Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety symptoms in COVID-19 outpatients with different levels of respiratory and ventilatory support in the acute phase undergoing three months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The well-known COVID-19 pandemic totally transformed people's lives, paving the way to various psychopathological symptoms. In particular, patients may experience a short- and long-term decreasing in their wellbeing. In this vein, the aim of this paper was to assess the COVID-19 patients' psychopathological profile (post-traumatic stress disorder, distress, anxiety and depression symptoms), detecting possible differences linked to the ventilatory treatments. METHODS: Outpatients who recovered from COVID-19 were asked to provide socio-demographic and clinical information, and to complete a brief psychological screening evaluation (Impact of Event Scale-Revised [IES-R], Depression Anxiety Stress Scale [DASS-21]). RESULTS: Overall, after informed consent, 163 Italian patients took part in this research. Of them, 31.9% did not undergo any ventilatory therapy, 27.6% undertook oxygen therapy, 28.2% underwent noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and 12.3% received invasive mechanical ventilation. Although no statistically significant differences were revealed among patients stratified by spontaneous breathing or ventilatory therapies, they reported statistically significant more depression (4.5+5.2 vs. 3.5+3.2; P=0.017) and anxiety (4.3+4.5 vs. 2.4+2.6; P<0.00001) symptoms than normative groups. Moreover, patients experiencing COVID-19 disease as a trauma, complained statistically significant higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms than who did not describe a clinically relevant traumatic experience (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, this study suggests to healthcare professionals to consider COVID-19 experience as a potential real trauma for patients, and underlines the necessity to define patients' psychopathological profile in order to propose tailored and effective preventive and supportive psychological interventions.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in COVID-19 patients at 3 months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Long-term effects of Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) are of utmost relevance. We aimed to determine: 1) the functional capacity of COVID-19 survivors by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET); 2) the characteristics associated with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) performance; 3) the safety and tolerability of CPET. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3, Genoa. Three months after hospital discharge a complete clinical evaluation, trans-thoracic echocardiography, CPET, pulmonary function tests, and dominant leg extension (DLE) maximal strength measurement were performed. RESULTS: From the 225 patients discharged alive from March to November 2020, we excluded 12 incomplete/missing cases and 13 unable to perform CPET, leading to a final cohort of 200. Median percent-predicted peak oxygen uptake (%pVO2) was 88% (78.3-103.1). Ninety-nine (49.5%) patients had %pVO2 below, whereas 101 (50.5%) above the 85% predicted value. Among the 99 patients with reduced %pVO2, 61 (61%) had a normal anaerobic threshold: of these, 9(14.8%) had respiratory, 21(34.4%) cardiac, and 31(50.8%) non-cardiopulmonary reasons for exercise limitation. Inerestingly, 80% of patients experienced at least one disabling symtpom, not related to %pVO2 or functional capacity. Multivariate linear regression showed percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in one-second(ß = 5.29,p = 0.023), percent-predicted diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide(ß = 6.31,p = 0.001), and DLE maximal strength(ß = 14.09,p = 0.008) to be independently associated with pVO2. No adverse event was reported during or after CPET, and no involved health professional developed COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: At three months after discharge, about 1/3rd of COVID-19 survivors show functional limitations, mainly explained by muscular impairment, calling for future research to identify patients at higher risk of long-term effects that may benefit from careful surveillance and targeted rehabilitation.

[Italian cardiologists and tobacco smoking. A survey on the prevalence and knowledge of smoking and strategies for smoking cessation in a cohort of Italian cardiologists]. / Cardiologi italiani e fumo di tabacco. Survey su prevalenza e conoscenza del tabagismo e delle strategie antifumo di una coorte di cardiologi italiani.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death. Its cessation is the most cost-effective strategy for reducing long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although both healthcare professionals and the general population are aware of the detrimental effects of smoking on health, more than 25% of Italians are current smokers. Recent surveys showed that almost 50% of smoker patients relapse to smoke after having been discharged for acute coronary syndrome. Physicians who smoke may be a barrier for effective cessation interventions. Thus, it is important to assess cardiologists' attitude toward smoking habits and the implementation of smoking cessation programs. METHODS: The survey "Italian cardiologists and smoking habits" has been held in 2013 during the 44° National Congress of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) to assess cardiologists' smoking status, their level of knowledge about smoking cessation interventions and their involvement in the management of smoking cessation. Out of more than 1200 cardiologists attending the ANMCO congress, 610 subjects (aged 51 ± 11 years) answered an anonymous 35-item questionnaire; they were asked to declare their smoking status (9.5% current smokers). RESULTS: Among doctors who attended the survey, 58% correctly indicated smoking as an addiction and 45% regularly advised their patients to stop smoking. The majority of cardiologists (93%) reported a positive attitude toward smoking cessation strategies, 62% of them thought that cardiologists themselves should treat smoking dependence, though specific tools (70%) and education for the management of smoking cessation are lacking (66%). Two thirds of the entire sample of ANMCO cardiologists declared their willingness to participate in specialized educational programs. CONCLUSIONS: More than a half of Italian cardiologists are aware that smoking is an addiction. Although they feel themselves yet inadequate toward this approach, they are favorable to implement their own knowledge and skills toward smoking cessation.

