RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Most patients with advanced gallbladder cancer are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer the possibility of a durable response with less toxicity. This prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the anticancer activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Nineteen patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to ≥1 previous therapy received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] confirmed on subsequent scan); secondary end points included unconfirmed overall response, clinical benefit rate (confirmed and unconfirmed responses + stable disease >6 months), progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS: The confirmed ORR was 16% (CR, n = 1 [5%]; PR, n = 2 [11%]); all were microsatellite stable, and the confirmed CR had undetectable programmed death-ligand 1 by immunohistochemistry. The unconfirmed ORR and clinical benefit rates were both 32%. The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range, 4-35.1+ months). The 6-month progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI, 12-55). The median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-19.1). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%), anemia (26%), and anorexia (26%). Aspartate aminotransferase elevation was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (11%). There was 1 possibly related death (sepsis with attendant hepatic failure). CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed modest efficacy with durable responses in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02834013 (ClincialTrials.gov). PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This prospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 19 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to previous therapy. The combination demonstrated modest efficacy with a 16% confirmed overall response rate, durable responses, and manageable toxicities, suggesting potential benefits for this challenging patient population.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Antígeno CTLA-4 , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar , Ipilimumab , Nivolumabe , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Humanos , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Vesícula Biliar/patologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Ipilimumab/efeitos adversos , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Immunotherapy can significantly improve efficacy of cancer treatments. For locally advanced stage III lung cancers, chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting can achieve complete pathological response in about 40% of cases. However, optimal cancer response in patients receiving immunotherapy is sometimes associated with potentially fatal bystander injury to lung and liver. We report a successful combined double lung and liver transplantation for immunotherapy-associated respiratory failure and cirrhosis in a patient with advanced lung cancer. A 68-year-old man with stage IIIA squamous cell lung cancer encountered severe interstitial pneumonitis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver following systemic anticancer therapy that included immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. These adverse events culminated into fulminant end-stage pulmonary fibrosis and cirrhosis, which were treated with simultaneous lung and liver transplantation, complete resection of lung cancer, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The patient demonstrated promising early outcomes without recurrence of cancer at 12 months. Given that oncologic treatments can induce irreversible solid organ failure despite cancer control, our report suggests that in carefully selected patients without systemic metastasis and in whom complete resection of residual cancer can be performed, organ transplantation can be life-saving.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy regimens have significantly improved survival for patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Improvements in overall survival (OS) in two separate pembrolizumab trials have demonstrated survival improvements over chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 status. The optimal chemotherapy backbone for combination with immunotherapy is unknown. We hypothesized nab-paclitaxel may be a well-suited platinum partner to use in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy for both adenocarcinoma and squamous histology and conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the efficacy of this regimen in advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Adult patients with previously untreated, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC (any histology) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, any PD-L1 expression, and no EGFR mutations or ALK translocations, received carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 day 1, nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, and pembrolizumab 200 mg day 1 q21 days for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pembrolizumab q3w. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Forty-six evaluable patients enrolled, 14 in phase I and 32 in phase II, from June 2015 to July 2018 with a median duration of follow-up of 35.4 months. Median time from enrollment to data lock was 42 months. In the ITT population, the ORR was 35%, median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.6-8.2), and median OS was 15.4 months (CI, 12.4-28.1). There were no statistical differences in PFS or OS by PD-L1 status. The 2- and 3-year landmark OS rates were 33% and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab are a safe and effective regimen for patients with both squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. Although this study did not meet the prespecified endpoints, the median and landmark OS results are consistent with durable benefit of this regimen as seen in phase III trials for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adulto , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carboplatina/farmacologia , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Antígeno B7-H1 , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The tumor microenvironment can be classified into three immune phenotypes: inflamed, immune excluded, and immune-desert. Immunotherapy efficacy has been shown to vary by phenotype; yet, the mechanisms are poorly understood and demand further investigation. This study unveils the mechanisms using an artificial intelligence-powered software called Lunit SCOPE. Artificial intelligence was used to classify 965 samples of non-small-cell lung carcinoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas into the three immune phenotypes. The immune and mutational profiles that shape each phenotype using xCell, gene set enrichment analysis with RNA-sequencing data, and cBioportal were described. In the inflamed subtype, which showed higher cytolytic score, the enriched pathways were generally associated with immune response and immune-related cell types were highly expressed. In the immune excluded subtype, enriched glycolysis, fatty acid, and cholesterol metabolism pathways were observed. The KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, and MET splicing variant were mostly observed in the inflamed subtype. The two prominent mutations found in the immune excluded subtype were EGFR and PIK3CA mutations. This study is the first to report the distinct immunologic and mutational landscapes of immune phenotypes, and demonstrates the biological relevance of the classification. In light of these findings, the study offers insights into potential treatment options tailored to each immune phenotype.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Inteligência Artificial , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Amarelo de Eosina-(YS) , Hematoxilina , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Mutação , Fenótipo , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Although the association between post-transplant malignancy (PTM) and immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation has been studied, an integrated review of PTM after lung transplantation is lacking. We investigated the incidence and types of de novo PTM and its impact on survival following double lung transplantation (DLT). The incidence and type of PTM as well as the annual and cumulative risks of each malignancy after DLT were analyzed. The overall survival (OS) of recipients with or without PTM was compared by the Kaplan-Meier survival method and landmark analysis. There were 5,629 cases (23.52%) with 27 types of PTMs and incidences and OS varied according to the types of PTMs. The recipients with PTM showed a significantly longer OS than those without PTM (p < 0.001). However, while the recipients with PTM showed significantly better OS at 3, and 5 years (p < 0.001, p = 0.007), it was worse at the 10-year landmark time (p = 0.013). And the single PTM group showed a worse OS rate than the multiple PTM group (p < 0.001). This comprehensive report on PTM following DLT can help understand the risks and timing of PTM to improve the implementation of screening and treatment.
