Partial breast irradiation with interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Long-term results of a phase II prospective study.

PURPOSE: We report the long-term results of phase II prospective study with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial multi-catheter high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS: 240 patients received APBI (4Gy, twice daily; total dose 32Gy). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 96months. Recurrences in the treated breast developed in 8 patients (3.3%) at a median of 73months after APBI. The 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were respectively, 1.8% (95%CI: 0.6-4.3) and 6.6% (95%CI: 2.7-12.9). Regional recurrences developed in 5 patients (2%) at a median of 28months and distant metastases in 8 (3.3%) at a median of 32.5months. Breast cancer specific mortality occurred in 6 patients (2.5%) at a median of 60months. Acute toxicity developed in 71 (29.6%) patients (G1 in 60 and G2 in 11). Almost all were skin toxicity and hematomas. Late toxicity was observed in 90 patients (37.5%), G1 in 97 cases and G2 in 11. Some patients presented with more than one type of toxicity. Teleangectasia and fibrosis were the most common (48 and 44 cases respectively), followed by fat necrosis (in 18 patients) Tamoxifen emerged as the only risk factor for breast fibrosis (p=0.007). Cosmetic results were judged by the physicians as excellent in 174 (83.7%) patients, good in 25 (12%) fair in 8 (3.8%) and poor in 1 (0.5%); 174 patients (83.7%) judged outcomes as excellent, 26 (12.4%) as good, 7 (3.4%) as fair and 1 (0.5%) as poor. Physician/patient agreement was good (weighted k-value 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: APBI with interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy was associated with good outcomes, low relapse and toxicity rates. Few events during this long-term follow-up preclude identifying specific features of patients at risk of relapse and illustrate the need for a large data-base.

Definitive three-dimensional high-dose-rate brachytherapy for inoperable endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To report our experience on high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer unfit to surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent HDR-BT as definitive treatment. Median age was 79 years (range, 60-95), median Karnofsky performance status 90% (range, 60-100). Histology was endometrial adenocarcinoma in 14 (82%), and non-endometrial in 3 (18%) patients. In 15 (88%) patients, clinical stage was I and in remaining 2 (12%) was III. All patients were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) and endometrial biopsy. Using the Fletcher applicator, a CT-based planning HDR-BT was delivered. Local control (LC) was obtained when there was an interruption of vaginal bleeding in absence of CT-imaging progression. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent HDR-BT alone and three external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with HDR-BT. All patients had a clinical LC, after a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 6-131), 3 and 6 years LC rates were 86% and 69%, respectively. Cancer specific survival (CSS) at 1, 2, and 6 years was 93%, 85%, and 85%, respectively. Age, stage, dose, and type of radiotherapy did not result significant prognostic factors for LC and CSS. Only histology significantly influenced LC: for high-risk histology (i.e., non-endometrial carcinoma or grade [G] 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma) LC was 73% at 1 year and 36% at 6 years; for low-risk histology (i.e., G1-2 endometrial adenocarcinoma) was 100% at 1 and 6 years (p = 0.05). Two (12%) patients had G2 acute toxicity and two others (12%) G1 late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Although some limitations of our analysis (relatively few number of patients recruited, retrospective evaluation, and consequent suboptimal patient selection), it confirms effectiveness and safety of definitive HDR-BT for medically inoperable stage I-III endometrial cancer. The best LC was obtained in stage I low-risk histology.

Lung reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We examined safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in reirradiation for lung recurrent lesions (LRLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients, 4 with lung local failure from primary non-small cell lung carcinomas and 14 with lung metastases, were reirradiated with SBRT for 29 LRLs. Doses were recalculated to an Equivalent Dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) and α/ß ratio was assumed to be Gy10 for primary and metastatic lung tumors and Gy3 for organ at risk. Cumulative administered doses were calculated adding doses of prior radiotherapy and reirradiation. RESULTS: Peripherally located lesions received 5 fractions of 8-10 Gy, while centrally ones lower doses (5 fractions of 5-8 Gy). Cumulative EQD2 did not exceed 198 Gy10 and reirradiated volumes were rather small (median 18 cc). Local control was obtained for all patients except one and lasted medially 43 months. Median overall survival was 40 months from reirradiation. Only acute grade 1 toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation of LRLs with SBRT was feasible and effective. It is important to appropriately select patient and to adopt organ at risk constrains considering cumulative doses.

