RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the treatment of psoriasis in patients with skin of color – a diverse population among whom variations in clinical features and higher quality of life impact have been reported. This single-center, open-label clinical study evaluated the safety and efficacy of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. METHODS: A total of 20 male and female subjects (ages ≥ 18, BSA ≥10%, PASI Score ≥ 12, IGA ≥ 3) completed this study. The total study duration was 28 weeks. During the treatment period, subjects received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, then monthly through week 20. RESULTS: 73% of patients achieved at least 90% improvement in PASI score (PASI90) at week 16 compared to baseline (P=0.0592). There was a statistically significant proportion of patients achieving PASI75, IGA of clear or almost clear, and a change from baseline in DLQI total score at weeks 12, 16, and 24. A statistically significant reduction in IGAxBSA-75 score was achieved between week 16 and baseline. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was small and underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in some endpoints. Furthermore, the study period was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which contributed to numerous missing data points. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab 300 mg administered monthly was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in treating skin of color patients with psoriasis and improving health-related quality of life. Larger studies involving skin of color populations with psoriasis are warranted. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):600-606. doi:10.36849/JDD.8128.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Psoríase , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Masculino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , COVID-19RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease prevalent in skin of color patients. Studies have demonstrated that dapsone gel, 7.5% (Aczone) used once daily is effective, safe, and well-tolerated for the treatment of acne in both men and women. However, minimal data are available in skin of color populations. This single-center, open-label clinical study investigated the efficacy and safety of dapsone gel, 7.5% in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. METHODS: Twenty (20) adult subjects with moderate to severe acne and Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI were enrolled in this study and treated with dapsone gel, 7.5% once daily for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Dapsone gel, 7.5% applied daily for 24 weeks reduced acne severity, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and decreased new inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions in skin of color patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Treatment resulted in improved acne health-related quality of life and patient symptoms related to acne, including patient-reported post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, especially with a treatment duration of 18 weeks or longer. Limitations: The sample size was small and underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in some endpoints. CONCLUSION: Dapsone gel 7.5% was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in treating acne vulgaris and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in skin-of-color patients. Larger studies involving skin-of-color populations with acne vulgaris are warranted. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):410-417. doi:10.36849/JDD.7897.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Administração Cutânea , Dapsona , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Dapsona/administração & dosagem , Dapsona/efeitos adversos , Géis , Hiperpigmentação/induzido quimicamente , Hiperpigmentação/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Pigmentação da Pele , Resultado do Tratamento , Minorias Étnicas e RaciaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi during laser hair removal (LHR) has been noted to cause clinical and dermoscopic changes that may appear similar to findings seen in atypical or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. The rate and characteristics of these changes has not been well-studied. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review article is to assess the literature for reported changes in melanocytic nevi following LHR to guide clinical practice. METHODS: PubMed was searched December 5, 2022 for articles evaluating changes in melanocytic nevi after LHR treatment using the following search terms: "nevi laser hair removal," "nevi diode," "nevi long pulse alexandrite," "nevi long pulse neodymium doped yttrium aluminum garnet," and "melanoma laser hair removal." All English language patient-based reports discussing incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi while undergoing LHR with a laser were eligible for inclusion, while reports of changes following hair removal with non-laser devices such as intense pulsed light were excluded. Studies evaluating non-melanocytic nevi such as Becker's nevus or nevus of Ota were excluded as were those evaluating the intentional ablation or removal of melanocytic lesions. RESULTS: Ten relevant studies were included, consisting of seven case reports or series and three observational trials, two of which were prospective and one retrospective. Among the seven case reports or series there were a total of 11 patients, six of which had multiple affected nevi. Clinical and dermoscopic changes to nevi following LHR appear to be common in clinical practice, though not well studied. Clinical and dermoscopic changes have been noted to present as early as 15 days after treatment and persist to the maximum time of follow up at 3 years. Commonly reported changes include regression, decreased size, laser induced asymmetry, bleaching, darkening, and altered pattern on dermoscopy. Histologic changes include mild atypia, thermal damage, scar formation, and regression. Although some of the clinical and dermoscopic alterations may be concerning for malignancy, to our knowledge, there are no documented cases of malignant transformation of nevi following treatment with LHR. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the low number of relevant reports and their generally small sample size, many of which is limited to single cases. Additionally, comparison of available data was limited by variable reporting of treatment regimens and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to nevi treated during LHR are not uncommon. Modifications to nevi may occur and look similar to changes seen in dysplastic or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. Notably, despite the widespread use of LHR since the first device was Food and Drug Administration approved in 1995, a time span of nearly three decades, there have been no reported cases of melanoma or severe dysplastic changes within treated nevi. However, dermatologists should be aware that morphologic and dermoscopic alterations can occur after LHR to prevent unnecessary surgical procedures. Although melanoma has not been reported to occur in nevi treated with LHR nor with any other laser exposures, further long-term data is needed to fully elucidate this concern. Optimally, nevi should be examined by a dermatologist before LHR to determine a baseline clinical and dermoscopic morphology. If there is concern for potential atypia, laser should be avoided over such nevi to avoid confusion at future follow up visits.
