Early expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and activation of its receptor in chick neuroblasts.

To investigate the involvement of pituitary adenylate cyclase- activating polypeptide (PACAP) and GH-releasing factor (GRF) during early chick brain development, we established neuroblast- enriched primary cell cultures derived from embryonic day 3.5 chick brain. We measured increases in cAMP generated by several species-specific forms of the peptides. Dose-dependent increases up to 5-fold of control values were measured in response to physiological concentrations of human/salmon, chicken, and tunicate PACAP27. Responses to PACAP38 were more variable, ranging from 5-fold for human PACAP38 to 4-fold for chicken PACAP38, to no significant response for salmon PACAP38, compared with control values. The responses to PACAP38 may reflect a greater difference in peptide structure compared with PACAP27 among species. Increases in cAMP generated by human, chicken, and salmon/carp GRF were not statistically significant, whereas increases in response to lower-range doses of tunicate GRF27-like peptide were significant, but small. We also used immunocytochemistry and Western blot to show synthesis of the PACAP38 peptide. RT-PCR was used to demonstrate that messenger RNAs for PACAP and GRF and a PACAP-specific receptor were present in the cells. This is a first report suggesting an autocrine/paracrine system for PACAP in early chick brain development, based on the presence of the ligand, messages for the ligand and receptor, and activation of the receptor in neuroblast-enriched cultures.

Human growth hormone-releasing hormone hGHRH(1-29)-NH2: systematic structure-activity relationship studies.

Two complete and two partial structure-activity relationship scans of the active fragment of human growth hormone-releasing hormone, [Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2, have identified potent agonists in vitro. Single-point replacement of each amino acid by alanine led to the identification of [Ala8]-, [Ala9]-, [Ala15]- (Felix et al. Peptides 1986 1986, 481), [Ala22]-, and [Ala28, Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 as being 2-6 times more potent than hGHRH(1-40)-OH (standard) in vitro. Nearly complete loss of potency was seen for [Ala1], [Ala3], [Ala5], [Ala6], [Ala10], [Ala11], [Ala13], [Ala14], and [Ala23], whereas [Ala16], [Ala18], [Ala24], [Ala25], [Ala26], and [Ala29] yielded equipotent analogues and [Ala7], [Ala12], [Ala17], [Ala20], [Ala21], and [Ala27] gave weak agonists with potencies 15-40% that of the standard. The multiple-alanine-substituted peptides [MeTyr1,Ala15,22,Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (29) and [MeTyr1,Ala8,9,15,22,28,Nle 27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (30) released growth hormone 26 and 11 times, respectively, more effectively than the standard in vitro. Individual substitution of the nine most potent peptides identified from the Ala series with the helix promoter alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) produced similar results, except for [Aib8] (doubling vs [Ala8]), [Aib9] (having vs [Ala9]), and [Aib15] (10-fold decrease vs [Ala15]). A series of cyclic analogues was synthesized having the general formula cyclo(25-29)[MeTyr1,-Ala15,Xaa25,Nle27,Yaa29+ ++]-GHRH(1-29)-NH2, where Xaa and Yaa represent the bridgehead residues of a side-chain cystine or [i-(i + 4)] lactam ring. The ring size, bridgehead amino acid chirality, and side-chain amide bond location were varied in this partial series in an attempt to maximize potency. Application of lactam constraints in the C-terminus of GHRH(1-29)-NH2 identified cyclo(25-29)[MeTyr1,Ala15,DAsp25,Nle27,Orn29+ ++]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 (46) as containing the optimum bridging element (19-membered ring) in this region of the molecule. This analogue (46) was 17 times more potent than the standard. Equally effective was an [i-(i + 3)] constraint yielding the 18-membered ring cyclo(25-28)[MeTyr1,Ala15,Glu25,Nle,27Lys28]- hGHRH-(1-29)-NH2 (51) which was 14 times more potent than the standard. A complete [i-(i + 3)] scan of cyclo(i,i + 3)[MeTyr1,Ala15,Glui,Lys(i + 3),Nle27]-hGHRH(1-29)-NH2 was then produced in order to test the effects of a Glu-to-Lys lactam bridge at all points in the peptide. Of the 26 analogues in the series, 11 had diminished potencies of less than 10% that of the agonist standard, 4 were weak agonists (15-40% relative potency), and 4 analogues were equipotent to the standard. The 7 most potent analogues ranged in potency from 3 to 14 times greater than that of the standard and contained the [i-(i + 3)] cycles between residues 4-7, 5-8, 9-12, 16-19, 21-24, 22-25, and 25-28. The combined results from these systematic studies allowed for an analysis of structural features in the native peptide that are important for receptor activation. Reinforcement of the characteristics of amphiphilicity, helicity, and peptide dipolar effects, using recognized medicinal chemistry approaches including introduction of conformational constraints, has resulted in several potent GHRH analogues.

