Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that there is no significant variability in apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) at assessment of the short- and midterm reproducibility of ADC measurements in a healthy population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this prospective institutional review board-approved study after they provided written informed consent. A 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) system was used to perform five axial diffusion-weighted (DW) abdominal acquisitions (session 1). A mean of 147 days +/- 20 (standard deviation) later, 16 of the 20 volunteers were imaged again with use of the same protocol and MR system (session 2). The mean ADCs for three regions of interest (ROIs) in five anatomic locations (right hepatic lobe, spleen, and head, body, and tail of pancreas) were calculated. The coefficient of variation (CV, equal to standard deviation divided by mean) was calculated for each subject, session, and anatomic location. The ADC and CV data were then analyzed by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P < .001) in mean ADCs among the five anatomic locations. There were no significant differences in ADCs among the various repeated sequence acquisitions or the three ROIs. There were no significant differences in ADCs between imaging sessions 1 and 2. ADCs were fairly stable over the midterm within a given individual. Finally, there were no significant differences in resulting CVs between the imaging sessions or anatomic locations. The mean CV for ADC measurement reproducibility was 14% (95% confidence interval: 13%, 15%). CONCLUSION: The mean CV for short- and midterm ADC reproducibility was 14% at abdominal DW imaging. Treatment effects of less than approximately 27% (change in ADC divided by pretreatment ADC) will not be clinically detectable with confidence with one acquisition in a single individual.

Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine what effects a variety of diffusion encoding techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T have on measured abdominal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained in a healthy population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this prospective Institutional Review Board-approved study following written informed consent. Imaging was performed on a 1.5 T and a 3 T magnetic resonance system (Siemens, Erlangen) with several abdominal axial diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions: an orthogonal diffusion encoding with b-values of 0/400 seconds/mm, and a series of four 3-scan trace weighted acquisitions with b-values of 0/50, 0/400, 0/800, 0/50/400/800 seconds/mm, respectively. The mean ADC values were calculated for 3 regions of interest (ROI) in 5 locations (right hepatic lobe, spleen, pancreatic head, body, and tail). The ADC data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between measured ADC values at 1.5 T and 3 T for liver (P < 0.001), but not for pancreas (P = 0.427) or spleen (P = 0.167). There was no significant difference (P > 0.999) in the measured ADC values between the orthogonal encodings and the 3-scan trace weighted encoding with the same b-value. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) between all 4 weighting schemes for the 3-scan trace with the measured ADC decreasing with increasing b-value. CONCLUSION: Measured abdominal ADC values depend on the exact selection of b-value used for encoding for liver, pancreas, and spleen. In addition, the measured ADC values depend on the field strength of the scanner for liver.