Assuntos
Remoção de Cabelo , Melanoma , Nevo Pigmentado , Nevo , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Remoção de Cabelo/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico por imagem , Nevo Pigmentado/cirurgia , Nevo Pigmentado/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Dermoscopia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on usage of topical medications in patients with darker phototypes. This single-center, randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled clinical study investigated the efficacy of a combination calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) aerosol foam 0.005%/0.064% in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. METHODS: 25 adult subjects were randomized 4:1 to Cal/BD foam or foam vehicle once daily for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of open label treatment. From week 4 to week 8, subjects randomized to Cal/BD foam once daily switched to Cal/BD foam twice weekly for 4 weeks, while those randomized to vehicle applied Cal/BD foam once daily. RESULTS: At week 4, 4/19 (21%) of Cal/BD foam patients achieved clear/almost clear Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) status with ≥2 grade improvement compared with 0/5 (0%) of vehicle patients (P=0.54). 12/19 (63%) of Cal/BD foam patients achieved a 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 4, compared with 0/5 (0%) of vehicle patients (P=0.04). Mean changes in melanin index at week 4 indicate a trend toward increased pigmentation in Cal/BD foam patients and decreased pigmentation in foam vehicle patients (P=0.30). All adverse events were mild and deemed unrelated to treatment by the investigators. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was small and underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in most endpoints. CONCLUSION: Cal/BD foam was safe and well tolerated in plaque psoriasis patients with skin of color. Larger studies involving skin of color populations with psoriasis are warranted. Pigmentary changes (hyper- and hypopigmentation) in lesional skin were observed. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(2): 165-173.doi:10.36849/JDD.6910.
Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Psoríase , Adulto , Humanos , Pigmentação da Pele , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/induzido quimicamente , Pele , Betametasona , Aerossóis/uso terapêutico , Excipientes , Resultado do Tratamento , Combinação de MedicamentosRESUMO
Rosacea is among the most common facial skin conditions diagnosed by dermatologists. Typical clinical features include erythema, flushing, telangiectasia, papules, and pustules distributed on the central face. While the prevalence of rosacea is highest among white populations of Northern European descent, recent reports have found that rosacea frequently occurs in people from a broad range of racial/ethnic backgrounds and skin types. When rosacea presents in darker skin types, the diagnosis is often more challenging due to masking of features by increased epidermal melanin. As such, under-diagnosis and underreporting may contribute to misconceptions about the prevalence of rosacea in populations with skin of color. Recognizing the unique presentations and complications associated with darker skin types is necessary to reduce the disparities in rosacea treatment, especially as the American population continues to become increasingly heterogeneous. Although rosacea is most common in middle-aged females, patients of other demographics may have more negative impacts on quality of life due to their disease. In this article, we review rosacea management with a focus on special patient groups: people with skin of color, and less common forms of rosacea, in order to diminish the physical and psychosocial burden of rosacea in all patient groups. Due to the variability inherent to rosacea, we advocate for an individualized, patient-centered approach to disease management.
Assuntos
Dermatologia/organização & administração , Carga Global da Doença , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Pigmentação da Pele , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Dermatologistas/educação , Dermatologia/educação , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/educação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Rosácea/epidemiologia , Rosácea/terapia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies have shown an increased prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD), but many of the features of ADHD may occur as a result of the poor sleep and itch distraction associated with AD. METHODS: A case-control study was performed in children aged 6-17 years with moderate/severe AD compared with age-/sex-matched healthy controls. Participants were screened for ADHD using Vanderbilt assessments. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with AD and 18 controls completed the study. Two children with AD (11.7%) and one control (5.56%) met screening criteria for ADHD via parent-completed Vanderbilt assessments; AD patients were not significantly more likely to screen positive for ADHD (P = 0.47), or comorbid behavior disorders (P = 0.23). However, AD patients were more likely than controls to exhibit ADHD-associated behaviors, most significantly inattention. CONCLUSIONS: Our AD cohort did not have a significantly increased prevalence of ADHD. Certain neurocognitive symptoms are increased in children with moderate-to-severe AD compared to controls.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Adolescente , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Testes de Estado Mental e Demência , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of the CD8+ subtype of mycosis fungoides (MF) is controversial. Although most authors believe that determining the presence of this cell surface antigen has no prognostic value, others have observed a more indolent course for CD8+ MF compared with CD4+ MF. OBJECTIVES: To review the cases of CD8+ MF in the pediatric and adult populations seen at our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of clinical and pathologic data. Age, stage at presentation, and outcomes of patients at our institution were compared with those of 2 large MF cohorts that predominantly were CD4+ from the relevant literature. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients of a median age of 46 years were included. A higher frequency of early-stage disease was observed for CD8+ MF patients at diagnosis when compared with other cohorts, including 31 (47%) patients with stage IA, 33 (50%) with stage IB, and 2 (3%) with stage IIB (P = .001, P = .001, and P = .002, respectively). With a median follow-up (5.5 years, range 0.2-21 years) similar to other cohorts, a higher rate of complete remission was achieved (65.5%, P = .001), and a lower rate of progression was observed (P = .004). LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective review. CONCLUSION: Our experience with CD8+ MF confirms a more indolent course of disease with this MF variant. Our results warrant a conservative treatment approach limited to skin-directed therapies and observation in most patients.
