In Situ Pulmonary Arterial Thrombosis: Literature Review and Clinical Significance of a Distinct Entity.

Filling defects identified in the pulmonary arterial tree are commonly presumed to represent an embolic phenomenon originating from thrombi formed in remote veins, particularly lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, accumulating evidence supports an underappreciated cause for pulmonary arterial thrombosis (PAT), namely, de novo thrombogenesis-whereby thrombosis arises within the pulmonary arteries in the absence of DVT. Although historically underrecognized, in situ PAT has become of heightened importance with the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In situ PAT is attributed to endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and acute lung injury and has been described in a range of conditions including COVID-19, trauma, acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease, pulmonary infections, and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. The distinction between pulmonary embolism and in situ PAT may have important implications regarding management decisions and clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the pathophysiology, imaging appearances, and management of in situ PAT in various clinical situations. This understanding will promote optimal tailored treatment strategies for this increasingly recognized entity.

Radiologist age and diagnostic errors.

PURPOSE: Previous investigations into the causes of error by radiologists have addressed work schedule, volume, shift length, and sub-specialization. Studies regarding possible associations between radiologist errors and radiologist age and timing of residency training are lacking in the literature, to our knowledge. The aim of our study was to determine if radiologist age and residency graduation date is associated with diagnostic errors. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included 1.9 million preliminary interpretations (out of a total of 5.2 million preliminary and final interpretations) of imaging examinations by 361 radiologists in a US-based national teleradiology practice between 1/1/2019 and 1/1/2020. Quality assurance data regarding the number of radiologist errors was generated through client facility feedback to the teleradiology practice. With input from both the client radiologist and the teleradiologist, the final determination of the presence, absence, and severity of a teleradiologist error was determined by the quality assurance committee of radiologists within the teleradiology company using standardized criteria. Excluded were 3.2 million final examination interpretations and 93,963 (1.8%) of total examinations from facilities reporting less than one discrepancy in examination interpretation in 2019. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age and residency graduation date was performed for calculation of relative risk of overall error rates and by major imaging modality. Major errors were separated from minor errors as those with a greater likelihood of affecting patient care. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age, residency graduation date, and log total examinations interpreted was used to calculate odds of making a major error to that of making a minor error. RESULTS: Mean age of the 361 radiologists was 51.1 years, with a mean residency graduation date of 2001. Mean error rate for all examinations was 0.5%. Radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with major errors (p < 0.05), with a relative risk 1.021 for each 1-year increase in age and relative risk 1.235 for each decade as well as for minor errors (p < 0.05, relative risk 1.007 for each year, relative risk 1.082 for each decade). By major imaging modality, radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with computed tomography (CT) and X-ray (XR) major and minor error, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) major error, and ultrasound (US) minor error (p < 0.05). Radiologist age was positively associated with odds of making a major vs. minor error (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mean error rate for all radiologists was low. We observed that increasing age at any residency graduation date was associated with increasing relative risk of major and minor errors as well as increasing odds of a major vs. minor error among providers. Further study is needed to corroborate these results, determine clinical relevance, and highlight strategies to address these findings.

Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Research has not yet quantified the effects of workload or duty hours on the accuracy of radiologists. With the exception of a brief reduction in imaging studies during the 2020 peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the workload of radiologists in the United States has seen relentless growth in recent years. One concern is that this increased demand could lead to reduced accuracy. Behavioral studies in species ranging from insects to humans have shown that decision speed is inversely correlated to decision accuracy. A potential solution is to institute workload and duty limits to optimize radiologist performance and patient safety. The concern, however, is that any prescribed mandated limits would be arbitrary and thus no more advantageous than allowing radiologists to self-regulate. Specific studies have been proposed to determine whether limits reduce error, and if so, to provide a principled basis for such limits. This could determine the precise susceptibility of individual radiologists to medical error as a function of speed during image viewing, the maximum number of studies that could be read during a work shift, and the appropriate shift duration as a function of time of day. Before principled recommendations for restrictions are made, however, it is important to understand how radiologists function both optimally and at the margins of adequate performance. This study examines the relationship between interpretation speed and error rates in radiology, the potential influence of artificial intelligence on reading speed and error rates, and the possible outcomes of imposed limits on both caseload and duty hours. This review concludes that the scientific evidence needed to make meaningful rules is lacking and notes that regulating workloads without scientific principles can be more harmful than not regulating at all.

