Lack of evidence for administering vitamin D analogs to kidney failure patients to improve survivability.

INTRODUCTION: The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Bone Metabolism Guidelines recommend the use of active vitamin D analogs for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroid bone disorder in end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, the effect of vitamin D therapy on the mortality of ESRD patients has not yet been tested in randomized controlled trials. A 2005 publication entitled "Activated Injectable Vitamin D and Hemodialysis Survival: A Historical Cohort Study" claimed ESRD patients receiving injectable vitamin D had a survival advantage. In an effort to validate that conclusion, this author reviewed the publicly-available data of the US Renal Data System (USRDS) and other published reports to evaluate if the use of vitamin D analogs has been shown to be effective in the past decade in improving ESRD patient survival. METHOD: A review, examination, and comparison of the data extracted from the USRDS were made for the period of 1992 - 2002 which covered Medicare ESRD patients in terms of vitamin D administration and mortality. Other pertinent studies were reviewed in the same way. RESULTS: This critical review revealed that scientific evidence for the administration of injectable vitamin D is insufficient in this cohort study as the design flaws inherently diminish the significance of their findings. The annual mortality rate in US Medicare hemodialysis patients has remained unchanged despite the dramatic increase in the percent of these patients receiving injectable vitamin D, which suggests that vitamin D analog therapy does not improve survivability in ESRD patients. CONCLUSION: The potentially harmful consequences of excessive vitamin D analog dosing should caution nephrologists and other CKD health professionals against the off-label use of vitamin D analogs for improved survivability in ESRD patients until additional randomized controlled studies/trials are done and the effects made clear. This review emphasizes the need for additional research to further elucidate the role of vitamin D in the treatment and mortality of ESRD patients.

Development of a novel immunoradiometric assay exclusively for biologically active whole parathyroid hormone 1-84: implications for improvement of accurate assessment of parathyroid function.

We developed a novel immunoradiometric assay (IRMA; whole parathyroid hormone [PTH] IRMA) for PTH, which specifically measures biologically active whole PTH(1-84). The assay is based on a solid phase coated with anti-PTH(39-84) antibody, a tracer of 125I-labeled antibody with a unique specificity to the first N-terminal amino acid of PTH(1-84), and calibrators of diluted synthetic PTH(1-84). In contrast to the Nichols intact PTH IRMA, this new assay does not detect PTH(7-84) fragments and only detects one immunoreactive peak in chromatographically fractionated patient samples. The assay was shown to have an analytical sensitivity of 1.0 pg/ml with a linear measurement range up to 2,300 pg/ml. With this assay, we further identified that the previously described non-(1-84)PTH fragments are aminoterminally truncated with similar hydrophobicity as PTH(7-84), and these PTH fragments are present not only in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (2 degrees -HPT) of uremia, but also in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (1 degrees -HPT) and normal persons. The plasma normal range of the whole PTH(1-84) was 7-36 pg/ml (mean +/- SD: 22.7 +/- 7.2 pg/ml, n = 135), whereas over 93.9% (155/165) of patients with 1 degrees -HPT had whole PTH(1-84) values above the normal cut-off. The percentage of biologically active whole PTH(1-84) (pB%) in the pool of total immunoreactive "intact" PTH is higher in the normal population (median: 67.3%; SD: 15.8%; n = 56) than in uremic patients (median:53.8%; SD: 15.5%; n = 318; p < 0.001), although the whole PTH(1-84) values from uremic patients displayed a more significant heterogeneous distribution when compared with that of 1 degrees -HPT patients and normals. Moreover, the pB% displayed a nearly Gaussian distribution pattern from 20% to over 90% in patients with either 1 degrees-HPT or uremia. The specificity of this newly developed whole PTH(1-84) IRMA is the assurance, for the first time, of being able to measure only the biologically active whole PTH(1-84) without cross-reaction to the high concentrations of the aminoterminally truncated PTH fragments found in both normal subjects and patients. Because of the significant variations of pB% in patients, it is necessary to use the whole PTH assay to determine biologically active PTH levels clinically and, thus, to avoid overestimating the concentration of the true biologically active hormone. This new assay could provide a more meaningful standardization of future PTH measurements with improved accuracy in the clinical assessment of parathyroid function.

A novel immunoradiometric assay detects full-length human PTH but not amino-terminally truncated fragments: implications for PTH measurements in renal failure.

