Double protection in patients with a massive thrombus in the infarct-related artery - a single-center retrospective study.

Introduction: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with thrombus formation on a ruptured or ulcerated atherosclerotic plaque. The consequences of a massive thrombus (MT) may include lack of reperfusion, extensive myocardial infarction (MI) and its complications. Although there are various treatment options for patients with coronary thrombi, double protection (DP) - manual thrombectomy (MTH) with a distal protection device (DPD) - has not been tested yet. Aim: To present DP outcomes in the treatment of patients with STEMI and MT patients. Material and methods: Fourteen patients with STEMI and MT were included in the study. Those patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with DP. Results: Inferior MI was found in 12 (85.8%) patients. Stents were implanted in 13 (92.8%) patients. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Thrombus Grade 5 was present in 11 (78.6%) patients and Grade 4 in 3 (21.4%) patients. The median thrombus length was 39.1 mm. Complete reperfusion (TIMI flow 3) was observed in 11 (78.6%) patients and TIMI flow 2 in 3 (21.4%) patients. Myocardial Blush Grade (MBG) was used in patients with TIMI flow 3 and Grade 3 was found in 5 (35.7%) patients. Resolution in ST-segment elevation > 50% was obtained in 13 (92.8%) patients. No myocardial rupture, stroke, or death occurred during hospitalization. Conclusions: DP in MT patients is a safe and feasible procedure. However, further observations and studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this method.

Comparison of outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with small and large Medtronic Evolut R and Evolut PRO self-expandable prosthetic valves.

Introduction: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continue to expand. Very often TAVI must be done in large annuli. Implantation of the bigger prostheses is often associated with more procedural problems, which may affect the outcomes. Aim: To compare the outcomes of TAVI procedures using the self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R 34 with the smaller Evolut R or Evolut Pro 23, 26 or 29. Material and methods: We analysed 87 patients who received self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R and Pro valves. Group I consisted of 59 (67.81%) patients with Evolut 23, 26 or 29, and group II consisted of 28 (32.18%) patients who received an Evolut 34 valve. Results: EuroSCORE II was 5.59 in group I vs 7.87 in group II (p = 0.02). The oversizing rate was higher in group II: 24.1% vs. 18.5% (p < 0.001). The procedure and fluoroscopy times were longer in group II: 209 vs. 187 min (p = 0.03), 44 vs. 27 min (p = 0.01). Moderate paravalvular leak was found more frequently in group II: 5 v 1 (p = 0.04). There was less device success in group II: 22 (78.57%) vs. 57 (96.6%) (p = 0.05). Early safety criteria were similar in both groups: 52 (88.1%) and 24 (92.3%) (p = 0.56). 30-day mortality was similar: 4 (6.7%) vs. 0 in group I and II respectively (p = 0.16). Conclusions: TAVI procedures in patients requiring an Evolut R 34 prosthesis are more challenging than in those who need smaller valves. Paravalvular leaks are more frequently observed after TAVI with Evolut R 34, which results in lower device success.

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Valve Replacement: A 24-months Propensity-matched Analysis of the SILCARD Registry.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the comparison between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in a real-world setting are scarce and in Central and Eastern Europe no such data exist. In this study, we aimed at analyzing retrospectively the characteristics and outcome of patients with aortic stenosis treated either with surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation between 2006 and 2016 in the Silesian Province, Poland in a representative real-world cohort. METHODS: In the Silesian Cardiovascular Database we retrospectively identified 5186 patients who received either transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement in 1 of 3 tertiary cardiovascular centers. Baseline characteristics, including relevant clinical history, and outcomes were compared before and after propensity-score matching of both groups, with 348 pairs of patients constituting the propensity-matched study cohort. The primary end-point was 24-month all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics of propensity-matched groups were similar. There was no difference between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement groups with respect to the death rate at 2 years (19.9% vs. 15.6%; P =.479). In the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices were more frequently implanted after the procedure (3.7% vs. 0.0, P <.001). The groups had similar rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and re-hospitalization. Hospital stay in the matched groups was shorter after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 14.1 versus 15.7 days (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: At 24 months, transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients had similar outcomes as surgical aortic valve replacement except for a higher rate of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation and shorter hospital stay.