Design of monocyclic (1-3) and dicyclic (1-3/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

Careful analysis of the NMR structures of cyclo(4-10)[Ac-Delta(3)Pro(1),DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),DNal (6), Dpr(10)]GnRH, dicyclo(4-10/5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3), Asp(4), Glu(5),DArg(6),Lys(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH, and dicyclo(4-10/5, 5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DPal(3),Asp(4), Glu(5)(Gly),DArg(6),Dbu(8), Dpr(10)]GnRH showed that, in the N-terminal tripeptide, a type II beta-turn around residues 1 and 2 was probable along with a gamma-turn around DTrp(3)/DPal(3). This suggested the possibility of constraining the N-terminus by the introduction of a cyclo(1-3) scaffold. Optimization of ring size and composition led to the discovery of cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (5, K(i) = 0.82 nM), cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(Gly), DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (13, K(i) = 0.34 nM), cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (20, K(i) = 0.14 nM), and cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DAsp(1)(betaAla), DCpa(2), DOrn(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (21, K(i) = 0.17 nM), which inhibited ovulation significantly at doses equal to or lower than 25 microgram/rat. These results were particularly unexpected in view of the critical role(s) originally ascribed to the side chains of residues 1 and 3.(1) Other closely related analogues, such as those where the [DAsp(1)(betaAla), DOrn(3)] cycle of 21 was changed to [DOrn(1)(betaAla), DAsp(3)] of cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DOrn(1)(betaAla), DCpa(2),DAsp(3),DNal(6),DAla(10)]GnRH (22, K(i) = 2.2 nM) or where the size of the cycle was conserved and [DAsp(1)(betaAla), DOrn(3)] was replaced by [DGlu(1)(Gly), DOrn(3)] as in cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DOrn(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (23, K(i) = 4.2 nM), were approximately 100 and 25 times less potent in vivo, respectively. Analogues with ring sizes of 18 ¿cyclo(1, 1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6),DA la(10)]GnRH (24)¿ and 19 ¿cyclo(1,1'-3)[Ac-DGlu(1)(betaAla),DCpa(2),DLys( 3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (25)¿ atoms were also less potent than 21 with slightly higher K(i) values (1.5 and 2.2 nM, respectively). These results suggested that the N-terminal tripeptide was likely to assume a folded conformation favoring the close proximity of the side chains of residues 1 and 3. The dicyclic analogue dicyclo(1-3/4-10)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),Asp (4),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (26) was fully active at 500 microgram, with a K(i) value of 1 nM. The in vivo potency of 26 was at least 10-fold less than that of monocyclic cyclo(1-3)[Ac-DAsp(1),DCpa(2),DLys(3),DNal(6), DAla(10)]GnRH (5); this suggested the existence of unfavorable interactions between the now optimized and constrained (1-3) and (4-10) cyclic moieties that must interact as originally hypothesized. Tricyclo(1-3/4-10/5-8)[Ac-DGlu(1),DCpa(2), DLys(3),Asp(4),Glu(5), DNal(6),Lys(8),Dpr(10)] GnRH (27) was inactive at 500 microgram/rat with a corresponding low affinity (K(i) = 4.6 nM) when compared to those of the most potent analogues (K(i) < 0.5 nM).

Design of potent dicyclic (1-5/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

