A single-center, open label, randomized, controlled study of hydroxychloroquine sulfate in the treatment of low risk PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQ) in the treatment of low risk phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)-associated membranous nephropathy (MN). METHODS: A total of 110 patients with low risk PLA2R-associated MN were included in the study. Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were assigned randomly to two groups: the HCQ treatment group and the control group. The control group received standard supportive treatment according to the guidelines, while the HCQ treatment group received HCQ in addition to the supportive treatment. The clinical data of the patients were analyzed, with comparisons made at baseline and during the six-month follow-up period. Any adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTS: The baseline data were comparable between the HCQ treatment group and the control group. At the end of the six-month follow-up period, the reductions in urine protein excretion and serum PLA2R antibody titer were more notable in the HCQ treatment group than those in the control group, with these differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). Compared to the control group, the HCQ treatment group had fewer patients who were converted from low risk to moderate-to-high risk (p = 0.084). There were also no severe adverse reactions in the HCQ treatment group. CONCLUSION: In patients with low risk PLA2R-associated MN, adequate supportive therapy combined with HCQ is superior to supportive therapy alone in controlling proteinuria and reducing serum PLA2R antibody titers. Additionally, our study demonstrated that the incidence of adverse reactions did not increase. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No.: ChiCTR1900021757, Date of registration: 2019-03-08).

Efficacy and safety of dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade for non-elderly diabetic kidney disease patients with preserved eGFR.

AIM: Although sodium glucose cotransporter2 inhibitor (SGLT-2I) is widely used in clinical practice, sufficient renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition remains the cornerstone of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) treatment. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual RAS blockade compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy in non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR (WHO Standard, < 60y). METHODS: This single-center study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900024752), and approved by the ethical committee (KY201994). In this study, we recruited non-elderly type 2 diabetes volunteers with initial diagnosis of DKD to receive dual RAS blockade or monotherapy. 150 non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR were recruited. The patients were randomly divided into dual RAS blockade group and monotherapy group. The dual RAS blockade group treatment regimen was an 80 mg valsartan plus a 4 mg perindopril tert-butylamine per day. At the same time, monotherapy group patients who received the 8 mg perindopril tert-butylamine or 160 mg valsartan monotherapy. The clinical data of the three groups were compared at baseline and collected during the follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline of patients who received dual RAS blockade was similar to that of monotherapy group. After 12 months of treatment, the median level of proteinuria in the dual RAS blockade group was significantly lower than that in the monotherapy group. There was no significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level, potassium, blood pressure and no serious adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: In non-elderly DKD patients with preserved eGFR, dual RAS blockade is superior to control proteinuria, and does not increase the probability of adverse reactions such as hyperkalemia, hypotension and acute kidney injury in 12 months.

Ghrelin-attenuated cognitive dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Diabetic encephalopathy is clinically characterized by acquired behavior and cognitive dysfunction but its pathogenesis is not clear. This study aimed to explore the pathogenesis of diabetic encephalopathy and the mechanisms of ghrelin to ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in diabetic rats. Thirty-six streptozotocin diabetic rat models were established; 12 weeks later, all the rats were randomly divided into 3 groups [diabetic model group (D), ghrelin treatment group (T1), and ghrelin and D-lys-3-GHRP-6 treatment group (T2)] of 12 each. Twelve normoglycemic rats were classified in the normal group (N). Learning and memory behaviors were measured using a spatial version of the Morris water maze test. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB), phosphorylated CREB (p-CREB), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2), caspase-3, and Bcl-xl protein expressions in the hippocampi of all the rats were detected using immunohistochemistry. The mRNA expressions of BDNF, CREB, and caspase-3 were examined using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The hippocampus neuronal apoptosis was measured by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling method. We found that learning and memory level in the ghrelin treatment group improved significantly, expression of Bcl-xl, BDNF, CREB, p-CREB, and p-ERK1/2 in the hippocampus was increased in the ghrelin treatment group, and the number of apoptotic neurons in the hippocampus decreased remarkably. Our results showed that the changes of BDNF, CREB, and hippocampus neuronal apoptosis might be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic encephalopathy. We suggested that ghrelin improved cognitive ability in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by improving the expressions of BDNF and CREB and by attenuating hippocampus neuronal apoptosis. The effects of ghrelin depend on the receptor of ghrelin, GHSR-1a, and ERK1/2 pathway.

Short-term efficacy and safety of repaglinide versus glimepiride as augmentation of metformin in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: Consistent evidence is still lacking on which one, glimepiride plus metformin or repaglinide plus metformin, is better in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of these two methods in treating T2DM. Methods: The literature research dating up to August 2018 was conducted in the electronic databases. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the short-term (treatment period ≤12 weeks) efficacy and safety of these two methods in treating patients with T2DM were included. No language limitation was used in this study. The decreased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2h plasma glucose (2hPG) levels were used as the primary outcome to assess the efficacy, and the adverse events and hypoglycemia were used as the secondary outcome to assess the safety. Results: In total, 11 RCTs composed of 844 T2DM patients were included. The results showed that there were no significant differences in decreasing HbA1c and FPG levels between the two methods, but the estimated standardized mean differences favored the repaglinide plus metformin. Meanwhile, the repaglinide plus metformin was significantly more effective in decreasing 2hPG levels than glimepiride plus metformin. In addition, fewer patients reported adverse events and experienced hypoglycemia in the repaglinide plus metformin group. Conclusion: These results indicated that the repaglinide plus metformin might have some advantages over glimepiride plus metformin in the short-term treatment of patients with T2DM, and should be further explored.

Treatment of pretibial myxedema with intralesional immunomodulating therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Local immune regulation therapy has been one of the therapeutic methods used for the treatment of autoimmune thyroid disease in patients with pretibial myxedema (PTM). However, the poor response rate and high recurrence rate are still major problems. Whether a premixed corticosteroid, compound betamethasone, could enhance remission rate and decrease recurrence rate in patients with PTM was investigated in the present study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We have performed a clinical utility observation of compound betamethasone with intralesional injections based on basic thyroid disease treatment in 32 PTM patients between January 2008 and August 2016. The patients were followed up for 2 years, and the clinical outcomes and side effects were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients had a complete remission after different times of injection. A total of 21.7% patients had complete remission with one time of injection, 34.8% with two times of injection, 17.4% with three times of injection, 4.3% with four times of injection, and 4.3% with five times of injection. In all, 56.3% patients with a disease duration of <6 months had complete remission after a 1-month treatment, 37.5% patients with a disease duration between 6 months and 12 months had complete remission after a 2-month treatment, 3.1% patients with a disease duration of 2 years had complete remission after a 5-month treatment, and 3.1% with a disease duration of 5 years had complete remission after a 7-month treatment. CONCLUSION: Compound betamethasone with multipoint intralesional injection is a feasible, effective, and secure novel strategy in the treatment of PTM.