Assuntos
Terapia de Imunossupressão , Transplante de Pulmão , Neoplasias , Incidência , Risco , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating a variety of cancer types has increased in recent years, so too have the number of reports on patients acquiring resistance to these therapies. Overcoming acquired resistance to immunotherapy remains an important need in the field of immuno-oncology. Herein, we present a case that suggests sequential administration of combination immunotherapy may be beneficial to advanced cervical cancer patients exhibiting acquired resistance to mono-immunotherapy. The patient's tumor is microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), which is an important biomarker in predicting ICI response. Results from recent interim prospective studies using combination immunotherapy (eg, nivolumab and ipilimumab) with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor following progression on anti-PD-1 inhibitors (eg, nivolumab) have shown anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced melanoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We also introduce retrospective studies and case reports/case series of dual checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD-1 inhibitor plus anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor after progression on prior anti-PD/PD-L1 monotherapy. To date, there has been no prospective study on the use of combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy at the time of progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with MSI-H tumors or advanced cervical cancer. In this report, we provide evidence that supports future investigations into such treatments.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos , Ipilimumab/farmacologia , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/genéticaRESUMO
The recent, rapid advances in immuno-oncology have revolutionized cancer treatment and spurred further research into tumor biology. Yet, cancer patients respond variably to immunotherapy despite mounting evidence to support its efficacy. Current methods for predicting immunotherapy response are unreliable, as these tests cannot fully account for tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment. An improved method for predicting response to immunotherapy is needed. Recent studies have proposed radiomics-the process of converting medical images into quantitative data (features) that can be processed using machine learning algorithms to identify complex patterns and trends-for predicting response to immunotherapy. Because patients undergo numerous imaging procedures throughout the course of the disease, there exists a wealth of radiological imaging data available for training radiomics models. And because radiomic features reflect cancer biology, such as tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment, these models have enormous potential to predict immunotherapy response more accurately than current methods. Models trained on preexisting biomarkers and/or clinical outcomes have demonstrated potential to improve patient stratification and treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss current applications of radiomics in oncology, followed by a discussion on recent studies that use radiomics to predict immunotherapy response and toxicity.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Neoplasias , Algoritmos , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Aprendizado de Máquina , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/terapia , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The authors previously reported the results of the nonpancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort of the SWOG S1609 DART (Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors) trial, which permitted all histologic grades and had a 44% overall response rate (ORR) among patients with high-grade disease. Here they sought to validate their findings in a dedicated prospective cohort of high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms within S1609. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was conducted across multiple rare tumor cohorts. The dedicated, high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort was examined here. The primary end point was the ORR according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (defined by local pathology review) were enrolled in this cohort of S1609. The most common primary sites were unknown primaries (21%), which were followed by the rectum, gastroesophageal junction, cervix, and pancreas (11%). The median number of lines of prior therapy was 1 (range, 0-3). All patients were microsatellite-stable. The median Ki-67 value was 80%. The ORR was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-45%), and the clinical benefit rate (stable disease for ≥6 months plus partial responses plus complete responses) was 32% (95% CI, 13%-57%). The 6-month PFS rate was 32% (95% CI, 16%-61%) with a median PFS of 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8 months to ∞) and a median OS of 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.1 months to ∞). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%) and rash (26%), and the most common grade 3/4 immune-related adverse event was rash (15%); there were no events that required treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated a 26% ORR in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms, with durable responses seen in patients with refractory disease.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Metformin has been widely used as the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus for its anti-hyperglycemic effect. In recent years, it has also been extensively studied for its anti-cancer effect as it diminishes immune exhaustion of CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). It decreases apoptosis of CD8 + TILs, thereby enhancing T cell-mediated immune response to tumor cells. Here, we present a unique case of a patient with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who exhibited an overall partial response as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) since starting metformin in combination with nivolumab therapy. Our patient had been treated with nivolumab monotherapy for 2 years until she had progression of disease. After she was started on metformin along with nivolumab therapy, she has shown a significant durable response for over 6 months. Many patients develop resistance to immunotherapy such as antibodies against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Tumor hypoxia is one of the resistance factors. Signals activated by hypoxic environments in tumors are associated with decreased sensitivity to the PD-1 blockade. Metformin inhibits oxygen consumption in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, reducing intratumoral hypoxia. These data suggest that metformin can improve susceptibility to anti-PD-1 treatment. To the best of our knowledge, our case is the first reported example demonstrating a proof-of-concept that metformin can contribute to overcoming acquired resistance to PD-1 inhibitors.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/imunologia , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) A, B, and C, which has been shown to have anti-tumour activity against NTRK gene fusion-positive solid tumours, including CNS activity due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We present an integrated efficacy and safety analysis of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours harbouring oncogenic NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 gene fusions treated in three ongoing, early-phase trials. METHODS: An integrated database comprised the pivotal datasets of three, ongoing phase 1 or 2 clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2), which enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who received entrectinib orally at a dose of at least 600 mg once per day in a capsule. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and could have received previous anti-cancer therapy (except previous TRK inhibitors). The primary endpoints, the proportion of patients with an objective response and median duration of response, were evaluated by blinded independent central review in the efficacy-evaluable population (ie, patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who were TRK inhibitor-naive and had received at least one dose of entrectinib). Overall safety evaluable population included patients from STARTRK-1, STARTRK-2, ALKA-372-001, and STARTRK-NG (NCT02650401; treating young adult and paediatric patients [aged ≤21 years]), who received at least one dose of entrectinib, regardless of tumour type or gene rearrangement. NTRK fusion-positive safety evaluable population comprised all patients who have received at least one dose of entrectinib regardless of dose or follow-up. These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001). FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018) the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 54 adults with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours comprising ten different tumour types and 19 different histologies. Median follow-up was 12.9 months (IQR 8·77-18·76). 31 (57%; 95% CI 43·2-70·8) of 54 patients had an objective response, of which four (7%) were complete responses and 27 (50%) partial reponses. Median duration of response was 10 months (95% CI 7·1 to not estimable). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in both safety populations were increased weight (seven [10%] of 68 patients in the NTRK fusion-positive safety population and in 18 [5%] of 355 patients in the overall safety-evaluable population) and anaemia (8 [12%] and 16 [5%]). The most common serious treatment-related adverse events were nervous system disorders (three [4%] of 68 patients and ten [3%] of 355 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Entrectinib induced durable and clinically meaningful responses in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours, and was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. These results show that entrectinib is a safe and active treatment option for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours. These data highlight the need to routinely test for NTRK fusions to broaden the therapeutic options available for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours. FUNDING: Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Fusão Gênica , Indazóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Receptores de Fator de Crescimento Neural/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptores de Fator de Crescimento Neural/genética , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Benzamidas/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Indazóis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/antagonistas & inibidores , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/patologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Receptor trkA/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor trkA/genética , Receptor trkB/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor trkB/genética , Receptor trkC/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor trkC/genética , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accessible biomarkers are needed for immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously described a multivariate risk prediction model, the iSEND, which categorises advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab into Good, Intermediate or Poor groups. This model was developed by using only clinical and analytical variables (sex, ECOG-performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and post-treatment delta NLR). METHODS: An international database of 439 patients who received post-platinum PD-1/L1 monotherapies was collected for validation. Performance of the iSEND to different PD-L1 groups was compared by using time-dependent positive predictive value (PPV) for their mortality events. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18.2 months (95% CI: 15.9-19.6). The overall survival of the iSEND Good (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.22-0.43, p < 0.0001) was superior to the iSEND Poor. Time-dependent PPV for mortality of iSEND Poor was superior to PD-L1 = 0% group at 12 (75 vs. 53%, p = 0.01) and 18 months (85 vs. 46%, p = 0.03). However, female gender did not independently associate with better outcome in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The iSEND model is associated with the outcome of post-platinum PD-1/L1 monotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients. The iSEND Poor demonstrated a superior performance to PD-L1 = 0% in negative prognostication. Prospective investigation and modelling with other significant parameters in a larger cohort are warranted.