The Association Between Serum Levels of Glial Biomarkers, Clinical Severity and Electro-encephalography Features in Idiopathic West and Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes.

Introduction: Although the contribution of enhanced glial activity in seizure induction is increasingly recognized, the role of glia-induced neuroinflammation in the physiopathology of epileptic encephalopathy (EE) has been scarcely investigated. Methods: To delineate the contribution of glial activity in EE, we measured levels of glia-derived mediators with previously described biomarker value, including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), soluble CD163 (sCD163) and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) by ELISA in sera of patients with idiopathic West syndrome (WS, n=18), idiopathic Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS, n=13) and healthy controls (n=31). Results: Patients with EE showed significantly higher CHI3L1 levels compared to healthy controls. Levels of HMGB1, CHI3L1, sCD163 and TREM2 were higher in LGS patients than WS patients and/or healthy controls. One or more of the investigated mediators were associated with treatment responsiveness, disease severity and presence of pathological features on electroencephalography (EEG). Conclusions: To our knowledge, our findings provide the initial patient-based evidence that astrocyte- and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation might be involved in the pathogenesis of LGS and WS. Moreover, glial mediators may serve as prognostic biomarkers in patients with idiopathic EE.

Distribution of peripheral blood mononuclear cell subtypes in patients with West syndrome: Impact of synacthen treatment.

BACKGROUND: West Syndrome (WS) is an epileptic encephalopathy that typically occurs in infants and is characterized by hypsarrhythmia, infantile spasms, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Demonstration of autoantibodies and cytokines in some WS patients and favorable response to immunotherapy have implicated inflammation as a putative trigger of epileptiform activity in WS. Our aim was to provide additional support for altered inflammatory responses in WS through peripheral blood immunophenotype analysis. METHODS: Eight WS cases treated with synacthen and 11 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were included. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated and immunophenotyping was performed in pre-treatment baseline (8 patients) and 3 months post-treatment (6 patients) samples. The analysis included PBMC expressing NFκB transcription and NLRP3 inflammasome factors. RESULTS: In pre-treatment baseline samples, switched memory B cells (CD19+IgD-CD27+) were significantly reduced, whereas plasma cells (CD19+CD38+CD138+) and cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+) were significantly increased. Regulatory T and B cell ratios were not significantly altered. Synacthen treatment only marginally reduced helper T cell ratios and did not significantly change other T, B, NK and NKT cell and monocyte ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings lend further support for the involvement of inflammation-related mechanisms in WS. New-onset WS patients are inclined to display increased plasma cells in the peripheral blood. Synacthen treatment does not show a beneficial effect on most effector acquired and innate immunity subsets.