Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 27(4): 482-7, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26749504

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound guidance for vascular cannulation seems safer and more effective than an anatomical landmark approach, though it has not gained widespread support partly due to workflow interference of wired probes. A wireless ultrasound transducer (WUST) may overcome this issue. We report the effectiveness, time consumption, and safety of the first-in-human experience in axillary vein cannulation guided with a novel WUST for the implantation of cardiovascular implantable electric devices (CIEDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: After a one-month training period, we routinely performed WUST-guided puncture to all first implants, prospectively registering data from the first 50 patients. We analyzed the time needed for preparing the WUST and for achieving each vein cannulation, and the rate of unsuccessful or accidental arterial punctures and complications. WUST-guided axillary vein access was successful in 49 out of 50 patients, totaling 86 cannulated veins. Median WUST preparation time was 55 [44-62] seconds and median time needed for each venous cannulation was 56 [36-71] seconds. A total of 84.9% of the veins were cannulated at the first attempt. There were 7 unsuccessful puncture attempts and 1 accidental arterial puncture. No pneumothorax, hemothorax, or nervous injury occurred in the 49 successfully cannulated patients. The unsuccessful one (distal subclavian occlusion) developed a minor local subcutaneous emphysema with no confirmed radiologic pneumothorax, not requiring intervention. During a follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.1 months, a patient developed a pocket infection, with no other significant complications. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided axillary vein cannulation using a wireless transducer for the implantation of CIEDs is a feasible, fast, and safe method.


Assuntos
Veia Axilar/ultraestrutura , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Marca-Passo Artificial , Próteses e Implantes , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Tecnologia sem Fio/instrumentação , Idoso , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Transdutores , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 38(9): 1058-65, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26010612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance increases safety and efficacy in vascular cannulation and is considered the standard of care. However, barriers including workflow interference and the need to be assisted by a second operator limit its adoption in clinical routine. The use of wireless US (WUS) may overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a novel WUS probe during its initial implantation in an electrophysiology (EP) laboratory. METHODS: Thirty-six patients requiring femoral venous cannulation for EP procedures were included in this single center, prospective, observational study, comparing WUS guidance with the anatomical landmark approach. The primary endpoint was time to successful cannulation. Secondary endpoints included rate of unsuccessful punctures, accidental arterial punctures, and workflow interference. RESULTS: Compared with anatomical landmark approach, WUS guidance significantly reduced mean time to successful cannulation (87.3 ± 94.3 vs 238.1 ± 294.7 seconds, P < 0.01). Workflow interference was predominantly nonexistent or mild and decreased after the first three weeks of use. In addition, WUS guidance improved safety and efficacy, reducing the rate of accidental arterial punctures (0.02 ± 0.1 vs 0.25 ± 0.5 arterial punctures per cannulation, P < 0.05) and unsuccessful attempts (0.26 ± 0.8 vs 1.75 ± 2.1 attempts per cannulation, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: WUS guidance resulted in faster, safer, and more effective femoral venous cannulation than the anatomical landmark approach without adding significant workflow interference. The application of wireless technology in this setting contributed to overcoming some of the barriers preventing a more widespread clinical use of US guidance.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/instrumentação , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/instrumentação , Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/instrumentação , Tecnologia sem Fio/instrumentação , Fluxo de Trabalho , Idoso , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Punções/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Transdutores/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA