Definition of the Post-COVID syndrome using a symptom-based Post-COVID score in a prospective, multi-center, cross-sectoral cohort of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON).

PURPOSE: The objective examination of the Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) remains difficult due to heterogeneous definitions and clinical phenotypes. The aim of the study was to verify the functionality and correlates of a recently developed PCS score. METHODS: The PCS score was applied to the prospective, multi-center cross-sectoral cohort (in- and outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection) of the "National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON, Germany)". Symptom assessment and patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires were analyzed at 3 and 12 months (3/12MFU) after diagnosis. Scores indicative of PCS severity were compared and correlated to demographic and clinical characteristics as well as quality of life (QoL, EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Six hundred three patients (mean 54.0 years, 60.6% male, 82.0% hospitalized) were included. Among those, 35.7% (215) had no and 64.3% (388) had mild, moderate, or severe PCS. PCS severity groups differed considering sex and pre-existing respiratory diseases. 3MFU PCS worsened with clinical severity of acute infection (p = .011), and number of comorbidities (p = .004). PCS severity was associated with poor QoL at the 3MFU and 12MFU (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The PCS score correlated with patients' QoL and demonstrated to be instructive for clinical characterization and stratification across health care settings. Further studies should critically address the high prevalence, clinical relevance, and the role of comorbidities. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The cohort is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov under NCT04768998.

Determining the optimal frequency of SARS-CoV-2 regular asymptomatic testing: A randomized feasibility trial in a home care setting.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presented a challenge for caregiving relatives in the home care setting. Caregivers can transmit SARS-CoV-2 to their relatives who are often at high risk for a severe course of COVID-19. Regular testing of asymptomatic caregivers for SARS-CoV-2 may reduce the risk of transmission. The optimal method and frequency of regular asymptomatic testing is unknown. We conducted a prospective, randomised trial to assess the feasibility, recruitment and acceptance of different testing frequencies. This serves to inform a future definitive randomised controlled trial. METHODS: We carried out a parallel three-armed feasibility trial, enrolling adult participants who provided home-based care for a relative at least twice a week. Participants were randomly assigned using sealed envelopes to either conduct saliva-based antigen self-testing at a frequency of once a week (group I), twice a week (group II), or every two days (group III). The participants completed questionnaires on a weekly basis. Main outcome measures were feasibility of recruitment, adherence to self-tests and distress caused by self-testing. We further collected data on the use of mouth-nose mask. RESULTS: From 25 March to 7 May 2021 we assessed 27 participants and randomised 26 in the study: 8 participants in group I, 8 in group II and 10 in group III. All participants completed the study. In group I 48/48 (100.0%; 95% CI 92.6% to 100.0%), in group II 93/96 (96.9%; 95% CI 91.2% to 98.9%) and in group III 209/210 (99.5%; 95% CI 97.4% to 99.9%) self-tests were carried out at home. Participants did not perceive regular self-testing as burdensome in any of the study arms. We did not observe any infection with SARS-CoV-2. During the study, mask adherence decreased from 35% to 19% in all groups. CONCLUSION: Conducting such a study was feasible. The participants tolerated regular self-testing well, which was reflected in a high level of test adherence. However, regular self-testing may have led to decreased protective behaviour. To demonstrate that regular asymptomatic testing reduces infection transmission, a future definitive trial should be performed at a time of a high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and be implemented as a multicentre study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00026234.

IL-1ß and TGF-ß act antagonistically in induction and differentially in propagation of human proinflammatory precursor CD4+ T cells.

Cytokines are critical messengers that control the differentiation of Th cells. To evaluate their impact on the fate of human naive CD4(+) T cells from cord and adult blood, early T cell differentiation was monitored after T cell activation in the presence of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Interestingly, the analysis of Th cell lineage-specific molecules revealed that IL-1ß on its own mediates differentiation of Th cells that secrete a wide range of proinflammatory cytokines and stably express CD69, STAT1, IFN-γ, and IL-17. Notably, our data suggest that IL-1ß induces Th17 cells independent of RORC upregulation. In contrast, TGF-ß that triggers RORC prevents Th17 cell development. This suppressive function of TGF-ß is characterized by inhibition of STAT1, STAT3, and CD69. However, after repeated anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 stimulation, we observe that TGF-ß provokes an increase in Th17 cells that presumably relies on reactivation of a default pathway by preferential inhibition of IFN-γ. Hence, our data extend the view that the principal cytokines for determining Th cell fate are IL-12 for the Th1 lineage, IL-4 for the Th2 lineage, and TGF-ß in conjunction with IL-6 for the Th17 lineage. We propose that IL-1ß induces a general proinflammatory Th cell precursor that, in the presence of the lineage-specifying cytokines, further differentiates into one of the specific Th cell subpopulations.

Twice weekly polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveillance swabs are not as effective as daily antigen testing for containment of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks: A modeling study based on real world data from a child and adolescent psychiatry clinic.

OBJECTIVE: In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, child and adolescent psychiatry wards face the risk of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) introduction and spread within the facility. In this setting, mask and vaccine mandates are hard to enforce, especially for younger children. Surveillance testing may detect infection early and enable mitigation measures to prevent viral spread. We conducted a modeling study to determine the optimal method and frequency of surveillance testing and to analyze the effect of weekly team meetings on transmission dynamics. DESIGN AND SETTING: Simulation with an agent-based model reflecting ward structure, work processes, and contact networks from a real-world child and adolescent psychiatry clinic with 4 wards, 40 patients, and 72 healthcare workers. METHODS: We simulated the spread of 2 SARS-CoV-2 variants over 60 days under surveillance testing with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and rapid antigen tests in different scenarios. We measured the size, peak, and the duration of an outbreak. We compared medians and percentage of spillover events to other wards from 1,000 simulations for each setting. RESULTS: The outbreak size, peak, and duration were dependent on test frequency, test type, SARS-CoV-2 variant, and ward connectivity. Under surveillance conditions, joint staff meetings and therapists shared between wards did not significantly change median outbreak size under surveillance conditions. With daily antigen testing, outbreaks were mostly confined to 1 ward and median outbreak sizes were lower than with twice-weekly PCR testing (1 vs 22; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Modeling can help to understand transmission patterns and guide local infection control measures.

Simultaneous Administration of Statins and Pioglitazone Limits Tumor Growth in a Rat Model of Malignant Glioma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Statins are cholesterol reducers with considerable dose-dependent effect against glioma cells. The apoptotic effect could be increased by combining statins or by adding pioglitazone (PGZ). The last one is an anti-diabetic drug, an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARG). We used an animal model to test the effect of such combination in vivo and we investigated the changes on immunological processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three rats (F344/DuCrl) were anesthetized and glioblastoma (F98) cells were implanted stereotactically. Animals were randomized into four groups: i) control (N=9); ii) intraperitoneal injection of PGZ 10 mg/kg/day (N=8); iii) oral administration of atorvastatin (ATVS) 40 mg/kg and lovastatin (LVS) 50 mg/kg (N=8); iv) oral administration of ATVS 40 mg/kg, LVS 50 mg/kg and PGZ 5 mg/kg (N=8). Treatment was started at 3rd postoperative day and continued for 14 days. The animals were followed-up for 30 days after start of therapy. Survival time, tumor volume, proliferation rate, counts of peripheral and tumor infiltrating leukocytes were compared. RESULTS: No difference of survival time or incidence of neurological deficits was observed. The combination of statins with PGZ led to a significant reduction in tumor volume by approximately 40% (p<0.05), statins combination was less effective and PGZ alone did not affect tumor volume. The groups treated with statins displayed significantly lower counts of peripheral CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and lower tumor associated CD68-positive cells (p<0.01, in respect to controls or PGZ alone). The proliferation rate was not statistically different. No relevant toxic effects were observed. DISCUSSION: Statins and PGZ are well-tolerated in rats and produced a significant tumor reduction, while an impact on neurological deficits or survival improvement could not be demonstrated. The reduction of infiltrating macrophages by using statins and PGZ should be further studied.