Preoperative computed tomographic angiogram for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Precision in preoperative evaluation of the abdominal wall vascular anatomy is of utmost importance in successful planning and execution of perforator flap surgery for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. We performed a study in 357 patients scheduled for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap breast reconstruction to review our 5-year experience with the technique we developed based on our previous research confirming accuracy of a computed tomographic (CT) angiogram (multidetector row computed tomography [MDCT]) in preoperative planning of abdominal perforator flap surgery. Images obtained from the radiological study were used to create an accurate map of dominant abdominal perforators of the deep inferior epigastric artery, showing their location, size, and anatomic considerations of relevance for the preoperative flap design. Anatomic dissection of all perforators was performed in the first 36 cases to compare the data with preoperative MDCT findings. In the following 321 patients, the dominant perforator was chosen solely on the basis of MDCT and dissected directly. Exact correlation between surgical and radiological results was found in the first 36 cases. A significant reduction in average operating time and postoperative complications was noted in the following 321 patients. CT angiogram provides important preoperative information on inferior abdominal wall vascular anatomy, facilitating DIEAP flap harvest, saving operative time, and reducing complications and costs. It proved to be an invaluable tool in the preoperative algorithm for DIEAP flap breast reconstruction.

In search of the ideal method in perforator mapping: noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging.

A reliable method for precise identification of the dominant perforator would be extremely valuable in perforator flap surgery. During the past 5 years, multidetector-row computed tomography has demonstrated excellent results in preoperative planning of abdominal free flap breast reconstruction, significantly reducing operative time and complications. The main drawbacks of computed tomography are unnecessary radiation to the patient and possible allergic reactions to intravenous contrast material. To circumvent these limitations, we performed noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging for abdominal perforator mapping. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this technique in preoperative planning of breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. From October 2007 to February 2009, noncontrast magnetic resonance preoperative mapping was performed in 56 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps. Imaging results were compared with the intraoperative clinical findings in all patients. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging without the contrast showed no false-positive or false-negative results. In all cases, the perforator chosen as dominant according to magnetic resonance images corresponded with the perforator chosen intraoperatively (100% predictive value). Preoperative imaging techniques make perforator flap surgery safer for the patient. Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging provides reliable information on the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall, facilitating selection of the most appropriate deep inferior epigastric artery dominant perforator. It avoids radiation to the patient and also the need for intravenous contrast medium as required for the multidetector-row computed tomography. In our opinion, noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging is an ideal method for preoperative planning of breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps.

Correlation between superficial and deep lymphatic systems using magnetic resonance lymphangiography in breast cancer-related lymphedema: Clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) has increased our knowledge of lymphatic anatomy and lymphedema pathophysiology and improved the efficacy of microsurgical procedures to manage peripheral lymphedema. The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of MRL to detect communications between superficial and deep lymphatic systems in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) and to investigate whether these communications could preserve lymphatic drainage of the hand. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2017 we used MRL imaging in 59 women with BCRL. Lymphedema of the arm and hand was detected in 30 patients while the hand was spared in 29. Using axial and coronal MRL reconstruction images we investigated the existence of any communication between the superficial and deep lymphatic systems. RESULTS: Among the 29 patients with spared hand, MRL revealed that 24 had at least one communicating lymphatic perforator at the wrist region (p < 0.001). Lymphatic flow at the axilla was clearly visualized in 16 of the 29 patients (55.2%), no perforating lymphatic vessels were detected in the group with lymphedema in the hand (30 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Communications between the deep and superficial lymphatic systems at the wrist region in BCRL patients without hand lymphedema should be considered when planning microsurgical lymphatic procedures at the wrist and in postoperative compression therapy.

