[Residual symptoms after a treated major depressive disorder: in practice ambulatory observatory carried out of city]. / Symptômes résiduels après traitement antidépresseur d'un épisode dépressif majeur: observatoire réalisé en pratique ambulatoire de ville.

INTRODUCTION: The main therapeutic objective for depression is remission (absence of clinical signs of the disorder and low scores on assessment scales), yet partial remission rates remain high (insufficient criteria for diagnosing the disorder while clinically and psychometrically assessable symptoms continue to linger. The presence of residual symptoms is associated with a higher relapse rate of depression, occurring up to 5 times earlier, an increased suicide rate, significant use of healthcare services and a marked social impairment. The most frequently reported symptoms are specific to depression, i.e. anxiety and irritability, depressed mood, feelings of guilt and loss of interest in activities, asthenia and difficulty falling asleep at night. Residual symptoms constitute a valid and reliable clinical marker of prognosis (especially for relapse and chronicity) and must be treated with specific therapeutic strategies. Studies on depression with residual symptoms are few and mainly focus on populations of hospitalized patients or those with a severe form of depression. Since little work has been done with regard to patients monitored on an outpatient basis, we felt it was appropriate to select a population of depressed patients from private psychiatric practice. Our main objective was to analyze the frequency of residual symptoms after 8 to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment and to study the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of these subjects. DESIGN: 1 790 patients who had presented with one major depressive episode per DSM IV criteria and who had been receiving antidepressant treatment for 8 to 12 weeks were included and evaluated. 463 private psychiatrists practicing in metropolitan France were randomly selected and stratified by region and sex ratio (30% female and 70% male) to obtain a sample as representative as possible of the French psychiatrist population. The following were measured and assessed: anthropometric and socio-demographic characteristics, the history of depression, a description of the last major depressive episode, a description of its management, current clinical variables, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score, the physician's assessment of residual symptoms, and a description of the patient's management on the day of the appointment. RESULTS: Following acute treatment, evaluation of depressive symptoms on the Hamilton scale showed that 549 (32%) of subjects had a score below 8; 792 patients (46.7%) had a score between 8 and 18; and 354 (20%) had a score above 18. Patients in the first group (HDRS<8) who were considered to be in remission started treatment early (chi2=18.28, DOF=4, p<0.01) for a first episode (51.3%) with a low number of initial symptoms (chi2=27.03, DOF=6, p<0.01). The evaluators found persistent depressogenic factors (chi2=15.9, DOF=2, p<0.01) and significant psychiatric co-morbidity (chi2=18.28, DOF=4, p<0.01) in subjects in partial remission (HDRS between 8 and 18). The non-responders (HDRS>18) presented a history of more depressive episodes (chi2=17.04, DOF=4, p<0.01) and a delay of more than 30 days before treatment was initiated (chi2=18.2, DOF=4, p<0.01). With regard to the nature of residual symptoms, at least 50% of subjects in partial remission were very symptomatic for depressive mood (65.4%), psychic anxiety (56.6%), and loss of interest and time away from work (49.4%). Indicators of severe depression (early morning insomnia, psychomotor retardation, agitation, hypochondriasis, weight loss and lack of awareness of the disorder) were reported less frequently, and usually not at all. Conclusion - These results illustrate three important points. First, a significant percentage (46.7%) of patients who responded to treatment subsequent to the acute period presented with residual symptoms. Second, these symptoms are included in the areas of depressed mood - psychic anxiety . Third, a delay in initiating treatment seems to have an effect on response. These results confirm the need to develop strategies to screen for these residual forms for these residual forms of depression, as well as specific methods to treat them.

[Residual symptoms after a treated major depressive disorder: a survey among private psychiatrists]. / Symptômes résiduels après traitement antidépresseur d'un épisode dépressif majeur: enquête d'opinion réalisée auprès de psychiatres à activité libérale.

UNLABELLED: Recent studies suggest that depression with residual symptoms is a frequent progressive form of this disease. It is associated with a poor prognosis that translates into an earlier and higher relapse rate, and has a significant medical and social impact. Several literature reviews emphasize that residual symptoms are under-evaluated and that their treatment should follow an incisive strategy with the goal of complete eradication of symptoms. Specific patterns have not been detected either, and the evaluation of residual symptoms remains subject to numerous biases due to the lack of a validated definition. The purpose of this study was to analyze the opinions and attitudes of psychiatrists about residual symptoms following major depressive episodes treated with antidepressants as part of their daily private practice. DESIGN: 867 psychiatrists were selected from across France to form a representative sample of the medical specialization. They were questioned with a closed-choice questionnaire on the scope of the residual depressive symptoms concept (definition, professional consensus), determining factors in their onset (factors associated with the patient, with the initial episode, with management) and their practical and therapeutic attitude towards these symptoms. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of residual symptoms in their depressed patients was 25%. Fifty-seven percent of the physicians queried felt the concept was appropriate, but 70.3% thought that it did not have a strong professional consensus. The definitions deemed most appropriate were those involving the persistence of clinical signs (asthenia or minor cognitive impairment), whereas the use of psychometric criteria was mentioned less often. There is a clear absence of consensus concerning the diagnostic delay of residual symptoms, as 30% diagnosed them after 6 months. Responses about factors that may be predictive or affect the onset of residual symptoms (associated with the patient, the nature of the initial episode and the management) did not reflect a unified position, nor did they necessarily correspond to the data in the literature. However, while the therapeutic attitude seemed adequate (verifying treatment compliance, clinical re-evaluation, therapeutic re-adjustment), 64% of the physicians considered residual symptoms to be a therapeutic challenge. CONCLUSION: Through the wide disparity of responses, this observational study demonstrates the absence of consensus with regard to the concept of residual symptoms. While it does appear that practitioners often adopt an approach that is pragmatic yet still close to that recommended by the ANAES [Agence National d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé, French National Health Accreditation and Evaluation Agency], such an approach does not seem to be optimized for the specific treatment of these symptoms. This clinical concept remains little studied, and lacking a specific definition, appears to be under-evaluated and under-treated by conventional treatment strategies. Further research on residual symptoms is necessary in order to establish true and valid definitions that will.