In 8 adolescents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), basal PTH concentrations measured with a novel immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) (Scantibodies Laboratory, Inc.; S-IRMA) were invariably lower than those estimated with an established assay (Nichols Institute; N-IRMA) (263 +/- 228 versus 645 +/- 442 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.00001). During in vivo dynamic testing, set points for calcium-regulated PTH release were indistinguishable for both IRMAs (1.21 +/- 0.05 versus 1.22 +/- 0.06). However, maximal PTH concentrations were significantly lower when measured by S-IRMA then by N-IRMA (557 +/- 448 and 1114 +/- 606 pg/ml, respectively); minimum PTH concentrations were 41 +/- 65 pg/ml (5.0 +/- 4.2% of maximum) and 189 +/- 137 pg/ml (13.6 +/- 7.2% of maximum), respectively. Correlation between PTH and blood ionized calcium indicated that PTH measured by S-IRMA decreased more readily than the concentrations determined by N-IRMA. The N-IRMA showed indistinguishable cross-reactivity with hPTH(1-84) and hPTH(7-84), while the S-IRMA detected only the full-length peptide. Furthermore, the radiolabeled detection antibody of the N-IRMA interacted equivalently with hPTH(1-34) and hPTH(2-34), while the S-IRMA showed crossreactivity only with hPTH(1-34). These differences in assay specificity could explain the observed differences in ESRD, and suggest that PTH concentrations estimated by the S-IRMA reflect more accurately the amount of biologically active PTH in the circulation. Since low concentrations of PTH are frequently associated with adynamic bone disease, our findings may have significant implications for the treatment of renal osteodystrophy with calcium and/or biologically active vitamin D analogs.

Comparison of intact PTH assay and whole PTH assay in long-term dialysis patients.

Adynamic bone disease has become a major problem in long-term dialysis patients. It has been suggested that higher levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) are needed to maintain normal bone turnover in uremia. PTH levels currently are evaluated routinely by intact PTH assay, which may detect inactive 7-84 PTH fragments as well as 1-84 PTH. We examined the efficacy of whole PTH assay, which detects 1-84 PTH exclusively, in 99 nondiabetic patients on maintenance dialysis for more than 10 years, without any residual renal function. PTH levels determined by whole PTH assay were lower than those determined by intact PTH assay in all cases. Serum markers of bone metabolism, such as serum activity of bone alkaline phosphatase, correlated well with whole PTH levels. Because 7-84 PTH has been shown to inhibit the effects of 1-84 PTH, the biologic activity of circulating PTH in uremic patients may be much lower than the values assayed by conventional intact PTH assay. Despite an attempt to correlate 1-84 PTH/7-84 PTH ratio with bone histology, we could find only 1 patient out of 99 with 1-84 PTH/7-84 PTH ratio less than 1, which has been suggested to be indicative of low turnover bone. A cutoff value of this ratio should be set in the future for patients with a long hemodialysis history, with various modes of medical therapy.

Improved assessment of bone turnover by the PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio in ESRD patients.

BACKGROUND: The "intact" parathyroid hormone (PTH) assay recognizes PTH-(1-84) as well as amino terminally truncated PTH fragments, that is, large carboxyterminal PTH fragments (C-PTH fragments). The present study investigated whether the use of the plasma PTH-(1-84)/C-PTH fragment ratio enhances the noninvasive assessment of bone turnover in patients on dialysis. METHODS: Bone biopsies and blood samples for determinations of routine indices of bone turnover and PTH peptides were obtained in 51 adult patients on dialysis not treated with drugs affecting bone such as vitamin D or corticosteroids. Blood levels of large C-PTH fragments were calculated by subtracting PTH-(1-84) from "intact" PTH. Patients were classified according to their levels of bone turnover based on histomorphometrically obtained results of activation frequency. Prediction of bone turnover by the various blood indices was done by using proper statistical methods. In addition, hypercalcemia was induced by calcium gluconate infusion in a subset of patients, and levels of PTH-(1-84), "intact" PTH, and PTH-(1-84)/C-PTH fragment ratio were determined. RESULTS: The PTH-(1-84)/C-PTH fragment ratio was the best predictor of bone turnover. A ratio> 1 predicted high or normal bone turnover (sensitivity 100%), whereas a ratio <1 indicated a high probability (sensitivity 87.5%) of low bone turnover. Calcium infusion resulted in decrease in PTH-(1-84)/C-PTH fragment ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The PTH-(1-84)/C-PTH fragment ratio predicts bone turnover with acceptable precision for biological measurements. Moreover, a change in serum calcium levels is one of the regulators of the relative amount of circulating PTH-(1-84) and its large C-PTH fragments.