Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 121(39): e2320716121, 2024 Sep 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284061

RESUMO

The assessment of social determinants of health (SDoH) within healthcare systems is crucial for comprehensive patient care and addressing health disparities. Current challenges arise from the limited inclusion of structured SDoH information within electronic health record (EHR) systems, often due to the lack of standardized diagnosis codes. This study delves into the transformative potential of large language models (LLM) to overcome these challenges. LLM-based classifiers-using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa)-were developed for SDoH concepts, including homelessness, food insecurity, and domestic violence, using synthetic training datasets generated by generative pre-trained transformers combined with authentic clinical notes. Models were then validated on separate datasets: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III and our institutional EHR data. When training the model with a combination of synthetic and authentic notes, validation on our institutional dataset yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78 for detecting homelessness, 0.72 for detecting food insecurity, and 0.83 for detecting domestic violence. This study underscores the potential of LLMs in extracting SDoH information from clinical text. Automated detection of SDoH may be instrumental for healthcare providers in identifying at-risk patients, guiding targeted interventions, and contributing to population health initiatives aimed at mitigating disparities.


Assuntos
Violência Doméstica , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Insegurança Alimentar , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Humanos
2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 37(2): 246-251, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456421

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess differences in the use of perioperative regional anesthesia for thoracic surgery based on race and ethnicity. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2020. The study authors applied a multivariate logistic regression in which the dependent variable was the primary endpoint (regional versus no regional anesthesia). The primary independent variables were race and ethnicity. SETTING: Multiple healthcare systems in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were ≥18 years of age and undergoing thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Regional anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On adjusted multivariate analysis, Hispanic patients had lower odds (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.80, p = 0.0003) of receiving regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control compared to non-Hispanic patients. There was no significant difference in the odds of regional anesthesia when comparing racial cohorts (ie, White, Black, Asian, or other). CONCLUSIONS: There were differences observed in the provision of regional anesthesia for thoracic surgery among ethnic groups. Although the results of this study should not be taken as evidence for healthcare disparities, it could be used to support hypotheses for future studies that aim to investigate causes of disparities and corresponding patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Cirurgia Torácica , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca , Estudos Retrospectivos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde
3.
J Intensive Care Med ; 37(1): 46-51, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33084472

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis continues to be the leading cause of death in intensive care units and surgical patients comprise almost one third of all sepsis patients. Anemia is a modifiable risk factor for worse postoperative outcomes in sepsis patients. Here we aim to evaluate the association of preoperative anemia and postoperative mortality in sepsis patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to query for preoperative sepsis patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy between 2014 and 2016. Preoperative hematocrit was stratified into 4 categories: ≥30% to polycythemia, <21%, 21 and less than 30%, and polycythemia. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of preoperative hematocrit with primary and secondary endpoints. The multivariable analysis included preoperative hematocrit, gender, age, BMI, smoking status, functional status, hypertension, steroid use, bleeding disorder, and sepsis. The odds ratio (OR) with associated 95% confidence interval (CI) is reported for all outcomes. A p-value of less than <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The unadjusted 30-day death rate was the highest for patients with preoperative hematocrit <21% (p < 0.001) compared to the other hematocrit cohorts. The odds of 30-day death was significantly increased for patients with preoperative hematocrit <21% (OR 2.39 95% CI: 1.28-4.49, p = 0.006) and 21-30% (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05 -1.72, p = 0.017) compared to patients with preoperative hematocrit of ≥30% and less than polycythemic ranges (reference cohort). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia in sepsis patients undergoing surgery can lead to increased mortality, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Diagnosing sepsis early in the hospital course can allow physicians more time to titrate anticoagulation medications and treat preoperative anemia.


Assuntos
Anemia , Sepse , Anemia/complicações , Hematócrito , Humanos , Laparotomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/complicações
4.
Surg Endosc ; 35(3): 1348-1354, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206919

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Compared to other common outpatient operations, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has higher rates of unanticipated hospital admission with reports ranging from 1.0 to 39.5%. Identification of simple preoperative risk factors for admission can aid appropriate patient selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of obesity with need for hospital admission and day of surgery postoperative complications. METHODS: The ACS NSQIP database from 2007 to 2016 was used to evaluate patients ≥ 18 years old who had undergone outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary outcome was hospital admission, defined as hospital length of stay ≥ 24 h. The secondary endpoint was postoperative complications on day of surgery. A multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) and the outcomes of interest. Odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported. RESULTS: 192,750 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the outpatient setting. 38,945 (20.20%) required hospital admission. 89 (0.05%) had postoperative complications on the day of surgery. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, when compared to the baseline cohort of BMI ≥ 30 and < 40 kg/m2, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 had a 10% increased odds of hospital admission (OR 1.10, CI 1.02-1.19, p < 0.001). BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 and < 50 kg/m2 was not associated with increased odds of hospital admission (OR 0.99, CI 0.95-1.03, p 0.725). There was no increased odds of postoperative complications for patients with higher BMI (OR 1.35, CI 0.32-3.89, p < 0.623). CONCLUSION: Patients with super obesity have a 10% increased odds of hospital admission following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Obesity is not associated with increased odds of same-day postoperative complications. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the morbidly obese is safe; however, those with BMI > 50 kg/m2 should be considered on a case-by-case basis.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Adulto , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(5): 28, 2021 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33761010

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss surgical infiltration and various abdominal wall blocks, including transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum blocks, and review the literature on the evidence behind these approaches and analgesia for cesarean delivery (CD). RECENT FINDINGS: Adequate pain management in the parturient following CD is important to facilitate early ambulation and neonatal care while also improving patient satisfaction and decreasing hospital length of stay. Neuraxial opioids have been a mainstay for postoperative analgesia; however, this option may not be available for patients undergoing emergency CD and have contraindications to neuraxial approaches, refusing an epidural or spinal, or with technical difficulties for neuraxial placement. In such cases, alternative options include a fascial plane block or surgical wound infiltration. The use of regional blocks or surgical wound infiltration is especially recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD. Adequate postoperative analgesia following CD is an important component of the overall care of the parturient as it helps facilitate early mobilization and improve patient satisfaction. In conclusion, the use of abdominal fascial plane blocks or surgical wound infiltration is recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Cesárea/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Músculos Abdominais , Parede Abdominal/inervação , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Epidural , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Ferida Cirúrgica
6.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 35(11): 3283-3287, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637421

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The authors hypothesized that monitored anesthesia care (MAC)-either by local sedation or regional anesthesia (RA)-compared with general anesthesia (GA), would be associated with lower odds of significant 30-day postoperative complications and mortality in patients undergoing an ankle amputation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient. PARTICIPANTS: The authors used data from patients who underwent ankle amputation from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry. INTERVENTION: RA as primary anesthetic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of primary anesthesia type with the outcomes. The regression analysis included all covariates to test the association of the primary exposure variable (anesthesia type) with each outcome of interest. The odds ratio (OR), with associated 95% confidence interval (CI), was reported for each covariate. There were a total of 3,368 patients undergoing guillotine amputation through the tibia/fibula (n = 2,935) or ankle disarticulation (n = 433). Among these patients, 15.5% (n = 491) received MAC as their primary anesthetic. Among all patients, 11.4% (n = 363) experienced a significant postoperative complication. On multivariate logistic regression, MAC was found to decrease odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82, p = 0.002), but not mortality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.87-1.84, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This study showed that MAC was associated with improved outcomes, as opposed to GA, as the primary anesthetic in ankle amputations.


Assuntos
Anestésicos , Tornozelo , Amputação Cirúrgica , Anestesia Geral , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 60(4): 738-741, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814311

RESUMO

We examined the association of body mass index (BMI) with sociodemographic data, medical comorbidities and hospital admission following ambulatory foot and ankle surgery. We conducted an analysis utilizing data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2007 to 2016. Adult patients who underwent ankle surgery defined as ankle arthrodesis, ankle open reduction and internal fixation, and Achilles tendon repair in the outpatient setting. We examined 6 BMI ranges: <20 kg/m2 underweight, ≥20 to <25 kg/m2 normal weight, ≥25 to <30 kg/m2 overweight, ≥30 to <40 kg/m2 obese, ≥40 kg/m2to <50 kg/m2 severely obese, and ≥50 kg/m2 extremely obese. The primary outcome was hospital admission. We performed multivariable logistic regression and reported odds ratios (OR) and their associated 95% confidence interval (CI) and considered a p value of <.05 as statistically significant. Data extraction yielded 13,454 adult patients who underwent ambulatory ankle surgery. We then performed listwise deletion to exclude cases with missing observations. After excluding 5.4% of the data, the final study population included 12,729 patients. The overall rate of hospital admission was in the population was 18.6% (2,377/12,729). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 0.03% (4/12,729). We found no significant association of BMI with hospital admission following multivariable logistic regression. We recommend that BMI alone should not be solely used to exclude patients from having ankle surgery performed in an outpatient setting, especially since this patient group makes up a significant proportion of orthopedic surgery.


Assuntos
Tornozelo , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Hospitais , Humanos , Obesidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
8.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 34(9): 2440-2445, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192917

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have evaluated the association between anesthesia type and outcomes after endovascular angioplasty/stents for aortoiliac occlusive disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between primary anesthesia type and postprocedural complications for endovascular angioplasty of aortoiliac occlusion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multi-institutional. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 3,110 patients undergoing endovascular angioplasty of aortoiliac occlusive disease, with 1,974 and 1,136 patients who underwent monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and general anesthesia (GA), respectively. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the years 2012 to 2016 was used for the present study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final analysis included 3,110 patients, 63% of whom received MAC and 37% of whom received GA. The mean age was 64 years among the GA group, of whom 57.2% were male. The mean age among that MAC group was 65 years, 55.8% of whom were male. After adjusting for demographic factors and preoperative comorbidities, there was a statistically significant lower odds of postoperative complications (ie, pulmonary complications, infection, intraoperative/postoperative transfusion, reoperation, and amputation) and shorter length of stay in the MAC group compared with the GA group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although larger observational studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the potential effect of MAC versus GA, MAC anesthesia should be considered for patients undergoing endovascular angioplasty for aortoiliac occlusion.


Assuntos
Angioplastia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 34(1): 136-142, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31445834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The literature remains sparse regarding the influence of primary anesthesia type (monitored anesthesia care [MAC] v general anesthesia) on 30-day adverse events after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). The objective of this study was to report the association of primary anesthesia type with 30-day adverse events after TCAR. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Registry from 2012-2016. SETTING: Multi-institutional. PARTICIPANTS: The final analysis included 625 patients who underwent TCAR. INTERVENTIONS: The primary exposure was anesthesia type, categorized as MAC (defined as regional anesthesia, local anesthesia, or MAC) or general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary 30-day endpoints included pulmonary, renal, and cardiac complications; sepsis; deep venous thrombosis; stroke; blood transfusion; embolism/thrombosis of ipsilateral carotid vessel; and redo surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of MAC was 73.4%. A 93% decrease was observed in the odds of 30-day mortality (p = 0.003) in patients who received MAC. Mean (standard deviation) hospital stay (2.99 [5.92] d v 4.30 [9.15] d; p = 0.037) and case duration (88.45 [39.48] min v 105.85 [63.77] min; p < 0.001) were shorter among patients who received MAC. The odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.65; p = 0.009) were significantly lower in the MAC group. No other differences in secondary endpoints were found between the anesthesia type cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of studies on this topic pertain to carotid endarterectomy patients, and this retrospective analysis sheds light on outcomes after TCAR. Overall, the authors urge additional risk stratification and preprocedural optimization to carefully select patients who may undergo MAC.


Assuntos
Estenose das Carótidas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Artérias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(11): 3089-3092, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32636107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 4 (ASA PS 4) comprises patients with "severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life." The purpose of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis to report the rate of complications in the ASA PS 4 patients who undergo elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In addition, we report whether neuraxial anesthesia is associated with improved outcomes compared to general anesthesia in these patients. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was used to extract patient records. The study population included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TJA from 2014 to 2016 and who were classified as ASA PS 4. To measure differences in outcomes and patient characteristics, we used chi-squared tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported for all covariates. A P value of <.01 was selected. RESULTS: Among the patients who were ASA PS 4, 58 (1.4%) experienced 30-day mortality, 349 (8.2%) experienced 30-day readmission, 271 (6.3%) had a postoperative complication, and 504 (11.8%) required a transfusion. Those receiving neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia had lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.49; P = .0001) and lower odds of perioperative transfusion (OR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.45-0.65; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The elevated risks for ASA PS 4 patients undergoing TJA may be too high to justify surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is a reasonable alternative to general anesthesia if pursuing TJA in patients with a very high comorbidity burden.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Comorbidade , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA