RESUMO
Despite its high prevalence, effective treatment for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) remains elusive. Although the mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist spironolactone, in conjunction with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), its efficacy in managing degenerative MR is uncertain. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of valsartan (a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor), spironolactone, and combination therapy in mitigating MR-induced myocardial dysfunction. Using a mini-invasive model of degenerative MR, we administered valsartan (31 mg/kg/day), spironolactone (80 mg/kg/day), or a combination of both to rats over a 4-week period. Serial echocardiography and pressure-volume loops were utilized to assess cardiac function and hemodynamics. Rats with degenerative MR treated with valsartan or spironolactone alone did not show significant improvement in myocardial dysfunction. In contrast, combination therapy resulted in significant improvement. Similarly, the pressure-volume relationship was significantly improved in rats treated with the combination therapy compared to that in rats treated with a single therapy. Mechanistically, combination therapy effectively suppressed circulating and cardiac expression of aldosterone- and apoptosis-associated proteins. Overall, combination treatment with valsartan and spironolactone significantly attenuated the degenerative MR-induced myocardial stress and dysfunction, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue for managing degenerative MR-induced HF.
RESUMO
Background: The door-to-balloon (D2B) time is a critical quality measure in managing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We developed an integrated STEMI activation system, named Acute Myocardial Infarction Software Aids (AMISTAD), to optimize care for STEMI patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the AMISTAD system on D2B times and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of consecutive STEMI patients receiving primary PCI between July 2017 and December 2018 at a single center. The patients were categorized into AMISTAD and non-AMISTAD groups. Outcomes included D2B time, length of hospital stay, and 12-month cardiovascular outcomes. Data were analyzed using multiple regression models; subgroup and sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 114 STEMI patients were enrolled (38 AMISTAD, 76 non-AMISTAD). The AMISTAD group had a significantly shorter mean D2B time (66.7 ± 13.2 vs. 76.6 ± 24.9 minutes, p = 0.02) and non-significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.7 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.09). The 12-month cardiovascular outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.30-2.09, p = 0.64). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses had consistent outcomes. Conclusions: Integrating the AMISTAD system into the STEMI workflow was associated with a reduced D2B time and shorter hospital stay. Further research involving larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods is needed to assess the generalizability and impact on cardiovascular outcomes. The AMISTAD system has the potential to improve the quality of care for STEMI patients.