Distribution and frequency of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-associated long-term complications in children with chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve outcomes for pediatric malignancies characterized by specific gene rearrangements and mutations; however, little is known about the long-term impact of TKI exposure. Our objective was to assess the incidence and type of late-onset TKI-related toxicities in children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: We reviewed medical records from patients diagnosed with CML between 2006 and 2019 at <21 years of age and prescribed one or more TKIs. Patients treated with stem cell transplant were excluded. Outcomes were captured beginning at 1 year after CML diagnosis. Outcome incidence was described overall and stratified by TKI exposure during the data-capture period. RESULTS: Twenty-two eligible TKI-exposed patients with CML were identified. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (range: 2.2-14.3). All pericardial (n = 3) or pleural (n = 3) effusion outcomes occurred in patients treated with TKIs during the data-capture period. Other outcomes included hypertension (n = 2), ectopy on electrocardiogram (n = 2), and gastrointestinal bleed (n = 1). All outcomes were graded as mild to moderate: some resulted in a temporary discontinuation of TKI, but none led to a change in TKI. No differences were noted in outcome incidence by type of TKI exposure. CONCLUSIONS: TKIs have substantially improved prognosis for subsets of childhood leukemia, but there are limited long-term data to inform exposure-based risk for late-onset complications and screening. Our results suggest that TKI-exposed survivors may be at risk for long-term outcomes that extend well into survivorship.

Playing Well With Others: The Challenge of Academic and Community Radiology Practice Integration.

OBJECTIVE. In this article, we review models for clinical integration across the full spectrum of radiologic services in merged health systems that include both academic and community practice components. We also discuss the issues involved in the integration of disparate practice models and reward systems for both the community radiology group and the academic faculty practice group. CONCLUSION. Although we see advantages to the current trends in mergers and acquisitions within academic radiology, it remains to be seen whether academic and community practice radiology groups can truly work and play well together.

Difficult Intubation and Ventilation in an Infant With Retropharyngeal Abscess With Mediastinal Extension.

A previously healthy 7-month-old male infant presented for evaluation of fever, deceased oral intake, and intermittent noisy breathing. Physical examination revealed neck tenderness. Soft tissue neck radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan supported a diagnosis of retropharyngeal swelling with extension to the superior mediastinum. Surgical exploration was planned, and endotracheal intubation was performed in the operating room. Significant cardiorespiratory derangements developed immediately after the tracheal tube was inserted, including hypotension, hypoxia, and bradycardia with signs of cardiac ischemia. The patient was resuscitated with intravenous fluids, vasopressors, and bronchodilators; his condition improved after resuscitation and surgical evacuation of purulent material. A combination of mediastinal mass effect, aspiration, and bronchospasm likely contributed to the patient's deterioration. The subsequent clinical course was uneventful. The patient was extubated in a delayed fashion and discharged on the fourth postoperative day. This case highlights the importance of preparing for a difficult airway in cases of retropharyngeal abscesses that necessitate tracheal intubation. A multidisciplinary approach is best suited to manage the airway, preferably in the operating room.

Overnight Resident versus 24-hour Attending Radiologist Coverage in Academic Medical Centers.

