Wellness project implementation within Houston's Faith and Diabetes initiative: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Faith-based health promotion has shown promise for supporting healthy lifestyles, but has limited evidence of reaching scale or sustainability. In one recent such effort, volunteers from a diverse range of faith organizations were trained as peer educators to implement diabetes self-management education (DSME) classes within their communities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with provision of these classes within six months of peer-educator training. METHODS: This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify patterns from interviews, observations, attendance records, and organizational background information. Two research team members thematically coded interview transcripts and observation memos to identify patterns distinguishing faith organizations that did, versus did not, conduct DSME classes within six months of peer-educator training. Bivariate statistics were also used to identify faith organizational characteristics associated with DSME class completion within this time frame. RESULTS: Volunteers from 24 faith organizations received peer-educator training. Of these, 15 led a DSME class within six months, graduating a total of 132 participants. Thematic analyses yielded two challenges experienced disproportionately by organizations unable to complete DSME within six months: [1] Their peer educators experienced DSME as complex, despite substantial planning efforts at simplification, and [2] the process of engaging peer educators and leadership within their organizations was often more difficult than anticipated, despite initial communication by Faith and Diabetes organizers intended to secure informed commitments by both groups. Many peer educators were overwhelmed by training content, the responsibility required to start and sustain DSME classes, and other time commitments. Other priorities competed for time in participants' lives and on organizational calendars, and scheduling processes could be slow. In an apparent dynamic of "crowding out," coordination was particularly difficult in larger organizations, which were less likely than smaller organizations to complete DSME classes despite their more substantial resources. CONCLUSIONS: Initial commitment from faith organizations' leadership and volunteers may not suffice to implement even relatively short and low cost health promotion programs. Faith organizations might benefit from realistic previews about just how challenging it is to make these programs a sufficiently high organizational and individual priority.

Substance-use and sexual harm reduction strategies of methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men and inject drugs.

Research indicates that men who have sex with men (MSM), use methamphetamine, and inject drugs are at high risk of HIV infection and they employ multiple harm reduction strategies simultaneously to reduce that risk. In this study, we identified substances most commonly injected and harm reduction strategies most often employed by methamphetamine-using MSM, used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify patterns of harm reduction strategies, and differentiated MSM within each class by individual characteristics. We analyzed data from 284 participants who completed an online cross-sectional survey. Commonly injected substances were methamphetamine (93.70%), gamma-hydroxybutyrate/gamma-butyrolactone (41.55%), flunitrazepam (40.49%), and cocaine (35.56%). The substance-use strategies most often used were avoidance of sharing needles (85.92%) and use of bleach to clean drug paraphernalia (64.08%). The sexual strategy most often used was avoidance of condomless anal intercourse (CAS) while using drugs (77.11%). Using an LCA approach, we identified three classes distinguishable by age, race/ethnicity, and outness. One class (19%) employed lay strategies to reduce harm: they avoided sharing drug preparation equipment, serosorted when sharing needles and equipment or having CAS, and practiced withdrawal when having CAS. The largest class (53%) combined sexual and substance-use strategies: they avoided sharing needles, used bleach to clean needles and equipment, avoided CAS when using drugs, and used extra lubricant when having CAS. The remaining class (28%) employed only substance-use rather than sexual strategies. More MSM of color were in the substance-use class, and more young, non-Hispanic White men were in the lay class. The low utilization of sexual strategies by younger, non-Hispanic White men in the lay class is concerning as they are just as likely as older, non-Hispanic White men in the combined class to have CAS with multiple male partners. Interventionists should consider these differences when developing interventions tailored to methamphetamine-using MSM.

Dimension reduction of 911 Good Samaritan Laws: Drawing inferences from policy surveillance.

BACKGROUND: 911 Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) extend legal protection to people reporting drug overdoses who may otherwise be in violation of controlled substance laws. Mixed evidence suggests GSLs decrease overdose mortality, but these studies overlook substantial heterogeneity across states. The GSL Inventory exhaustively catalogs features of these laws into four categories: breadth, burden, strength, and exemption. The present study reduces this dataset to reveal patterns in implementation, facilitate future evaluations, and to produce a roadmap for the dimension reduction of further policy surveillance datasets. METHODS: We produced multidimensional scaling plots visualizing the frequency of co-occurring GSL features from the GSL Inventory as well as similarity among state laws. We clustered laws into meaningful groups by shared features; produced a decision tree identifying salient features predicting group membership; scored their relative breadth, burden, strength, and exemption of immunity; and associated groups with state sociopolitical and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: In the feature plot, breadth and strength features segregate from burdens and exemptions. Regions in the state plot differentiate quantity of substances immunized, burden of reporting requirements, and immunity for probationers. State laws may be clustered into five groups distinguished by proximity, salient features, and sociopolitical variables. DISCUSSION: This study reveals competing attitudes toward harm reduction that underly GSLs across states. These analyses provide a roadmap for the application of dimension reduction methods to policy surveillance datasets, accommodating their binary structure and longitudinal observations. These methods preserve higher-dimensional variance in a form amenable to statistical evaluation.

Self-Reported Quality, Health, and Cost-Related Outcomes of Care Coordination Among Patients with Complex Health Needs.

Care coordination is an increasingly popular strategy to help patients with complex health conditions manage their diseases more effectively. The purpose of the current study was to assess associations between patient-reported receipt of care coordination and their experiences of health, health care quality, and cost-related outcomes. Regression analyses of data from 431 patients across 13 Texas providers indicate that patients who reported receiving care coordination had higher odds of perceiving having enough information about how to manage their conditions (OR 2.02, P < .01), having information about education and treatments available (OR 1.87, P < .01), and reporting better access to care (beta = .27, P < .01). Receipt of care coordination was not associated with patients' reports of how up-to-date their doctors were about care from other providers, patients' health-related functioning, or patients' intention to return to the emergency department. Patients' reasons for intending to return to the emergency department included the speed of care there relative to alternatives and satisfaction with the quality of care they had received previously in the emergency department. Results suggest that care coordination in usual practice may improve patient preventive care, but not some other health or cost-related outcomes.

Effect of Patient Care Coordination on Hospital Encounters and Related Costs.

Given high costs of hospital encounters, providers have increasingly turned to patient-centered health care programs to improve cost-effectiveness and population health for patients with high needs. Yet, evidence is mixed about program effectiveness. This pre-post comparative analysis assessed whether the number of hospital encounters and related costs decreased for patients who received care coordination services funded through Texas's 1115(a) Medicaid waiver incentive-based payment model, under which providers created new programs to improve care quality, population health, and cost-effectiveness. This study compared hospital records for patients who were frequent emergency department users at 4 urban safety net hospitals in Texas and state data for hospital encounters for the calendar years 2013 through 2015. The study included 9061 patients who frequently used emergency departments: 4117 patients who received waiver-funded care coordination services at 2 hospitals and 4944 patients who received usual care at 2 comparison hospitals. Regression models compared changes in patients' hospital use and length of stay for the 2 groups. Patients receiving waiver-funded care coordination had a 19% lower probability of hospitalization after receiving care coordination relative to patients who received usual care, for a mean savings of approximately $1500 per year per patient. Receiving care coordination was not associated with a change in length of stay. Care coordination developed by hospitals to meet the needs of their most vulnerable patients can reduce their use of hospital resources through better preventive care. These findings bolster the business case for care coordination, which may help ensure service continuation.

Integrating Primary Care Into Community Mental Health Centres in Texas, USA: Results of a Case Study Investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that people with serious mental illness benefit from receiving primary care within mental health care settings, there is little research on this type of integration. The objective of this study was to characterize how providers and patients experienced implementation of primary care into specialty mental health services. METHODS: During site visits, study team members interviewed staff and conducted focus groups with patients at 10 United States community mental health centres then beginning to integrate primary into their practices. One year later, follow up phone interviews with key centre staff informants validated and updated findings. Data analysis included thematic coding of results from staff interviews and patient focus groups. RESULTS: Findings included the importance of the scope of primary care services provided on site, given limited alternatives available to patients; rapid scale-up; overcoming challenges in provider recruitment and retention; and adaptations to engage patients as well as to improve communication between mental health and primary care providers. CONCLUSION: Providers and patients perceived improvements through integrated care. However, the majority of patients were uninsured, and the funding was short term. The long-term viability of integrated care for community mental health centre patients may hinge on adequate, predictable public funding.