In three earlier papers, the structures and biological potencies of numerous mono- and dicyclic antagonists of GnRH were reported. Among these, two families, each containing two to four members were identified that had very high antagonist potencies in an antiovulatory assay (within a factor of 2 of those of the most potent linear analogues) and high affinities (K(i) < 0.5 nM) for the rat GnRH receptor (rGnRHR). The most favored cycles bridged the side chains of residues (4-10),(1,2) (5-8),(2) (4-10/5-8),(2) (1-3),(3) and (1-3/4-10).(3) Our goal was to identify a consensus model of bioactive conformations of GnRH antagonists, yet these biocompatible constraints did not sufficiently restrain the spatial location of the N-terminal tripeptide with respect to the C-terminal heptapeptide, due largely to the rotational freedom about the bonds connecting these regions. Examination of models derived from NMR studies of cyclo(4-10) analogues suggested a large number of possible cyclic constraints such as cyclo (0-8), (1-8), or (2-8). All analogues tested with these substitutions were inactive as antiovulatory agents at 1 mg/rat (5-9) and had low affinity for rGnRHR. On the other hand, bridging positions 3 and 8 with a [DAsp(3)] to [Dbu(8)] (12, K(i) = 13 nM) or [Orn(8)] (13, K(i) = 14 nM) in the parent compound cyclo(3-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DXaa(3), Arg(5),DNal(6),Xbb(8),DAla(10)]GnRH yielded analogues that blocked ovulation at 250 microgram/rat. Analogue 14 (K(i) = 2.3 nM), with a [DAsp(3), Lys(8)] bridge, was fully active at 50 microgram/rat. Loss of potency (>20-fold) was observed with the substitution of [DAsp(3)] in 14 by [DGlu(3)] in 15 (K(i) = 23 nM). Dicyclic analogues possessing the (4-10) cycle and selected (1-6), (2-6), and (2-8) cycles led to analogues that were inactive at doses of 500 microgram/rat or larger. Two analogues with (1-8/4-10) cycles (16, K(i) = 1.1 nM) or (3-8/4-10) cycles (22, K(i) = 17 nM) showed full antiovulatory potency at 250 microgram/rat. None of these substitutions yielded analogues potent enough (>80% inhibition of ovulation at 5 microgram/rat or less and K(i) < 0.5 nM) to be candidates for structural analysis by NMR. On the other hand, four dicyclic (1, 1'-5/4-10) analogues met this criterion: dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (32, K(i) = 0.22 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DNal(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (34, K(i) = 0.38 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(betaAla),DCpa(2), DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (40, K(i) = 0.15 nM), and dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly), DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (41, K(i) = 0.24 nM). Since they differed slightly in terms of the (1,1'-5) bridge length (21 and 22 atoms) and bridgehead configuration, we may hypothesize that they assume similar bioactive conformations that satisfy a very discriminating receptor, since many other closely related analogues were significantly less potent.

Design of potent dicyclic (4-10/5-8) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists.

With the ultimate goal of identifying a consensus bioactive conformation of GnRH antagonists, the compatibility of a number of side chain to side chain bridges in bioactive analogues was systematically explored. In an earlier publication, cyclo[Asp(4)-Dpr(10)]GnRH antagonists with high potencies in vitro and in vivo had been identified.(1) Independently from Dutta et al. (2) and based on structural considerations, the cyclic [Glu(5)-Lys(8)] constraint was also found to be tolerated in GnRH antagonists. We describe here a large number of cyclic (4-10) and (5-8) and dicyclic (4-10/5-8) GnRH antagonists optimized for affinity to the rat GnRH receptor and in vivo antiovulatory potency. The most potent monocyclic analogues were cyclo(4-10)[Ac-DNal(1), DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),DArg(6),Xaa(10)]GnRH with Xaa = D/LAgl (1, K(i) = 1.3 nM) or Dpr (2, K(i) = 0.36 nM), which completely blocked ovulation in cycling rats after sc administration of 2.5 microgram at noon of proestrus. Much less potent were the closely related analogues with Xaa = Dbu (3, K(i) = 10 nM) or cyclo(4-10)[Ac-DNal(1), DFpa(2),DTrp(3),Glu(4),DArg(6),D/LAgl(10)]GnRH (4, K(i) = 1.3 nM). Cyclo(5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Glu(5),DArg++ +(6),Lys(8), DAla(10)]GnRH (13), although at least 20 times less potent in the AOA than 1 or 2 with similar GnRHR affinity (K(i) = 0.84 nM), was found to be one of the most potent in a series of closely related cyclo(5-8) analogues with different bridge lengths and bridgehead chirality. The very high affinity of cyclo(5,5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1), DCpa(2),DPal(3),Glu(5)(betaAla),DArg(6),(D or L)Agl,(8)DAla(10)]GnRH 14 (K(i) = 0.15 nM) correlates well with its high potency in vivo (full inhibition of ovulation at 25 microgram/rat). Dicyclo(4-10/5-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp (4),Glu(5),DArg(6), Lys(8),Dpr(10)]GnRH (24, K(i) = 0.32 nM) is one-fourth as potent as 1 or 2, in the AOA; this suggests that the introduction of the (4-10) bridge in 13, while having little effect on affinity, restores functional/conformational features favorable for stability and distribution. To further increase potency of dicyclic antagonists, the size and composition of the (5-8) bridge was varied. For example, the substitution of Xbb(5') by Gly (30, K(i) = 0.16 nM), Sar (31, K(i) = 0.20 nM), Phe (32, K(i) = 0.23 nM), DPhe (33, K(i) = 120 nM), Arg (36, K(i) = 0.20 nM), Nal (37, K(i) = 4.2 nM), His (38, K(i) = 0.10 nM), and Cpa (39, K(i) = 0.23 nM) in cyclo(4-10/5,5'-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DPal(3),Asp(4),G lu(5)(Xbb(5')), DArg(6),Dbu,(8)Dpr(10)]GnRH yielded several very high affinity analogues that were 10, ca. 10, 4, >200, 1, ca. 4, >2, and 2 times less potent than 1 or 2, respectively. Other scaffolds constrained by disulfide (7, K(i) = 2.4 nM; and 8, K(i) = 450 nM), cyclo[Glu(5)-Aph(8)] (16, K(i) = 20 nM; and 17, K(i) = 0.28 nM), or cyclo[Asp(5)-/Glu(5)-/Asp(5)(Gly(5'))-Amp(8)] (19, K(i) = 1.3 nM; 22, K(i) = 3.3 nM; and 23, K(i) = 3.6 nM) bridges yielded analogues that were less potent in vivo and had a wide range of affinities. The effects on biological activity of substituting DCpa or DFpa at position 2, DPal or DTrp at position 3, and DArg, DNal, or DCit at position 6 are also discussed. Interestingly, monocyclo(5-8)[Glu(5), DNal(6),Lys(8)]GnRH (18, K(i) = 1. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Rat corticostatin R4: synthesis, disulfide bridge assignment, and in vivo activity.