Comparison of the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are constantly expanding, including younger patients. Bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) often occur in this group. In order to achieve optimal treatment results in younger patients, it is necessary to develop an effective method for selecting the size of implanted valves. AIM: To compare the results of TAVI with use of a self-expanding prosthesis in patients with a BAV and a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) with valve selection based on annular sizing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The diagnosis of BAV and TAV and measurements (annular sizing) were based on multi-slice computed tomography scans. Eighty-three patients received a self-expanding CoreValve or Evolut R prosthesis. In group I (BAV) there were 21 (25.3%) patients and in group II (TAV) there were 62 (74.7%) patients. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. Device success was achieved in 16 (76.2%) and 55 (88.7%) (p = NS) in group I and II respectively. Composite endpoints: early safety occurred in 5 (23.8%) and 11 (17.7%) patients (p =NS) in group I and II respectively; clinical efficacy occurred in 10 (47.6%) and 28 (45.2%) patients (p = NS) in group I and II respectively. 30-day mortality was 4.8% vs 9.7%, 1-year mortality was 28.6% vs 17.7% (p = NS) in group I and II respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and BAV is as effective as in patients with TAV using self-expanding prostheses if the valve selection is based on annular sizing.

Female gender and the clinical and periprocedural profile and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: experiences of a tertiary Polish centre.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the establishment of multiple factors influencing short- and mid-term outcomes in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the real-world data on the association between gender and outcomes after TAVI remain conflicting. AIM: To evaluate the association of female gender with the clinical and periprocedural characteristics along with in-hospital, short- and medium-term outcomes of patients treated with TAVI in comparison with male patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the prospective, single-centre registry of consecutive patients with severe AS referred for TAVI from 26 November 2008 to 31 December 2018 were analysed retrospectively. The study population comprised 275 patients who were divided by gender. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality at 1 year. RESULTS: Women constituted 132 (48.0%) of the overall population. Women were significantly older, but had a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and had less frequently undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) before TAVI. The implantation success rate was comparable between genders, but women less frequently required implantation of a pacemaker after TAVI, although they more frequently required blood transfusion due to severe bleeding. The primary endpoint occurred in 13.6% of women and 7.7% of men (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Despite advanced age and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, the overall short- and medium-term mortality in patients treated with TAVI in our analysis of the real-world population remains relatively low. Although women seemed to have a slightly better clinical baseline profile, their in-hospital, 30-day, 6-month and 12-month outcomes did not differ significantly from the male patients.

Comparison of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the everolimus-eluting metallic stent in real-world patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the withdrawal of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) from clinical use, continuous observation of BVS-treated patients is necessary. In the vast majority of clinical trials, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were excluded from the analysis. AIM: To compare the early and long-term outcomes of the BVS with the everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) in patients with STEMI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with BVS or EES in our center were screened. For analysis, only patients with STEMI were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the target lesion failure at 12 and 24 months. The secondary endpoints encompass occurrence of the patient-oriented cardiovascular endpoint (PoCE), stent thrombosis (ST), device, and procedural success. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 2,137 patients were hospitalized for STEMI. Of these, 123 patients received the BVS (163 scaffolds; 151 lesions), whereas in 141 patients the EES (203 stents; 176 lesions) was implanted. The median follow-up was 931 ±514 days. The primary endpoint at 12 months occurred in 9.7% in the BVS group and in 8.5% in the EES group (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-7.56; p = 0.076). At 24 months the incidence of the primary endpoint was 15.2% in the BVS group and 14.9% in the EES group (HR = 2.46; 95% CI: 0.85-7.07; p = 0.095). The rates of PoCE, ST, device, and procedural success were also comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: STEMI patients treated with the BVS showed statistically similar rates of primary and secondary endpoints compared with the EES.

[POL-TAVI First--Polish report on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) of Edwards-Sapien prosthesis in the first 19 high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and comorbidities]. / Nasze forum--kardiolodzy i kardiochirurdzy razem Raport POL-TAVI FIRST z zastosowania przezcewnikowej implantacji zastawki aortalnej typu Edwards-Sapien u pierwszych w Polsce 19 chorych z grupy bardzo duzego ryzyka, z ciezka stenoza aortalna i chorobami obciazajacymi rokowanie.

Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, who from November 2008 to March 2009 were treated with Edwards-Sapien transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) within the POL-TAVI First Polish Registry, were included in the analysis. Nineteen patients aged 78+/-4.8 years with high operation risk and Logistic EuroSCORE 25+/-7.6% were reported (74% were females). In 15 (79%) patients the valve was implanted transapically (TA), in the other four (21%)--via the femoral arterial access (TF). The valve was successfully implanted in 16 (84%) patients, in one patient aortic valvuloplasty alone was performed. During in-hospital period two patients died (one during periprocedural period and another one--two months after the implantation). During the mean follow-up of 5+/-1.5 months (except for one patient who is still in hospital) all patients are in NYHA class I or II. Results of the initial series of 19 TAVI patients in Poland are satisfactory, and the trial will be continued with careful medical and economical analysis.

