Bilateral simultaneous ureteroscopy for bilateral stone disease: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of bilateral renal and/or ureteric stones can be challenging due to concerns about its safety and efficacy compared to staged ureteroscopy. This review evaluates the current evidence to look at the outcomes of bilateral simultaneous ureteroscopy (BS-URS) for urinary stone disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review using studies identified by a literature search between January 1990 and August 2013. All English language articles reporting on outcomes of BS-URS for urolithiasis were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from each study. RESULTS: A total of seven studies (312 patients) were identified with a mean age of 40 years. Of the reported stone location, two thirds of the stones were in the ureter. With a mean operative time of 58 minutes, stone free status was achieved in 87.1% after the first look and 91.6% after a re-look for pure ureteric stones. Nearly 86% of patients had a postoperative stent inserted with a mean hospital stay of 2 days. In the pure ureteric stone cohort a total of 134 (50.8%) complications were reported. Around three quarters of the complications were Clavien I grading (hematuria, lower urinary symptoms and flank pain) and under a quarter were Clavien III complications. CONCLUSION: Although BS-URS achieved a high overall stone free rate; the complication rate seemed to be high. The quality of included studies in this review was weak and future research with good methodology is required to evaluate the feasibility and safety of BS-URS procedure.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy without radiation: Ultrasound localization is as effective as fluoroscopy.

CONTEXT: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the first-line treatment for renal calculi in most cases. Recent technology has allowed lithotriptor machines to localize stones using fluoroscopy or ultrasound (US). AIM: The aim of this study is to compare stone free rates (SFR) using two techniques. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective cohort study. We have studied 95 patients with renal calculi undergoing first SWL treatment with localization using US (48 pts) and fluoroscopy (47 pts). SFR was defined as fragments ≤2 m at 4 weeks post procedure on x-ray or US. Patient records were reviewed. RESULTS: Stone size and location, age and body mass index were comparable between groups. Stones ≤7 mm had better SFR with US 86% (18/21) compared to fluoroscopy 59% (10/17) P= 0.08. Overall the US group had similar SFR to the fluoroscopy group for stones of all sizes and locations with 60% (29/48) compared to 45% (21/47)P= 0.18. Radiation exposure was the biggest difference between techniques with a mean radiation dose (mGy/cm2) in the US group of 103 (0-233) and 2113 (241-7821) in the fluoroscopy group. Radiation use in the US group was due to the use of a single shot pre- and post-procedure, this could be reduced to zero. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show equivalent outcomes using US compared to the traditional fluoroscopy localization technique. We would encourage departments to develop the use of US localization to reduce radiation exposure to patients.