We have synthesized significant amounts of the most potent member of the rat corticostatins that inhibits ACTH-induced corticosteroid and compared its structure to that of the natural hormone. The cystine bridging arrangement that corresponds to that reported for a human defensin (3-31, 5-20, 10-30) was determined. The in vitro corticostatic activity of the synthetic rat corticostatin R4 paralleled that of the natural R4. Biological studies in vivo showed that doses of 8 or 12 mg corticostatin/kg effectively interfered with corticosterone release in stressed rats. We conclude that in the assays that were used, the biological activity of the synthetic and natural molecules was identical. The availability of significant amounts of synthetic material will make possible studies investigating the physiological role played by corticostatins in modulating the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Comparison of an agonist, urocortin, and an antagonist, astressin, as radioligands for characterization of corticotropin-releasing factor receptors.

The characteristics of a high-affinity antagonist radioligand are compared with those a high-affinity agonist in binding to the cloned corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF-R1) and type 2 (CRF-R2) and to the native receptors that exist in rat cerebellum and brain stem. The relative potencies of CRF antagonists and agonists to the two types of cloned CRF receptors overexpressed stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells are determined using the antagonist radioligand 125I- [DTyr1]astressin (Ast*), and the agonist radioligand, 125I -[Tyr0]rat urocortin (Ucn*). The inhibitory binding constants (Ki) of astressin and urocortin are 1 to 2 nM for all receptors and are independent of which radioligand is employed. Astressin binds with high affinity to the native cerebellar/brain stem receptor and relative potencies of selected CRF analogs determined with Ast* on the native receptor are similar to those obtained for the cloned CRF-R1. The specific binding of Ast* to endogenous brain receptors is greater than that of Ucn*, resulting in more sites being detected by the antagonist than by the agonist. In contrast to another CRF agonist, the binding of Ucn* to the cloned receptors is relatively insensitive to guanyl nucleotides at both 20 degreesC and 37 degreesC; however, its binding to the native receptor is displaced by guanyl nucleotides at 37 degreesC and, to a lesser degree, at 20 degreesC. As expected, the binding of the antagonist Ast* is not affected by guanyl nucleotides. Because it is a high-affinity, specific CRF antagonist, astressin is eminently suitable as a ligand for detection and characterization of both endogenous and cloned CRF receptors.

Expression, purification, and characterization of a soluble form of the first extracellular domain of the human type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor.

The first extracellular domain (ECD-1) of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptor, (CRFR1), is important for binding of CRF ligands. A soluble protein, mNT-CRFR1, produced by COS M6 cells transfected with a cDNA encoding amino acids 1--119 of human CRFR1 and modified to include epitope tags, binds a CRF antagonist, astressin, in a radioreceptor assay using [(125)I-d-Tyr(0)]astressin. N-terminal sequencing of mNT-CRFR1 showed the absence of the first 23 amino acids of human CRFR1. This result suggests that the CRFR1 protein is processed to cleave a putative signal peptide corresponding to amino acids 1--23. A cDNA encoding amino acids 24--119 followed by a FLAG tag, was expressed as a thioredoxin fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Following thrombin cleavage, the purified protein (bNT-CRFR1) binds astressin and the agonist urocortin with high affinity. Reduced, alkylated bNT-CRFR1 does not bind [(125)I-D-Tyr(0)]astressin. Mass spectrometric analysis of photoaffinity labeled bNT-CRFR1 yielded a 1:1 complex with ligand. Analysis of the disulfide arrangement of bNT-CRFR1 revealed bonds between Cys(30) and Cys(54), Cys(44) and Cys(87), and Cys(68) and Cys(102). This arrangement is similar to that of the ECD-1 of the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR), suggesting a conserved structural motif in the N-terminal domain of this family of receptors.