Assuntos
Micose Fungoide/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD8/biossíntese , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micose Fungoide/metabolismo , Gradação de Tumores , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/metabolismo , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Melanoma/induzido quimicamente , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População UrbanaRESUMO
Following the eradication of smallpox, intermittent small outbreaks of mpox (monkeypox) have occurred with increasing frequency, primarily in endemic regions of Africa. With the rapid spread of mpox around the globe in 2022, we are approaching a second zoonotic pandemic of the 21st century. Given the predominance of cutaneous involvement in mpox, dermatologists should be prepared to recognize the clinical features and manage this increasingly prevalent disease. This article reviews a brief history of the mpox virus, clinical presentation, complications, approach to diagnosis, methods of transmission, infection control recommendations, indications for vaccination, and therapeutic options to inform dermatologists on the frontline of the mpox epidemic.
Assuntos
Mpox , Humanos , Vacinação , Controle de Infecções , Surtos de Doenças , PandemiasRESUMO
Importance: A widely cited meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials has claimed ivermectin as an effective treatment for prevention of mortality in COVID-19. However, an unrecognized interaction variable with the relative risk (RR) of mortality may substantially change the appropriate interpretation of this analysis. Objective: To evaluate the association between regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis and ivermectin trial results for the outcome of mortality by testing the hypothesis that strongyloidiasis prevalence interacts with the RR of mortality. Data Sources: Original meta-analysis as well as a manual review of all references in a dedicated ivermectin trial database (c19ivermectin) from January 1, 2019, to November 6, 2021. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials using ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 and reporting the outcome of mortality. Studies were excluded in the event of publications revealing suspected trial fraud and/or randomization failure. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study characteristics and RR estimates were extracted from each source. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Differences by strongyloidiasis prevalence were estimated using subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative risk of mortality in ivermectin trials in regions of high vs low strongyloidiasis prevalence and correlation coefficient of meta-regression analysis between RR of mortality and regional prevalence of strongyloidiasis. Results: A total of 12 trials comprising 3901 patients were included in the analysis. Four trials (33%) took place in regions of high strongyloidiasis prevalence and 8 (67%) trials took place in regions of low strongyloidiasis prevalence. Ivermectin trials that took place in areas of low regional strongyloidiasis prevalence were not associated with a statistically significant decreased risk of mortality (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.60-1.18]; P = .31). By contrast, ivermectin trials that took place in areas of high regional strongyloidiasis prevalence were associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality (RR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.70]; P = .008). Testing for subgroup differences revealed a significant difference between the results of groups with low and high strongyloidiasis prevalence (χ21 = 4.79; P = .03). The estimate for τ2 (the variance of the study effect sizes) was 0 (95% CI, 0.0000-0.2786), and the estimate for I2 (percentage of variability that is explained by between-study heterogeneity) was 0 (95% CI, 0-43.7%). The meta-regression analysis revealed an RR decrease of 38.83% (95% CI, 0.87%-62.25%) for each 5% increase in strongyloidiasis prevalence. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis of 12 trials including 3901 patients, strongyloidiasis prevalence was found to interact with the RR of mortality for ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. No evidence was found to suggest ivermectin has any role in preventing mortality among patients with COVID-19 in regions where strongyloidiasis was not endemic.
Assuntos
Antiparasitários/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19/mortalidade , Doenças Endêmicas , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Estrongiloidíase/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prevalência , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Risco , Estrongiloidíase/tratamento farmacológicoAssuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/induzido quimicamente , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Poisoning through pediatric skin leading to acute systemic symptoms is a relatively uncommonly reported phenomenon. Systemic toxicity through the skin typically occurs by direct contact between therapeutic or non-therapeutic topical agents and the skin. Though uncommon, poisoning through pediatric skin can have significant consequences and must be recognized so the offending agent may be discontinued and appropriate treatment initiated. We performed a literature search for all article types between 1950 and April 2016 to provide a single source of detectable cases of acute toxicity in pediatric patients due to percutaneous exposure. This literature review discusses relevant pediatric skin physiology along with reports of poisoning events that resulted in systemic signs and symptoms and even death to provide a comprehensive report on causes of pediatric poisoning through the skin.