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/sangue , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tissue tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a potential biomarker predicting response to anti-programmed cell death-1 protein receptor (PD-1)/programmed cell death-1 protein ligand (PD-L1) therapy, but few studies have explored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) TMB in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 136 patients with NSCLC with ctDNA testing were retrospectively evaluated from a single institution, along with a validation cohort from a second institution. ctDNA TMB was derived using the number of detected mutations over the DNA sequencing length. RESULTS: Higher ctDNA TMB was significantly correlated with smoking history (p < .05, chi-squared test). Among patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 20), higher ctDNA TMB was significantly correlated with shorter progressive free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; 45 vs. 355 days; hazard ratio [HR], 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-24.6; p < .01, and OS 106 days vs. not reached; HR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27.1; p < .01, respectively). In a small independent validation cohort (n = 12), there was a nonsignificant numerical difference for higher ctDNA TMB predicting shorter OS but not PFS. ctDNA TMB was not correlated with RECIST tumor burden estimation in the subset of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that higher ctDNA TMB, at the current commercial sequencing length, reflects worse clinical outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Biomarkers to identify patients who will respond to immune checkpoint blockade are critical. Tissue tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a viable biomarker to predict response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, but few studies have explored the meaning and potential clinical significance of noninvasive, blood-based TMB. Here, we investigated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) TMB and present data demonstrating that current ctDNA TMB may reflect tumor burden and that ctDNA panels with a greater number of mutations may be necessary to more accurately reflect tissue TMB.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/imunologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/imunologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , DNA Tumoral Circulante/sangue , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Mutação , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/imunologia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Critérios de Avaliação de Resposta em Tumores Sólidos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary retroperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma (PRSA) is an extremely uncommon malignancy exclusively reported in females. Due to the rarity of the disease, it is difficult to establish a standardized treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a unique case of PRSA in a 71-year-old male who presented with right-sided lower back pain and numbness. Magnetic resonance imaging identified a mass invading the adjacent psoas muscle and twelfth rib. Tissue biopsy confirmed poorly differentiated PRSA. Patient was initially treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy regimen. This resulted in complete radiological resolution of the tumor. However, 12 weeks later, rapid recurrence was noted on follow-up CT scan. The patient was then treated with external radiotherapy with concurrent nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody. The patient displayed a positive response to treatment with reduction in primary tumor and metastases and had a sustained disease control. CONCLUSION: Treatment with radiotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody could be an effective modality of management for PRSA.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/radioterapia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/terapia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/terapia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/imunologia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The emergence of immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. Inhibitors of immune checkpoints, including antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death protein 1, and programmed death ligand 1, have demonstrated notable efficacy in certain advanced cancers. Unfortunately, many patients do not benefit from these therapies and either exhibit primary resistance to treatment or develop acquired mechanisms of resistance after initially responding to therapy. Here, we review the genomic and immune traits that may promote resistance to T-cell-mediated immunotherapy, with a focus on identifying potential biomarkers that could eventually be used in the clinical setting to guide treatment selection. We summarize the clinical evidence for these markers and discuss how current understanding of resistance mechanisms can inform future studies and aid clinical decision-making in order to derive maximum benefit from immunotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immunotherapy has rapidly progressed as a treatment modality for multiple cancers, but it is still unclear which patients are likely to benefit from these therapies. Studies of resistance mechanisms have only recently started to identify biomarkers that can help predict patient outcomes. This review summarizes the available clinical data in regard to immunotherapy resistance, with a focus on molecular biomarkers that may be useful in guiding clinical decision-making. It discusses possible applications of these biomarkers and highlights opportunities for further clinical discovery.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Imunoterapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias/imunologia , Transdução de Sinais , Evasão Tumoral , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab, now FDA-approved for use in treating several types of cancer, have been associated with immune-related adverse effects. Specifically, the antibodies targeting the programmed-cell death-1 immune checkpoint, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have been rarely reported to induce the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Here we describe a case of a patient who developed antibody-positive type 1 diabetes mellitus following treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with systemic chemotherapy for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. We will also provide a brief literature review of other rarely reported cases of type 1 diabetes presenting after treatment with pembrolizumab and nivolumab, as well as discussion regarding potential mechanisms of this adverse effect and its importance as these drugs continue to become even more widespread.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/imunologia , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular/imunologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , MasculinoRESUMO
