Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases: a retrospective mono-institutional study in a large cohort of patients.

Introduction: Lymph node metastases (NMs) are a common site of tumor spread that can occur at different times of the disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be a therapeutic option for the treatment of NMs in the setting of oligometastatic disease (OMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate as primary end points the local control (LC) and secondary end points the locoregional nodal control (LRNC), distant nodal control (DNC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and concurrently to assess the predictive factors of response. Methods: This is a retrospective study that analyzes a group of patients treated with SBRT on NMs from different primary tumors, with a of maximum five metastasis. Treated lesions were divided into four groups: oligometastatics, oligorecurrents, oligoprogressives, and oligopersistents. Results: From 2007 to 2021, 229 NMs were treated in 174 patients with different primary tumor. The schedule most represented was 30 Gy in five fractions. The LC was obtained in 90% of NMs treated by SBRT with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 93%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. The LRNC was reached in 84% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 88%, 83%, and 77%, respectively. The DNC was obtained in 87% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 92%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. The DMFS was obtained in 38% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 57%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. The rate of PFS were 44%, 23%, and 13% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of OS were 78%, 48%, and 36%, respectively. Conclusion: SBRT is an option for the treatment of NMS, with high rates of LC, improving survival, and with a good safety and tolerance. Tumor volume, tumor burden, lesion site, and doses can be predictive factors of response; however, multi-institutional studies with a greater number of patients could be helpful to better select patients and understand the right integrations between ablative treatment and systemic therapies.

Safety of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of patients with a cardiac implantable device (CIED) developing cancer and requiring a course of radiotherapy (RT) is increasing remarkably. Previously published reports agree that standard and conventionally fractionated RT is usually safe for CIEDs, but no "in-vivo" reports are available on the potential effects of thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) regimens to CIEDs functioning. The purpose of our study is therefore to evaluate the effects of SABR on CIEDs (pacemakers [PM] or implantable cardiac defibrillators [ICD]) in a cohort of patients affected by primary or metastatic lung lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected all CIED-bearing patients undergoing SABR between 2007 and 2019 at our Institution. All CIEDs were interrogated before and after the SABR course to check for any malfunction. Prescription dose, beam energy and maximum dose (Dmax) to CIEDs were retrieved for each patient. Electrical records of the CIEDs were reviewed by the medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (24 with a PM and 10 with an ICD), who underwent 38 separate SABR courses, were included in the study. Eight patients (24%) were PM-dependent. Prescription dose of SABR ranged 26-60 Gy in 1-8 fractions, with a photon energy ranging 6-to-10 MV (76.3% and 23.7%, respectively) and a median Dmax to CIEDs of 0.17 Gy (range 0.04-1.97 Gy). Electrical parameters were stable in post-treatment device programming visits and no transient or persistent alteration of the CIED function was recorded in any patient. No inappropriate interventions were recorded in the 10 ICD-bearing patients during the treatment fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic SABR proved to be safe for CIEDs when the dose is kept <2 Gy and the beam energy is ≤10 MV, irrespective of the pacing-dependency and of the CIED type.

Re-irradiation in lung disease by SBRT: a retrospective, single institutional study.

BACKGROUND: The loco regional relapse is frequent in the lung disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of re-irradiation by SBRT in terms of Local Control (LC) and toxicities. METHODS: From April 2011 to December 2016, twenty-two patients received a re-irradiation by SBRT. Twenty- seven lesions were treated. The medium BED(10) of re-irradiation was 100.6 Gy (range: 48-151.2 Gy) and the medium EQD2(10) was 93.8 Gy (range: 40-126 Gy). In the previous treatment the medium BED(10) was 97.2 Gy (range: 40-120 Gy), the medium EQD2(10) was 81 Gy (range: 32.5-100 Gy). The median time between the first and the second treatment was 18 months. RESULTS: Local Control was reached in 18 out of 27 (66%) re-irradiated lesions, with rates of 67 and 54% at 1- year and 2- years respectively. The treatment was well tolerated; the maximum recorded toxicity was Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Re- irradiation by SBRT may represent an option for the treatment of lung disease with good results in terms of LC and toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Primary and Metastatic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes and toxicities in patients with liver disease treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2016, 43 patients with 58 lesions (6 primary and 37 metastatic liver tumors) were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: Local Control was reached in 47 out of 58 (81%) treated lesions with 12 and 24-month rates of 81% and 74% respectively. The progression-free survival at 12 and 24 months was 42% and 36%, respectively. The disease specific survival at 12 and 24 months was 74% and 46% respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 20 months and the rates of OS were 74% and 46% at 12 and 24 months respectively. Toxicity was very low consisting mainly of Grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: SBRT provides good local control for both primary and metastatic liver lesions, with minimal toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Lesions. A Single-institution Experience.

AIM: To evaluate survival and toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, 23 patients with 34 lesions (three primary and 31 metastatic liver tumors) were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 9 months (range=1-76) for all patients. Local control was reached in 27 out of 34 (79%) treated lesions, with 1 and 2 years rates of 93% and 73%, respectively. The progression-free survival at 1-year and 2-year was 50% and 25%, respectively. Median overall survival was 16 months (95% confidence interval=8-24 months), with 1-year and 2-year rates of 58% and 41%, respectively. Toxicity was very low consisting mainly of grade 1 and 2 events. CONCLUSION: SBRT provides good local control for both primary and metastatic liver lesions, with minimal toxicity.