Interstitial needles versus intracavitary applicators only for locally advanced cervical cancer: results from real-life dosimetric comparisons.

Background and purpose: Image-guided adapted brachytherapy (IGABT) is superior to other radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We aimed to investigate the benefit of interstitial needles (IN) for a combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) approach using IGABT over the intracavitary approach (IC) alone in patients with LACC after concomitant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy. Materials and methods: We included consecutive patients with LACC who were treated with IC/IS IGABT after radiochemotherapy (RCT) in our retrospective, observational study. Dosimetric gain and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) were investigated by comparing the IC/IS IGABT plan with a simulated plan without needle use (IC IGABT plan) and the impact of other clinical factors on the benefit of IC/IS IGABT. Results: Ninety-nine patients were analyzed, with a mean EBRT dose of 45.5 ± 1.7 Gy; 97 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. A significant increase in median D90% High Risk Clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was found for IC/IS (82.8 Gy) vs IC (76.2 Gy) (p < 10-4). A significant decrease of the delivered dose for all OAR was found for IC/IS vs IC for median D2cc to the bladder (77.2 Gy), rectum (68 Gy), sigmoid (53.2 Gy), and small bowel (47 Gy) (all p < 10-4). Conclusion: HR-CTV coverage was higher with IC/IS IGABT than with IC IGABT, with lower doses to the OAR in patients managed for LACC after RCT. Interstitial brachytherapy in the management of LACC after radiotherapy provides better coverage of the target volumes, this could contribute to better local control and improved survival of patients.

Evaluation of surface image guidance and Deep inspiration Breath Hold technique for breast treatments with Halcyon.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy/agreement of a three-camera Catalyst Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) system on a closed-gantry Halcyon for Free-Breathing (FB) and Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) breast-only treatments. METHODS: The SGRT positioning agreement with Halcyon couch and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was evaluated on phantom and by evaluation of 2401 FB and 855 DIBH breast-only treatment sessions. The DIBH agreement was evaluated using a programmable moving support. Dose agreement was evaluated for manual SGRT-assisted beam interruption and Halcyon arc beam interruption. RESULTS: Geometrical phantom agreement was < 0.4 mm. Couch and SGRT agreement for an anthropomorphic phantom resulted in 95% limits of agreement in Right-Left/Feet-Head/Posterior-Anterior (RL/FH/PA) directions of respectively ± 0.4/0.8/0.5 mm and ± 1.1/1.1/0.6 mm in the virtual and real isocenter. FB-SGRT-assisted patient positioning compared to CBCT positioning resulted in RL/FH/PA systematic differences of -0.1/0.1/2.0 mm with standard deviations of 2.7/2.8/2.4 mm. This mean systematic difference had three origins: a) couch sag/isocenter difference of ≤ 0.5 mm. b) Average reconstructed FB-CBCT images do not visually represent the average respiratory position. c) CBCT-based positioning focused on the inner thoracic interface, which can introduce a mean positioning difference between SGRT and CBCT. Manual SGRT-assisted beam interruption and arc interruptions resulted in mean gamma passing rates > 97% (0.5%/0.5 mm) and mean absolute differences < 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy was comparable with breast-only C-arm SGRT techniques, with different tradeoffs. Depending on the patient's morphology, real-time tracking accuracy in the real isocenter can be reduced. This study demonstrates possible discordances between SGRT and CBCT positioning for breast.

Universal evaluation of MLC models in treatment planning systems based on a common set of dynamic tests.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of characterising MLCs and MLC models implemented in TPSs using a common set of dynamic beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A set of tests containing synchronous (SG) and asynchronous sweeping gaps (aSG) was distributed among twenty-five participating centres. Doses were measured with a Farmer-type ion chamber and computed in TPSs, which provided a dosimetric characterisation of the leaf tip, tongue-and-groove, and MLC transmission of each MLC, as well as an assessment of the MLC model in each TPS. Five MLC types and four TPSs were evaluated, covering the most frequent combinations used in radiotherapy departments. RESULTS: Measured differences within each MLC type were minimal, while large differences were found between MLC models implemented in clinical TPSs. This resulted in some concerning discrepancies, especially for the HD120 and Agility MLCs, for which differences between measured and calculated doses for some MLC-TPS combinations exceeded 10%. These large differences were particularly evident for small gap sizes (5 and 10 mm), as well as for larger gaps in the presence of tongue-and-groove effects. A much better agreement was found for the Millennium120 and Halcyon MLCs, differences being within ± 5% and ± 2.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using a common set of tests to assess MLC models in TPSs was demonstrated. Measurements within MLC types were very similar, but TPS dose calculations showed large variations. Standardisation of the MLC configuration in TPSs is necessary. The proposed procedure can be readily applied in radiotherapy departments and can be a valuable tool in IMRT and credentialing audits.

Dosimetric leaf gap and leaf trailing effect in a double-stacked multileaf collimator.

PURPOSE: To investigate (i) the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and the effect of the "trailing distance" between leaves from different multileaf collimator (MLC) layers in Halcyon systems and (ii) the ability of the currently available treatment planning systems (TPSs) to approximate this effect. METHODS: DICOM plans with transmission beams and sweeping gap tests were created in Python for measuring the DLG for each MLC layer independently and for both layers combined. In clinical Halcyon plans both MLC layers are interchangeably used and leaves from different layers are offset, thus forming a trailing pattern. To characterize the impact of such configuration, new tests called "trailing sweeping gaps" were designed and created where the leaves from one layer follow the leaves from the other layer at a fixed "trailing distance" t between the tips. Measurements were carried out on five Halcyons SX2 from different institutions and calculations from both the Eclipse and RayStation TPSs were compared with measurements. RESULTS: The dose accumulated during a sweeping gap delivery progressively increased with the trailing distance t . We call this "the trailing effect." It is most pronounced for t between 0 and 5 mm, although some changes were obtained up to 20 mm. The dose variation was independent of the gap size. The measured DLG values also increased with t up to 20 mm, again with the steepest variation between 0 and 5 mm. Measured DLG values were negative at t  = 0 (the leaves from both layers at the same position) but changed sign for t  ≥ 1 mm, in line with the positive DLG sign usually observed with single-layer rounded-end MLCs. The Eclipse TPS does not explicitly model the leaf tip and, as a consequence, could not predict the dose reduction due to the trailing effect. This resulted in dose discrepancies up to +10% and -8% for the 5 mm sweeping gap and up to ±5% for the 10 mm one depending on the distance t . RayStation implements a simple model of the leaf tip that was able to approximate the trailing effect and improved the agreement with measured doses. In particular, with a prototype version of RayStation that assigned a higher transmission at the leaf tip the agreement with measured doses was within ±3% even for the 5 mm gap. The five Halcyon systems behaved very similarly but differences in the DLG around 0.2 mm were found across different treatment units and between MLC layers from the same system. The DLG for the proximal layer was consistently higher than for the distal layer, with differences ranging between 0.10 mm and 0.24 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The trailing distance between the leaves from different layers substantially affected the doses delivered by sweeping gaps and the measured DLG values. Stacked MLCs introduce a new level of complexity in TPSs, which ideally need to implement an explicit model of the leaf tip in order to reproduce the trailing effect. Dynamic tests called "trailing sweeping gaps" were designed that are useful for characterizing and commissioning dual-layer MLC systems.