Re-irradiation of brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression: clinical practice suggestions.

The recent improvements of therapeutic approaches in oncology have allowed a certain number of patients with advanced disease to survive much longer than in the past. So, the number of cases with brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression has increased, as has the possibility of developing a recurrence in areas of the central nervous system already treated with radiotherapy. Clinicians are reluctant to perform re-irradiation of the brain, because of the risk of severe side effects. The tolerance dose for the brain to a single course of radiotherapy is 50-60 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions. New metastases appear in 22-73% of the cases after whole brain radiotherapy, but the percentage of reirradiated patients is 3-10%. An accurate selection must be made before giving an indication to re-irradiation. Patients with Karnofsky performance status > 70, age < 65 years, controlled primary and no extracranial metastases are those with the best prognosis. The absence of extracranial disease was the most significant factor in conditioning survival, and maximum tumor diameter was the only variable associated with an increased risk of unacceptable acute and/or chronic neurotoxicity. Re-treatment of brain metastases can be done with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients had no relevant radiation-induced toxicity after a second course of whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. There are few data on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the re-irradiation of brain metastases. In general, the incidence of an "in-field" recurrence of spinal metastasis varies from 2.5-11% of cases and can occur 2-40 months after the first radiotherapy cycle. Radiation-induced myelopathy can occur months or years (6 months-7 years) after radiotherapy, and the pathogenesis remains obscure. Higher radiotherapy doses, larger doses per fraction, and previous exposure to radiation could be associated with a higher probability of developing radiation-induced myelopathy. Experimental data indicate that also the total dose of the first and second radiotherapy, interval to re-treatment, length of the irradiated spinal cord, and age of the treated animals influence the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy. An alpha/beta ratio of 1.9-3 Gy could be generally the reference value for fractionated radiotherapy. However, when fraction sizes are up to 5 Gy, the linear-quadratic equation become a less valid model. The early diagnosis of relapse is crucial in conditioning response to re-treatment.

Management of metastatic spinal cord compression.

Metastatic spinal cord compression, diagnosed in 3-7% of cancer patients, is one of the most dreaded complications of metastatic cancer. It is an oncologic emergency, which must be diagnosed early and treated promptly to achieve the best results and avoid progressive pain, paralysis, sensory loss and sphincter incontinence. Patients who are ambulatory at the time of the diagnosis have a higher probability of obtaining good response to treatment and a longer survival. In clinical practice, back pain accompanies metastatic spinal cord compression in most cases, even in patients with no neurologic deficits. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best tool for diagnosing metastatic spinal cord compression and is able to identify spinal cord compression in 32-35% patients with back pain, bone metastases and normal neurologic examination. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging gives the extension of the lesion, can diagnose other unsuspected clinical metastatic spinal cord compression sites, and is useful for the radiation oncologist in defining the target volume. Radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases, whereas surgery is advised only in selected patients (ie, if stabilization is necessary, if radiotherapy has already been given in the same area, when vertebral body collapse causes bone impingement on the cord or nerve roots, when there are diagnostic doubts, or when computed tomography-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy cannot be performed). Laminectomy should be abandoned in favor of more aggressive surgery (ie, posterior, anterior, and/or lateral approach, tumor mass resection, and stabilization of the spine). Generally, radiotherapy must be administered 7-10 days after surgery. The optimal radiation schedule has not been defined. However, as recently suggested by some clinical trials, even the hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens are effective and can be used without increasing radiation-induced myelopathy. Moderate doses of dexamethasone should be used in the early phases of therapy. After radiotherapy, spinal recurrence is generally found in sites different from the first compression area. A close post-treatment follow-up is suggested using clinical parameters (pain, motor and sphincter function), and magnetic resonance imaging should be performed only when a second metastatic spinal cord compression and/or myelopathy are clinically suspected.