Integrating data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies to predict the response to pregabalin in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: More patient-specific medical care is expected as more is learned about variations in patient responses to medical treatments. Analytical tools enable insights by linking treatment responses from different types of studies, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Given the importance of evidence from both types of studies, our goal was to integrate these types of data into a single predictive platform to help predict response to pregabalin in individual patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN). METHODS: We utilized three pivotal RCTs of pregabalin (398 North American patients) and the largest observational study of pregabalin (3159 German patients). We implemented a hierarchical cluster analysis to identify patient clusters in the Observational Study to which RCT patients could be matched using the coarsened exact matching (CEM) technique, thereby creating a matched dataset. We then developed autoregressive moving average models (ARMAXs) to estimate weekly pain scores for pregabalin-treated patients in each cluster in the matched dataset using the maximum likelihood method. Finally, we validated ARMAX models using Observational Study patients who had not matched with RCT patients, using t tests between observed and predicted pain scores. RESULTS: Cluster analysis yielded six clusters (287-777 patients each) with the following clustering variables: gender, age, pDPN duration, body mass index, depression history, pregabalin monotherapy, prior gabapentin use, baseline pain score, and baseline sleep interference. CEM yielded 1528 unique patients in the matched dataset. The reduction in global imbalance scores for the clusters after adding the RCT patients (ranging from 6 to 63% depending on the cluster) demonstrated that the process reduced the bias of covariates in five of the six clusters. ARMAX models of pain score performed well (R 2 : 0.85-0.91; root mean square errors: 0.53-0.57). t tests did not show differences between observed and predicted pain scores in the 1955 patients who had not matched with RCT patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of cluster analyses, CEM, and ARMAX modeling enabled strong predictive capabilities with respect to pain scores. Integrating RCT and Observational Study data using CEM enabled effective use of Observational Study data to predict patient responses.

Spinal effects of the fesoterodine metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine and/or doxazosin in rats with or without partial urethral obstruction.

PURPOSE: The combination of muscarinic receptor and alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists is increasingly used for benign prostatic hyperplasia related lower urinary tract symptoms. In addition to the well established peripheral site of action, little is known about the central effects of muscarinic receptor antagonists and muscarinic receptor/alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist combinations on bladder function, partly due to poor brain penetration after systemic administration. We assessed the effects of intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine, an active metabolite of fesoterodine, in obstructed and nonobstructed rats, and of combined intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine/doxazosin in a rat model of partial urethral obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 80 male Sprague-Dawley rats to test various doses of intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine and/or intrathecal doxazosin on urodynamic parameters. Urodynamic evaluation without anesthesia was done 3 days after bladder and intrathecal catheterization. Two weeks before urodynamics 40 rats underwent partial urethral obstruction. RESULTS: Intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine had no urodynamic effects in nonobstructed rats. Compared to controls obstructed rats had increased bladder pressure and weight, and voiding frequency. In obstructed rats 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine restored urodynamic parameters to those seen in nonobstructed animals. Doxazosin had effects similar to those of intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine. When the 2 drugs were combined, at the doses used only small additional effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Urodynamic changes in obstructed rats can be normalized by intrathecal 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine and by intrathecal doxazosin. The central pathways on which the 2 drugs act seem to be up-regulated with partial urethral obstruction and less relevant under normal conditions.

