RESUMO
Systemic AL amyloidosis is an incurable condition with various presentations and may cause multiple complications related to organ involvement. As survival has improved, disease and therapy-related quality of life (QoL) is becoming an increasingly important treatment endpoint. We review the literature summarising the utilised QoL questionnaires (QLQs) and assess their validity according to COSMIN (Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) standards. Thirteen retrospective observational studies and thirty-two prospective clinical trials were analysed. Most QLQs are generic or only validated in populations with distinct complications of the disease. None meet 'strong evidence' for validation in this context. There is a need to develop a disease-specific QLQ, which could inform treatment choices and facilitate the approval of novel therapies.
Assuntos
Amiloidose de Cadeia Leve de Imunoglobulina , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Amiloidose de Cadeia Leve de Imunoglobulina/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) is an incurable chronic B-cell malignancy, but highly responsive to treatment. Treatments include fixed-duration chemotherapy and continuous oral chemoimmunotherapy. In this expanding field, it is important to have reliable information on the impact of the various therapies on patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognised as important to understand patient experience of disease beyond traditional clinical outcome measures. Four QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life core questionnaire], BIPQ [Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire], HADS [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale], EQ-5D-5L [EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system questionnaire]) are embedded in the UK national WM registry, the Rory Morrison Registry. We reviewed the results from a snapshot of PROMs. As of November 2021, 155 patients completed PROM data with 98% completion rate across all 58 questions. Complete clinical information was available for 52 patients. The majority of QoL questions (69%) failed to elicit a notable median response. Only four questions elicited statistically significant responses when comparing groups, and these were exclusively found in the EuroQoL-5D-5L and HADS questionnaires. Our data suggest that widely used questionnaires may not be suitable for patients with WM. We advocate the development of WM-specific outcome measures to overcome this.
RESUMO
The Corona Virus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with a very high incidence of thrombotic complications. The exact mechanisms for this excess risk for clots have not been elucidated although one of the often-quoted pathophysiological entity is immunothrombosis. Recognition of thrombotic complications early on in this pandemic led to an over-explosion of studies which looked at the benefits of anticoagulation to mitigate this risk. In this review, we examine the rationale for thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 with particular reference to dosing and discuss what may guide the decision-making process to consider anticoagulation. In addition, we explore the rationale for thrombosis prevention measures in special populations including outpatient setting, pregnant females, children, those with high body mass index and those on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.