Determinants of neuropsychiatric flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from five phase III trials of belimumab.

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of neuropsychiatric (NP) flares in patients with SLE treated for active SLE yet no ongoing severe NPSLE with non-biologic standard therapy plus belimumab or placebo. METHODS: We analysed data from five phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-NEA, BLISS-SC, EMBRACE; n = 3638) after exclusion of patients with baseline NP BILAG A. Factors associated with NPSLE flare, defined as a new NP BILAG A or B, were investigated using Cox regression. In a subgroup analysis, we studied patients with baseline NP BILAG E for determinants of de novo NPSLE flare. Organ damage was assessed using the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI). RESULTS: We documented 105 (2.9%) NPSLE flares. In multivariable analysis, male sex (HR = 2.37; 95% CI: 1.31, 4.28; P = 0.004), baseline NP BILAG B-D (HR = 5.91; 95% CI: 3.86, 9.06; P < 0.001), and increasing SDI scores (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.50; P < 0.001) were strongly associated with NPSLE flare. Belimumab use yielded no association at any dose or administration form. In analysis of SDI domains, NP damage was the strongest determinant of NPSLE flare (HR = 3.25; 95% CI: 2.72, 3.88; P < 0.001), holding true for cognitive impairment (HR = 14.29; 95% CI: 9.22, 22.14; P < 0.001), transverse myelitis (HR = 21.89; 95% CI: 5.40, 88.72; P < 0.001), and neuropathy (HR = 8.87; 95% CI: 5.59, 14.09; P < 0.001). Male sex was the strongest determinant of de novo NPSLE flare (HR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.51, 7.04; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Male sex, NPSLE history, and NP damage were strong determinants of impending NPSLE flare. No clear protection or predisposition was conferred from add-on belimumab.

Patients with NPSLE experience poorer HRQoL and more fatigue than SLE patients with no neuropsychiatric involvement, irrespective of neuropsychiatric activity.

OBJECTIVES: Substantial proportions of patients with SLE report poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our objective was to investigate the impact of neuropsychiatric involvement (NP) in SLE on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We analysed data from four phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC, EMBRACE; N = 2968). The NPSLE group comprised individuals with NP-BILAG A/B/C/D or score in any descriptor of the NP-SLEDAI-2K at baseline (N = 350), while the non-NPSLE group consisted of patients with NP-BILAG E (N = 2618). HRQoL was assessed with the SF-36, EQ-5D-3L, and FACIT-F. Full health state (FHS) was defined as 'no problems' in all EQ-5D dimensions. RESULTS: NPSLE patients reported lower scores in the SF-36 physical and mental component summary compared with the non-NPSLE population [mean (s.d.): 35.7 (9.1) vs 39.6 (9.6); P < 0.001 and 37.3 (12.1) vs 41.4 (11.0); P < 0.001, respectively]. NPSLE patients also exhibited impaired HRQoL in all EQ-5D dimensions compared with non-NPSLE patients (P < 0.05 for all). A substantially lower proportion of NPSLE patients experienced FHS in comparison with the non-NPSLE group (3.3% vs 14.5%; P < 0.001). NPSLE was associated with severe fatigue [23.8 (12.2) vs 31.5 (11.6); P < 0.001]. Notably, our findings revealed no discernible distinctions between active and inactive NPSLE patients with regard to SF-36, EQ-5D, FHS or FACIT-F scores. CONCLUSION: NP in patients with SLE has a detrimental effect on HRQoL experience and is associated with severe fatigue, regardless of the degree of neuropsychiatric disease activity. Early intervention is warranted in NPSLE patients to enhance long-term HRQoL experience.

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus contributes to organ damage beyond the nervous system: a post-hoc analysis of 5 phase III randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI) items, especially non-neuropsychiatric items. METHODS: Baseline data from five phase III trials (BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC, BLISS-NEA, EMBRACE) were analysed. NPSLE involvement was defined as NP BILAG A/B/C/D (n = 272); NP BILAG E denoted non-neuropsychiatric SLE (n = 3273). We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The median (IQR) and mean ± SD SDI scores were 0 (0-1) and 0.62 ± 1.09. Compared with the non-neuropsychiatric SLE group, NPSLE patients were more likely to develop damage (adjusted (a)OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 2.28-3.59). This held true also after suppression of the NP SDI items (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.36-2.12). Beyond the neuropsychiatric domain, NPSLE was associated with damage in the cardiovascular (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.75-3.95), musculoskeletal (aOR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.43-2.52), and skin (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.06-2.22) SDI domains. Dissecting domains into items, NPSLE was associated with coronary artery disease (aOR = 3.08; 95% CI = 1.44-6.58), myocardial infraction (aOR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.54-6.27), muscle atrophy (aOR = 3.34; 2.16-5.16), scarring alopecia (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19-2.70), bowel infarction (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.20-3.26), retinopathy (aOR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.15-4.32), and premature gonadal failure (aOR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.11-3.90). CONCLUSION: The intricate association between NPSLE and damage accrual extends beyond the nervous system to also comprise the musculoskeletal, skin, and cardiovascular organ systems.