Urodynamic evaluation of fesoterodine metabolite, doxazosin and their combination in a rat model of partial urethral obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the urodynamic effects of fesoterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent, alone and combined with doxazosin, in a rat model of partial urethral obstruction (PUO), as 35-83% of men with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, and as the combination of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor- and muscarinic-receptor antagonists has been proposed to be beneficial for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven male Sprague-Dawley rats (250 g) had surgically induced PUO; 2 weeks later they were evaluated by cystometry with no anaesthesia or any restraint. After a 1-h period either 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT, the active metabolite of fesoterodine, previously known as SPM 7605), doxazosin or a combination of both, was given intravenously (0.1 mg/kg body weight), and cystometry was continued for another 45 min. Fifteen healthy, age-matched rats served as a control. RESULTS: At 2 weeks after surgery the obstructed rats had an greater bladder weight, threshold pressure (TP) and micturition frequency (MF), and lower bladder capacity (BCap) and micturition volume (MV) than the controls. 5-HMT did not cause urinary retention in obstructed rats, but decreased TP, maximum pressure (MP), spontaneous bladder activity (SA) and, paradoxically, increased MF. Doxazosin alone decreased TP, MP, MF and increased BCap and MV. 5-HMT and doxazosin together did not depress the ability to empty the bladder, and showed decreased TP, MP and SA. CONCLUSIONS: 5-HMT, alone and in combination, did not impair the voiding ability in obstructed rats. Doxazosin counteracted some of the 'negative' effects of 5-HMT in this model (increase of MF) and did not attenuate the 'positive' effects (decrease of bladder SA). In this model, the combination of 5-HMT and doxazosin appeared to be urodynamically safe and well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of tolterodine extended-release in men with overactive bladder symptoms treated with an α-blocker: effect of baseline prostate-specific antigen concentration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the efficacy and safety of a combination of tolterodine extended-release (ER) plus α-blocker treatment varies with high or low levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men who have persistent overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms after any α-blocker monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged ≥ 40 years were eligible if they reported ≥ 8 micturitions/24 h, including ≥ 1 urgency episode/24 h with or without urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), and at least some moderate bladder-related problems at baseline despite receiving treatment with an α-blocker for ≥ 1 month. Exclusion criteria included a postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) of ≥ 200 mL and history of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. Subjects were randomly assigned to tolterodine-ER 4 mg or placebo for 12 weeks; all subjects continued their α-blocker treatment throughout the study. Subjects completed 5-day bladder diaries at baseline and week 12, in which they recorded all micturitions and rated the sensation associated with each micturition using the 5-point Urinary Sensation Scale (USS). For this post hoc analysis, efficacy, safety, and tolerability data were stratified by the study median PSA concentration at baseline (1.41 ng/mL). RESULTS: In the tolterodine-ER +α-blocker and placebo +α-blocker groups, 160 and 159 men, respectively, had PSA levels of <1.41 ng/mL, and 166 and 160 men, respectively, had PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL. Men with higher PSA levels were slightly older and had higher PVR at baseline compared with men with lower PSA levels. At week 12, improvements in daytime micturitions, 24-h urgency episodes, and daytime urgency episodes were significantly greater with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker both in men with PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL and those with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL (P < 0.05). Among men with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL, improvements in 24-h micturitions and frequency-urgency sum (sum of USS ratings for all micturitions) were also significantly greater with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker (P < 0.05). There were no significant treatment differences in change in UUI episodes in either PSA group (although only 19% of subjects reported UUI at baseline), nor in nocturnal micturitions or nocturnal urgency episodes. Among men with PSA levels of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL, there was a statistically significant increase in PVR (P = 0.036) and decrease in maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max); P = 0.038) with tolterodine-ER +α-blocker vs placebo +α-blocker; these changes were not considered clinically meaningful. There were no treatment differences for changes in PVR or Q(max) among men with PSA levels of < 1.41 ng/mL. One subject receiving tolterodine-ER +α-blocker (PSA concentration of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL) and two subjects receiving placebo +α-blocker (one each in the PSA concentration subgroups of ≥ 1.41 ng/mL and < 1.41 ng/mL) had acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. CONCLUSION: In a 12-week study, the addition of tolterodine-ER to α-blocker therapy improved key OAB symptoms and appeared to be well tolerated compared with placebo +α-blocker in men with persistent OAB symptoms, regardless of subjects' prostate size as judged by serum PSA concentration.

Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head-to-head placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine 8 mg with tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg and placebo in a randomized clinical trial of patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 12-week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, eligible patients reported OAB symptoms for > or = 3 months and recorded > or = 8 voids and > or = 1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode per 24 h in 3-day bladder diaries at baseline. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week then 8 mg for 11 weeks); tolterodine ER 4 mg; or placebo (with sham dose escalation for tolterodine ER and placebo). Endpoints were changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint), total and nocturnal voids, urgency episodes, severe urgency episodes, and frequency-urgency sum per 24 h; mean voided volume per void (MVV); and the OAB questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). Safety and tolerability were assessed and summarized over the 12-week study period. RESULTS: Fesoterodine (636 patients) significantly improved UUI episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) compared with tolterodine ER (641 patients; P = 0.017) and placebo (313 patients; P < 0.001). Fesoterodine also produced significantly greater improvements than tolterodine ER in MVV (P = 0.005). Fesoterodine significantly improved all diary endpoints compared with placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.327). Tolterodine ER significantly improved all diary endpoints vs placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.506) and MVV (P = 0.103). Diary dry rates (the proportion of patients reporting no UUI episodes at endpoint among those with one or more UUI episodes at baseline) were significantly higher with fesoterodine (64%) than with tolterodine ER (57%; P = 0.015) and placebo (45%; P < 0.001). Improvements in PPBC, UPS and OAB-q scale and domain scores at week 12 were all significantly better with fesoterodine than placebo (all P < 0.001) and tolterodine ER (all P < 0.05) except for the OAB-q Sleep domain vs tolterodine ER (P = 0.081). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 5% in the fesoterodine group, 16% and 4% in the tolterodine ER group, and 6% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 6%, 4% and 2% in the fesoterodine, tolterodine ER, and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with OAB, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superior efficacy over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo in reducing UUI episodes (primary endpoint) and in improving most patient-reported outcome measures. Both active treatments were well tolerated.

Correlations among improvements in urgency urinary incontinence, health-related quality of life, and perception of bladder-related problems in incontinent subjects with overactive bladder treated with tolterodine or placebo.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrate that tolterodine extended release (ER) significantly improves urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes. Instruments that measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide additional information that is valuable for assessing whether clinical improvements are meaningful to the patient. This study determined the correlation of changes in bladder diary variables and other PROs in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Subjects with OAB, urinary frequency, and UUI were treated with 4 mg once-daily tolterodine ER or placebo for 12 weeks. Subjects completed 7-day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) at baseline and week 12. Only subjects who reported at least some minor bladder-related problems at baseline (PPBC score > or = 3) were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Reductions in UUI episodes per week were significantly greater in the tolterodine ER group (n = 500) compared with the placebo group (n = 487) at week 12 (-71% vs -33%, P < 0.0001). A significantly greater percentage of subjects in the tolterodine ER group reported improvement on the PPBC versus placebo (58% vs 45%, P < 0.0001), and 7 of 10 KHQ domains were significantly improved versus placebo (all P < 0.05). Significant correlations were found for median percentage changes in UUI episodes with changes in PPBC scores (r = 0.35,P < 0.0001) and the 7 improved KHQ domains (r = 0.16-0.32, P < or = 0.0011). Changes in PPBC scores and all KHQ domains were significantly correlated (r = 0.13-0.38, P < or = 0.009) in the tolterodine ER group. Correlations among endpoints in the placebo group were similar to those observed in the tolterodine ER group. CONCLUSION: Improvement in UUI episodes after 12 weeks of treatment with tolterodine ER or placebo was correlated with improvements in patients' perception of their bladder-related problems and health-related quality of life. Correlations were moderate in magnitude but statistically significant, suggesting that PROs are important and relevant measures for evaluating OAB treatment.

Integrating Machine Learning With Microsimulation to Classify Hypothetical, Novel Patients for Predicting Pregabalin Treatment Response Based on Observational and Randomized Data in Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Variability in patient treatment responses can be a barrier to effective care. Utilization of available patient databases may improve the prediction of treatment responses. We evaluated machine learning methods to predict novel, individual patient responses to pregabalin for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, utilizing an agent-based modeling and simulation platform that integrates real-world observational study (OS) data and randomized clinical trial (RCT) data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The best supervised machine learning methods were selected (through literature review) and combined in a novel way for aligning patients with relevant subgroups that best enable prediction of pregabalin responses. Data were derived from a German OS of pregabalin (N=2642) and nine international RCTs (N=1320). Coarsened exact matching of OS and RCT patients was used and a hierarchical cluster analysis was implemented. We tested which machine learning methods would best align candidate patients with specific clusters that predict their pain scores over time. Cluster alignments would trigger assignments of cluster-specific time-series regressions with lagged variables as inputs in order to simulate "virtual" patients and generate 1000 trajectory variations for given novel patients. RESULTS: Instance-based machine learning methods (k-nearest neighbor, supervised fuzzy c-means) were selected for quantitative analyses. Each method alone correctly classified 56.7% and 39.1% of patients, respectively. An "ensemble method" (combining both methods) correctly classified 98.4% and 95.9% of patients in the training and testing datasets, respectively. CONCLUSION: An ensemble combination of two instance-based machine learning techniques best accommodated different data types (dichotomous, categorical, continuous) and performed better than either technique alone in assigning novel patients to subgroups for predicting treatment outcomes using microsimulation. Assignment of novel patients to a cluster of similar patients has the potential to improve prediction of patient outcomes for chronic conditions in which initial treatment response can be incorporated using microsimulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRIES: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00156078, NCT00159679, NCT00143156, NCT00553475.

