Metatarsal sliding osteotomy is effective without altering plantar pressure in Morton's neuroma: Retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Various operative methods for the treatment of Morton's neuroma have been discussed, and osteotomy of the metatarsal bone has been reported recently. However, there has been no report of pedobarographic changes after metatarsal osteotomy. Pedobarographic changes of other metatarsal area after the surgery may cause transfer metatarsalgia, and thorough analysis of the pedobarographic data should be performed peri-operatively. The purpose of this study is to investigate the post-operative pedobarographic changes of sliding osteotomy of the 3rd metatarsal bone for treating Morton's neuroma. METHODS: Forty patients (45 feet) who underwent metatarsal sliding osteotomy of the 3rd metatarsal bone for treating Morton's neuroma from November 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Proximal sliding osteotomy was performed at the proximal 3rd metatarsal bone through dorsal approach. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS LMIS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Plain radiograph and pedobarogram were performed to evaluate the radiologic and pedobarographic outcomes. RESULTS: AOFAS score was improved from 52.8 ± 9.0 (18-62) to 88.8 ± 9.8 (78-100) and FFI was improved from 61.8 ± 4.9 (50-70) to 32.2 ± 5.1 (23-42) on average. The 3rd metatarsal bone was shortened by 3.1 ± 0.8 mm and dorsally shifted by 1.5 ± 0.4 mm after the surgery. Plantar intermetatarsal distances between 2nd and 3rd and 3rd and 4th metatarsal heads were significantly increased post-operatively. Average forefoot pressure and maximum pressure of the 2nd to 4th metatarsal head were not significantly changed between pre-operatively and post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Proximal metatarsal sliding osteotomy of the 3rd metatarsal bone shows a satisfactory result in both clinical and pedobarographical evaluations. It could be an effective treatment of permanent indirect decompression of Morton's neuroma with avoiding recurred neuroma, adhesion of tissue, paresthesia, and transfer metatarsalgia.

Comparison of distal chevron osteotomy with and without lateral soft tissue release for the treatment of hallux valgus.

BACKGROUND: A lateral soft tissue release is often performed with distal chevron osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformities. However, many complications of lateral soft tissue release have been reported. To define the necessity of lateral soft tissue release, the authors compared the clinical and radiographic results of distal chevron osteotomy with and without it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 86 consecutive patients (152 feet) were enrolled in this prospective study. In Group A, 45 patients (74 feet) underwent a chevron osteotomy with lateral soft tissue release. In Group B, 41 patients (78 feet) underwent a chevron osteotomy without it. Mean followup was 1.7 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and AOFAS score were measured preoperatively, and 1-year followup postoperatively and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The change in HVA, IMA and AOFAS score were insignificant (p > 0.05) between Group A and Group B, however, the range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint was significantly less in Group A (p < 0.05). Complications of digital neuritis and cosmetically dissatisfied scarring of the dorsal web space were seen only in Group A. No cases had avascular necrosis of the metatarsal head, malunion or nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral soft tissue release may not be needed for mild or moderate hallux valgus deformities which may prevent decreased range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, neuritis of dorsal or plantar lateral digital nerve and cosmetic dissatisfaction of a dorsal scar.

Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular.

BACKGROUND: An accessory navicular bone may cause pain due to continuous irritation at its interface with the navicular. The authors performed the fusion of the accessory navicular and navicular with screw(s) to relieve the symptoms while preserving the continuity of the posterior tibial tendon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes of 31 consecutive patients (34 feet) with a painful type II accessory navicular. RESULTS: Bone union was confirmed on plain radiography in 28 (82%) of 34 feet. Twenty-two patients (24 feet) were assessed as excellent, two (three feet) as good, and one (one foot) as fair. Nonunion developed in six patients (six feet) and was defined as poor. CONCLUSION: When conservative treatment fails to relieve pain in a type II accessory navicular, fusion of the accessory navicular to the navicular may successfully relieve pain without disrupting the tibialis posterior tendon insertion.

Stress fracture of the proximal fibula in military recruits.

BACKGROUND: We wanted to report on stress fracture of the proximal fibula and to suggest the pathomechanism of this fracture. METHODS: Between April 2004 through April 2005, the military recruits who complained of leg pain during the 6 weeks basic training in the Republic of Korea Marine Corps education and training group were evaluated according to their clinical manifestations and plain radiographs. RESULTS: Twelve recruits of 635 recruits who complained leg pain were diagnosed as having fibular stress fracture. Eleven cases (10 recruits) appeared at the junction of the proximal and middle 1/3 of the fibula and 2 cases (2 recruits) were in the middle 1/3 of the fibula, as assessed radiologically. Tenderness was the most reliable clinical manifestation. All the fractures occurred after repetitive walking or jumping in a squatting position. Conservative treatments that included bed rest, immobilization and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs administration according to the symptom severity were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fibular stress fracture is not rare in military recruits. The shearing force on the proximal fibula and the repetitive stress by walking or jumping in a squatting position contribute to the stress fracture of the proximal fibula.