Percutaneous access to coronary arteries in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures - is it a real problem?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still developing and changing our approach to treating patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Aortic stenosis frequently coexists with coronary artery disease. Both diseases have similar risk factors for their development and one should expect a future progression of coronary artery disease. The current guidelines have expanded TAVI indications to include intermediate-risk patients, and perhaps they will be expanded to include low-risk patients in the future. Survival after TAVI in younger patients will depend on the durability of the aortic valves and methods of coronary artery disease treatment. This paper presents some aspects of performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients who had TAVI performed using the two most popular aortic valves - balloon expandable aortic valves (Edward Sapien/Edward Sapien XT/Sapien 3) and self-expandable aortic valves (CoreValve/Evolut R) - on the basis of several examples. This paper also focuses on technical aspects associated with a proper implantation of aortic valves to ensure easy access to coronary arteries, as well as on possible problems when the implantation is not optimal. We discuss interactions between the structure of the aortic valve stent, catheters, commissures of new aortic valves, and coronary ostia.

Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes of severe aortic stenosis treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may increase in-hospital and long-term mortality. AIM: To evaluate the impact of CAD in patients who underwent TAVI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of the first 142 patients treated with TAVI between 26 November 2008 and 31 December 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: group I comprised 103 (72.5%) patients with CAD, and group II comprised 39 (27.5%) patients without CAD. RESULTS: Group I was characterized by a significantly higher risk according to EuroSCORE - 11.2 ±2.5 vs. 9 ±2.3 in group II (p < 0.001) and Logistic EuroSCORE - 25.4 ±13.4 vs. 16.3 ±8.7 (p < 0.001). 30-day mortality was 8 (7.8%) vs. 2 (5.1%) (p = NS) and 1-year mortality was 22 (21.4%) vs. 6 (15.4%) (p = NS) in group I and II respectively. The composite endpoint evaluating the efficacy of TAVI was achieved in 82 (79.6%) vs. 31 (79.5%) (p = NS) in group I and II respectively. The composite endpoint, which involved 30-day observation, occurred in 39 (37.86%) vs. 12 (30.77%) (p = NS) and the composite endpoint, which involved 1-year evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TAVI, occurred in 48 (57.8%) vs. 13 (48.1%) (p = NS) in patients with and without CAD respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The short- and mid-term outcomes of TAVI patients with CAD, despite higher risk profile, did not differ from the outcomes of treatment in patients without CAD.

Aortic balloon valvuloplasty as a bridge-to-decision in patients with aortic stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a method of treatment for patients who are temporally ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This procedure allows one to select patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction or with symptoms of unknown origin who can benefit from AVR or TAVI. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcome of therapy in patients treated with balloon aortic valvuloplasty. To define clinical characteristics, immediate and distant outcomes of the procedure, and factors affecting the 12-month mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the procedural and clinical outcomes of 47 consecutive patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in our center. RESULTS: Age and logistic EuroSCORE were 76.81 ±6.64 and 22.85 ±13.74, respectively. The mean gradient after the procedure decreased from 52.23 ±18.21 to 35.52 ±13.43 mm Hg (p = 0.001). Major complications occurred in 5 (10.6%) patients. In-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortalities were 6.38%, 10.63% and 42.55%, respectively. 31.9% of patients underwent the destination therapy (TAVI or AVR). One-year mortality in the group treated conservatively after BAV was 56.2%, while in the group treated with AVR or TAVI it was 13.3%. Procedural success, presence of arterial hypertension, and performance of the destination therapy were factors associated with a decreased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be treated as a bridge-to-decision on further treatment. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty has high efficacy and an acceptable adverse events rate. Patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty are high-risk patients with many comorbidities.