Correction: Using time series analysis approaches for improved prediction of pain outcomes in subgroups of patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207120.].

Assessing the Value of Time Series Real-World and Clinical Trial Data vs. Baseline-Only Data in Predicting Responses to Pregabalin Therapy for Patients with Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Treatment challenges necessitate new approaches to customize care to individual patient needs. Integrating data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies may reduce potential covariate biases, yielding information to improve treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to predict pregabalin responses, in individuals with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, by examining time series data (lagged inputs) collected after treatment initiation vs. baseline using microsimulation. METHODS: The platform simulated pregabalin-treated patients to estimate hypothetical future pain responses over 6 weeks based on six distinct time series regressions with lagged variables as inputs (hereafter termed "time series regressions"). Data were from three randomized controlled trials (N = 398) and an observational study (N = 3159). Regressions were derived after performing a hierarchical cluster analysis with a matched patient dataset from coarsened exact matching. Regressions were validated using unmatched (observational study vs. randomized controlled trial) patients. Predictive implications (of 6-week outcomes) were compared using only baseline vs. 1- to 2-week prior data. RESULTS: Time series regressions for pain performed well (adjusted R2 0.85-0.91; root mean square error 0.53-0.57); those with only baseline data performed less well (adjusted R2 0.13-0.44; root mean square error 1.11-1.40). Simulated patient distributions yielded positive predictive values for > 50% pain score improvements from baseline for the six clusters (287-777 patients each; range 0.87-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Effective prediction of pregabalin response for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy was accomplished through combining cluster analyses, coarsened exact matching, and time series regressions, reflecting distinct patterns of baseline and "on-treatment" variables. These results advance the understanding of microsimulation to predict patient treatment responses through integration and inter-relationships of multiple, complex, and time-dependent characteristics.

WHY COMBINE DIFFERENT DATA SOURCES?: Analyzing the tremendous amount of patient data can provide meaningful insights to improve healthcare quality. Using statistical methods to combine data from clinical trials with real-world studies can improve overall data quality (e.g., reducing biases related to real-world patient variability). WHY CONSIDER A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS?: The best predictor of future outcomes is past outcomes. A "time series" collects data at regular intervals over time. Statistical analyses of time series data allow us to discern time-dependent patterns to predict future clinical outcomes. Modeling and simulation make it possible to combine enormous amounts of data from clinical trial databases to predict a patient's clinical response based on data from similar patients. This approach improves selecting the right drug/dose for the right patient at the right time (i.e., personalized medicine). Using modeling and simulation, we predicted which patients would show a positive response to pregabalin (a neuropathic pain drug) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. WHAT ARE THE MAJOR FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS?: For pregabalin-treated patients, a time series analysis had substantially more predictive value vs. analysis only of baseline data (i.e., data collected at treatment initiation). The ability to best predict which patients will respond to therapy has the overall implication of better informing drug treatment decisions. For example, an appropriate modeling and simulation platform complete with relevant historical clinical data could be integrated into a stand-alone device used to monitor and also predict a patient's response to therapy based on daily outcome measures (e.g., smartphone apps, wearable technologies).

Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a post hoc analysis of a phase III trial, the maximum recommended doses of fesoterodine (8 mg) and tolterodine (4 mg) for improving overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as fesoterodine effectively reduces OAB symptoms vs placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with frequency (> or =eight voids/24 h) and either urgency (> or =six episodes over 3 days) or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI; > or =three episodes over 3 days) were randomized to placebo, fesoterodine 4 or 8 mg, or tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg for 12 weeks; fesoterodine 4 mg data were published elsewhere. Patients completed a 3-day bladder diary in which they recorded the time of each void, voided volume (VV), and the severity of urgency. A post hoc inferential analysis was conducted on the primary endpoint (voids/24 h), the two co-primary endpoints (UUI episodes/24 h and treatment response), several secondary endpoints (severe urgency plus UUI per 24 h, mean VV (MVV)/void, and continent days/week), HRQoL, using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and self-reported bladder-related problems. A subanalysis also assessed all endpoints for patients who were incontinent at baseline. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating adverse events, residual urine volume, laboratory variables and treatment withdrawals. RESULTS: By week 12, patients with OAB in both active-treatment groups showed significant improvements in most bladder diary variables and treatment response rates compared with placebo. Fesoterodine 8 mg was statistically significantly better than tolterodine ER 4 mg for improving UUI episodes, severe urgency plus UUI, mean VV, and number of continent days/week. In addition, the fesoterodine and tolterodine ER groups showed significantly greater improvements in HRQoL than the placebo group, with positive changes in most domains of the KHQ and an improvement in ICIQ-SF score. The fesoterodine 8-mg group had statistically significant improvements over placebo in eight of nine KHQ domains. A major improvement in the severity of bladder-related problems was reported by 39% of the fesoterodine 8 mg and 34% of the tolterodine ER groups vs 25% of those on placebo (P < or = 0.01). Results for the subgroup of incontinent patients at baseline were similar to the overall results. Adverse events reported most commonly with active treatment included dry mouth, constipation, dry eye, dry throat, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Both fesoterodine and tolterodine ER significantly improved OAB symptoms and HRQoL, with statistically significant advantages for fesoterodine 8 mg compared with tolterodine ER on several important endpoints.

Using time series analysis approaches for improved prediction of pain outcomes in subgroups of patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Prior work applied hierarchical clustering, coarsened exact matching (CEM), time series regressions with lagged variables as inputs, and microsimulation to data from three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and a large German observational study (OS) to predict pregabalin pain reduction outcomes for patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Here, data were added from six RCTs to reduce covariate bias of the same OS and improve accuracy and/or increase the variety of patients for pain response prediction. Using hierarchical cluster analysis and CEM, a matched dataset was created from the OS (N = 2642) and nine total RCTs (N = 1320). Using a maximum likelihood method, we estimated weekly pain scores for pregabalin-treated patients for each cluster (matched dataset); the models were validated with RCT data that did not match with OS data. We predicted novel 'virtual' patient pain scores over time using simulations including instance-based machine learning techniques to assign novel patients to a cluster, then applying cluster-specific regressions to predict pain response trajectories. Six clusters were identified according to baseline variables (gender, age, insulin use, body mass index, depression history, pregabalin monotherapy, prior gabapentin, pain score, and pain-related sleep interference score). CEM yielded 1766 patients (matched dataset) having lower covariate imbalances. Regression models for pain performed well (adjusted R-squared 0.90-0.93; root mean square errors 0.41-0.48). Simulations showed positive predictive values for achieving >50% and >30% change-from-baseline pain score improvements (range 68.6-83.8% and 86.5-93.9%, respectively). Using more RCTs (nine vs. the earlier three) enabled matching of 46.7% more patients in the OS dataset, with substantially reduced global imbalance vs. not matching. This larger RCT pool covered 66.8% of possible patient characteristic combinations (vs. 25.0% with three original RCTs) and made prediction possible for a broader spectrum of patients. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (as applicable): NCT00156078, NCT00159679, NCT00143156, NCT00553475.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and safety of the new antimuscarinic agent fesoterodine relative to placebo for overactive bladder syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter trial performed in the United States. Overall 836 subjects with urinary frequency, urinary urgency or urgency urinary incontinence were randomized to placebo (274), 4 mg fesoterodine (283) or 8 mg fesoterodine (279) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in the number of micturitions per 24 hours. Co-primary end points were the change in the number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours and the treatment response. Secondary efficacy end points were other bladder diary variables, such as the change in mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating adverse events, electrocardiograms, post-void residual urine volume, laboratory parameters and treatment withdrawals. RESULTS: Treatment with 4 or 8 mg fesoterodine resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements from baseline to end of treatment for the primary and co-primary end points compared with placebo (p <0.05). Results for most secondary end points, including mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours, were also significantly improved vs placebo. The adverse events reported more frequently with fesoterodine than with placebo were dry mouth, constipation and urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 doses of fesoterodine were well tolerated and they statistically significantly improved overactive bladder symptoms.

