Treatment of grade II-III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy.

Meningiomas account for 30-35% of intracranial tumors. Grade I meningiomas are most common and carry the best prognosis. Grade II and III meningiomas are more aggressive and the outcomes after surgical resection alone remain unsatisfactory. The main objective of this retrospective, single-center study was to assess our results of treatment of grade II-III intracranial meningioma with helical tomotherapy (HT). We retrospectively reviewed patients with histologically proven (WHO 2007) grade II-III meningioma irradiated with HT. Patients were treated one session a day, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 59.4 Gy and 68.4 Gy delivered in 33 and 38 fractions of 1.8 Gy each to the LR PTV and HR PTV, with or without simultaneous integrated boost. From May 2011 to January 2015, 19 patients (15 with grade II and 4 with grade III meningiomas) were treated. Median follow-up for patients with Grade II or Grade III meningiomas, was 29.2 months (range, 10.7-52.4) and 21.3 months (range, 2.4-51.3), respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 89.2%, 83.6% and 56.3% respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 94.7%, 94.7% and 78.9%, respectively. No patient had neurological toxicity greater than grade 2 in the acute period. During follow-up, only one patient had neurological toxicity greater than or equal to grade 3. The management of grade II to III meningiomas using HT with doses exceeding 60 Gy is associated with good local control and acceptable survival results.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Era: Outcomes of 120 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to evaluate the outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety of a large consecutive series of 362 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastases treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2015, 362 consecutive patients with brain metastases from RCC were treated using SRS in 1 fraction: 226 metastases (61 patients) using Gamma-Knife at a median of 18 Gy (50% isodose line); 136 metastases (63 patients) using linear accelerator at a median of 16 Gy (70% isodose line). The median patient age was 58 years. At the first SRS, 37 patients (31%) received a systemic treatment. Among systemic therapies, TKIs were the most common (65%). RESULTS: The local control rates were 94% and 92% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a minimal dose >17 Gy and concomitant TKI treatment were associated with higher rates of local control. The overall survival rates at 12 and 36 months were 52% and 29%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor survival included age ≥65 years, lower score index for SRS, concomitant lung metastases, time between RCC diagnosis and first systemic metastasis ≤4 months, occurrence during treatment with a systemic therapy, no history of neurosurgery, and persistence or occurrence of neurological symptoms at 3 months after SRS. Seventeen patients had Grade III/IV adverse effects of whom 3 patients presented a symptomatic radionecrosis. CONCLUSION: SRS is highly effective in patients with brain metastases from RCC. Its association with TKIs does not suggest higher risk of neurologic toxicity.

Laparoscopic uterine fixation to spare fertility before pelvic radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a surgical technique for laparoscopic uterine fixation (LUF) to decrease uterine radiation therapy side effects in case of rectal or anal cancer. DESIGN: This video article uses a surgical case to demonstrate the detailed technique. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this video presentation. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): A 26-year-old nulliparous female patient diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma and liver metastases. After the completion of right hepatectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the use of the FOLFOX regimen, pelvic radiation therapy was applied before tumor excision. INTERVENTION(S): The patient underwent laparoscopic ovarian transposition. During the same intervention, we fixed the uterus with three late resorbable sutures into the fascia of the anterior abdominal wall as cranial as possible to remove the uterus away from the radiation field. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Value and feasibility of LUF. RESULT(S): LUF was feasible and effective. Estimated isodoses demonstrated that this intervention may decrease uterine consequences of pelvic radiotherapy. The patient did not report any specific pain or complication in the postoperative period. Three months after the completion of pelvic concurrent chemoradiation therapy, the patient had normal menstrual periods. Hormonal blood tests were satisfactory. Ultrasound showed persistent ovarian function. CONCLUSION(S): Considering its simplicity of realization, LUF should be discussed for reproductive-age patients before undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for anal or rectal cancer. A close collaboration is required between surgeons and radiation oncologists to optimize the treatment and to decrease side-effects of radiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy may contribute to enhance a multimodal fertility-sparing strategy in global management of young patients.

Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in primary vaginal cancers: A monocentric experience.

PURPOSE: Primary vaginal cancer is a rare disease for which treatment has been modeled based on cervical cancer. We report our experience in the use of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in this indication. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated for vaginal cancer with a combination of external beam radiation therapy and IGABT were identified through electronic search. The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations for cervical cancer have been extrapolated with the definition of two clinical target volumes (CTVs) corresponding to the residual disease after external beam radiation therapy (CTVBT), assessed from clinical and imaging findings, and the so-called CTVi, comprising the CTVBT with directional margins and at least the initial disease at diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were identified. MRI was used for brachytherapy guidance in 82% of the cases. An interstitial component was used in 59% of the cases. The D90 CTVBT and D90 CTVi were 73.1 ± 12.8 Gy and 66.6 ± 6.7 Gy, respectively. After a median followup of 40.1 months, nine recurrences in 8 patients were observed of which four were local. Local relapses occurred within the CTVBT. Three-year local control and disease-free rates were 82% and 65%, respectively. At 2 years, the Grade 2-4 gastrointestinal or urinary morbidity accrual rate was 9%. Twelve patients experienced late sexual morbidity, including three patients with Grade 3 stenosis. CONCLUSION: IGABT is feasible in vaginal cancer with promising outcomes. Harmonizing the definition of CTVs is required to allow comparisons between experiences and to perform multicenter studies.

Contribution of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy to pelvic nodes treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: With the increasing use of simultaneous integrated boost in the treatment of cervical cancer, there is a need to anticipate the brachytherapy (BT) contribution at the level of the pathologic pelvic lymph nodes. This study aimed to report the dose delivered at their level during BT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pelvic nodal involvement and treated with a combination of chemoradiation followed by image-guided adaptive pulsed-dose-rate BT were selected. On per BT three-dimensional images, pelvic lymphadenopathies were delineated, without planning aim. For the purposes of the study, D100, D98, D90, and D50 were reviewed and converted in 2-Gy equivalent doses, using the linear quadratic model with an α/ß of 10 Gy. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were identified, allowing evaluation at the level of 226 lymphadenopathies. The majority of them were external iliac (48%), followed by common iliac (25%), and internal iliac (16%) regions. The 2-Gy equivalent doses D98 were 4.4 ± 1.9 Gy, 5.4 ± 3.1 Gy, and 4.3 ± 2.1 Gy for the obturator, internal iliac, and external iliac, respectively, and 2.8 ± 2.5 Gy for the common iliac. The contribution to the common iliac nodes was significantly lower than the one of external and internal iliac (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BT significantly contributes to the treatment of pelvic nodes at the level of approximately 5 Gy in the internal, external, and obturator areas and 2.5 Gy in the common iliac, allowing the anticipation of nodal boost with the simultaneous integrated boost technique. However, important individual variations have been observed, and evaluation of the genuine BT contribution should be recommended.