Academic medical centers have long relied on radiology residents to provide after-hours coverage, which means that they essentially function with autonomy. In this approach, attending radiologist review of resident interpretations occurs the following morning, often by subspecialist faculty. In recent years, however, this traditional coverage model in academic radiology departments has been challenged by an alternative model, the 24-hour attending radiologist coverage. Proponents of this new model seek to improve patient care after hours by increasing report accuracy and the speed with which the report is finalized. In this article, we review the traditional and the 24-hour attending radiologist coverage models. We summarize previous studies that indicate that resident overnight error rates are sufficiently low so that changing to an overnight attending model may not necessarily provide a meaningful increase in report accuracy. Whereas some centers completely replaced overnight residents, we note that most centers use a hybrid model, and overnight residents work alongside supervising attending radiologists, much as they do during the day. Even in this hybrid model, universal double reading and subspecialist final review, typical features of the traditional autonomous resident coverage model, are generally sacrificed. Because of this, changing from resident coverage to coverage by an attending radiologist that is 24 hours/day, 7 days/week may actually have detrimental effects to patient safety and quality of care provided. Changing to an overnight attending radiologist model may also have negative effects on the quality of radiology resident training, and it significantly increases cost.

Communicating Uncertainty in the Radiology Report.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this article are to explore the issue of diagnostic uncertainty in radiology and how the radiology report has often fallen short in this regard and to suggest approaches that can be helpful in addressing this challenge. CONCLUSION: The practice of medicine involves a great deal of uncertainty, which is an uncomfortable reality for most physicians. Radiologists are more often than not faced with considerable diagnostic uncertainty and in their written reports are challenged to effectively communicate that uncertainty to referring physicians and others.

Key Principles in Quality and Safety in Radiology.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to introduce the reader to basic concepts of quality and safety in radiology. CONCLUSION: Concepts are introduced that are keys to identifying, understanding, and utilizing certain quality tools with the aim of making process improvements. Challenges, opportunities, and change drivers can be mapped from the radiology quality perspective. Best practices, informatics, and benchmarks can profoundly affect the outcome of the quality improvement initiative we all aim to achieve.

Online Portals: Gateway to Patient-Centered Radiology.

OBJECTIVE: Online portals typically allow access to radiology reports, causing a shift in the communication. This article evaluates the studies available in the literature about patient portals and the use of patient portals in radiology. Patient and physician preferences and the impact on radiology reporting are presented. CONCLUSION: Patient portals provide an opportunity for radiologists to engage with their patients via a new method of communication. Radiologist collaboration with referring physicians is important in providing care in accordance with patient preferences.

A Patient-Centered Radiology Quality Process Map: Opportunities and Solutions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the tools and opportunities available for patient-centered care in radiology and to create a quality patient-centered care process map to organize them for radiology practices. CONCLUSION: This article provides a review of the many opportunities to increase and improve patient-centered care in radiology. A process map that organizes and highlights key elements of patient-centered care throughout the radiology care process is provided that can be implemented to enhance the patient experience of our services and improve the quality of care provided.

Mandatory Assignment of Modified Wells Score Before CT Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism Fails to Improve Utilization or Percentage of Positive Cases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the impact of embedding a pretest probability rule that is required during the computerized physician order-entry (CPOE) process on the appropriateness of CT angiography (CTA) of the pulmonary arteries for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the electronic medical records of all adults who visited the ED from October 17, 2010, through October 17, 2012 (n = 96,507). The primary outcome was the appropriateness of pulmonary CTA. Logistic regression was used to test whether rates of appropriate use, overuse, and underuse of pulmonary CTA improved significantly after the implementation of the decision support tool when controlling for other patient characteristics. RESULTS: Pulmonary CTA was appropriately used in 67.2% of patients with a modified Wells score of ≥ 4, a positive d-dimer test result, or both. CTA was overused in 19.3% of patients and underused in 13.5% of patients. Each additional month after the start of the intervention was associated with a 4-percentage point increase in the odds that the modified Wells score would indicate CTA had been used appropriately (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) and significantly lowered the odds of overuse of CTA (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96) based on the modified Wells score. These changes were not associated with any significant alteration in the level of CTA utilization or the positivity rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of a mandatory field in the CPOE record was associated with a significant improvement in the appropriate ordering of pulmonary CTA but did not change the PE positive rate or CTA utilization. It seems likely that physicians gradually inflated the modified Wells scores in spite of the fact that a threshold modified Wells score was not required to perform pulmonary CTA.