Early and long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in real-world clinical practice - insights from the ZABRZE-BVS registry.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized trials have proven the feasibility and safety of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in selected populations of patients. Data concerning the results of BVS in "real-world" registries with an appropriate sample size are limited. AIM: Assessment of early- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing bioresorbable scaffold implantation in an all-comers population of the ZABRZE-BVS registry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ZABRZE-BVS registry is a prospective registry including consecutive patients treated in the period 2013-2016 with the intention to implant a BVS (ABSORB, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California). The primary endpoint was occurrence of the 12- and 24-month device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoint includes occurrence of patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) at 12 and 24 months, device (lesion basis) and procedural success (patient basis). RESULTS: A total of 456 patients during 467 procedures received 588 scaffolds in 563 lesions. Of note, 25.4% of patients presented with diabetes mellitus and 62.3% had an acute coronary syndrome. In QCA analysis, 78.7% of patients had type B2/C lesions, minimal lumen diameter was 0.78 ±0.54 mm, whereas post-procedural acute lumen gain was 1.61 ±0.61 mm. Median follow-up was 781 days. The cumulative rate of DoCE was 6.7% at 12 months and 12.2% at 24 months. Rates of 12- and 24-month PoCE were 12.4% and 20.1%, respectively. The percentage of device success was 98.7%, while the procedural success rate was 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The Absorb BVS was successfully and safely implanted in an unselected group of patients. Scaffold thrombosis developed predominantly in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Prognostic Significance of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical significance of complex ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) (sustained ventricular tachycardia [sVT] and ventricular fibrillation [VF]) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) depending on timing of arrhythmia. We analyzed 4,363 consecutive patients with STEMI treated invasively between 2004 and 2014. The median follow-up was 69.6 months (range: 0 to 139.8 months). The study population was divided into 2 main groups; VA group encompassed 476 patients (10.91%) with VAs, whereas 3,887 subjects (89.09%) without VT or VF were included into the control group. In VA population, prereperfusion VA (34.24%; n = 163) was the most common arrhythmia, whereas reperfusion-induced, early postreperfusion, and late postreperfusion VAs were diagnosed in 103 (21.64%), 103 (21.64%), and 107 (22.48%) patients, respectively. Every type of sVT or VF complicating STEMI portended significantly worse in-hospital prognosis, however a late onset arrhythmia was associated with the highest (over fivefold) and reperfusion-induced VA with the lowest (less than threefold) increase in mortality risk compared with the control group. On the contrary, long-term mortality was significantly increased only in subjects with late postreperfusion and prereperfusion VAs compared with VA-free population (43.93% and 36.81%, respectively vs 22.58%; p <0.001). Apart from cardiogenic shock on admission, late postreperfusion (hazard ratio 3.39) and prereperfusion VAs (hazard ratio 2.76) were the strongest independent predictors of death in the analyzed population. In conclusion, 1 in 10 patients with STEMI treated invasively was affected by sVT or VF. The clinical impact of VAs was strongly dependent on timing of arrhythmia.

Risk stratification for complex ventricular arrhythmia complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate risk factors for ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) and to develop the risk score for prediction of VF/VT in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated invasively. The secondary aim was to assess the effect of VF/VT on mortality depending on timing of arrhythmia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 4363 consecutive patients with STEMI treated invasively. Among them, 163 patients with pre-reperfusion arrhythmia were excluded from the study. Group ventricular arrhythmias (VA) encompassed patients with VF/VT - those with reperfusion-induced arrhythmia were included into group VA1, whereas group VA2 consisted of patients with postreperfusion arrhythmia. The control group comprised patients free of VF/VT. RESULTS: VF or VT occurred in 313 (7.45%) patients - group VA1 encompassed 103 (32.9%) and group AV2 210 (67.1%) patients. Cardiogenic shock on admission [hazard ratio (HR) 3.5], new-onset atrial fibrillation (HR 2.1), incomplete revascularization (HR 1.7), prior myocardial infarction (HR 1.6) and symptom-to-balloon time more than 3 h (HR 1.3) were the independent predictors of VF/VT occurrence. In group VA2, the in-hospital and long-term mortality were 4- and 1.5-fold higher than in the arrhythmia-free population (20.5 vs. 4.5% and 36.2 vs. 22.6%, respectively; P<0.001). On the contrary, in group VA1, the long-term mortality was not significantly higher compared with the control group (26.2 vs. 22.6%; P=NS), whereas in-hospital mortality was almost three-fold increased (12.5 vs. 4.5%, respectively; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The risk score based on simple clinical parameters might be useful for risk stratification for VF/VT in patients with STEMI. The predictive value of VF/VT was strongly dependent on timing of arrhythmia.