Discriminating between neuropathic pain and sensory hypersensitivity using the Chronic Pain Questions (CPQ).

OBJECTIVE: The Chronic Pain Questions (CPQ) were developed for clinical use with the aim of supporting primary care physicians in the screening, assessment and monitoring of patients with chronic pain. the purpose of this study was to examine the ability of the cpq CPQ to discriminate between patients with neuropathic pain (nep) versus those with sensory hypersensitivity (sh). METHODS: Adult men and women with a diagnosis of a NeP or SH condition were recruited from 5 clinical sites across the United States. Participants completed a series of self-administered questionnaires, including the CPQ. Continuous variables were compared between groups with independent t-tests; categorical variables were compared with chi-square analyses. A series of exploratory logistic regressions were performed to discern optimal screening criteria for SH using CPQ responses. RESULTS: 98 participants, 68 with physician-confirmed diagnoses of SH and 30 with NeP, participated. 81.6% were female, 73.5% Caucasian, and mean (± SD) age was 58.4 ± 12.6 years. SH participants included significantly more females compared to the NeP group (94.1% vs. 53.3%). Differences in CPQ responses between groups were statistically significant for six of the 14 CPQ items with SH participants having significantly lower scores on specific pain quality questions and significantly higher scores on trouble thinking/remembering (5.3 ± 3.5 vs. 3.0 ± 2.8) and sensitivity to lights/noises/smells (4.8 ± 3.5 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0). No significant differences were found between groups for chronic pain intensity, pain made worse with touch, pain limited to joints, or pain interference with usual activity, sleep or mood. Logistic regression analyses revealed strong c indices (≥0.89) for all models. Consistent findings demonstrated that younger age, female gender, and scores ≥6 for the CPQ question on sensitivity to lights/noises/smells were all predictive of SH. CONCLUSIONS: The CPQ can help differentiate between patients with NeP and SH. More research is warranted.

Psychometric validation of the electronic chronic pain questions (eCPQ) in a primary care setting.

OBJECTIVE: Collecting data that helps evaluate different types of pain may improve physicians' decision-making with regard to treatment selection and on-going monitoring of patients. To date, no chronic pain assessments have been widely implemented in primary care. The aim of this study was to psychometrically validate the electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) in a primary care setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All men and women ≥18 years arriving at two similar primary care clinics in southeastern Michigan were invited to participate. Clinic staff verbally administered the eCPQ to patients and recorded their answers into the electronic medical record (EMR) prior to physician consultation with results available for physician review. Concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman correlations between eCPQ and patient-completed ancillary measures. Known-group validity was assessed by stratifying patients on self-reported chronic pain as well as by pain diagnosis (i.e. ICD-9 codes). To compare patients with chronic pain versus no chronic pain t-tests and chi-square tests were performed. Reproducibility was assessed between interviewer- and self-administration over time. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients were invited to participate and 455 patients consented to take part in the study (85.2% response rate); 395 patients had analyzable eCPQ data; 70.1% were Caucasian; 68.1% female; mean age was 43.4; 52.7% (n = 208) self-reported chronic pain. Correlations between eCPQ and ancillary measures supported concurrent validity. Excellent discrimination between groups was evidenced based on self-reported chronic pain and ICD-9 diagnosis. Patients with self-reported chronic pain reported significantly (p < .0001) higher pain ratings and greater interference with usual activities, sleep, and mood than those without chronic pain. Test-retest reliability between modes (interviewer- vs. self-administration) was excellent as was reproducibility based on self-administration of the eCPQ at two separate time points. Key limitations: Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants based on ICD codes. Utilizing ICD codes to identify individuals with chronic pain may not be a reliable approach as it is dependent upon providers accurately and consistently entering chronic pain diagnoses in the EMR. CONCLUSIONS: The eCPQ has sound psychometric measurement properties, including concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and reproducibility. The eCPQ appears to be useful to identify patients with chronic pain and to assess and monitor symptoms over time.

