People's Knowledge and Attitudes About Factors That Can Impact Wound Healing in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Background Wounds, ranging from acute to chronic, demand timely intervention to prevent complications. Infections can impede healing, leading to sepsis. Chronic wounds impact society, causing limitations in mobility and social exclusion. Early identification of infections is crucial for effective treatment, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use, and improving patient outcomes. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted from June to October 2023 in Saudi Arabia using a self-administered online questionnaire to assess wound healing knowledge and attitudes. Convenient random sampling via social media was employed to collect data. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Our study predominantly featured female (67.1%), Saudi (94.8%), aged 18-25 years (42.0%), and married (51.1%) participants. Chronic illnesses were prevalent in 24.2%, with heart disease (5.7%) and hypertension (4.5%) being notable. Burn injuries (27.4%) and upper extremity wounds (40.9%) were common, prompting immediate medical care (54.1%). Internet sources (22.6%) and relatives/friends (18.4%) were key for wound care information. Participants displayed solid awareness of wound-related factors, with notable misconceptions regarding Zamzam water (44.4%) and coffee beans (39.3%). Participants prioritized stopping bleeding (41.1%) and using wound patches (42.1%) for home injuries. Age group, education, marital status, and occupation impacted knowledge about wound healing. Conclusions Our study highlights key demographics, prevalent chronic illnesses, common wound types, and crucial sources of wound care information. Participants' awareness, coupled with notable misconceptions, emphasizes the importance of tailored education. Factors such as age, education, marital status, and occupation impact knowledge about wound healing.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Awareness and Knowledge of Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global health concern associated with a plethora of chronic diseases. Genetic and lifestyle factors play a pivotal role in its development, making it a significant challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. In this context, sleeve gastrectomy has emerged as a prominent bariatric surgical intervention, but the level of awareness and knowledge regarding its indications and complications in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia is underexplored. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over one year, from January 2022 to December 2022. The study aimed to assess the level of awareness among adults residing in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia regarding the indications and potential complications associated with sleeve gastrectomy. The study utilized random sampling and distributed a well-designed questionnaire in both English and Arabic. The questionnaire, validated for reliability, covered demographic data, general knowledge of sleeve gastrectomy, awareness of its indications, and knowledge of potential complications. RESULTS: The study included 1730 participants, with a majority in the 18-25 age group, predominantly female, and possessing a bachelor's degree. Awareness of sleeve gastrectomy was remarkably high, with 99% of respondents having heard of it, but only 50.1% accurately recognized the correct body mass index range for classifying obesity. Knowledge scores revealed 61.7% with poor knowledge, 31% with moderate knowledge, and 7.2% with good knowledge levels. Only 56.1% correctly identified the indications for sleeve gastrectomy. While participants displayed awareness of common complications, such as nutritional deficiencies, knowledge gaps persisted. CONCLUSION: This study exposes significant gaps in awareness and knowledge regarding sleeve gastrectomy, particularly concerning its indications and potential complications. It underscores the urgent need for targeted educational initiatives and active healthcare provider engagement in disseminating accurate information. Bridging these knowledge gaps through tailored public health campaigns can empower individuals to make informed decisions about the management of obesity.

Reasons for Hospitalization of Sickle Cell Disease Patients in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is among the prevalent chronic diseases in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. To our knowledge, there is no published research that reports the reasons for hospitalization in the Eastern Province of the country. Therefore, this study aimed to fill this gap. DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted in the period from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients with sickle cell disease who were admitted and treated in the hospital were included in this study. Patients' sociodemographic data and reasons for hospitalization were collected and analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences, version 21 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: There were 103 SCD patients, and the age range was from 18 to 62 years old. The majority of the patients were males (56.3%) and were in the younger age group (≤30 years old; 60.2%). The results showed that the most frequent cause of admission was a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) (n=94, 91.3%), followed by acute chest syndrome (ACS) (n=32, 31.1%), and then by hemolytic crisis (27 of the cases; 26.2%). However, we found that a higher number of hip avascular necrosis (AVN) cases were statistically significant in relation to the higher number of hospital admissions (p<0.05), whereas other reasons were not found to have a statistically significant association. CONCLUSION: The most frequent cause of admission was VOC episodes, followed by ACS, and then by hemolytic crises. Also, a higher number of hip AVN episodes were statistically significant with the higher number of hospital admissions.

Management of Extremity Venous Thrombosis in Neonates and Infants: An Experience From a Resource Challenged Setting.

We aimed to evaluate the outcome of different treatment modalities for extremity venous thrombosis (VT) in neonates and infants, highlighting the current debate on their best tool of management. This retrospective study took place over a 9-year period from January 2009 to December 2017. All treated patients were referred to the vascular and pediatric surgery departments from the neonatal intensive care unit. All patients underwent a thorough history-taking as well as general clinical and local examination of the affected limb. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I included those who underwent a conservative treated with the sole administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH), whereas group II included those who were treated with UFH plus warfarin. Sixty-three patients were included in this study. They were 36 males and 27 females. Their age ranged from 3 to 302 days. Forty-one (65%) patients had VT in the upper limb, whereas the remaining 22 (35%) had lower extremity VT. The success rate of the nonsurgical treatment was accomplished in 81% of patients. The remaining 19% underwent limb severing, due to established gangrene. The Kaplan-Meier survival method revealed a highly significant increase in both mean and median survival times in those groups treated with heparin and warfarin compared to heparin-only group ( P < .001). Nonoperative treatment with anticoagulation or observation (ie, wait-and-see policy) alone may be an easily applicable, effective, and a safe modality for management of VT in neonates and infants, especially in developing countries with poor or highly challenged resource settings.