Importance of complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The role of incomplete revascularization (ICR) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is controversial. We evaluated the impact of ICR on short- and long-term outcome in patients with AMI and multivessel disease (MVD) treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) during index hospital stay. METHODS: Single-center observational study covered 798 patients with MVD selected from 1486 consecutive patients with AMI treated with PCI. At discharge, 605 (75.8%) of the patients still had at least 1 diseased artery (ICR group); in 193, complete revascularization (CR) has been achieved (CR group). Any-cause mortality rate and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during hospitalization, within a follow-up period of 30 days and 29.7 months, were compared between both groups in the whole population and within the high-risk subgroups. Propensity model to predict the probability of CR according to 16 variables was used. RESULTS: Mortality and MACE rates were significantly higher in ICR group than among completely revascularized subjects during short- and long-term observation (remote mortality 18.5% vs 7.2%, MACE 53.1% vs 24.3%, both P < .001). Higher mortality rate was also observed within the subgroups with diabetes (25.2% vs 4.8%), renal dysfunction (44.1% vs 13.8%), and lowered ejection fraction (26.5% vs 10.5%, all P < .05). Propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis showed that ICR was a significant and strong predictor of remote death (propensity-adjusted hazard ratio 2.01, 95% CI 1.71-2.31, P = .02) and MACE (hazard ratio 2.08, 95% CI 1.90-2.26, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete revascularization is a strong and independent risk factor of death and MACE in patients with AMI treated with PCI.

Assessment of cardiovascular function following transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on six-minute walk test.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is presently a recognized treatment mo-dality for patients with severe aortic stenosis ineligible for surgery. It reduces mortality as compared to the conservative treatment. It is further expected from this therapy to improve quality of life by improving of the cardiovascular function performance. The aim of this study is to compare patients' cardiovascular system efficiency in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) made before and after TAVI and at the 6-12-month follow-up. METHODS: From January 2009 until February 2012, in the Silesian Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, TAVI was performed in 104 patients. Eighty-two patients who underwent 6MWT before surgery were qualified for the analysis. The average age of the patients was 76.0 ± 9.17 years, women made 45.1%. The risk of surgical treatment according to the Logistic Euroscore averaged 22.76 ± 12.63%, and by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons - 5.55 ± 3.34%. The 6MWT was performed within 1 month before the TAVI procedure, up to a month after the procedure and during the 6-12-month follow-up. RESULTS: The 6-minute walk test after TAVI was performed by 64 patients, and after 6-12 month follow-up by 46 patients. The average distance in 6MWT increased from 268.4 ± 89.0 m before treat-ment to 290.0 ± 98.2 m after the procedure (p = 0.008) and 276.1 ± 93.5 m to 343.1 ± 96.7 m after 6-12 months (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures significantly improve function of the cardiovascular system evaluated by the 6MWT in 1- and 6-12-month observations. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 2: 167-175).

Significance of Atrial Fibrillation Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The aim of the present study is to assess the clinical impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by new-onset AF depending on STEMI location and timing of arrhythmia. We analyzed 4,363 consecutive STEMI patients treated invasively. Finally, 4,099 subjects were included into further analysis, as 264 patients were excluded because of previous AF history. In total, 1,800 (43.9%) subjects with anterior infarction were included into Group 1, whereas Group 2 encompassed 2,299 (56.1%) patients with nonanterior infarction. Subsequently, both groups were divided into patients with new-onset AF (AF Group 1 and 2, respectively) and without AF (Control Group 1 and 2). New-onset AF was recognized in 225 patients (5.5%): 96 (5.3%) with an anterior wall infarction (AF Group 1) and 129 (5.6%) with a nonanterior wall infarction (AF Group 2). The incidence of early-onset arrhythmia (within 24 hours after admission) was significantly higher in AF Group 2 than in AF Group 1: 71.3% versus 35.4% (p <0.001). In Group 1, both early- and late-onset AFs were associated with significantly increased in-hospital mortality compared with AF-free population (17.7% and 27.4%, respectively vs 6.3%; p <0.05), whereas in Group 2, in-hospital mortality was increased only in subjects with late-onset AF compared with AF-free population (13.5% vs 4.2%, p <0.05). New-onset AF was the independent predictor of death only in Group 1 (hazard ratio 2.16) and this effect was stronger for late-onset AF (hazard ratio 2.86). In conclusion, 1 in 20 patients with STEMI treated invasively was affected by new-onset AF. The predictive value of new-onset AF was strongly related with STEMI location and timing of arrhythmia.