Are patients ready for communication with radiologists? Results of the R2P2 survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient empowerment requires that patients have enough information to make decisions concerning their own health. If patients are to discuss imaging results with radiologists, they have to know who these medical professionals are and what they do. PURPOSE: To examine whether patients understand the role of radiologists, and if particular subgroups are better informed than other ones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive radiology outpatients in eight radiology centers could complete a web-based or printed questionnaire. Respondents indicated on a five-point Likert scale their level of agreement with 18 statements on the role of radiologists and their preferences concerning contacts with radiologists. Results were rearranged to allow comparison of predetermined subgroups. Dichotomous results were analyzed using χ(2) statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1,146 questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. Results showed confusion as to the question whether radiologists are medically qualified and enjoy all the privileges thereof. Medically qualified or highly educated respondents were modestly better informed. Patients in private practice were better informed than outpatients in hospitals. CONCLUSION: Patient empowerment requires better understanding of the role of radiologists. Different population subgroups necessitate specific information strategies.

Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction.

Arriving at a medical diagnosis is a highly complex process that is extremely error prone. Missed or delayed diagnoses often lead to patient harm and missed opportunities for treatment. Since medical imaging is a major contributor to the overall diagnostic process, it is also a major potential source of diagnostic error. Although some diagnoses may be missed because of the technical or physical limitations of the imaging modality, including image resolution, intrinsic or extrinsic contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio, most missed radiologic diagnoses are attributable to image interpretation errors by radiologists. Radiologic interpretation cannot be mechanized or automated; it is a human enterprise based on complex psychophysiologic and cognitive processes and is itself subject to a wide variety of error types, including perceptual errors (those in which an important abnormality is simply not seen on the images) and cognitive errors (those in which the abnormality is visually detected but the meaning or importance of the finding is not correctly understood or appreciated). The overall prevalence of radiologists' errors in practice does not appear to have changed since it was first estimated in the 1960s. The authors review the epidemiology of errors in diagnostic radiology, including a recently proposed taxonomy of radiologists' errors, as well as research findings, in an attempt to elucidate possible underlying causes of these errors. The authors also propose strategies for error reduction in radiology. On the basis of current understanding, specific suggestions are offered as to how radiologists can improve their performance in practice.

Radiographic evaluation of non-localizing parathyroid adenomas.

PURPOSE: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism routinely undergo preoperative imaging to localize the abnormal gland to facilitate a guided parathyroidectomy. These techniques include neck ultrasound (US), dual phase planar technetium-99m ((99m)TC) sestamibi (MIBI) scans, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), combined SPECT/CT, and four dimensional CT scans (4D CT). Despite appropriate preoperative imaging, non-localization of abnormal glands does occur. This study aims to determine whether non-localization is the result of radiologic interpretive error or a representation of a subset of truly non-localizing parathyroid adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed; two senior radiologists reinterpreted the preoperative imaging (US and MIBI scans) of 30 patients with initially non-localizing studies. All patients underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism at a tertiary referral center. Both radiologists were blinded to the scores of his colleague. The results were compared for inter-reader reliability using Cohen's kappa test. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of thirty nuclear studies were found to be negative on reinterpretation. The readers agreed in 86.67% of their observations, with a kappa (κ) value of 0.706 (SE=±0.131, 95% confidence interval for κ =0.449-0.962). One of eighteen ultrasounds had positive localizations on reexamination, however, the inter-observer agreement was only 55.6%, with a kappa value of 0.351 (SE=±0.139, and 95% confidence interval for κ =0.080-0.623). Overall, no statistically significant difference in preoperative and retrospective interpretation was found. CONCLUSION: This study identifies a subset of parathyroid adenomas that do not localize on preoperative imaging despite sound radiographic evaluation.