goal setting (-0.5 points, 95% CI -1.2, 0.3, d = -0.3, P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: PRISM was associated with improvements in benefit finding and hopeful thinking, two adaptive coping skills which may mitigate long-term psychosocial risk.

Health-related quality of life changes following renal transplantation in children.

BACKGROUND: Studies of HRQoL after kidney transplant have yielded conflicting results. We sought to assess the impact of kidney transplant on HRQoL. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the PedsQL3.0ESRD module during dialysis and at 3 and 12 months following kidney transplant in 56 recipients. For the entire cohort, we described HRQoL scores at each time point and used ANOVA models to test for associations between demographic and transplant-related factors and post-transplant scores. We used linear mixed models to investigate interactions between transplant and demographic and transplant-related factors and to estimate differences between mean pre- and post-transplant scores. Longitudinal changes in HRQoL were assessed by t test. RESULTS: We found increases in all mean total scores, including subscales, at each assessed time period from dialysis to 3 months post-transplant to 12 months post-transplant. Post-transplant total scores did not differ by gender, race, proximity to hospital, allograft source, or dialysis modality, but did differ by recipient age. Among participants with both pre- and post-transplant observations, total scores increased for both recipients and parent-proxies. CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the association between kidney transplant and improvement in HRQoL in the first year following transplant. Future research should further explore outcomes over the longer-term and factors contributing to HRQoL among this population.

Unintentional Pediatric Marijuana Exposures Prior to and After Legalization and Commercial Availability of Recreational Marijuana in Washington State.

BACKGROUND: Washington State was one of the first states to legalize recreational marijuana. Increased availability of marijuana may result in more unintentional pediatric exposure, which often presents as altered mental status with unknown cause. OBJECTIVES: To quantify unintentional pediatric marijuana exposures reported to the Washington Poison Center (WAPC) prior to and after legalization and commercial availability of recreational marijuana. METHODS: Data were obtained from the WAPC database, toxiCALL®. Patients ≤ 9 years old with a reported marijuana exposure between July 2010 and July 2016 were included in the analysis. Patient and exposure characteristics were summarized and median exposure frequencies were calculated for the periods prior to and after legalization. RESULTS: There were 161 cases meeting the inclusion criteria that occurred between July 2010 and July 2016. Of these, 130 (81%) occurred in the 2.5-year period after legalization of recreational marijuana in January 2013. The median age of exposed children was 2 years (range 0-9 years). Eighty-one percent of the exposures occurred in the child's own home. The number of exposures per month increased after recreational marijuana was legalized in November 2012, and increased further once recreational marijuana shops were legally allowed to open in July 2014. CONCLUSION: Reported unintentional pediatric marijuana exposure has increased in the state of Washington since recreational marijuana was legalized. As marijuana becomes more available, clinicians should be aware of the risk of unintentional pediatric marijuana exposure, and this should inform lawmakers regarding regulations around childhood exposure to marijuana.

Emergency Provider Use of Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pediatric Constipation.

BACKGROUND: More than half of children evaluated as outpatients for abdominal pain are diagnosed with constipation. X-ray use in this scenario is variable: less than 5% in clinic settings, greater than 70% in emergency departments. X-rays increase misdiagnosis rate, remain costly, and involve radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the use of plain radiographs by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) providers in the diagnostic evaluation and management of pediatric constipation. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of PEM providers was performed. Survey participants were subscribers to the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine Listserv. To assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, participants were presented a case of pediatric constipation meeting Rome III clinical criteria. Participants also categorized frequency of x-ray use, reasons for obtaining, estimated diagnostic utility, and elements of institutional standard approach. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three hundred five of 1272 Listserv members (24%) responded. Ninety-nine percent elected to treat for constipation in a case meeting Rome III clinical criteria; one third (31%) would obtain plain radiographs for this same scenario. Plain radiographs were viewed as somewhat (59%) or minimally (29%) value-added in the evaluation of suspected pediatric constipation. Obtaining family buy-in (44%) was the most common reason for utilizing plain radiographs. Frequency of use varied across geographic regions and with participant and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests that many PEM providers obtain radiographs to convince families of the diagnosis of constipation. This is not a viable management plan given the risks of radiation as well as costs. There remains room for improvement as we attempt to reduce use of radiation in the evaluation of common pediatric illnesses.