Impact of CoreValve size selection based on multi-slice computed tomography on paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leak (PVL) has significant impact on long-term outcomes in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study sought to determine whether multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT)-guided valve selection reduces PVL after CoreValve implantation. METHODS: The analysis encompassed 69 patients implanted with CoreValve and were divided into two groups. In Group I (30 patients), valve selection was based on standard procedures, in Group II (39 patients), on MSCT measurements. Paravalvular leak was assessed with angiography and echocardiography. RESULTS: Multi-slice computed tomography results influenced a change of decision as to the size of the implanted valve in 12 (30.9%) patients in Group II and would have caused the decision to change in 9 (37.5%) patients in Group I. The degree of oversizing in Group I and II was 12.8% ± ± 7.6% vs. 18.6% ± 5.1% (p = 0.0006), respectively. The oversizing among the patients with leak degree of 0-1 and ≥ 2 was 18.1% ± 6.0% and 12.8% ± 7.4% (p = 0.0036). Angiographic assessment indicated post-procedural PVL ≥ 2 in 50% of patients in Group I and 20.5% in Group II (p = 0.01), while echocardiographic assessment indicated the same in 73.3% of patients in Group I and 45.6% in Group II (p = 0.0136). The composite endpoint occurred in 26.6% (8/30) patients in Group I vs. 5.1% (2/39) patients in Group II (p = 0.0118). CONCLUSIONS: Selecting the CoreValve device based on MSCT resulted in smaller rates of PVL and less frequent composite endpoint. In 1/3 of patients MSCT led to a change of the valve size. The degree of oversizing had a significant impact on PVL.

Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures - predictors and management.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a safe and efficient alternative to cardiac surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In many countries the number of performed TAVI procedures equals the number of surgical implantations. Indications for TAVI are becoming more liberal, allowing a wider spectrum of patients to benefit from the advantages of transcatheter therapy. Due to its invasive nature, TAVI is associated with some complications such as conduction disturbances. Although these disturbances are usually not lethal, they have a great influence on patients' state and long term-survival. The most relevant and common are His' bundle branch blocks, atrioventricular blocks, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation. With the frequency at 10% to even 50%, conduction abnormalities are among the most important TAVI-related adverse events. Risk factors for conduction disturbances include age, anatomy of the heart, periprocedural factors, type of implanted valve, and comorbidities. Severity of occurring complications varies; therefore selection of a proper treatment approach is required. Considered as the most effective management, permanent pacemaker implantation turned out to negatively influence both recovery and survival. Moreover, there is no expert consensus on use of resynchronization therapy after TAVI. In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive analysis of the most common conduction disturbances accompanying TAVI, factors related to their occurrence, and treatment approach.

POL-TAVI - Polish Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation - simple tool, great value, rationale and design.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in adults in Europe and North America. Management of AS patients depends on accurate diagnosis of the cause and stage of the disease process: the first and definitive therapeutic choice for a growing number of elderly patients with symptomatic AS is surgical treatment. In patients not eligible for surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) constitutes a safe and effective alternative. As an innovative, costly method of treatment, it requires however careful monitoring of its course, documenting its early and long-term results, and assessment of its safety and medical-economic cost-effectiveness. A medical registry seems to be an excellent tool to perform such analysis. The aim of this paper is to present the design and rationale for creation of the first National Cardiac-Cardiac Surgical Registry of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Treatment POL-TAVI, to describe its genesis and to highlight its key assumptions and aims. Despite its recent beginnings, the POL-TAVI Registry has already demonstrated its value and usability in monitoring and assessment of TAVI procedures, leading to further improvement and development of this new method in Poland. It constitutes an important and valuable tool for patients, the medical community and the payer.

Safety and efficacy of a second-generation coronary sirolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymers in daily clinical practice: a 12-month follow-up of the ALEX registry.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) have shown higher safety and efficacy compared with first-generation DESs. This effect was achieved by improving biocompatibility using an interalia cobalt-chromium construction, thinner stent struts and biodegradable polymers. OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients receiving a novel second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 424 consecutive patients who received an Alex stent were enrolled in the registry from January to December 2012. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of 12-month major cardiac adverse events, defined as cases of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. Quantitative coronary angiography for 240 randomly selected patients was performed by an independent Corelab. RESULTS: The primary endpoint occurred in 31 of 424 patients (7.3%). The rates of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were 3.3, 2.6 and 3.5%, respectively. According to the definition established by the Academic Research Foundation, definitive and probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 1.6% (7/424) of patients, including six cases of early ST and one case of late ST. The acute device success rate was 98.5%. CONCLUSION: The ALEX Registry provides evidence for the safety and effectiveness of the study device in a relevant population. Quantitative analysis showed a satisfactory performance of the study device for complex coronary lesions. The 12-month rates of major cardiac adverse event and ST were similar to those of other second-generation DES registries.