Rethinking chronic pain in a primary care setting.

Chronic pain substantially impacts patient function and quality of life and is a burden to society at large in terms of increased health care utilization and loss of productivity. As a result, there is an increasing recognition of chronic pain as a public health crisis. However, there remains wide variability in clinical practices related to the prevention, assessment, and treatment of chronic pain. Certain fundamental aspects of chronic pain are often neglected including the contribution of the psychological, social, and contextual factors associated with chronic pain. Also commonly overlooked is the importance of understanding the likely neurobiological mechanism(s) of the presenting pain and how they can guide treatment selection. Finally, physicians may not recognize the value of using electronic medical records to systematically capture data on pain and its impact on mood, function, and sleep. Such data can be used to monitor onset and maintenance of treatments effects at the patient level and evaluate costs at the systems level. In this review we explain how these factors play a critical role in the development of a coordinated, evidence-based treatment approach tailored to meet specific needs of the patient. We also discuss some practical approaches and techniques that can be implemented by clinicians in order to enhance the assessment and management of individuals with chronic pain in primary care settings.

Dextromethorphan suppresses both formalin-induced nociceptive behavior and the formalin-induced increase in spinal cord c-fos mRNA.

The injection of dilute formalin results in a stereotyped nociceptive behavioral response. Administration of dextromethorphan (s.c.) but not saline, 30 min prior to intraplantar formalin injection prevents this nociceptive response in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, intraplantar formalin reliably induces c-fos mRNA in the ipsilateral spinal dorsal horn as assessed with quantitative solution hybridization at 30 min postinjection. No change in c-fos mRNA was detected in the contralateral spinal dorsal horn, nucleus raphe magnus, periaqueductal grey, medial thalamus, or sensorimotor cortex. Pretreatment with dextromethorphan at 60 mg/kg s.c., 30 min prior to formalin resulted in a suppression of c-fos induction, so that c-fos mRNA levels in the ipsilateral spinal dorsal horn of animals receiving dextromethorphan prior to formalin did not differ from controls. These data indicate that dextromethorphan suppresses formalin nociceptive behavior and one of the biochemical consequences of formalin nociception, i.e., induction of c-fos mRNA.

Region-specific changes in NMDA receptor mRNA induced by chronic morphine treatment are prevented by the co-administration of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist LY274614.

The steady-state mRNA levels of the NMDA receptor NR1 subunit were determined by a quantitative solution hybridization assay in selected CNS regions associated with antinociception in the rat. Tissues were obtained by microdissection from rats treated chronically with morphine alone or in combination with LY274614, a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist. Morphine treatment for 7 days resulted in the development of tolerance to morphine's analgesic effect and produced a significant decrease in the steady-state NR1 mRNA levels in the spinal cord dorsal horn (by 16%), and an elevation in nucleus raphe magnus and medial thalamus (by 26 and 38%, respectively). The NR1 mRNA levels were unchanged in the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus, locus coeruleus, periaqueductal grey, and sensorimotor cortex. NMDA receptor binding in the spinal cord measured with [3H]MK-801 was reduced approximately 50% by chronic morphine treatment. Co-administration of LY274614 (s.c. at 24 mg/kg/24 h via an osmotic pump) not only attenuated the development of morphine tolerance but also prevented the changes in the NR1 mRNA levels induced by chronic morphine administration. Neither a 7-day infusion of LY274614 nor an acute injection of morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) changed the NR1 mRNA levels. These results suggest that changes in the expression of the NR1 mRNA induced by chronic morphine in three CNS regions involved in antinociception are associated with the development of morphine tolerance and in the spinal cord, morphine tolerance is associated with the downregulation of NMDA receptors.