Major technologic advances in genomics have made possible the identification of critical genetic alterations in cancer, which has led to a rapid paradigm shift in what is now considered personalized cancer treatment. This exponential growth in the understanding of cancer genomics is reshaping the drug development process, from drug discovery to novel designs of clinical trials. It is also exposing the critical importance of rigorous validation of molecular diagnostics platforms, such as the use of whole-exome sequencing and patient-derived xenografts, which may eventually be utilized to guide treatment decisions and may ultimately enable the true practice of personalized oncology. This review describes the achievements in therapeutic and molecular diagnostics, details evolving molecular platforms, and highlights the challenges for the translation of these developments to daily clinical practice.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/genética , Medicina de Precisão , Biologia Computacional , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Breast cancer is one of the major public health problems of the Western world. Recent advances in genomics and gene expression-profiling approaches have enriched our understanding of this heterogeneous disease. However, progress in functional proteomics in breast cancer research has been relatively slow. Allied with genomics, the functional proteomics approach will be important in improving diagnosis through better classification of breast cancer and in predicting prognosis and response to different therapies, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapy. In this review, we will present functional proteomic approaches with a focus on the recent clinical implications of utilizing the reverse-phase protein array platform in breast cancer research.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Proteômica/métodos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Descoberta de Drogas , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Humanos , Prognóstico , Análise Serial de Proteínas , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por MatrizRESUMO
Background: Molecular biomarkers are reshaping patient stratification and treatment decisions, yet their precise use and best implementation remain uncertain. Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), an area of increasing research interest with prognostic value across various conditions, lacks defined clinical relevance in certain non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes. Exploring the relationship between ITH and tumor mutational burden (TMB) is crucial, as their interplay might reveal distinct patient subgroups. This study evaluates how the ITH-TMB dynamic affects prognosis across the two main histological subtypes of NSCLC, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma, with a specific focus on early-stage cases to address their highly unmet clinical needs. Methods: We stratify a cohort of 741 early-stage NSCLC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on ITH and TMB and evaluate differences in clinical outcomes. Additionally, we compare driver mutations and the tumor microenvironment (TME) between high and low ITH groups. Results: In lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), high ITH predicts an extended progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 21 vs. 14 months, P=0.01), while in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), high ITH predicts a reduced PFS (median: 15 vs. 20 months, P=0.04). This relationship is driven by the low TMB subset of patients. Additionally, we found that CD8 T cells were enriched in better-performing subgroups, regardless of histologic subtype or ITH status. Conclusions: There are significant differences in clinical outcomes, driver mutations, and the TME between high and low ITH groups among early-stage NSCLC patients. These differences may have treatment implications, necessitating further validation in other NSCLC datasets.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While evidence of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) continues to grow, the lack of a consensual definition obscures a proper characterization of HPD incidence. We examined how HPD incidence varies by the tumor type or the type of definition used. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science from database inception to June 21, 2022. Observational studies reporting HPD incidence, in patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, and all statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: HPD incidence was 12.4% (95% CI 10.2%-15.0%) with evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 119.32, p < 0.001). Meta-regression showed that the risk of developing HPD was higher in patients with advanced gastric cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 10.83; 95% CI, 2.14-54.65; p < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (adjusted OR, 7.99; 95% CI, 1.68-38.13; p = 0.006), non-small cell lung cancer (adjusted OR, 7.14; 95% CI, 1.58-32.29; p = 0.005), and mixed or other types (adjusted OR, 5.09; 95% CI, 1.12-23.14, p = 0.018) than in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Across definitions, HPD defined as a tumor growth kinetics ratio ≥ 2 (adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.07; p = 0.025) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) reported higher incidence than when HPD was defined as RECIST-defined progressive disease and a change in the tumor growth rate (TGR) exceeding 50% (∆TGR > 50). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of immunotherapy-related HPD may vary across tumor types and definitions used, supporting the argument for a uniform and improved method of HPD evaluation for informed clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Imunoterapia , Neoplasias , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Incidência , Neoplasias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
IDH2 gain-of-function mutations cause DNA hypermethylation interfering with cellular differentiation and are linked to poor disease outcomes in NSCLC. IDH2-inhibitor enasidenib is approved for refractory acute myeloid leukemia but has been associated with delayed onset of differentiation syndrome-a potentially fatal inflammatory reaction caused by differentiating agents, namely all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. We report the first case of differentiation syndrome in a patient with NSCLC treated with enasidenib, who after 7 weeks experienced bilateral peripheral edema and shortness of breath, with scans exhibiting pericardial effusion and ground-glass opacities suggestive of pneumonitis. Differentiation syndrome should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with solid tumors undergoing IDH2-inhibitor targeted therapy.