Cost-effectiveness of locally prepared Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts in Edmonton.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to show the cost-effective benefits of creating a sustainable local program where Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts were prepared locally instead of imported from American eye banks. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: In 2018, 2 local technicians were trained to prestrip DMEK grafts in Edmonton up to 2 days before surgery when local donor tissue was available. When no local tissue was available, prestripped DMEK grafts were imported from U.S. eye banks. The total cost of locally prepared and imported DMEK grafts over 27 months was compared with the cost that otherwise would have been accrued if all DMEK grafts had been imported. RESULTS: Over 27 months, 82 DMEK grafts (55.3%) were prepared locally and 63 DMEK grafts (44.7%) were imported. The total cost of preparing 82 grafts locally was $9349.19. The total cost of importing 63 prestripped DMEK grafts was $282 431.52. The combined total cost of locally prepared and imported DMEK grafts was $291 780.71. The total cost that otherwise would have been incurred if every graft was imported was $632 108.64. This difference in costs was $340 327.93 over 27 months. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a sustainable program to make high-quality DMEK grafts with local donor corneas is a cost-effective alternative to importing prestripped DMEK grafts in Edmonton.

Survivability of locally prepared versus imported Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts in Edmonton.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term graft survivability of locally prestripped versus imported prestripped Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts in Edmonton. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients who underwent DMEK surgery between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020. PARTICIPANTS: All patients receiving a DMEK transplant during the study period in Edmonton. METHODS: Two local technicians were trained to prestrip DMEK grafts in Edmonton. When available, local tissue was prestripped for DMEK surgery; otherwise, prestripped DMEK grafts were imported from an accredited American eye bank. Patient characteristics and DMEK graft characteristics and DMEK survivability were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two locally prestripped DMEK grafts and 35 imported prestripped DMEK grafts were used during the study period. Donor cornea characteristics and patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Best-corrected visual acuity improved up to 6 months postoperatively and was 0.2 logMAR in the locally prestripped DMEK group and 0.2 logMAR in the imported DMEK group (p = 0.56). Rebubble rates were 25% in the locally prestripped DMEK group and 19% in the imported DMEK group (p = 0.43). There was 1 primary graft failure in each group (p = 0.93). Endothelial cell density decreased by 37% in the locally prestripped DMEK group and by 33% in the imported DMEK group 2 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survivability of locally prepared DMEK grafts is comparable with that of DMEK grafts imported from American eye banks.