Promoting resilience in adolescents and young adults with cancer: Results from the PRISM randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk for poor psychosocial outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether a novel intervention targeting resilience resources would improve patient-reported resilience, quality of life, and psychological distress. METHODS: In this parallel, phase 2 randomized controlled trial, English-speaking AYAs (12-25 years old) with cancer were randomized to the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention or usual care (UC). PRISM is a brief, skills-based intervention targeting stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning making. Participants completed surveys at enrollment and 6 months. Mixed effects regression models evaluated associations between PRISM and the primary outcome (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores) and secondary outcomes (generic and cancer-related quality of life [Pediatric Quality of Life modules], psychological distress [Kessler-6], and anxiety/depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression]) at 6 months. RESULTS: Ninety-two AYAs were enrolled, were randomized, and completed baseline surveys (48 in the PRISM group and 44 in the UC group); 73% were 12 to 17 years old, and 62% had leukemia or lymphoma. Attrition was primarily due to medical complications and/or death; 36 PRISM participants and 38 UC participants completed 6-month surveys. PRISM was associated with improved resilience (+3.0 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-5.4; P = .02) and cancer-specific quality of life (+9.6; 95% CI, 2.6-16.7; P = .01) and reduced psychological distress (-2.1; 95% CI, -4.1 to -0.2; P = .03) but not generic quality of life (+7.2; 95% CI, -0.8 to 15.2; P = .08). Although anxiety was similar between the groups, 2 PRISM participants (6%) and 8 UC participants (21%) met the criteria for depression at 6 months (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-1.09; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: PRISM was associated with improved psychosocial outcomes in comparison with UC, suggesting that brief, skills-based interventions for AYAs may provide a benefit.

Diastolic pressure indices offer a novel approach to predicting risk of graft loss after pediatric heart transplant.

PH is a risk factor for GL after HTx. However, traditional parameters are not reliable predictors of risk in children. We hypothesized that DPI (dPAP and DPG) are predictive of GL in pediatric HTx recipients. The UNOS/SRTR database was reviewed to identify pediatric HTx recipients (age <18 years) between 1994 and 2013. Recipients with pretransplant hemodynamic data were grouped by diagnosis (CMP or CHD), and the groups were analyzed separately. Bivariate Cox regression analysis examined the association between hemodynamic variables and GL. DPI showed the strongest association with early GL in recipients with CMP (dPAP: HR = 1.25 [1.09-1.42]; DPG: 1.24 [1.11-1.38]). Among CHD recipients, DPI were associated with early GL in those with preexisting PH (dPAP: HR = 1.16 [1.01-1.33]; DPG: HR = 1.10 [1.00-1.21]). No cutoff values for "high-risk" DPI were identified, but a continuous relationship between higher DPI and risk of early GL was observed. DPI are associated with early GL in select pediatric HTx recipients. Our findings suggest that DPI should be considered as part of routine hemodynamic assessment for pediatric HTx candidates.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Lidocaine Analgesia for Transurethral Bladder Catheterization Delivered via Blunt Tipped Applicator in Young Children.

OBJECTIVE: Transurethral bladder catheterization (TUBC) is a painful, frequently performed procedure for collecting sterile urine. We sought to determine if administration of intraurethral lidocaine before TUBC using a blunt tipped syringe decreases procedural pain in young children in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: Randomized clinical trial of children 0 to 36 months old requiring TUBC for collection of urine in a pediatric emergency department was performed. Patients received intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly or usual care (no analgesia). Randomization was stratified by sex. Intraurethral lidocaine jelly was administered via Uro-Jet, 5 minutes before TUBC. Baseline child state, lidocaine application, TUBC, and child state 1 minute post-TUBC were videotaped. Neither providers nor parents were blinded to study arm. Videos were scored by a trained, independent, blinded reviewer using the Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) and Modified Behavioral Pain Score scales. Pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Our primary outcome was difference in FLACC scores between groups. RESULTS: Eighty children were enrolled in the study, and 73 had analyzable data. No differences were detected in pain by mean FLACC score between intervention (8; 95% confidence interval, 7-9) and control (9; 95% confidence interval, 8-10) groups. There were no differences between groups in mean FLACC score when stratified by age or sex or in mean Modified Behavioral Pain Score. CONCLUSIONS: Intraurethral lidocaine for TUBC for urine collection using a blunt tipped applicator did not improve procedural pain scores. Pain scores were high across groups. Further study should be performed to improve analgesia for this highly painful procedure.

Hope, distress, and later quality of life among adolescent and young adults with cancer.

We aimed to explore the predictive value of screening for distress alone, hope alone, or a combination of both. In a multicenter prospective study, 37 English-speaking adolescents and young adults with cancer and 40 parents completed validated instruments at diagnosis ("baseline") and 3-6 months later ("follow-up"). Correlated regression models described associations. Within each instrument, baseline and follow-up scores were associated. However, only a composite hope/distress score predicted all three patient-centered outcomes. Multidimensional screens incorporating positive and negative psychosocial constructs may predict patient-centered outcomes better than isolated, single-construct instruments.