Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Age Ageing ; 48(1): 94-100, 2019 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30304489

RESUMO

Background: although many studies have demonstrated the association between body mass index (BMI) and many diseases, there is little evidence of postoperative mortality after hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between BMI and mortality after hip arthroplasty in the older population. Methods: a total of 3,627 older patients who underwent hip arthroplasty from 2010 to 2013 were included. We used Cox regression analysis to evaluate the association between BMI and mortality after hip arthroplasty. The hazard ratios (HRs) was calculated from 30 days, 31-365 days, and from the first day of surgery to the day of death during the study. Results: under-weight (BMI under 18.5 kg/m2) is significantly associated with increased mortality (HR:1.423; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.023-1.981) after hip arthroplasty compared to the normal range. However, in the short-term mortality within 30 days after surgery, both under-weight (HR: 2.368; 95%CI: 1.130-4.960) and obesity (25-29.9 kg/m2, HR: 2.023; 95%CI: 1.008-4.059) are associated with increased mortality. Conclusion: our study suggested that under-weight is associated with increased risk of mortality after hip arthroplasty. Further, in a short-term outcome, obesity appear to be associated with increased mortality after hip arthroplasty within 30 days.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/mortalidade , Obesidade/mortalidade , Magreza/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/complicações , Osteoartrite do Quadril/complicações , Osteoartrite do Quadril/mortalidade , Osteoartrite do Quadril/cirurgia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Magreza/complicações , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(11)2023 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37296813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the prevalent incidence of re-tear following rotator cuff repair, there is a notable lack of comparative studies investigating the outcomes between patients with re-tear who underwent primary repair versus those who received patch augmentation for large-to-massive tears. We assessed clinical outcomes of these techniques through a retrospective, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: 134 patients diagnosed with large-to-massive rotator cuff tears from 2018 to 2021 underwent surgery; 65 had primary repair and 69 had patch augmentation. A total of 31 patients with re-tears were included, split into two groups; Group A (primary repair, 12 patients) and Group B (patch augmentation, 19 patients). Outcomes were evaluated using several clinical scales and MRI imaging. RESULTS: Most clinical scores improved postoperatively in both groups. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed between groups, except for pain visual analog scale (P-VAS) scores. P-VAS scores showed greater decrease in the patch-augmentation group, a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: for large-to-massive rotator cuff tears, patch augmentation led to greater decreases in pain than primary repair, despite similar radiographic and clinical results. Greater tuberosity coverage of the supraspinatus tendon footprint may impact P-VAS scores.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA