Modified Brain Injury Guidelines for preinjury anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury: An opportunity to reduce health care resource utilization.

INTRODUCTION: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) stratify patients by traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity to provide management recommendations to reduce health care resource burden but mandates that patients on anticoagulation (AC) are allocated to the most severe tertile (BIG 3). We sought to analyze TBI patients on AC therapy using a modified BIG model to determine if this population can offer further opportunity for safe reductions in health care resource utilization. METHODS: Patients 55 years or older on AC with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) from two centers were retrospectively stratified into BIG 1 to 3 risk groups using modified BIG criteria excluding AC as a criterion. Intracranial hemorrhage progression, neurosurgical intervention (NSI), death, and worsened discharge status were compared. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included, with 23%, 29%, and 48% classified as BIG 1, BIG 2, and BIG 3, respectively. The BIG 3 cohort had a higher rate of AC reversal agents administered (66%) compared with the BIG 1 (40%) and BIG 2 (54%) cohorts ( p < 0.01), as well as ICH progression discovered on repeat head computed tomography (56% vs. 38% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001). No patients in the BIG 1 and 2 cohorts required NSI. No patients in BIG 1 and 3% of patients in BIG 2 died secondary to the ICH. In the BIG 3 cohort, 16% of patients required NSI and 26% died. Brain Injury Guidelines 3 patients had 15 times the odds of mortality compared with BIG 1 patients ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The AC population had higher rates of ICH progression than the BIG literature, but this did not lead to more NSI or mortality in the lower tertiles of our modified BIG protocol. If the modified BIG used the original tertile management on our population, then NS consultation may have been reduced by up to 52%. These modified criteria may be a safe opportunity for further health care resource and cost savings in the TBI population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD) of a class C TLR9 agonist in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a murine pancreatic cancer model.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunotherapy has had limited clinical benefit in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This is thought to be due to its desmoplastic immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in addition to high intratumoral pressures that limit drug delivery. Recent preclinical cancer models and early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated the potential of toll-like receptor 9 agonists, including the synthetic CpG oligonucleotide SD-101, to stimulate a wide range of immune cells and eliminate suppressive myeloid cells. We hypothesized that Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery via Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion of toll-like receptor 9 agonist would improve responsiveness to systemic anti-programmed death receptor-1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a murine orthotopic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model. METHODS: Murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (KPC4580P) tumors were implanted into the pancreatic tails of C57BL/6J mice and treated 8 days after implantation. Mice were assigned to one of the following treatment groups: Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion delivery of saline, Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion delivery of toll-like receptor 9 agonist, systemic anti-programmed death receptor-1, systemic toll-like receptor 9 agonist, or the combination of Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion delivery of toll-like receptor 9 agonist and systemic anti-programmed death receptor-1 (Combo). Fluorescently labeled toll-like receptor 9 agonist (radiant efficiency) was used to measure uptake of the drug on day 1. Changes in tumor burden were evaluated by necropsy at 2 different time points, 7 and 10 days after toll-like receptor 9 agonist treatment. Blood and tumors were collected at necropsy 10 days after toll-like receptor 9 agonist treatment for flow cytometric analysis of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and plasma cytokines. RESULTS: All mice analyzed survived to necropsy. Site of tumor fluorescence measurements revealed 3-fold higher intensity fluorescence in Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion delivery of toll-like receptor 9 agonist compared to systemic toll-like receptor 9 agonist mice. Tumor weights were significantly lower in the Combo group compared to Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion delivery of saline. Flow cytometry of the Combo group demonstrated significantly increased overall T-cell number, specifically CD4+ T-cells, and a trend toward increased CD8+ T-cells. Cytokine analysis showed significantly decreased IL-6 and CXCL1. CONCLUSION: Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery of toll-like receptor 9 agonist by Pancreatic Retrograde Venous Infusion with systemic anti-programmed death receptor-1 demonstrated improved pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumor control in a murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma model. These results support study of this combination therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients and expansion of ongoing Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery clinical trials.

Immunomodulation by poly-YE reduces organophosphate-induced brain damage.

Accidental organophosphate poisoning resulting from environmental or occupational exposure, as well as the deliberate use of nerve agents on the battlefield or by terrorists, remain major threats for multi-casualty events, with no effective therapies yet available. Even transient exposure to organophosphorous compounds may lead to brain damage associated with microglial activation and to long-lasting neurological and psychological deficits. Regulation of the microglial response by adaptive immunity was previously shown to reduce the consequences of acute insult to the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we tested whether an immunization-based treatment that affects the properties of T regulatory cells (Tregs) can reduce brain damage following organophosphate intoxication, as a supplement to the standard antidotal protocol. Rats were intoxicated by acute exposure to the nerve agent soman, or the organophosphate pesticide, paraoxon, and after 24 h were treated with the immunomodulator, poly-YE. A single injection of poly-YE resulted in a significant increase in neuronal survival and tissue preservation. The beneficial effect of poly-YE treatment was associated with specific recruitment of CD4(+) T cells into the brain, reduced microglial activation, and an increase in the levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the piriform cortex. These results suggest therapeutic intervention with poly-YE as an immunomodulatory supplementary approach against consequences of organophosphate-induced brain damage.

Pressure-enabled delivery of gemcitabine in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model.

BACKGROUND: We describe the use of pancreatic retrograde venous infusion in an orthotopic murine model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and hypothesize that pancreatic retrograde venous infusion delivery of gemcitabine will increase concentrations of gemcitabine in the tumor and the subsequent tumor response to treatment. METHODS: Murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (KPC4580P) was transplanted onto the pancreatic tail of C57BL/6J mice. Groups (n = 15) of mice were assigned to sham laparotomy and 100 mg/kg intraperitoneal infusion of gemcitabine (systemic gemcitabine), pancreatic venous isolation with pancreatic retrograde venous infusion of 100 mg/kg gemcitabine, or pancreatic retrograde venous infusion with saline infusion. Tumor pressures were recorded during pancreatic retrograde venous infusion. Mice were killed at 1 hour or 7 days after infusion. RESULTS: Baseline tumor pressures were 45 ± 8 mm Hg, and pancreatic retrograde venous infusion increased tumor pressures by 29 ± 6 mm Hg (P < .01). Pancreatic retrograde venous infusion gemcitabine mice had greater tumor gemcitabine concentrations compared with systemic gemcitabine (127 vs 19 ng/mg; P < .01) and lesser tumor volumes compared with both systemic gem and pancreatic retrograde venous infusion with saline (274 vs 857 vs 629 mm3; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic retrograde venous infusion increased tumor pressures greater than baseline, improved gemcitabine delivery, and increased the treatment response. These findings suggest that pressurized, regional delivery overcomes the increased pressure barrier in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Additional preclinical studies with cytotoxic and immunotherapeutic agents and clinical trials using pressure-enabled drug delivery with pancreatic retrograde venous infusion devices are underway.