Attainment of remission and low disease activity after treatment with belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Disease remission or low disease activity are key treatment targets for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Pivotal trials of belimumab were conducted before the introduction of these targets. In this study, we aimed to pool data across trials to assess attainment of remission and low disease activity in a large, racially and culturally diverse patient population with SLE. METHODS: In this integrated post-hoc analysis, we pooled data from five phase 3 trials of belimumab (BLISS-76 [NCT00410384], BLISS-52 [NCT00424476], BLISS-NEA [NCT01345253], BLISS-SC [NCT01484496], and EMBRACE [NCT01632241]), in patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE. Patients were randomly assigned to receive belimumab (10 mg/kg per month intravenously or 200 mg per week subcutaneously) or placebo, plus standard therapy. The proportion of patients with Definitions of Remission in SLE (DORIS) remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were analysed every 4 weeks from week 4 to week 52 for belimumab versus placebo, using modified Poisson regression adjusted for trial variance, in all patients and in subgroups per baseline SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score (<10 or ≥10); anti-double stranded DNA positivity (yes or no); low complement 3 (C3) or C4 levels (yes or no); anti-dsDNA positivity or low C3 or C4 levels (yes and no); prednisone-equivalent dose (≤7·5 mg per day or >7·5 mg per day); antimalarial use (yes or no); and by race (Black African ancestry or African American, Asian, Indigenous American, or White). FINDINGS: Data for 3086 patients (1869 in the belimumab group and 1217 in the placebo group) were analysed. 2913 (94%) of 3086 patients were women and 173 (6%) were men, and the median age was 36 years (IQR 28-45). The proportion of patients with DORIS remission was significantly higher in the belimumab group than the placebo group at weeks 28, 48, and 52 (week 52: 148 [8%] of 1869 participants vs 68 [6%] of 1217 participants; risk ratio 1·51 [95% CI 1·15-1·99]; p=0·0055). The proportion of patients who attained LLDAS was higher in the belimumab group than the placebo group at weeks 8, 24, 32-52 (week 52: 322 [17%] of 1869 participants vs 125 [10%] of 1217 participants; 1·74 [1·44-2·12]; p<0·0001). A higher proportion of patients had DORIS remission at week 52 in the belimumab group than the placebo group among all baseline subgroups denoting high disease activity, with the exception of those on a prednisone-equivalent dose higher than 7·5 mg per day in whom there was no difference for DORIS remission with belimumab versus placebo. The proportion of patients with LLDAS was significantly higher among patients in the belimuab group than those who received placebo from week 44 in all baseline subgroups denoting high disease activity or earlier in some subgroups, and the differences were maintained at week 52. INTERPRETATION: In adults with active SLE, belimumab plus standard therapy yielded greater benefit than placebo plus standard therapy in attaining DORIS remission (for which low rates were attained in both groups) and LLDAS, with differences observed as early as week 28 for DORIS remission and week 8 for LLDAS. FUNDING: Swedish Rheumatism Association, King Gustaf V's 80-year Foundation, Swedish Society of Medicine, Nyckelfonden, Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation, Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation, Region Stockholm, and the Karolinska Institutet.

Effect of Belimumab on Preventing de novo Renal Lupus Flares.

Introduction: Belimumab was recently approved for treating lupus nephritis (LN), yet de novo LN cases during belimumab treatment given for nonrenal causes have been reported. Identification of reliable signals of impending flare is imperative. Methods: We evaluated belimumab efficacy in preventing de novo renal flares and factors associated with renal flare occurrence in nephritis-naïve patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are receiving add-on belimumab or placebo in 5 phase 3 clinical trials using Cox regression analysis. Results: Of 1844 eligible patients, 136 (7.4%) developed a de novo renal flare during a 52-week long follow-up. Asian origin (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [HRadj]: 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.94; P = 0.001), positive baseline anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels (HRadj: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.07-1.63; P = 0.008), and increasing mean prednisone dose during follow-up (HRadj: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04; P < 0.001) were associated with de novo renal flares. Low-dose intravenous (IV) belimumab (1 mg/kg monthly) yielded a nearly 3-fold lower hazard of de novo renal flare (HRadj: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = 0.004). Subcutaneous (SC) belimumab (200 mg weekly) also yielded a lower hazard (HRadj.: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54-0.88; P = 0.003). The labeled IV dose (10 mg/kg monthly) conferred no clear protection (HRadj.: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.50-1.09; P = 0.127). Conclusion: We corroborated the substantial vulnerability of the Asian SLE population to renal affliction. Add-on low-dose IV belimumab (1 mg/kg) and SC belimumab appeared protective against renal flares in nephritis-naïve patients with SLE. The approved IV dose (10 mg/kg) yielded no clear protection.

High intensity interval training protects from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder induced cognitive impairment.

This study aimed to show the possible protective effects of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in PTSD-induced rats and probable underlying mechanisms. Female rats (n = 44) were separated as; Sedentary (SED), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), HIIT groups. Then the groups were divided into subgroups according to PTSD induction (n = 6-8/group). Exercise groups performed HIIT or MICT for 6 weeks. On the fifth week, PTSD was induced by single prolonged stress protocol. Cognitive functions were evaluated by object recognition, anxiety levels by hole-board and elevated plus maze, and fear conditioning by passive avoidance tests. Following decapitation, malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), luminol and lucigenin chemiluminescence levels, and myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities were measured, and histopathological damage was evaluated. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Cognitive decline and aggravated anxiety levels in SED + PTSD group were improved in both PTSD-induced exercise groups (p < 0.05-0.001). The increased chemiluminescence levels, MPO activity and histological damage were depressed in both PTSD-induced exercise groups (p < 0.05-0.001). The risen MDA levels in SED + PTSD group were suppressed only in HIIT + PTSD group (p < 0.01-0.001). The decreased GSH levels were increased by MICT (p < 0.05-0.001), and CAT and SOD activities were improved via HIIT (p < 0.05). Compared to SED group, latency was decreased in SED + PTSD (p < 0.05-0.01) group. Neuronal damage scores were alleviated in both PTSD-induced exercise groups (p < 0.001). PTSD-induced memory decline was protected by both of the exercise models however more effectively by HIIT via decreasing oxidative stress, anxiety levels and by improving antioxidant capacity as a protective system for neuronal damage.