[Pharmacotherapy of tobacco smoking from the point of view of the clinical cardiologist]. / La terapia farmacologica della dipendenza da fumo di tabacco dal punto di vista del cardiologo clinico.

Medical programs supporting smoking cessation are a complex task to set up. Each smoker should be evaluated for his stage of motivation to change, his nicotine dependence degree and also for the presence of relevant existing comorbidities. Several non pharmacologic techniques and a number of drugs have been demonstrated clearly effective in the smoking cessation therapy field. The purpose of this review is to analyse the available drug therapies mainly considering their possible use in the clinical cardiology "real world" scenario. Specific attention has been paid to the cardiovascular safety of each drug therapy trying to anticipate possible questions and concerns emerging in the daily practice of the clinical cardiologist, who normally can't be considered a smoking cessation "natural born" specialist.

[Appropriateness of diagnostic tests in cardiovascular prevention: what can we skip?]. / Appropriatezza delle procedure diagnostiche in prevenzione cardiovascolare: di che cosa possiamo fare a meno?

In recent years, a huge increase in the use of cardiac procedures, both invasive and non-invasive, was observed. Diagnostic tests, mainly non-invasive tests, are often prescribed inappropriately, in most cases replacing the clinical evaluation. The rate of inappropriate tests in cardiology is largely variable, depending on regional issues and different medical approach. When the test entails radiation exposure, the biological risk for both the patient and the environment must be taken into account. For this reason, the test that results in less biological risk should always be preferred as a first step.Moreover, it has not been clearly demonstrated that some diagnostic tests help to improve the outcome, that is to prevent cardiovascular events. As many as one sixth of the patients who undergo stress imaging are not taking proper medication, and very frequently no change in therapy is made after the test, regardless of the outcome. Since the appropriateness of diagnostic evaluation requests is mandatory, we focused on the diagnostic tests usually performed in primary and secondary prevention that carry no contribution to the clinical management of patients. This review addresses the need to optimize available resources, reduce costs and avoid unnecessary cardiovascular assessments, thereby enhancing the more efficient care delivery models.

Effect of smoking relapse on outcome after acute coronary syndromes.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the smoking relapse rate among smokers who had become abstinent during admission for acute coronary syndromes. The association between smoking relapse and mortality was also analyzed. A cohort of 1,294 consecutive active smokers who had interrupted smoking after admission for acute coronary syndromes (1,018 men and 276 women, mean age 59.7 ± 12.3 years) was followed up for 12 months after the index admission. All patients received a brief in-hospital smoking cessation intervention consisting of repeated counseling sessions. During follow-up, 813 patients (62.8%) resumed regular smoking (median interval to relapse 19 days, interquartile range 9 to 76). Increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.034 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.028 to 1.039, p = 0.001) and female gender (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.42, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of smoking relapse. Patients enrolled in a cardiac rehabilitation program (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91, p = 0.02) and those with diabetes (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94, p = 0.03) were more likely to remain abstinent. During follow-up, 97 patients died (1-year probability of death 0.075, 95% CI 0.061 to 0.090). Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard regression method, including smoking relapse as a time-dependent covariate, demonstrated that, after adjustment for patient demographics, the clinical history features and variables related to the index event, the resumption of smoking was an independent predictor of total mortality (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.7, p = 0.004). In conclusion, smoking relapse after acute coronary syndromes is associated with increased mortality, and counseling interventions should be integrated into the postdischarge support to reduce the negative effects of smoking resumption.