RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff (RC) pathologies are considered the most common cause of shoulder disability and pain. Arthroscopic repair of RC tears has proven to be an effective operation. Nonhealing and retear remain significant clinical problems and a challenge to surgeons. In addition, the essential biological augment to enhance RC tendon-bone healing is still under research. The purpose of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of injection of atelocollagen and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft in arthroscopic repair of full-thickness RC tears. METHODS: From January 2018 to March 2020, a total of 129 patients with full-thickness RC tear were treated by arthroscopic repair only (group 1, n = 36, with a mean age = 63.2 years), arthroscopic repair together with atelocollagen 1-mL injection (group 2, n = 44, with a mean age = 63 years), or RC tears together with ADM allograft 1-mL injection (group 3, n = 49, with a mean age = 64.6 years). They were prospectively studied. This study included patients with a repairable full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon size <5 cm. We excluded patients with isolated tears of the subscapularis tendon, those with a previous shoulder surgery, and those who had any type of injection for less than 6 weeks. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Constant Shoulder score, visual analog scale pain score, and range of motion were evaluated preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months of the postoperative period and the final follow-up. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 2 months and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 20 months. All groups showed improvement in functional and pain score at the final follow-up; however, there is no superior outcome among the 3 groups (P > .05). After 2 months, the nonhealing rate was 11% (4 of 36) for group 1, 4% (2 of 44) for group 2, and 2% (1 of 49) for group 3 (P > .05). The retear rates after 12 months was 19.4% (7 of 36) for group 1, 13.6% (6 of 44) for group 2, and 20.4% (10 of 49) for group 3 (P > .05). Adverse events were not detected in any groups. CONCLUSION: Our study did not show superior clinical or radiologic outcomes of atelocollagen and ADM allograft injections in arthroscopic RC repair over 12 months of follow-up in comparison to the control group. However, adverse events related to atelocollagen and ADM allograft injection were not observed.
Assuntos
Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Lesões do Manguito Rotador/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Artroscopia/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Colágeno/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Despite the documented clinical efficacy of the pie-crusting technique for medial collateral ligament (MCL) release in varus total knee arthroplasty, its quantitative effects on medial gaps and safety remain unclear. This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy (quantitative effect and consistency of the number of punctures) and the safety (frequency of early over-release) of the pie-crusting technique for MCL release. METHODS: From ten pairs of cadaveric knees, one knee from each pair was randomly assigned to undergo pie crusting in extension (group E) or in flexion (group F). Pie crusting was performed in the superficial MCL using a blade until over-release occurred. After every puncture, the incremental medial gap increase was recorded, and the number of punctures required for 2- or 4-mm gap increases was assessed. RESULTS: In group E, the extension gap increased from 0.8 to 5.0 mm and the flexion gap increased from 0.8 to 3.0 mm. In group F, the extension gap increased from 1.0 to 3.0 mm and the flexion gap increased from 2.6 to 6.0 mm. However, the gap increments were inconsistent with those that followed the preceding blade punctures, and the number of punctures required to increase the gaps by 2 or 4 mm was variable. The number of punctures leading to over-release in group E and group F was 6 ± 1 and 3 ± 1 punctures, respectively. Overall, 70% of over-release occurred earlier than the average number of punctures leading to over-release. CONCLUSIONS: Pie crusting led to unpredictable gap increments and to frequent early over-release. Surgeons should decide carefully before using the pie-crusting technique for MCL release and should be cautious of performing throughout the procedure, especially when performing in a flexed knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Ligamento Colateral Médio do Joelho/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Amplitude de Movimento ArticularRESUMO
Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been demonstrated in various cancers, including experimentally promoted tumors, gastrointestinal cancers, breast tumors and skin tumors. The mechanism that controls COX-2 expression is not yet clear. Currently, it is reported that COX-2 expression is frequently associated with mutated p53 genes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the expression patterns of COX-2 and p53 in several skin tumors and their correlation. An immunohistochemical method was used to investigate the expression of COX-2 and p53 proteins on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), basal cell carcinomas (BCC), Bowen's disease (BD), actinic keratosis (AK) and porokeratosis. The expression of COX-2 increased in 50% (5/10) of SCC, 80% (8/10) of BCC, 40% (4/10) of BD, 50% (5/10) of AK, and 20% (2/10) of porokeratosis cases. The expression of p53 increased in 90% (9/10) of SCC, 70% (7/10) of BCC, 70% (7/10) of BD, 50% (5/10) of AK, and 40% (4/10) of porokeratosis cases. COX-2 positivity rates of the p53-positive skin tumors were 56%, 100%, 57%, 80% and 25% in SCC, BCC, BD, AK and porokeratosis, respectively. However, the correlation between p53 and COX-2 expression in skin tumors was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Our results indicate that skin COX-2 and p53 may play roles in skin tumors, but that there is no apparent correlation between the two markers.