Fesoterodine: a new agent for treating overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine, a new antimuscarinic for treating overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. METHODS: Review of efficacy and safety data from the pivotal phase 3 trials of fesoterodine for the treatment of OAB. Although there were a number of additional end points, they were not included in the US prescribing information for fesoterodine and thus are not included in this article. RESULTS: OAB is a chronic condition affecting both men and women. The principal symptom is urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, with some patients experiencing increased daytime frequency and nocturia. In two 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trials, fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg administered once daily were significantly better than placebo in alleviating OAB symptoms, as determined by changes in bladder diary variables. Both doses of fesoterodine were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Fesoterodine is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment for OAB.

Tolterodine treatment improves storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men treated with alpha-blockers.

BACKGROUND: Some men receiving alpha-blocker therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms report persistent storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder (OAB). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tolterodine extended release (ER) in men on alpha-blocker therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind trial included men aged > or = 40 yr with frequency, urgency, and at least moderate problems reported on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), despite being on a stable dose of alpha-blocker for > or = 1 mo. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to tolterodine ER 4 mg per day or placebo for 12 wk while continuing their prescribed alpha-blocker therapy. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and week 12, subjects completed the PPBC, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), and 5-d bladder diaries using the five-point Urinary Sensation Scale (USS). Frequency-urgency sum was defined as the sum of USS ratings for all micturitions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PPBC improvement from baseline to week 12 was reported by 63.6% and 61.6% of subjects receiving tolterodine ER plus alpha-blocker and placebo plus alpha-blocker, respectively; this treatment difference, which was the primary end point, was not statistically significant (p>0.6699). At week 12, subjects receiving tolterodine ER plus alpha-blocker had significantly greater improvements versus placebo plus alpha-blocker in 24-h micturitions (-1.8 vs -1.2; p=0.0079) and daytime micturitions (-1.3 vs -0.8; p=0.0123); 24-h urgency episodes (-2.9 vs -1.8; p=0.0010), daytime urgency episodes (-2.2 vs -1.4; p=0.0017), and nocturnal urgency episodes (-0.5 vs -0.3; p=0.0378); frequency-urgency sum (-7.8 vs -5.1; p=0.0065); IPSS storage subscale (-2.6 vs -2.1; p=0.0370); and OAB-q symptom bother scale (-17.9 vs -14.4; p=0.0086) and coping domain (15.4 vs 12.4; p=0.0491). Acute urinary retention requiring catheterization occurred in < 1% of either group. There were no clinically meaningful changes in postvoid residual volume or maximum urinary flow rate. CONCLUSIONS: Men with bothersome OAB symptoms despite continued alpha-blocker therapy showed significantly greater improvements in diary variables, IPSS Storage scores, and symptom bother when receiving additional tolterodine ER versus placebo plus alpha-blocker.

Effects of tolterodine extended release on patient perception of bladder condition and overactive bladder symptoms*.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tolterodine extended release (ER) versus placebo at 1 and 12 weeks using questionnaires and diary measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with overactive bladder (OAB) were randomized to receive tolterodine ER (4 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. This double-blind study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00143377). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects completed the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and 3-day bladder diaries at baseline and weeks 1 and 12, and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at baseline and week 12. PPBC score changes were analyzed using 2-category (improvement, no improvement), 3-category (improvement, no change, deterioration), and 4-category (>or=2-point improvement, 1-point improvement, no change, deterioration) stratifications. Categorical change in PPBC scores from baseline to week 12 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 617 subjects were randomized (tolterodine ER, n = 410; placebo, n = 207). At week 1, a significantly higher percentage of subjects receiving tolterodine ER reported improvement on the PPBC compared with placebo (p < 0.05). Subjects receiving tolterodine ER also had a significantly greater reduction in all OAB symptoms versus placebo (all p < 0.05). At week 12, a higher percentage of tolterodine ER subjects reported PPBC improvement versus placebo subjects. This was significant in the 3- and 4-category analyses (both p < 0.05) but not in the 2-category analysis (the prespecified method of analysis; p = 0.098). Compared with the placebo group, the tolterodine ER group reported significantly greater week 12 improvements in all bladder diary variables (all p < 0.01) as well as in OAB-q Symptom Bother, total Health-Related Quality of Life, Coping, and Concern scores (all p