MDCT in the preoperative planning of abdominal perforator surgery for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of MDCT in planning abdominal perforator surgery for breast reconstruction in patients who have undergone mastectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients scheduled for postmastectomy breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps underwent MDCT. The images were evaluated to identify, characterize, and map the dominant musculocutaneous perforator vessels of the deep inferior epigastric artery. In the first 36 patients, we compared the intraoperative findings with the preoperative MDCT findings. In the latter 90 patients, the dominant perforator vessels were directly selected on the basis of MDCT findings. RESULTS: We found an exact correlation between the intraoperative and radiologic findings in the first 36 cases. In the following 90 cases, the average operating time saved per patient was 1 hour 40 minutes and there was a significant reduction in postsurgical complications. The preoperative evaluation by MDCT confirmed the wide range of variability in the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall previously described in anatomic studies. CONCLUSION: MDCT provides valuable information before surgery about the arterial anatomy of the inferior abdominal wall. It enables accurate identification of the most suitable dominant perforator vessel and makes surgical perforator flap procedures for breast reconstruction faster and safer.

Multislice computed tomography angiography of the fourth dorsal interosseous space in cadavers.

PURPOSE: To study computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings and compare anatomic correlation of the 4th dorsal metacarpal spaces and to determine the role of this technique for anatomic studies and flap design. METHODS: Hands from 17 cadavers were injected with a radiopaque mixture. The specimens were imaged using 16-detector-row computed tomography. Each image was analyzed by a radiologist, a plastic surgeon, and an anatomist. The following data were recorded: the presence of the 4th dorsal metacarpal artery, proximal and distal communicating branches and distal recurrent branch, and the number of cutaneous perforators. Afterwards, a meticulous dissection was carried out. A correlation between the radiologic findings and the gross anatomy was established. RESULTS: In all specimens, the 4th dorsal metacarpal artery and distal recurrent branch were identified. In 15 cases, at least 1 perforator was identified within the 4th space. In 2 cases, no perforator was identified. In all cases, the radiologic findings correlated with the anatomic findings in the dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multislice CTA provides good-quality information about the vascular anatomy of the dorsal aspect of the hand, including perforator vessels less than 0.5 mm in diameter. Multislice CTA allows for observation of the axis, trajectory, and branching pattern of the blood vessels and, most importantly, demonstrates the anatomic relationships among blood vessels, bones, and soft tissue.

Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative perforator mapping.

Identifying the position, course, and caliber of the dominant perforator is extremely valuable in the preoperative study for perforator surgery. Besides reliability, the ideal technique should offer low cost and high availability and reproducibility. It should be fast, easy to interpret, and free of morbidity. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDTC) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide images that are easy to interpret, and assess the perforator's caliber and localization and its intramuscular course and anatomic relationships. Noncontrast MRI avoids radiation to the patient and eliminates the need for intravenous contrast medium. This article discusses this method and presents our experience.

Extensor mechanism of the fingers: MR imaging-anatomic correlation.

Extension of the fingers is a complex function carried out by simultaneous action of extrinsic and intrinsic muscles, as well as retinacular structures in the dorsum of the wrist, hand, and fingers that support and coordinate the action of the muscles. The extensor mechanism of the fingers is divided into topographic zones, which extend from the forearm to the distal phalanx. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging shows in detail the musculotendinous and retinacular structures of the extensor apparatus. In the different extensor zones, MR imaging findings are similar to those seen macroscopically in anatomic sections. Understanding of and familiarity with the extensor anatomy of the hand and fingers by the radiologist is crucial for better assessment of pathologic conditions with MR imaging and optimization of this modality as a diagnostic tool. Extensor tendon injuries and tenosynovitis represent clinical situations in which knowledge of this anatomy is useful for the clinical radiologist.

MR imaging of ligament and tendon injuries of the fingers.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can provide important information for diagnosis and evaluation of soft-tissue trauma in the fingers. An optimal imaging technique should include proper positioning, dedicated surface coils, and specific protocols for the suspected abnormalities. Familiarity with the fine anatomy of the normal finger is crucial for identifying pathologic entities. MR imaging is a powerful method for evaluating acute and chronic lesions of the stabilizing articular elements (volar plate and collateral ligaments) of the fingers and thumbs, particularly in the frequently affected proximal interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints. As in other body regions, MR imaging is also useful for depicting traumatic conditions of the extensor and flexor tendons, including injuries to the pulley system. In general, normal ligaments and tendons have low signal intensity on MR images, whereas disruption manifests as increased signal intensity. Radiologists need to understand the full spectrum of finger abnormalities and associated MR imaging findings.